The URL can be used to link to this page

09SeptemberPB Planning Board August 6, 2024 Page 1 of 3 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA AUGUST 6, 2024 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. 2. Roll call of the Board members. (Completed by staff.) 3. Consent Agenda: ● Approval of agenda for the August 6, 2027, Planning Board meeting. ● Approval of the minutes from the July 9, 2024, Planning Board meeting. 4. Conflict of Interest: ● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be disclosed? (If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.) 5. Old Business. 6. New Business. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022009 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by HARRIS AUTO SALES, LLC, Ramseur, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 2042 Patterson Grove Rd, Columbia Township, Sandy Creek Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #8703776491, 13.12 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an automotive sales lot with no more than six cars on display with a 10 ft by 12 ft office and storage building. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022012 Page 1 of 198 Planning Board August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 3 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by ALEX DEAKINS, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 891 Gold Hill Rd, Asheboro Township, Tax ID #7762717343, 0.92 acres, RR - Residential Restricted District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a gunsmith shop in an existing building on the property with an indoor test firing range. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022013 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by EVAN BURKS, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3845 Bachelor Creek Rd, Richland Township, Tax ID #7687466565, 12.52-acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence for a family member. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022017 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by JAMES LOCKLEAR, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 735 Chaney Rd, Franklinville Township, Tax ID #7781746894, 2.01 acres, RR - Residential Restricted District and RA – Residential Restricted District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence for a family member. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022020 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by TROY MILLIKAN, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3903 Edgar Rd, New Market Township, Tax ID #7735165206, 12.51 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow building a house on the property beside the existing garage/apartment without having to build a breezway between the two residences. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022021 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC, Chattanooga, TN, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at NC Hwy 42 S, approximately 4/10 mile past Woodhaven Dr, Grant Page 2 of 198 Planning Board August 6, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Township, Tax ID #7688491314, 46.02 acres, E-1 - First Environmental District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a 325 ft self-supporting telecommunications tower for Verizon Wireless and other providers. Property Owner: Gary and Rebecca Newcomb REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022010 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by BOBBY EARNHARDT, Asheboro, NC, and their request to rezone 32.17-acres at US Hwy 311, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed, Tax ID #7746123319, Primary Growth Area and Secondary Growth Area, from HC- CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA - Residential Agricultural District to LI - Light Industrial District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the LI - Light Industrial District. Property Owner: Gary Welch REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022018 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified legislative hearing on the request by JAMIE DIXON, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 1.01-acres at 6319 Davis Ctry Rd, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #7747936653, Rural Growth Area, from RR - Residential Restricted District to RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the RA - Residential Agricultural District. HC - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT UPDATE DISCUSSION HC - Highway Commercial District Update Discussion 7. Update from the Planning Director. 8. Adjournment. Page 3 of 198 Page 1 of 11 7/9/2024 July 9, 2024 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on July 9, 2024, at 6:30 PM in Meeting Room A, Randolph County Office Building, 725 McDowell Rd, Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance. Pell reminded those in attendance that the Planning Board Rules of Procedure state that anyone wishing to speak must sign up to speak and that speakers other than the applicant are limited to three minutes. 2. Roll call of the Board members. (Completed by staff.) The County Planning staff completed the roll call of the members of the Board as they arrived to the meeting. Reid Pell, Ken Austin, Kemp Davis, Reggie Beeson, Melinda Vaughan, Brandon Hedrick, John Cable, Susan Thompson were present. County Planning Director Tonya Caddle and County Attorney Ben Morgan were also present, along with County Planning staff members Kayla Brown, Melissa Burkhart, David Harris, Kim Heinzer, and Tim Mangum. 3. Consent Agenda: ● Approval of agenda for the July 9, 2024, Planning Board meeting. ● Approval of the minutes from the June 4, 2024, Planning Board meeting. On the motion of Davis, seconded by Cable, the Board voted 7-0 to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. 4. Conflict of Interest: ● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be disclosed? (If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.) There were no Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication identified by any Planning Board member. 5. Old Business. There was no old business for the Planning Board to consider. 6. New Business. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022004 Page 4 of 198 Page 2 of 11 7/9/2024 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by FIDEL DEGOLLADO, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 1523 Spanish Dr, Cedar Grove Township, Tax ID #7649353271, 0.72 acres, RR - Residential Restricted. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow online sales of motor vehicles. Caddle presented the first case of the night along with site plans and photographs of the Degollado Special Use Permit Request. Pell opened the public hearing and explained that anyone wishing to speak during the Special Use Permit Requests must be sworn in. Morgan administered the oath to Fidel Degollado, the applicant. Degollado, 1523 Spanish Dr, told the Board that he has a full-time job with Duke Energy and would like to buy and sell automobiles part-time, through online sales, to supplement his income, and will be required to obtain a dealer's license. Pell asked the Board if they had any questions for Mr. Degollado. Cable asked Degollado if he had a business plan, how many vehicles he would have at one time, and how much traffic would be involved with the sales. Degollado said this would be part-time, he doesn't plan to have more than five cars at one time, and the sales would be online. Morgan asked Degollado to explain online sales. Degollado explained that he would advertise the vehicles on marketplace and anyone interested would come to his home to look at vehicle. Beeson asked how many cars he plans to have per month. Degollado said probably around three but no more than five per month. Austin asked if he would have advertisement signs. Degollado said no. Austin asked how he would advertise without signs. He said he would advertise online, using his home address and everything would be legal. Cable asked how he would deliver cars. Degollado said that the customer would have to come to his house to do paperwork. Davis asked where his house is located, how long he has lived there, and if he had talked to any of his neighbors. Degollado described location of his home on the site plans provided, said he has lived there since April, 2024, and he has talked to neighbors and knows most of them. Page 5 of 198 Page 3 of 11 7/9/2024 Cable asked if anyone would come to his house and what the hours of operations would be. Degollado said the buyers would have to come to his house to complete the paperwork for the vehicles and he would be available Monday through Friday from 5:00 pm, until 9:00 pm. Beeson said he had mentioned a garage or shop and asked if he would be repairing vehicles as well. Degollado said he would have minor repairs, clean up and detailing vehicles before selling. Cable asked how many of his neighbors he had talked to and what was their feedback. Degollado said he had talked to eight or nine of them and they were fine with his request. Hedrick asked if the vehicles would be inside the garage or have a fenced area for vehicles. Degollado said that he could have up to three in garage, and possibly two in driveway. Vaughan said the property appears to have a good buffer. Degollado said he didn't feel that he would bother anyone. Besson, (referring to photo one of presentation), asked if that would be the area where the cars would be parked. Degollado answered yes. He said he likes to keep things organized. Cable asked if the customers would come to his house to test drive vehicles. Degollado said they would more than likely test drive on Danny Bell Rd. Hedrick asked if Spanish Drive was a gravel drive. Degollado answered yes. He said it has been extended from asphalt. Austin asked if there were any deed restrictions for the property. Degollado said his Realtor told him there were not. Hedrick asked who maintains the gravel road. Degollado said he and the other two neighbors would have to maintain the road, but he hasn't been there long enough to need maintenance yet. There were no additional questions from the Board. Kathryn Bennett, 1515 Spanish Dr., Asheboro, took oath from Morgan. Bennett said she had not spoken with Degollado. She said she purchased her home a year ago in January, and the entire area was wooded. She said her home flooded in December, and they had to move for renovations. She explained that there are now two new homes, and she worries about the noise, traffic, and what this will do to her property value. Page 6 of 198 Page 4 of 11 7/9/2024 Davis asked Bennett if she was aware of how online sales work. Bennett said she has purchased other items online, but not a car. Davis said there would be only one person at a time on the property. Cable asked when she would be back in her home. Bennett said she is hoping that it will be by the end of summer. Austin asked about the amount of traffic since moving there. Bennett said there was rarely any traffic until construction started for the new houses. She said the cars on display will not be appealing, and the driveway is probably not more than twenty feet from her home. Morgan asked about the location of her home. Beeson said her home is located just before Degollado's home and asked Bennett if she would feel more comfortable with a limit on the number of cars allowed on display. Bennett answered yes. Having no additional questions from the Board, and no one else signed up to speak, Pell asked Degollado if he would like to come up and address the concerns of Ms. Bennett. Degollado said if Ms. Bennett is concerned about the number of cars in the driveway, he could store three inside the garage and possibly two outside if needed. Davis asked if he would agree to being limited to three cars inside the building and no more than two outside. Degollado answered yes. Hedrick stated that this is a Special Use request for Degollado and not a rezoning of any kind. He said it should not impact property values. Degollado said he will not have any junk on property because he lives there. Austin asked Degollado if he would agree to hours of 5:00 pm until no later than 9:00 pm. Degollado answered yes. Pell asked if it would be just Monday through Friday. Degollado answered yes. Cable asked if there would be an office, and if so, would there be an additional driveway for the office or use the existing drive. Degollado said there would be a 10x10 office and gravel extended to office for display area. Hedrick asked if the office and display area would be located on the south side of property. Degollado said everything would be on the lower driveway. Beeson stated that there is a requirement for set hours one day a week for a dealer's license and asked which day he would be open for an inspector. Degollado said his set hours would be on Thursdays. Having no additional questions from the Board, Pell closed the public hearing for Page 7 of 198 Page 5 of 11 7/9/2024 discussion or a motion. Davis said Degollado is proposing restrictive hours. Hedrick and Beeson talked about the consideration of Saturday hours. Austin suggested a limit of two cars being visible, agreed by Beeson. Cable shared his concerns about the negative impact on neighbors if five vehicles were allowed, although there is good vegetation, and buffers. Hedrick expressed concerns about road maintenance. Cable said even though others have come before the Board with a more specific plan, Bennett does not seem opposed if there is a more specific plan from Degollado with some conditions. Morgan stated that a business plan is not required. After further discussion from the Board, Degollado was asked if he would consider operation hours to be limited to Monday through Friday, from 5:00 pm until 8:00 pm, and Saturday from 10:00 am until 3:00 pm with a limit of two cars outside on display and no outside signage. Degollado agreed to the conditions and signed an updated application to reflect those conditions. Davis said the request satisfies the four-part test for a Special Use Permit request, and Degollado has agreed to the conditions so he would proceed with a motion. On the motion of Davis, seconded by Austin, with a vote of 7-0, the Board voted to approve the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board packet. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2024-00022005 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by DARRELL TILLER, Seagrove, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 9113 Erect Rd, Brower Township, Tax ID #8604994235, 10.11 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence for a family member as per the site plan. Caddle presented the next case of the night, along with site plans and photographs of the site. Morgan administered an oath to Darrell Tiller, the applicant. Darrell Tiller, 9113 Erect Rd, explained that he would like to add a second residence to his property for his niece because he is trying to help her. Page 8 of 198 Page 6 of 11 7/9/2024 Morgan asked what type of home he was proposing. Tiller said it would be a 2400 square foot double-wide mobile home on a permanent foundation. Pell asked if there were any questions from the Board. Austin asked if this home would have a new well and septic and use the existing driveway. Tiller said it would require a new well and septic and the existing driveway would be extended to the new home. Austin asked how close the new home would be to his home. Tiller said it would be approximately four hundred feet. Morgan explained to Tiller that if the Planning Board were to approve the request, one home could not be sold without the other. Tiller asked if he could come back later to divide the property. Morgan said he could request the subdivision, but it would not be a guarantee. He said he just wanted Tiller to be aware. Tiller said that he understood and agreed to the circumstances. Having no additional questions from the Board, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion or a motion. Hedrick said the photos and information provided for the request seem to be consistent with the area. Cable said the only downside to the request had been explained by Morgan and Tiller said he understood. Austin asked if the placement of the home would make a difference. Tonya explained that the road frontage would be the only concern. Hedrick said the request meets the Findings of Fact and he proceeded with a motion. On the motion of Hedrick, seconded by Beeson, with a vote of 7-0, the Board voted to approve the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board packet. REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022003 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by EMMER AND OAT, LLC, Franklinville, NC, and their request to rezone 1.78-acres out of 3.21 acres at 3314 NC Hwy 22 N, Franklinville Township, Sandy Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7793370945, Secondary Growth Area, from RR - Residential Restricted District and RA – Residential Agricultural District to RBO-CD - Rural Business Overlay - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a digital commercial photography studio as per the site plan. Page 9 of 198 Page 7 of 11 7/9/2024 Caddle presented the first rezoning case of the night, Emmer and Oat, LLC, Rezoning Request, along with site plans and photographs of the site. Marcus Santa, Cedar Forest Rd., Franklinville, said he is requesting the rezoning for a digital photo studio up to 4,000 sq ft. He said he and his wife currently rent a facility in Asheboro and would like their own space. He said they provide fashion photos for industries with no public traffic. He said once the photos are completed, they are uploaded digitally to the companies. He thien submitted an updated site plan and samples of digital photography (Exhibits 1 & 2). Pell asked if there were any questions from the Board. Cable asked him about his hours of operation. Santa said they usually work onsite from 10:00 am until 1:00 pm, with occasional early morning or evening hours depending on the photo needs. He said he and his wife would be the only people on site and most of their work was completed indoors. He also told the Board the single- wide mobile home that was previously on the property had been removed because they were trying to make the property look nicer. Davis asked if the only traffic would be mail service other than him and his wife. Santa answered yes. Morgan asked how he got here. Santa said he knew because this was a business, some avenues would have to be addressed, so he asked for the steps needed. He told the Board that the building would look more like a home than a business and although he is asking for 4000 square feet, it would probably only be 3200 square feet. Morgan stated that the Board appreciates him asking for permission rather than forgiveness. Austin told Santa congratulations on needing to expand. He asked if he would be obtaining a driveway permit from NCDOT. Santa answered yes. He said the new plans show a driveway on Cedar Forest Rd, but he will agree to either road as required. Hedrick commended Santa for adding a level 3 buffer and leaving the existing vegetation as well. Having no additional questions for Santa, the next speaker was called upon. Dane Cain, 3956 Cedar Forest Rd, said he was opposed to the driveway entrance entering off Cedar Forest Rd because there is a blind spot and too many accidents have already occurred in that area. He continued to say that commercial activity should not be allowed on this property with the potential of having a retail store or other activity in the future that would create an even greater amount of traffic. Pell explained to Mr. Cain that NCDOT had recommended the driveway be Page 10 of 198 Page 8 of 11 7/9/2024 connected to Cedar Forest Rd. Hedrick stated that the request was for a Conditional District to allow only a digital photo studio. Caddle also explained that nothing else would be an allowed use without additional approvals from the Board. Cain asked if there would be any advertisement signs. Caddle said there may be signs but no billboards. Cain repeated that the entrance should not be approved on Cedar Forest Dr. Beeson said the drawing of the proposal is very nice and would be good for the area. He said he understands his concerns, but the current proposal is better than what was previously on the property. Having no other questions from the Board, Pell asked the next speaker to come forward. John Wagoner, 3429 Cedar Forest Rd, asked if any of the photos would be taken outside the facility. He also mentioned the blind spot on the road and said the entrance should be required on NC Hwy 22. Pell said NCDOT will determine the driveway entrance, not the Board. Wagoner then told the Board that there is stress on the existing power grid for the residents (causing power outages), and allowing a business would only increase the problem. Pell asked Santa if he would like to address any of the concerns mentioned to the Board. Santa said he appreciates the farming community and would not do anything to negatively impact the area. He also stated that he would not have major signage, the security lights would be facing inward on the property, and the outdoor photos would strictly be used for fashion as needed for clients. He continued to say that he would prefer the entrance on NC Hwy 22 as well, but he would have to follow the requirements from NCDOT. He mentioned that a new electrical service would be installed with no impact on Cedar Forest Rd. Cable asked Santa if he had talked to anyone with NCDOT or State Highway Patrol concerning accidents. Santa said he had never seen accidents there. Cable asked if this studio would be similar to a studio used for furniture photography, referring to one in High Point. Santa answered yes. Having no additional questions from the Board, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion or a motion. Page 11 of 198 Page 9 of 11 7/9/2024 Cable said the concerns about the driveway location fall under the NCDOT requirements. He said this request seems to be a good product and will enhance the neighborhood. He said he also understands the concerns of people wanting things to remain the same. He said he believes this couple is making a big improvement on the property. Hedrick said the applicant has worked with NCDOT on the proposed driveway requirements, there are already commercial uses surrounding the property, and the proposed building has been designed to look like a home. Davis said the Conditional District request is for specific operations rather than open commercial use. Cable said based on the information given along with the site plans and exhibits, he would make a motion. On the motion of Cable, seconded by Austin, with a vote of 7-0, the Board voted to approve the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board packet. REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022007 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by THOMAS GWYN, High Point, NC, and their request to rezone 2.59-acres at 1585 Gable St, Trinity Township, Lake Reese Balance Watershed, Tax ID #6799603709, Primary Growth Area, from LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District to LI - Light Industrial District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the LI - Light Industrial District. Caddle presented the second rezoning case of the night, along with site plans and photographs of the site. Landon Hilliard, 1516 York Ave, High Point, said Mr. Gwyn is requesting a rezoning to LI, on the recommendation of Eric Martin. Having no one else signed up to speak, and no additional questions from the Board, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion or a motion. Cable said there is a chemical company across the street from this request. Hedrick stated that it seems to be a prime area for rezoning because most of the surrounding area is commercial. Davis said that he normally has issues with straight rezoning because of the unknown use of the property and the effects it will have on the neighboring area, and this property is surrounded by other commercial uses so the request would be a fit for the area. On the motion of Cable, seconded by Beeson, with a vote of 7-0, the Board voted to Page 12 of 198 Page 10 of 11 7/9/2024 approve the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board packet. REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022008 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by DONALD E. LEIDIGH, Asheboro, NC, and their request to rezone 1.26-acres out of 14.57 acres at 4284 US Hwy 64 W, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7721981112, Secondary Growth Area, from ictRA - Residential Agricultural District to LI - Light Industrial District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the LI - Light Industrial District. Caddle presented the last rezoning case of the night, Donald E. Leidigh Rezoning Request, along with site plans and photographs of the site. Donald E Leidigh, 4284 US Hwy 64 W, Asheboro, told the Board that he moved to NC twenty years ago. He said he has been wanting this property zoned to LI since he bought it due to the location, but has been working to clear the property of all the trees and brush to make it presentable and now mows the property. Having no one else to speak regarding the request, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion or a motion. Cable mentioned the solar farm near the property. Davis said there is a mix of commercial uses near the property, including solar farm, but Amity Hills Church is nearby as well. Hedrick referred to the Growth Management Plan 4.3; "Light Industrial uses should be located near Primary and Municipal Growth Areas to take advantage of proximity to available services and infrastructure and should be visually buffered according to their location". He said with the LI request having no conditions, the Board cannot require buffers so he finds it difficult to approve. Cable said there is a big difference between a church and LI use. He said the area is mixed-use. Davis explained that straight zoning opens up to multiple uses that may not be suitable for neighboring properties. Hedrick stated there are a lot of residential homes in the area. Beeson mentioned that requests are easier to approve if the Board understands the use of the property in this type of area. Davis said based on the discussion from the Board, he would make a motion. Page 13 of 198 Page 11 of 11 7/9/2024 On the motion of Davis, seconded by Hedrick, with a vote of 7-0, the Board voted to deny the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board packet. HC - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT UPDATE DISCUSSION HC - Highway Commercial District Update Discussion Caddle presented updated information to the Planning Board regarding the proposed updates to the HC - Highway Commercial District. She explained the proposal for rezoning has broken the existing HC zoning into three categories, taking multiple factors into consideration including the size of buildings, and the potential disruptive nature of development to neighboring properties. She mentioned the new definitions that were proposed as part of the amendment, and some of the considerations to be made for potential uses in the future. The Board discussed some of the positive considerations that have been made and stated that this change was moving in the right direction, allowing them to feel more comfortable about straight rezoning requests. Morgan stated that it might be a good idea to share the information with groups within the County before final drafts are presented. Caddle agreed. 7. Update from the Planning Director. The Planning Director had no updates for the Planning Board. 8. Adjournment. At 8:19 pm on motion of Cable, seconded by Hedrick, the Board voted 7-0 to adjourn. ________________________________ Chairman ________________________________ Clerk to the Planning Board Page 14 of 198 Page 15 of 198 N EoIxUJ E :l II I ' .I .- - \ I t T- T I Fir :.1 ! / II I I ') l !E tr \ T t I I i u 'I Page 16 of 198 ?? I :) N "l l l a r l t l t E j nl u B s s[ J r a H :lU O : l .L : ) $ O l l d Og S O d O U d V = I I *s tf.6 * Js I I E I I I r- I I m t 11.f1 - I : t i- | I+I I Page 17 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022009 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi- judicial Hearing on the request by HARRIS AUTO SALES, LLC, Ramseur, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 2042 Patterson Grove Rd, Columbia Township, Sandy Creek Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #8703776491, 13.12 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an automotive sales lot with no more than six cars on display with a 10 ft by 12 ft office and storage building. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 18 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 19 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: SANDY CREEK WATER QUALITY CRITICAL AREA Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710870300JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS:COMMERCIAL CAR LOT The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOTIVE SALES LOT WITH NO MORE THAN 6 CARS ON DISPLAY, WITH A 10X12 OFFICE AND STORAGE BUILDING. NO JUNK VEHICLES Signature of Applicant: Dustin Grant Authorized County Official Applicant: HARRIS AUTO SALES LLC City, St. Zip: RAMSEUR, NC 27316 Address: 2042 PATTERSON GROVE RD Owner: HARRIS, JEREMY L Address: 2042 PATTERSON GROVE RD City, St. Zip: RAMSEUR, NC 27316 Permit #: 2024-00022009 Parcel #: 8703776491 Date: 06/03/2024 Location Address: 2042 PATTERSON GROVE RD RAMSEUR, NC 27316 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME: HARRIS, JEREMY L Contact Phone:336-233-1427 JON P YORK3 Acreage: Township:13.1200 06 - COLUMBIA Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 20 of 198 Harris Auto Sales, LLC, Special Use Permit Request Location Map R A M S E U R J U L I A N R DPATTERSONGROVERD 1 inch equals 500 feet Directions to site: NC Hwy 49 N - (L) Ramseur Julian Rd - (L) Patterson Grove Rd - Site on (L) approx. 800 ft. at 2042 Patterson Grove Rd. Page 21 of 198 Harris Auto Sales, LLC, Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( PATT E R S O N G R O V E R D R A M S E U R J U L I A N R D The request is located in the Sandy Creek Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet White Tail Creek S/D (2013) SUP for used auto sales (1988) Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts RA RLOR RR Page 22 of 198 Harris Auto Sales, LLC, Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( PATT E R S O N G R O V E R D R A M S E U R J U L I A N R D The request is located in the Sandy Creek Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet White Tail Creek S/D (2013) SUP for used auto sales (1988) Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts RA RLOR RR Page 23 of 198 Harris Auto Sales, LLC, Special Use Permit Request R A M S E U R J U L I A N R D PATT E R S O N G R O V E R D The request is located in the Sandy Creek Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 200 feet Existing residence Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Page 24 of 198 Harris Auto Sales, LLC, Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Rameur Julian Rd. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Mulberry Academy St. Page 25 of 198 Mroczkowski, Angela Marie 1850 Mt View Church Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Speedling, Daniel Lee (Speedling, Kaylen Carter) 2018 Patterson Grove Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Groce, Thomas Dwain 2035 Patterson Grove Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Harris, Jeremy L 2042 Patterson Grove Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Bohannon, Natasha L (Bohannon, Baron V) 2057 Patterson Grove Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Schnick, Chad Morgan 2106 Patterson Grove Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Pike, J Hampton Trustee 2867 Pike Farm Rd Staley, NC 27355 Kimrey, James Randall (Kimrey, Shirley Mae) 1409 Ramseur Julian Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Kimrey, Shirley M 1409 Ramseur Julian Rd Ramseur, NC 27316 Page 26 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 27 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY HARRIS AUTO SALES, LLC SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022009 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 2042 Patterson Grove Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR HARRIS AUTO SALES, LLC BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 28 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 29 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 30 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 31 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022012 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by ALEX DEAKINS, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 891 Gold Hill Rd, Asheboro Township, Tax ID #7762717343, 0.92 acres, RR - Residential Restricted. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a gunsmith shop in an existing building on the property with an indoor test firing range. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 32 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 33 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710776200JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: OBTAIN FFL FOR A SMALL GUNSMITH SHOP IN AN EXISTING BUILDING - NO STOREFRONT - DROP OFF / PICK UP ONLY Signature of Applicant: Melissa Burkhart Authorized County Official Applicant: DEAKINS, ALEX City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27203 Address: 891 GOLD HILL RD Owner: DEAKINS, ALEX Address: 891 GOLD HILL RD City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27203 Permit #: 2024-00022012 Parcel #: 7762717343 Date: 06/11/2024 Location Address: 891 GOLD HILL RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:DEAKINS, ALEX Contact Phone:336 708-2337 BURNS & BOYD1 Acreage: Township:0.9200 01 - ASHEBORO Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 34 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request Location Map GOLD HILLRD WINDSO R T R L RANDOLPH TABERNACLE RD 1 inch equals 500 feet Asheboro Asheboro Directions to site: Bus 220 N - (R) Hub Morris Rd - (L) Old Liberty Rd - (R) Gold Hill Rd - Site on (R) approx. 3/10 mile past Randolph Tabernacle Rd at 891 Gold Hill Rd. Page 35 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( G OLD HILLRD 1 inch equals 250 feet SUP for auto sales lot (2018) Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads City of Asheboro ETJ County zoning Districts RR Page 36 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( GOL D H I L L R D 1 inch equals 400 feet SUP for auto sales lot (2018)Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads City of Asheboro ETJ County zoning Districts RA RR Page 37 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request GO L D H I L L R D 1 inch equals 100 feet Existing residence Legend Parcels Roads Existing building to be used for gunsmith shop Page 38 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request G OLD HILLRD 1 inch equals 250 feet SUP for auto sales lot (2018) Legend Parcels Roads Page 39 of 198 Deakins Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking toward Randolph Tabernacle Rd. Picture 6: Request location on right as seen looking toward E Presnell St. Page 40 of 198 Aguilar, Gabino Aviles Jr (Merida, Brenda Del Carmen Reza) 1843 Bailey Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Mateo, Mario Jose (Aguilar, Diana) 945 Country Place Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Portillo, Ena Sorto 815 Gold Hill Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Geiger, Pamela 864 Gold Hill Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Standley, Jerilynn E (Standley, William J) 869 Gold Hill Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Deakins, Alex (Deakins, Holly) 891 Gold Hill Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Key, Traci Nicole 948 Gold Hill Rd Asheboro, NC 27203 Page 41 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 42 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY ALEX DEAKINS SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022012 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 891 Gold Hill Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ALEX DEAKINS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 43 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 44 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 45 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 46 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022013 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by EVAN BURKS, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3845 Bachelor Creek Rd, Richland Township, Tax ID #7687466565, 12.52-acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence for a family member. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 47 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 48 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710768600JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW SECOND RESIDENCE FOR FAMILY MEMBER AS PER THE SITE PLAN Signature of Applicant: Timothy Mangum Authorized County Official Applicant: BURKS, EVAN City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Address: 3845 BACHELOR CREEK RD Owner: BURKS, EVAN M Address: 3845 BACHELOR CREEK RD City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit #: 2024-00022013 Parcel #: 7687466565 Date: 06/14/2024 Location Address: 3845 BACHELOR CREEK RD ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:BURKS, EVAN Contact Phone:336 688-2870 JERRY W & KAREN S SMITH1 Acreage: Township:12.5200 17 - RICHLAND Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 49 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request Location Map O L D N C H W Y 1 3 B A C H E L O R C R E E K RD 1 inch equals 1,000 feet Directions to site: NC Hwy 42 S - (R) Old NC Hwy 13 - (L) Bachelor Creek Rd - Site on (L) approx. 1/2 mile at 3845 Bachelor Creek Rd. Page 50 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( B A C H E L O R C R E E K R D Ba tchelor C ree k 1 inch equals 500 feet Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains County zoning Districts RA Page 51 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( B A C H E L O R C R E E K R D Ba tchelor C ree k 1 inch equals 500 feet Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains County zoning Districts RA Page 52 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request B A C H E L O R C R E E K R D 1 inch equals 400 feet Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains Existing residence Location of proposed second residence Page 53 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request B A C H E L O R C R E E K R D 1 inch equals 400 feet Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains Page 54 of 198 Burks Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Drive to request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Old NC Hwy 13. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Osborn Mill Rd. Page 55 of 198 Bremser, Cheryl Marie 3794 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Whitley, Jennifer (Whitley, Norris) 3821 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Bowman, Timothy H Life Estate (Bowman, Doris Mae Jenks Whitfield Life Estate) 3833 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Burks, Evan M (Burks, Jessalyn N) 3845 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Moffitt, James Randall 3846 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Derbin, Ned E (Sheehan, Karla J) 3885 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Maness, Barbara R 3907 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Maness, Michael Trustee 4349 Bachelor Creek Rd Asheboro, NC 27205 Patterson, Terry Lee 312 Sunrise Ave Franklinville, NC 27248 Page 56 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 57 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER APPROVING SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY EVAN BURKS SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022013 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 3845 Bachelor Creek Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR EVAN BURKS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 58 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 59 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 60 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 61 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022017 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by JAMES LOCKLEAR, Asheboro, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 735 Chaney Rd, Franklinville Township, Tax ID #7781746894, 2.01 acres, RR - Residential Restricted and RA – Residential Restricted District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence for a family member. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 62 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 63 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710778000JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW A SECOND RESIDENCE FOR A FAMILY MEMBER - SON Signature of Applicant: Melissa Burkhart Authorized County Official Applicant: LOCKLEAR, JAMES City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Address: 735 CHANEY RD Owner: LOCKLEAR, JAMES L Address: 735 CHANEY RD City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit #: 2024-00022017 Parcel #: 7781746894 Date: 06/24/2024 Location Address: 735 CHANEY RD ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:LOCKLEAR, JAMES Contact Phone:336 301-9233 Acreage: Township:2.0100 08 - FRANKLINVILLE Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 64 of 198 Locklear Special Use Permit Request Location Map CH A N E Y R D HO N E Y S U C K L E R D G A R LIN G T O N DREXT P R I N C E T O N C T EL DERBERRYCT BARBERRYCT IRON M O U N TAIN VIE W R D OLD STAGECOACHRD SHARRON DR 1 inch equals 400 feet Directions to site: US Hwy 64 E - (R) Foxfire Rd - (R) Chaney Rd - Site on (L) approx. 400 ft. past Sharron Dr at 735 Chaney Rd. Page 65 of 198 Locklear Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( SHARRON DR CHANEYRD 1 inch equals 250 feet Rezoned for landscaping business (2004) Sykes Meadows S/D (2005) Request location Sharron Forest S/D Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts CVOE RA RBO RR Page 66 of 198 Locklear Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( SHARRON DR CHANEYRD 1 inch equals 250 feet Rezoned for landscaping business (2004) Sykes Meadows S/D (2005) Sharron Forest S/D Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts CVOE RA RBO RR Page 67 of 198 Locklear Special Use Permit Request SHARRON DR CH A N E Y R D 1 inch equals 200 feet Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Page 68 of 198 Locklear Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request locaiton. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Sharron Dr. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Iron Mountain View Rd. Page 69 of 198 6/28/2024 Randolph County GIS Current Owner Information Randolph County, Its Agents and Employees make not warranty to the correctness of the information set forth on this document. PIN TAX_ACRES DESCRIPTION DEED_BOOK/PAGE OWNER ADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY_STATE_ZIP 7781643478 107.9 R2210;W R2609 W 001125/00469 MILLIKAN, JERRY R (MILLIKAN, RONDA T)2010 GOLD HILL RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 7781746665 1.8 SUSAN MCGEHEE;TR1 001738/01273 ANDERSON, EVE M (ANDERSON, JOEL A) 759 CHANEY RD ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7781746894 1.97 R2610;E 002752/01569 LOCKLEAR, JAMES 735 CHANEY RD ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7781747306 7.2 SUSAN MCGEHEE;TR2 002377/00758 PEREZ, ROCIO GARCIA 803 CHANEY RD ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7781757017 0.52 WILLIAM R & HELEN F PARSON;TR2 001130/00286 PARSON, WILLIAM R (PARSON, HELEN) 2938 SHARRON DR ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7781758014 0.5 SHARRON FOREST;L73-76 001111/00247 PARSON, WILLIAM R (PARSON, HELEN F) 2938 SHARRON DR ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7781759064 0.92 SHARRON FOREST LO 77 - 84 001109/00447 PARSON, WILLIAM R (PARSON, HELEN F) 2938 SHARRON DR ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Page: 1 of 1 Page 70 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 71 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY JAMES L LOCKLEAR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022017 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 735 ChaneyRd for the purpose indicated is hereby Choose the decision., subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Choose the decision. THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR JAMES L LOCKLEAR BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 72 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 73 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 74 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 75 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022020 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by TROY MILLIKAN, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3903 Edgar Rd, New Market Township, Tax ID #7735165206, 12.51 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a second residence that would become the primary residence of the property owner. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 76 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 77 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710773500JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS:SECOND RESIDENCE REQUEST The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: "I AM REQUESTING TO BUILD MY HOUSE BESIDE MY GARAGE/APARTMENT WITHOUT HAVING TO BUILD A BREEZEWAY. I AM THE ONLY RESIDENT AT THIS LOCATION." Signature of Applicant: Dustin Grant Authorized County Official Applicant: MILLIKAN, TROY City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350 Address: 3903 EDGAR RD Owner: MILLIKAN, TROY AZEL Address: 3588 MILLIKAN RD City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350 Permit #: 2024-00022020 Parcel #: 7735165206 Date: 07/03/2024 Location Address: 3903 EDGAR RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:MILLIKAN, TROY Contact Phone:336-215-1690 TROY MILLIKANA + LOT Acreage: Township:12.5100 13 - NEW MARKET Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 78 of 198 Millikan Special Use Permit Request Location Map EDGARRD F A R L O W PINES DR MTOLIVE CHURCH RD 1 inch equals 500 feet Directions to site: US Hwy 311 - (L) Beeson Farm Rd - (R) Edgar Rd - Site on (L) approx. 1 mile at 3903 Edgar Rd. Page 79 of 198 Millikan Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( EDGARRD 1 inch equals 400 feet Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts LI RA RR Page 80 of 198 Millikan Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( EDGARRD 1 inch equals 400 feet Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts LI RA RR Page 81 of 198 14 0 . 4 7' q 36 8 . 7 0 ' , o, o _o E =< -. J 4 9i o= f Jo ) 9 r. ,q zt o la F @a ,I - EI {, 33 7 . 4 6 ' , ! i, ' l r FI!i I ,! Gl e n c o Dr a f t i n g 33 6 - 4 6 4 - 6 6 0 6 z- / Page 82 of 198 Millikan Special Use Permit Request ED G A R R D 1 inch equals 250 feet Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Page 83 of 198 Millikan Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking toward Mt Olive Church Rd. Picture 6: Request location on right as seen looking toward Beeson Farm Rd. Page 84 of 198 7/3/2024 Randolph County GIS Current Owner Information Randolph County, Its Agents and Employees make not warranty to the correctness of the information set forth on this document. PIN TAX_ACRES DESCRIPTION DEED_BOOK/PAGE OWNER ADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY_STATE_ZIP 7735157823 12.41 JOE MILLIKAN LO NEW B 002525/00500 MILLIKAN, JOSEPH ALLEN 3146 MOUNT OLIVE CHURCH RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 7735162591 45.81 R1526;W JOSEPH MILLIKAN 002271/00005 MILLIKAN, JOSEPH B (MILLIKAN, ANITA B)3588 MILLIKAN RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 7735165206 12.51 TROY MILLIKAN LO A +LOT 002556/00131 MILLIKAN, TROY AZEL 3903 EDGAR RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 7735263369 1.9 JANE F MYERS TR 2 002847/01816 WARDLOW, ERIC (WARDLOW, JULIE DENNIS) 3946 EDGAR RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 7735264703 1.69 JANE F MYERS 002847/01814 MYERS, ROBERT CLAYTON JR LIFE ESTATE 3946 EDGAR RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 Page: 1 of 1 Page 85 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 86 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY TROY MILLIKAN SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022020 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 3903 Edgar Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR TROY MILLIKAN BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 87 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 88 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 89 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 90 of 198 CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022021 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the request by VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC, Chattanooga, TN, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at NC Hwy 42 S, approximately 4/10 mile past Woodhaven Dr, Grant Township, Tax ID #7688491314, 46.02 acres, E-1 - First Environmental District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a 325 ft self-supporting telecommunications tower for Verizon Wireless and other providers. Property Owner: Gary Franklin Newcomb ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. Page 91 of 198 OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God.” Page 92 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: E-1-FIRST ENVIRONMENTAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: YES 3710768800JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS:NEW TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF MULTI-PROVIDER WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY, INCLUDING 325' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER FOR VERIZON WIRELESS AND OTHER PROVIDERS. Signature of Applicant: Eric Martin Authorized County Official Applicant: VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC VERIZON WIRELESS City, St. Zip: CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402 Address: 430 CHESTNUT ST. Owner: NEWCOME, GARY FRANKLIN Address: 3872 NC HWY 42 S City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit #: 2024-00022021 Parcel #: 7688491314 Date: 07/03/2024 Location Address: Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:SANDIFER, MICHAEL Contact Phone:205 532-4870 Acreage: Township:46.7800 09 - GRANT Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 93 of 198 Vogue Towers II, LLC, Special Use Permit Request Location Map NCHWY42S STREAMWA T C H T RL 1 inch equals 500 feet Directions to site: NC Hwy 42 S - Site on (R) approx. 4/10 mile past Woodhaven Dr. Page 94 of 198 Vogue Towers II, LLC, Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( STREAM WA T C H T RL NC H W Y 4 2 S Ric hla n d Creek R ichland Creek Squirrel Cr e e k 1 inch equals 500 feet Request location ?d ?d Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains County zoning Districts E-1 RA RR Page 95 of 198 Vogue Towers II, LLC, Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( STREAM WA T C H T RL NC H W Y 4 2 S Ric hla n d Creek R ichland Creek Squirrel Cr e e k 1 inch equals 500 feet ?d ?d Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains County zoning Districts E-1 RA RR Page 96 of 198 ffi \ VOGUE SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE ID: NC-5024 VERIZON WIRELESS SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE ADDRESS: NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 LATITUDE / LONGITUDE: 35" 38' 32.52"N (35.642366) 79" 43' 34.08"W (-79.7261 33) VOGUE TOWERS 430 CHESTNUT STREET SUITE 101-B CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402 PROJECT DIRECTORY UNO OMERilErcfrAqRY FRAN&IN T NErcOMB REBECCA HUOSONs72 NC HTGMY 42 S A$EBORO. NC 27&3S.U.m9 APP!ICNT VGUE TffiRS N, TLC 4P CHESTNUT STREET, SUITE 101€cunal{(](B.fr37{2 PHONET 423.69.7455EUL TNFOOVGUETOWRS.NET E!.GEEEE4I!E-89.S!EE!.9UFRENCH T PERRE!LO ASS@hTESi@ ilSTH PqNTCENTER AST, SUITE !5 CONTACT MICMEL SANOIFER PHONE. 6.53.470 e9t4EE-V!!U!!W€: OUre ENERGY !E!S9g!!.EWE:AfAT VICINITY MAP ..? .? 9t 9 ,-,9!' 0 MAP sOURc€ GooGLE ar ,rr'r 0 LOCAL MAP \,; \",,. UP SOURC€ GOOGLE SHEET INDEX sxeer no I DESCRIPTION SITE SUMMARY StrE ryPE PROPOSEO Tffi8 ryPE PROPOSEO IOWF HEIdT. PROPOSED UD CENTER PROPOSED LASE ARATOMR UNTUDETOffiR TqOTUE GROUNO E!EVATION COUNry: ZONING JURISOICNON zoNtNG cusstflcAnoN PROPOSEO RAMNO S@NO BUIID SEIF SUPrcRT3I4 (OWMLL:35'{)3t5+t@x1@s' $' 32.5?',N (S.64e) (NAD83)79'4 g.GV(-79.7618)(MDA) 5r4 UNDOLPH COUNry MNOOTPH COUNry R42:S 7@er314 DISCLAIMER THIS DRAWNGANO THE DESIGN SHOM ARE THE PROPERfr OF FRENCHT PEAREUOASSOChTES. IT IS A UOUNON OF THEUWFOR NY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDES THE OIRECTION OF A LICENSEO PROFESSIOML ENGINEER. TOATER THIS OOCUMENT, SCALE BARS ARE CONSIDEREO HALF SEE IF PLONEO LARGER TMN 11"X17, PROJECT SCOPE CONSIFUCNON DRAWNGS FOR NEW SITE OEVOLPMENI OF AN UNMANNED TELECilMUNICATIONSFACIL , SIErcRK INCLUOES OF TOER TEIECN ANOUNLItrES, GRAOING, EROSION CONIROL,INSTALUTION EAUIPMENT ON CONCRETE FOUNOAIION, THE fACILIT IS UNMANNEOAND NOTFOR HUUN HAEITANON.A TECHNICNNWII VIStrThE SIT€ AS REqUIRED FOR ROUNNE MINTENANCE. NO SANITARY SEWR SERVICE, POIAgIEMTER, OR TRASH OISPO$L IS REOUIREOAND NO COWERCNL SIGNAE ts PfioPos€0. NC CODE COMPLIANCE ALL rcRKANOUTERIALS SHATL BE PERFORMEO AND INSTALLED IN ACCOROANCEWTH IHE CURRENT EDINONS OF IHE F4LOWNG CODES AS AOOPTED SY THE IOCAL GOVERNINGAUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PUNS IS IO BE CONSTRUCTEO TO PERMIrcRK NOI CONFORMING TO IHESE COOES. INTERNATIONALBUILDINGCODE blaED|T|ON. INTERNANONAL MECHANICAL COOE. A15 EDINON. INIERNAIIONAI FIRE COOE, &15 EOlllON. NAIOMLELECTRICcoo€.MEolnoN. INTERNATIONAt ENERGY CONSERVATION COOE 615 EOITION. ICC ANSI 117.1 ACCESSIBIIn COOE.2@EDITION ACCESSIEIIIB REOUIREMENTS FACILIN IS UNUNNEOANO NOT FOR HUMAN HA6ITATION MNDICAPPEDACCESS REOUIREMENTS ARE NOT REqUIRED IN ACCOROANCE WTH ThE 415 EC EUILDING CODE DIG ALERT @ CALL NORTH CAROLIMflE CAll(m)632{W CALL 3rcRKNG OAYS BEFORE YOU qG!s FPlil :u' \ verizon/ REV,OATE REVtSION BY o @G/@4 .d"*i^Y"'?EffE* Jw 1 oa@z024 .dii,Vo'?Efl,E* Jw ZONING REVIEWr @1@. ,,li,i"*".I9!* Jry4 od1stn24 ,;i,i^Y5?IV,[* Jry El 049521 NOT VAUD FOR CONSIRUCNil UNLESS SIGNEOAND STMPEO CHECreDBY: PROJECTMfi' FPA PROJECTNO: T, UEHE E, EADIEE M, $NOIFERt52A.tO VOGUE SITE WE: NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE IO NC-5024 VERZON WREIESS SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITEAOORESS: NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) TITLE SHEET T-1 ii "9 .brx.@ VOGTJEr(I.,VFRS Page 97 of 198 20II trPENDII B BUILDING COOE SUMMARY FORALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTSlgc€rl r ANo EAIY oEu&Ato TomrclJG)rR.sdq..h,&i. tb{ rh tuEno *^. $.r r o,2) O suL O s.bco!d,@ rcEW' TEEPdE"* Omn,Eri'tr Och.B, raEL.dil coNslR€IS ((.) _mltlD: (4bt_PrcrcSEOCUP!€Y{S)(Ch. 3t _&*qrEmY (T.* !e 5)c!mn: or ox or orv,DPr.Or Elx Orl ON htubrFi Ou Or+ O'H ON Ov{khrrdM.d) 0B OH O,i-B trv-B.sr,r; EM EP.tuOy.. trNFpa,r ONFpa ,rR ONFP ,rDMF.: !M OY6ch O' Or OilwnO Oory.x.BrB: 0M OY.! tdtu.&.] O'& Oi...ts.dh.Fh. h!h.O6 Ey* (coil*rh. hsrm.Fomrunrd.n,o,.ddis.lsed{,.r raq r.*trwib ) k_!b __ffi- _-" f@":IrtIEBATtrONSjfO'_,,-...:._,-,*T,r EX|STINeeOND|TIONS, ar.n4 tr^r tr&, O+r O^{ Or{ffi.8 No ALTERATTONS TO ',rH"". I ileffi 8m *G"G0NDE| 0s 5*,""hntu&o'OLr tudu O, O,O'r(jdo O' O,OBo^dd Or O, tr! O. tr5EB R.didERr Oe, ORi ORr&@, O s, ildd. O $, Lo End#OP.ilry 6.qOhiOEt(M OR.ry c.q.qdrdMu. O&6s&wrt*&r; .Frk*h.:tq+,.-s* H.xk.*.{Fryi!M Oh. Er{@i_ Oksu,u h (s.n-Tto rsd!F d.dutuntu6.d&necr h &r.mN *sqh bd.dru hMtu,.h drh.** NO AL"fERAt'tOilS.?gM -m e';ry E$pd k ($, r, -* etu.u *u6.rd.*i rbry r EX r Sffig$tBtf$f, [G::. d.-i uo ffi 'AdjAdorG.uEn., ar erqtr..decuFi.y BMA'..de.cFi.ya MhAn.dc.sr.rB NO ALTERATIONS TO I Front$...'ncr..... ts s.c y do.s. h.Yrs &htnnmuh6. _ rFlr r.dau&oPrld, : _'P)c R.r. Cf) -_ (rP) d. w: n'n6um*dh nE* *.y i_(9 W/P-0.21r we.-(r) 2 unhd.D.*s ue.o 3 truhur &6s Au = d Dd.dr.E.6.bbor D(llwn3{il) {s ?) s rr#huccmc, dh r.*.6.5.. FP/t :;:_. VOGUETOWFRS \ verizon/ REV. ME REVISION AY o rem24 ,;i,i,":?ISE- Jw 1 oa@t&24 ;i,i^y"'"J$[* Jw 2 @1stx24 ,Ji,i-'.t?E9,E* Jw 3 @1qrc2. ,li,:"'FBEgE* Jw 1 w1sm24 ,,lt?.Y^'BEgE* Jw &l o49521 NO :r:?:"** NO BfffinrroN s rol;tl*- ",ex r EtrB6oouorr r o ru su&rtudh trMoYs otrootrooooootr oooooooo a.ud..adFFdhbbi.lrdoi tu0 *i)€lerdotsnryil6 '.g5 eMb&.d9la h- (76 t)&eH., hrd-cir..6.116b@Frbd6t*,(r& !u r 2) a....d!deB (oir) trnHlWfitTEfU(frUNS rotuq.d.b.-ndie Hil=#I$gl#dp', @@ilElr*@ns'd s"'d nu 3) a -tsr.b sbn.b *n D&.!c s.tr tu rrd btrdns idor r. Lo.&d.06'6Fnc*tu,.(OrOr ro)Lo..M dtu6Sdqdk.dtu lru.rddl, tr0ro.r.r.7,Tr.r brr{lfiq1.l.l) r€&i or.eDBy aE ffi l'0s) Th. rqu{ io@ or .rch ft. o (&2)Th..qu.h r&LFor..ch .mh comFhd,(e.rync, clsi.rhn t-?1.07 5) STING N NU]ALItrKAII(JN> IU EX nuErc rtrilra r&urerflsti[[r$r-{ *dsd (lqlrffi htuddliE.@ O9 m M * -!d&) NOT VALIO FOR CONSIRUCNON UNLESS SIqEO ANO STMPEO CHECGDBY PROJECTUGR FPA PROJECTNO T, UEHE E, SAOIEE M, $NqFERt5a.!39 VOGUE SITE NAME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE ID NC-5024 NORTH HUDSON LAKE SIEADORESS NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANOOLPH COUNTY) APPENDIX B CODE SUMMARY T-2 !I FXISTING CONDITIONS IS TO\LTERA ilo tvtrD I v E; Page 98 of 198 ffiffi:Ih'M& dh.@d't[n deyl@tu,ry-bngtu.@d d&E@ b(&flidEf@tfudhp@dtubbS&ddr@ffi d.tu.dd,lydktu .bed,c{.uc.s6nd .ceydrqh Itud@:lredEPdcnlde EP@6m ^sw$1 oPdm oPMnmda1)d- s6 r{(lq.) IHER& EWAeE lPr€gr&. ndM dD RddqAsdy(*h-@)N/A wurnd-@_uvlrdffi - u{4.ro@dffihsL N/AIL@d..duv&dds8 - R{&dx& t@d@Gv&ddmw _R-V&dlrl& N/A SULOilG COOE SUMMARY FORAIL COMMERCII PROJECTSallmCBl@qEarelrru.l€[t@ ll@.;e: h(E)_*n'tE)- MdH.i4 +rdod.*rf{/AA]{}{ A l}t lll)l.lN(i ffid: Jrn&wd$ '15 .*lrqr,ER'. a@ry c -rymaM: Oa trB Oc OoPre& h tur $m'c hn P-.menRn(&ryF.*!e:5)or oil o[ otr.9diry.effi s-ts s1-x! tr3 trD Or &6l.fu{r.fud, urEru*sxdru:E.t@b O stuO 2O1I APPENDIX B 9UILflI'IG COOE SUMMARY FOR ALL COTMERCIAL PROJECTSxreLfi&xMilffiI.crmMTffiE IEl{^&0!ry miSu_.lJlwdys_ *furdrysMdryS-r&m tomd, - urr$@ry\lfEftflT|ONs TO*' "E(lsTtt{c co N D tTl o N skbdEhffitl*n d.grMdlnr _tu[{@ - dmdEftr - {. d@y d u^i - &.d@ldttdd&lM - g.(.@rMd.M - k.@*ffi: - FPlt la=j \ verizod DATE REVtStON BYo w@4 d""i",5REffE* Jw t w. ,*,iJ^'BIgE* rry @1w. ,;'"fJE".E$E* Jw 3 @io@. ;i,i""E".I$E* Jw 4 &1m21 ,Ji,i.Y3""ESE* Jw m 04952 BUILDING CODE SUMMARY FOR AU COMMERCIAL PROJECTSE&lmESiIrRsril * EEffi 3ffi Dl-ffi) rdcffi:.lwdoPtu EIPE@Ms1 OPtu ElP,.@ '*ffif,filffiNtr)T A BtJrDr._rNGddh.tub&re.htuffid&.tud@Ftudlfuq.@EkwfficPrytg)@tu@@6tu ffi8ry*hqhraeE:dl@kruai, Hffi; REL4&PffiIBMELJ@(:d M(k&WR@E@rh.h&l].4 NOT VALIO FOR CONSTRUCNON UNIESS SIGNEO ANO STNPEO CHECreOEYPROJECTMq FPA PROJECTNO T. UEHE E. ilUEE M, ilNqFER13U.19 V@U€ SITE WE NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE IO NC-5024 VERZON WREIESS SITE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE STTEAOORESS NC HVf/42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) APPENDIX B CODE SUMMARY T-3 Erenor W (dd.sry)N/A VOC;t-'F TOWIf RS Hram,n!7@ Page 99 of 198 9E.!!84!_EE9SEEUE!]SSCUU4!-Y-9!..]4pE! 1, THE CONTMCTOR SULT REVIEWANO EECWE FAMILIAR WTH SPECINCANONS CONTAINEOIN THE BIO PACGGE PREPAREO 8Y FRENCH A PARRELLO ASSOCIATES PA, OELIVERY S'ORAGE AND UNDLING I2 PLACE BACKFILL ANO FILL MATERIALS IN LAYERS NOT MORE THAN 8 INCHES {TOMM) IN LOOSE OEPTH FOR MATERIA! CilPACTEO BY HEAVY COMPACTION EOUIPMENT AND NOI MORE IHAN 4 INCHES O@N LOOSE OEPTH FOR MATERNL CdPACTfO AY HAN04PEMTEO IAMPERS2, IN THE EVENTOF CONFTICT BEMEN THE 8IO PACUGE SPECIFICANONS ANO IHESE NOTES THE PROUSIONS OF VEREON SPECIfICATIONS SMLITArePRECEOENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHAL! BE RESPONSIBLE fOR ALL PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULING ASSOCIAIED WTH HOISTING STAGING. ANO ERECNNG OF MTEfiATSAND EOUIPMENITOANryOR UPON THE EXISTING AUILOING, ALL ELEMENTS OF THEqISTING BUIIDING, I.E, STRUCTURE, BUILOINO fACAOEWN@WGUSS, SITE PUNTINGS ETC, SMLL 8€ PROTECTEO AS NECESSARY FRW SAIO ACTIONS. THIS rcRK MUSTBEMNE IN A SAFE, SECURE NON.OESTRUCNVE UNNER FOR PROTECNNG PERSONNEL ANO PROPERfr -sF- SEOIMENT FENCE A TEMPORARY SEOIMENT CONTROT MEASURE CONSISTING OF FABRIC EURIEDATTHE AOIOM, STRETCHEO. AND SUPPORTEOAY POSTS. TEMPORARY SEEONG PLANTING RAPIMROWNG ANNUAT GRASSES MTT6MINS, OR LEGWES TO PROUOE INIMT,TEMrcRARY COVER FG EROSION CONNOL ON DISTURAEDARUS, P€RUNEU SEEOING CONTROTLING RUNOFF AND EROSPN q DISTURBEO AREAS BY ESTASTISHING PERENNIAT VEGETANW COVER WTH SEEO, 3, TH€ CONTMCTOR SMLL VISIT IHE SITE OF THE PROPOS€D rcRKAND FULLY ACqUAINI HfiSELf WTH THE CONDINONS AS IHEY EXST IN ORMR THATANY RESIRICTIONS PERTANING TO THE rcRK ARE UNO€RSTOOO ALI ARUS ANO DIMENSIONSARE INDICATEO ON THE ORAWNGSAS ACCUMTELY AS POSSISIE,8UT ALL CONOINONS SHALL EE VERIFIED BY EACH CONTMCTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AT THE SIE. THE fAILURE OF THE CONTMCTOR TO EMMINE OR RECEIVEANY FORM, INSIRUM€NT OR OOCUMENT OR TO MSIT THE $TE SMIL NOI RELIEW THE CONTMCTOR FROMANY OSLIqTPN WTH RESPECIIO HIS OUOTED PRICE, TNE SUBMISSION OF A OUOTATION SHALL ACKNOUEOCE THAT THE CONTUCTOR ANO HIS SUECONTMCTORS MVE FUTLY EXAUNED THE SITE ANO KNOWTHE AETING CONOITIONS AND HAVE UOE PROVISIONS FOR OPERAIING UNOER THE CONOIflONSAS THEY EXISTATTHE SITE ANO HAW INCLUOEO ALL NECESSARY ITEMS, I3, PUCE BACKFILT ANO FITT UTERIALS EVENLY ONAlL SIDES OF STRUCTURES TO REQUIRED EIEVANONS. PUCE BACKFILL ANO FIIL UNIFORMLY AIONG THE FULL LENGTH OF EACH STFUCTURE 2. ALL EXCESS OR UNUSASIE CONSTRUCTION UTERIALS OR EQUIPMENI SULL BE REMOVED FROM ThE SITE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF A rcRK DAY AND STOREOIN A SATE MNNER OR RErcWO FROM SITE 14. PERCENTAGE OF WIMUM ORY OENSIfr REAUIREMEMS CdPACT SqLTO NOT IESS IUN THE FOIIOWNG PERCENTAGE OT ffiilUM ORY OENSITACC$OINGIOASil D rs7 WARRANNESAND BONOS: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUAUNTEE ALL UBOR ANDMTERIAIS USED IN THIS PROJECT fOR A PERIOD OF ONE (I) YEAR COWENCING FROM THE OATE Of FINAL ACCEPIANCE 8Y VERZON PARTNERSHIP ANY DEFICIENCIES TMT EECOME EVIOENT OURING THIS ONE (1) YAR PERIOO SHALL 8E CORRECTEO AT TAE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, E4lltsl4B! 1. UnUry TRENCHES: ExcAvATE TRENChES TO lNOlcAIEoST@ES, LINES, OEPfrS, ANO INWRT ELEVATIONS TO ATTOW I{STALUIION OF T@ OF PIPE BELOWFROSI TINE, A. UNDER STRUCTURES BUILDING PADS, STEPS ANO 8E!OWUPGRADE AND EACH UYER OF TREES SHRUBS, VINESA GROUND COVERS STABILtrING DISTURBEO ARAS 8Y ESTAALISHINGA VEGETANVE COVER OF TREES SHRUBS VINES. Oi GROUNO COVERS. MATFRIAI ATS PERCENT MAXIMUM ORY DENSIfr B, UNOERWALKWAYS, COMPACTTHE TOP6INCHES(1$ 8€TOWSUSGMOE AND EACH UYER OF UCKFILL OR FILL MTERNL AT $* STANOARD PROCTOR UNDER o @ A <@ tr MULCHING APPLICATION OF A PROTECTIVE BUNKET OF STRAWOR OTHER PUNT RESIOUE, GMVEL, OR SYNIHATIC UTERIAITO THE SOIL SURFACE4. IHE GENEML CONTRACIOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES SHALL INCLUOE 8UT NOT BE IIMITED TO THE INSTALUTION OF TBE 15, INSTAIT WARNING TAPE OIRECTLYABOVE UNLITIES 12 INCHES(M SELOW FINISHEO GMDE, UCEPI 6 INCHES (1S MM} EELOWSUEqAOE UNOER PAWMENTS ANO PAOS, 16, OETECTABIE WARNING TAPE ACIDANOATST}RESISTANT POLYETHYLENEFILMMRNINGTAPEMNUFACTUREO FOR MRKNG ANO IOENNryINC UNOERGROUNO UTIINES, 6 INCHES Ofl W)WE ANO4MITS (0,1 W) THICKMINIMUM, CONTINUOUSIY INSCRIBEOffiBA OESCRIPNON Of Of IHEUN(W WTH METAIIIC CORE ENCASED IN A PROIECNVE ilCKET FOR CORROSION PROTECTION, DETECTAAIE AY METAL OETECTORWEN TtrE IS BURIEO UP TO T INCHES O$MM) DEEP, ANO RIPRAPA UYER tr SIONE OESIqED TO PROTECTANO ST S|UEARAS SUBJEC] rO EROS|ON,IHE INSTALUNON OF THE CABLE TRENCHANO THE CABLE ROUNNG ENCLOSUREAS ffiI! AS, THE ELECTRIC SERUCE, TELEPHONE CONOUITS. qOUNOING SYSTEM. ANO COOROIMNON WTH LOqt UIILIry CflPANIES, 2 TRENCH AONilS ACAVATE ANO SMPE TRENCH 8O[ilS TO PROVIOE UNIFGM BURINGANO SUPPORTOF PIPES ANO CONDUIT SMPE SUBGRAOE TO PROUOE CONNNUOUS SUPPORT Fffi BELLS, JOINTS. ANO BARRETS OF PIPESANO rOR JOINTS. FININGS ANO SODIES OF CONOUIT, REMOW STONES AND SMRP OSJECTS TO AVOID POINT IOADING, OUSTCONNOL FOR ARilS NOT SUBJECTTORFfIC, WGETANON PROUOES THE MOSTPMCNCAL ANO EFFECNVE MEANS OF DUST CONTROL FOR OIHER ARAS, CONTROLMEASURES INCTUDE MULCHING. SPRINKLING, SPRAYING ADHESIW OR CALCIUM CHTORIDE, WNO AARRIERS, AND SURFACE ROUGHENING BY TILUGE, 5, THE ANENNA INSTALLERS RESPONSISIIITIES SHALL INCIUOE, BUT NOT AE UMIT€O TO, ROUTING OF CABTES FROM MOIO EOUIPMENTTOANTENMS,SUPPLYINGANO INSTALLINGATL ANTENM CABLE TMY, BRACKETS, ANO OTAERASSOCIATEO HARDMRE FOR SECURING ANTENNA CAALES. OETERMINING SUPPUER OF ANTENNAS, qOUNOINGOF ANTENMS TO CROUNDING SYSTEM. INSTAIIING ANTENNAS AND VERIFYING WTH VEREON MOIO fREQUETY ENGINEERS, THE AIIGNMENT IOCANON ANO PROPER ORIENTATION OF ANTENMS. 6. GENEilL CONTRACTOR SMLL COOROIMTE CONSTRUCNONACNUTESWTH GE BUILOIilG UNOLORD IN OROER TO AVOIO CONFLETSWTH CURRENT USE OF THE SITE, 3. EXISTING UTlltTlESr OO NOT INTERRUPT ExcavaTlNcAND UTILINES SERUNG FACILITIES OCCUPIEO BY THE OMER OR OTAERS EXCEPTffiEN PERMIIED IN MIIINC 8Y THE OMER ANO THEN ONLY AFTER ACCEPTABL€ T€MPORARY UTIIry SERMCES HAW BEEN PROVIOEO- A. TAPE COLORS: PRoUOE TAPE coLoRs To UnUnESAS r. RED. ELECTRIC b, OUNGE TETEPHONEANOOTHER CdMUNICATIONS,A, PROVIO€ AMINIMUM SOURS'NOTICE TO THE OMER AND RECEIVE ffiINEN NOIICE IO PROCEEO A€FORE INTERRUPTING ANY UT[Iry, TEMPORARY ROCK CHECKOAM A SMLL TEMPORARY STONE DAM CONSTRUCTED ACROSSA OMINAGE WAY TO REDUCE EROSION EY REDUCING THE VELOCIN OF FLOW STOC@ILE EXCAVATED UIERhTS ACCEPT BIE FOR UCrcILIANOFILLSOLMATERNTS NCLUDNGACCEPTABIEAORRWMAERqIS. ST@fILE SO! UTERIAIS WTHOUT NTERMXNG, PUCE, GUOE, AND SUPE STOCPITES TO DRAN SURFACEMTER. I 7, OtSpOSt. REMOW SURPTUS $TTSFACTORY SOtt. ANO MSEUTERAL,INCLUOINGUN$NSFACTORY SOIL. TMSH, AND OEBRIS ANO EqL!Y OISPOS€ OF ITOFF THE NER'S PROPERN. SNDGMUrc RESMPING THE GROUNO SURFACE TO PUNNEOGMOESAS OETERMINEO BY ENGINEERING SURVEY 7. THE MER hY MVEWKPERfORMEO UNER SEPARATE CONTUCTS, CONCURRENTLY, WN THE rcR( OE THIS $IREE PRESERVArcN & PROTECNON PRACNCES TO PRESERW ANO PROTECT OESIMALE TREES FROM DAMGE OURING PROJECT DEWLOPMENT,6. THE GENEUL CONTRACTOR SULL PERMITACCESS TO THE PROJECTTO THESE CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM THAR rcRK, A. STOCKPILE SOIL MTERhLS AWAY FROM EOGE OF EXCAVATIONS, DO NOTSIOREWTHIN ORIP IINE OF REMAINING TREES, MCGILL EXCAVATIONS PRilPTLY BUI NOT BEFORE COMPLETING THE FOLlOWNG TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCNON ENTRANCE/EXIT A GRAVELED AREA OR PAD LmATED AT POINTSffiERE VEHICLES ENTER AND LEAVE ACONSTRUCTION SITE, t, CONTRAC]OR SUTL CONFORM TO AIL APPIICABLE TOCAL, COUNW, STATEANOFEDERAL COOES, UWS ANO REOUIREMENTS. A, ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION BELOWFINISH GRAOE,A CONCRETE FRilErcRKREMOVAL C, REMOVAL OF TRASH AND OEBRIS fRfi EXCAVATION. I€MPORARY OIVERSIONS A TEMPORARY RIOGE OR EXCAVATEO CAANNEL OR CSBINANON RIOOEANO CUNNE! CONSTRUCTEOACROSS SLOPING UNDON A PREOEIEUINED GRADE 1 O, T8E CONTMCTOR SULL APPLY ANO PAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION P€RMIT, CERTITICATE OF @CUPANCY ANO ALL OIBER REOUIREO PERMITS OR LICENSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGALT INSPECnONS. I I THE CONTUCTOR'S ATENNON IS OIRECTEO TO FEO€RAL, STATE, AND IOCAL UM, RUIES AND REGULANONS CONCERNINGCONSIRUCDONSAF€fr ANDHULTH STANMRDS, BE CilSNUCTION CONTMCTOR AWAROEO THIS PROJECTSHATT ENSURE ALI rcRKNG SURROUNOINGS AND CONOItrONSARE SANIIARY. ANOARE NOT HBRDOUS OR DANGEROUS TOTAE HATTH OR $fET OF THE rcRK CREM OR EUILOING OCCUPANTS, PRECAUNON SHALL AE EXERCISEOATAU NMES FOR THE PROTECNON OF PERSONS AND PROPERry, IIS MANOATORY TUT THE SAFEry PROVSIONS OFAPPTICAALE LOCAT LArc, OSHA R€GUUTIONS ANO BUIIOINGAND CONSTRUCIION COOES. BE OBSERVEO FOR ALI CONTRACTORS, 6, PIACE ANO CfrPACT AEOOING COURSE ON ROCK AND OTHER UNYIEIOING SARING SURFACES ANO TO FILI UMUTHfiZEO ACAVANONS. SMPE EEOUNG COURSE IO PROSOE CONNNUOUS SUPPORT FS AELLS JONTS, ANO URR€LS OF PTPES ANO FOR €tNrS. FtnilCS. ANO BOOIES OF CONOUITS. -PO- PERMNENT DIVERSIONS A PERUNENT RIrcE OR CHANNE! ORCilBIMTION RIOGE ANO CHANNEL CONSIRUCI€D ON A DESIGNED GRAOE ACROSS sroPtNG uNo. OIVERSION DIC (PERIMEIER) A OIKE OR OIKE ANO CMNNEL CONSTRUCTED ATONG THE PERIMETER OFA DISTURBEO CONSTRUCNON AREA, RIGHT.OF-MY DIVERSIONS A RIOGE OR RIDGE AND CHANNEL CONSTRUCTEO DIAGONALLY ACROSS A SLOPING ROAO OR UNLIry RIGHT.OF.WAY THAT IS SUEJECTTO EROSION, 7, PLACE ANO CSPACT FIMI SACKFIIL OF SANSFACIORILY SOIL MTERIAL TO FINAL SUBGRADE, A. STISFACTORILYSOILMTERNLS ASilO2{7SOIL CUSSIFICATION GROUPS GW, GP, GM, SW, SP. ANO SM fREE OF ROCKOR GMVEL LARGER TMN 2 INCHES 1S MM) INANY OIMENSION OEBRIS, WASTE, FROZEN MAIERhLS, VEGEIATION AND OTHER OELETERIOUS MATER. 9. UNSATISFACTORY SOIT MERBLS ASW D 2€7 SOII CUSSIfICATION GROUPS @, SC ML, MH, CL, CH, OL OH, ANO -o- ! 2, THE CONSNUCNON CONTMCTOR IS SOTELY RESPONSISIE FOR OETERMININC ALT CONSTRUCTION MEANSAND MEfrOOS THE CONSTRUCNON CONTMCTOR ISALSO RESPONSBTE FOR ALTJOB SITE SAFET !0, SUESASE ANDUSE MAERNL NAruMILY OR ARtrFICIATTY GUOEO MXTURE OF MTURAIOR CRUSHEO GRAVEL, CRUSHEO STONE, AND MruUI OR CRUSHEO $NO,ASil OM. WfrATIASI S PERCENT PASSINCA 14INCB ($MM) SIEWANO NOT ffiE MN 6P€RCENTPASSINGA NO, @05[CRilEER) SIEVE, 1 1, PROUDE APPROVEO BORROW SOII MATERhLS FROM OFF$IEffiEN SUFFICIEN]APPROVED SqI UTERIALS ARE NOT AVAUBLE FRN EXCAVANONS. OUTLEI STABILBNON SNUCruRE A SIRUCTURE OE$GNEO TO CONTRO! EROSION AITHE OUTLETOFACUNNEI OR CONOUtr, FP/\ _ ".::::l':iii - :^":- \ verizod REV,OATE REVtStON 8Y o wm4 ,A'"'^';'B!9E* Jw , ow4 ,liiJ"""!CI* Jw os15t&4 ,;',i.'5?lVE- Jw 3 @10m24 ,j"-iJEBEgE* Jw 4 @1etu4 ,Jiir'3?E9,E* Jw * 049521 NOTVATIO fOR CONSIRUCNON UNTESS SIqEO ANO STMPED CHECEO 8Y PROJECIMGRfPA PROJECTNO T, UEhE E, SAqEE M, $NqFER 15226.139 VOGUE SI'E NME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE IO NC-5024 VEBZON WREIESS SITE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE SIE ADDFESS NC HVUY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS GN.1 EVALUATION ANO UYOUT. -TO- VOGUETOWTR:, Page 100 of 198 lEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SOIL STAEILATION NOTES STANDARO EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL PUN NOTES 1. ANY AREAS ffiICHARE EXPOSED FOR LONGER THAN 4DAYSANDWLL HAVE ADDITIONAT EARTHMOVNG ACNVIES PERFORMEO SHALL BE SEEDEDWTHATEMPORARY 6RASS MIXTURE- 1, ALL SRTH CLEARING CUTS 16, ALL SEOIMENT REMOVEO FROM SMPS SHALL 8E DISPOSED OF IN THE MANNER OESCRIBED ON THE PLAN DUWNGS, APPROVED EAS OF THE APPROVED DMWNGS (STAMPED, SIGNEO AND OATEO BY THE REVIEWNG AGENCY) MUSI BE AVAIUBLE AT THE PROJECT SITE ATALL TIMES, THE REVIEWNC AGENCY SMLL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PUN PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE CHANGES, THE REVIEWNG AGENCY MAY REOUIRE AWITEN SUBMINAL OF THOSE CUNGES FOR REVIEWANOAPPROVAL ATITS DISCRETION, I9, AREASWICA ARE TO BE TOPSOILEO SHALL 8E SCARIFIED TOA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 TO S INCHES{TO l2INCHES ON COMPACTEO SOILS-PRIOR TO PUCEMENTOF TOPSOIL, AREAS IO BE VEGETATEO SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL IN PUCE PRIOR TO SEEOINGANOMULCHING, FIILOUTSLOPES SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM OF 2 TNCHESOF TOPSOtf 2- PERMANENT SOII STABIUANON WLL SE APPLIEO TO AIL AREAS UPON C@PLENON OF EARTH DISTUREANCE ACIIVITIES, PRIOR TO PERMNENTSTAEILI4NONANY SOILS WICH ARE LEFT OISTURBEOARE IO BE TEMPOMRIIY STABILIZEO TO PREVENTSOIL EROSION, 3, FOLLOWNG FINAL GUOING OF AN AREA, TOPSOIL SHALL 8E APPLIEO TO THE FINISHED GRADE AND SULL BE PERMANENTLY STABILtrEO, IN IHE EVENITHATTHE TOPSOIL IS NOT AVAIUBIE ON SITE, TOPSOIL MY AE BROUGHT IN FRW ANOTHER SITE TMT MS SEENPRE+PPROVED BYTHE LOCAL SOIL CONSERVATION DISIRICT. 4. SPRUOING SHOULO BE OONE IN SUCH A MNNER THAT SODDING OR SEEOING CAN PROCEEO WTH A MINIMUM OF ADDINOML PREPARANON OR TILUGE, IRREOUURIIIES IN THE SURFACE RESULNNG FROMTOPSOIL PUCEMENT SHOULD BE CORRECTEO ON OROER TO PREVENTFORUTION OF DEPRESSIONS UNLESS SUCH OEPRESSIONS ARE PART OF ThE 2. AT LEASTT OAYS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY EARTH OISTUREANCE ACTIVTIES, INCLUDING CIEARINGAND GRUBBING, THE OMER ANO/OR OPEUTOR SHALL INVITE ALL CONTRACTORS, THE UNOOWER, APPROPRIATE MUNICIPALOFFICIALS, THE E&S PUN PREPARER, ANDA REPRESENTANVE FROM THE TOCAT CONSERVATION OISTRICT TOANON.SITE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING 20. ATL FIIIS SMLL BE COMPACTEDAS REAUIREO TO REOUCE EROSION SIIPPAGE,SENIEMENT, SUBSIOENCE, OR OTHER REUTEO PROBLEMS. FIIL INTENDEO TO SUPPORT BUILDING, SfRUCTURES, ANO CONDUITS, ETC. SHALI BE COMPACT'D IN ACCORDANCEWTH LOCAL REqUIREMENTS OR CODES, 3. AT LAST 3 OAYS PRIOR TO SIARTING ANY EARTH OISTURBANCE ACTMNES, OR EXPANOING INTOANAREA PREVIOUSLY UNURKEO, E11 SHALL 8E NOTIFIEDATFOR THE LOCANON OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UNLIIES, 4, ALL ARTH DISTURSANCE ACTIUNES SHALL PROCEED IN ACCOROANCE WTh SEAUENCE PROVIOED ON THE PUN DMWNGS, DEVANON FROM TBE SEOUENCE MUST BE APPROVED INffiITING FRil THE LOCAL CONSERVATIONS DISTRICTOR BY THE DEPARlMENT PRIOR TO IMPL'MENTATION 5, ARASTO BE FILTEDARE TO BE CLEARED GRUBBED ANO STRIPPEO OF TOPSOIITO REMOVE TREES VEGEIANON, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECNONABLE MTERhL, 6. CLEARING, CRUBBING, ANDTOPSOILSTRIPPING SHALL BE LIMIfEOTO THOSEAREAS OESCRIEEO IN ilCH STAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE, GENERAL SITE CLEARING, GRUEEING AND TOPSOIL STRIPPINGMAY NOTCWMENCE IN ANY STAGE OR PHASE OfTHE PROJECT UNNL THE E&S SMPS SPECIfIEO BY THE AMP SEAUENCE FOR THAT STAGE OR PHASE BAVE SEEN INSTAIIEO ANOARE FUNCTIONINGAS OESCRIBEO IN THIS E&S PUN. 21, ALL EARTHEN FIILS SHAL BE PUCEO IN CfiPACTEO UYERS NOT TO EXCEED E INCHES IN THIC6ESS, 22, FILT MAERIALS SULT 8E FREE OF FROZEN PARTICTES, BRUSH, R@TS SOD, OR OTHER FOREIGN OR OBJECNOMBLE MTERIALS THAIrcULD INTERFERE WTH OR PREVENT CONSTRUCTION OF SANSFACTORY FILtS.5, MULCH WIH MULCH CONTROL NENNG OR EROSION CONTROT BUNKETS MUST BE INSTALLEOON AIL SLOPES 3:1 ANO STEEPER.23, FROZEN UTERIALS OR SOFT, MUC( OR HIGHLY COMPRESSIBTE MATERIALS SHALL NOTBE INCORPOMTED INTO FILLS, 24, FILL SHALL NOT BE PUCEO ON SATURATED OR FROZEN SURFACES. 25. SEEPS OR SPRINGS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL 8E HANOLEO IN ACCOROANCEWTH THE STANDAROANO SPECIFICATION FOR SUASURTACE ORAIN OR OTHERAPPROVED METHOO, 6. STMW MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN LONG STRANOS, NOT ChOPPED OR FINELY BROKEN, 7. AIL SOIL STOCPIIES AND EMEAN&ENTS ARE TO AE TEMPORARILY STABILtrEO, STOCKPILES ARE TO 8E AT A SLOPE OF 2:1 OR LESS ANDMAY NOT EXCEED 35 FEET. 8. ATL SEEDEO AREAS, MICH HAVE BEENWASHED AWAY SHALL 8E FILLEO, RE.SEEOEDAND MULCHEDAS SOONAS POSSIBLE, 9, STABILIANON DETAILS 26. AtL GMDED ARAS SHALL BE PERMNENTLY STASILU EO IMMEOIATEIY UPON RilCHINGFINISHEOGMDE, CUTSLOPESIN COMPETENTBEDROCKANO ROCKFITLS NEEO NOT 8E VEGETATEO, SEEOED AREAS WTHIN S FEET OF A SURFACE WATER, OR AS OTHERWSE SHOM ON THE PUN OMWNGS, SHALL 8E BUNreTEDACCORDING TO THE STANOARDS OF THIS PUN,9,1,TEMPORARY STABILtrATION SEEO frPE/RATE WNTER WHEAT. lM LBS PER ACRE 4R- WNTER RYE.1@ LBS PER ACRE{R- ANNUAL RYEGRASS. l@ LBS PER ACRE AT NO TIME SHALL CONSTRUCNON VEHICLES BE ALLOMO TO ENTER AREAS OUTSIOE THE LIMIT OF OISIURSANCE EOUNOARIES SHOW ON THE PUN MAPS, THESE AREAS MUST BE CLEARLY MRKED AND FENCED OFF BEFORE CLEARINGANO GRUBBING OPERATIONS BEGIN, 27, IMMEDIATETY AfTER ARTH DISTUREANCE ACNVITIES CEASEIN ANYAREA OR SUBARA OF THE PROJECT. THE OPERATOR SHALL STABITEE ALL DISTURBEDAREAS, DURINC NON.GERMIMTING MONTHS, MULCH OR PROTECNVE BUNreNNG SHALL BE APPTIEO AS OESCRIBEO N THE PUN. AREAS NOT AT FINISHEO GMDE. ffiICH WTT BE R4CTIVATEDWTHIN 1 YEAR MAY 8E STAEILIZEO IN ACCORDANCEWTH THE TEMPOMRY STABIT4TTON SPECIFICATIONS- THOSE AREAS ffiICH WLL 8E RilCTIVATED WTHIN 1 YEAR SHAL! BE STABILIZEO IN ACCORDANCEWTH THE PERMANENT STABIIANON SPECIFrcANONS, MULCh TPSMTE ffiEAT STMW.3 TONS PERACRE -oR- OAT STMW.3 TONS PER ACRE{R- TIMOTHY HAY.3 TONS PER ACRE 8, TOPSOIL REAUIRED FOR THE ESIABLISHMENT OF VEGETANON SffALL 8E STOCKPILED ATTHE LOCATIONIS) SHOM ON THE PLAN MAPS(S] INTHE AMOUNT NECESSARY TO CWPLETE THE FINISH GRAOINGOF ALL EXPOSEDAREATHATARE TO BE STABILEEO BY VEGETATION, EACH STOCK PILE SHALL BE PROTECTED IN THE MANNER SHOM ON TBE PLAN ORAWNGS, STOCKPILE HEIGHTS SHALL NOTEXCEEO 35 fEET. STOCKPILE SLOPES SHALL BE 2H:1VOR FLArER. FERTITIZER TPSMTE LilE TPSMTE SEEDING SUSONS: (IG2G1O).6@ LBS PER ACRE 28, PERMANENT STAEIANON IS DEFINEO AS A MINIMUM UNIFORM, PERENNIATTO* VEGETANVE COVER OR OIHER PERMNENT NON.VECETATIVE COVER WTH A DENSIfr SUFFICIENTTO RESISTACCELERATED EROSION, CUTAND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CAPABTE OF RESISTING FAITURE DUE TO SLUMPING, SLIDING, OR OTHER MOVEMENTS,AGRICULTURAL.l TON PERACRE 9, IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERING UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES POSING THE POTENTIAL FOR ACCELERATEO EROSION ANO/OR SEDIMENT POLLUTION THE EEMEN APRIT l STAND 6TO8ER 1ST MULCH SULI BE USED DURING OTHERTIMES OPEMTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTAPPROPRIATE BESI MANAGEMENT PMCTICES IO MINIMPE THE POTENNAL FOR EROSION AND SEOIMENT POLLUTION AND NOTIFY THE LOCAL CONSERVANON DISTRICTAND/OR THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT 29, E&S BMPSSHALLREUIN FUNCTIONALAS SUCH UNTILALLAREASTRIBUIARY TOTHEM ARE PERMANENTLY STABILUEO OR UNNL THEY ARE REPUCED BYANOTHER BMP APPROVEO 8Y THE LOCAL CONSERVATION OISTRICT OR THE DEPARTMENT-e.2. eEE!!4!E!IS!Aq!!E4J!9!L SEEOI HARD FESCUE. l20 LBS PER ACRE PERENNIAL RYEGRASS. S LAS PER ACRE KENTUCXY EIUEGRASS.4 LBS PER ACRE 10, ATL EUILOING MTERIALS ANO WASTES SULL 8E REMOVED fROM THE SITE AND RECYCLEO OR OISPOSEO OF INACCORDANCE WTH THE SOLIDWASTE MANAGEMENT REGUUTIONS, NO EUILOING UTERIAIS OR WASTES OR UNUSED BUITDINGMATERIAIS SHALL BE BURNEO, BURIEO, OUMPED, OR DISCURGEOAT THE SITE, S, UPON COMPLENON OF ALL EARTH DISTURBANCES ACTIVITIES AND PERMANENT STABILIATION OF ALL DISTURBEDARUS. THE OW€R ANO/OR OPERATOR SHALL CONTACT THE TOCAL CONSERVATION OISTRICT FOR AN INSPECTION PRIOR TO REMOVAL/CONVERSION OF THE E&S BMPS- MULCH LIMEI WilT STMW OAI STRAW OR TIMOTHY UY MULCHING RATE: 3 TONS PER ACRE HYORATEDLHE UTE: 2TONS PERACREFERTILIZER 1G2G1O FERTILIZER UTE: ffi LBS PER ACRE SEEOING SASON: BEMEN Ji TO 5X5 AND 8X5TO1ryI. MULCH SHALL BE USED TEMPOMRIIY DURING OTHER SASONS- I1, ALL OFF,SITE WASTE ANO SORROWARUS MUST SAVEAN EAS PUN APPROVEO BY THE LOCALCONSERVATION OISTRICTOR THE OEPARTMENT FULLY IMPLEMENTEO PRIOR TO BEINGACTIVATEO, 31 AFTER FINA! SIIE STABILIATDN MS BEEN ACHIEVED, TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEOIMENT AMPS MUSTBE REMOVEDOR CONVERTED TO PERMANENT POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MNACEMENTBMPS. AREAS OISTURBED DURING REMOVAL OR CONVERSION OF THE BMPS SHALL BE STABILIZEO IMMEDBTELY. IN ORDER TO ENSURE RAPID REVEGETATION OF DISTURBED AREAS, SUCH REMOVAL/CONVERSIONS ARE TO 8E DONE ONLY OURING THE GERMINATING SASON. 32, UPON COMPLENON OFAI! EARTH OISTURAANCEACNVITIESANO PERMANENTSTABILIATbN OF ALL OISTURMNCE ARAS, THE OMER AND/OR OPERATOR SHAII CONTACT TH€ LOCAL CONSERVATION DISTRICTTO SCHEDULEA FINAL INSPECTION, I2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THATANY MATERhL AROUGHTON SITE IS CLEAN FILL. 13, ALL PUMPING Of WATER FROM ANY rcRKAREA SBALL BE @NE ACCORDINC TO THEPROCEDURE DESCRIBED IN THIS PLAN. OVER UNDISTURBEO VEGETATEDAREAS, 14, VEhICLESANO EQUIPMENTMAY NEITHERENTER OIRECTLYNOREXITOIRECTLYFROM ANY ANOINING PROP€RNES- 15, UNTIL THE SITE IS STABILIZED, ALL EROSION ANO SEOIMENT EMPS SHALI 8E MAINTAINED PROPERLY, MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE INSPECTIONS OFALL EROSION AND SEOIMENT BMPS AFTER UCH RUNOFF EVENI AND ON A EEKLY BASIS, ALL 33, FAILURE TO CORRECTTY INSTALL EAS BMPS. FAILURE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT.UO€N RUNOFF FROM IilVNGTHE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR FAILURE TO TAKE IMMEOhTE CORRECTIVE ACTION TO RESOIVE FAILURE Of E&S BMPS MAY RESULTIN ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL, AND/OR CRIMINAL PENALNES BEINC INSTITUTED BY THE LOCAL OEPARTMENTS AS REqUIR€D.PREVENTANVE ANO REMEOIAL MAINTEMNCE rcRK INCIUDINGCLEAN OUT, REPAIR, REPUCEMENT, RE.GRADING RE-SEEDING, RE-MUICHING, ANO RE{ENIN6 MUST 8E PERFORMED IMMEOIATELY, IF THE E&S BMPS FAIL TO PERFORM AS EXPECIEO REPUCEMENTAMPS OR MODIFICATIONS OF IHOSE INSTALLEOWLL BE REQUIREO, 16, ALOGSHOWNGOATESTHATEAS SMPSffREINSPECTEDASreLLASANY DEFICIENCIES FOUNOANO THE DATE TBEY reRE CORRECTED SULL BE MINTAINEO ON THE SITE AND 8E MAOE AVAILABLE TO REGUUTORYAGENCY OFFICIATSATTHE TIME OF INSPECTION, 17, SEDIMENTTRACKED ONTOANY PUBLIC ROADWAY OR SIOEWALK SHALL BE RETURNEO TO THE CONSTRUCNON SITE BY THE OF ENO ACH rcRK DAY AND DISPOSEO IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN THIS PUN, IN NO CASE SBALL THE SEOIMENT BE WASHED, SHOVELEO, OR SffiPT INTO ANY ROAOSIDE DITCH. STORM SEffiR, OR SURFACE FPlr ^:rrrr rttrc{ r rAattttc \ verizod REV,OATE REVISION AY a o4ost2o24 diirYEREfiE* Jry 0510812024 2 w15tm24 ,;i,iJ3".IVI* Jry 3 od1ot2o24 ,;ii,H#$[* Jw 4 od1st2o24 ,Ji?^?E?E9,E* Jrv m 049521,h NOT VALIO FOR CONSTRUCNON CHECGDBYPROJECTMGR FPA PROJECTNOT T, UEHE E, BAOIEE M, SNOIFER r528.139 VOGUE SITE NAME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE IO NC-5024 VERIZON WRETESS SITE NAME NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE AODRESS: NC HW42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS GN.2 . hryi.m ^ 14 VOGUETOWIRS Page 101 of 198 REINFORCING I, ALL REINFORCING BAR DETAILS SML! CONFORM TO THE TATESTACI COOE AND OETAILINC MNUAL, A, BENDING. TACKWIOING. CUTNG OR SUBSTITUIE REINFORCING OTHERTHAN AS SHOM ONTHE CONTMCTORAWNG IS PROHIBITEO UNTESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL FOR EACH CASE IS GIVEN AY THE ENGINEER.ABBREVIATION KEY ot BW. coNc. CONT, c.J. DIA, EL, ES HORZ, IN, LLVO o.c, REINF.REA'D stM.sD. STL, U,N,O, VERT,vLo DIMETER ELEVAiON EACH SIOE DIMETER ANOsonil CENTER LINE CONCREIE coNnNuous CONTROLJOINT FUNGE FACING INSIDE FUNGE FACING OUTSIDE FEET FIELO VERIFYqLVANIZED HOREONTAL INCH LEG FACING OUISIOE LONG LEC VERNCAL DOM LONG LEG VERNCAL UP MILES PER HOUR ON CENTER REINFORCE REOUIRED stMtuR STANOARO STEEL UNLESS NOTEO OTHERWSE VERNCAI VERNCAL LEG OOM VERNCA! LEG UP 2 ALL MRS SHALL BE ASTM 4.615 GMOE & 3, PROVDE AND SCHEOULE WTH TAE SHOP ORAWNGS ALI NECESSARYACCESSORIESTOHOLOREINFORCINGSECURELY IN POSITION, O, CONCRETE SHAIL 8E CONVEYED, PLACEO ANO FINISHED IN AGOODrcRffiNLIKE UNNER, 4, CIEARANCE OF MAIN REINFORCING FROM AOJACENT SURFACES UNLESS SHOM OTHERWSE SAAI BE: IO, PRIOR TO MAreNG REPAIRS, CONTMCTOR SUTL OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM ENGINEER TOMAG PATCHES FOR OTHER THANMINOR HONEY CilBING. A, UNFORMED SURFACES IN CONTACTWTH GROUNO OR EXPOSEO TOEATHER 3" B, BONOMSURFACESOF PAOON GMDE } C, fOilEO SURfACES IN CONTACT WTH GROUNO OREXPOSEOTOffiTHER 11, CONTRACIOR TO COORDINATE REAUIREMENTS OF STRUCTUML ARCHITECTURAL. MECHANICALANO ELECTRICAIORAWNGS WTH THE INSTALUTION OF CONCRETE. ! 2. ALL MATERhIS SMIL BE STOREO TO PROTECT THEM AqINST THE ELEMENTS, .,15EARSORSMILER 1-12 2b,URSURGERTHAN6 Z' C, UTERIORWALL SURFACES Z' d, IN AIT CASES NOT LESS THAN THE MR OIAMETER, FOUNDATION AI! FOUNOATIONS SHOUTD AAR ON SOI!WTH A NOMNAL AITOWABLE SOIL EARING PRESSURE OF I,@ PSF OR BEOR@K HAND CTEANEOANO FREE OF L@SE SOIT, ffiICHEWR IS LESS, 2. AI! FOUNOATION SUBGUOES SHALL 8E WRIFIEO IN frE FIELD BY THE ENqNEER. REOUIREO INSPECNONS TAE CONTUCTOR IS RESPONSIALE FOR THE COORqNANON ANO SCHEDULING Of ALL INSPECNONS REOUIREO 8Y LOCAL ANO STATE OFFIChLS HAUNG JURISOICTION, 2. THE CONfUCTOR SULL NOTIFY EE ENqNEER S HOURS IN AOVANCE OF ACAVAtrON SEET PUCEMENTAND CONCRETE PUCEMENT. CONCRETE 1, ALLCONCRETErcRKSHALL CONFORM TO THE IATEST EDITION OF THE ACI EUILOING COOE 2. AL! CONCRETE SMIT AIAIN @ PSF COMPRESSIVE STRENGB AT2AUYS, a. MINfiW CilENTIIOUS UrERnlS CONTENI:54 !8/CU.YO. A, WfiUMMTER CEMENNNOUS UTERIAIS RANOo5t C, SIUMP UMIT: { O. AIR CoNTENT:6 PERCENT PtuS oR MINUS 1.5 PERCENT ATTHE PqNTOF OELIVERY Fq I" NqIMTWHWAGqEqE WE, 3. RilOY MU A. CqPtYfrnACFrr ACSANO ASil C&. A, WMUMTUE BEMEN INTROOUCNON Of WATERato PuctN6To BE 1-t2 H@RS. C, UINIUM CEMENfCONIENT SULL BE 5 $CKS PER CUBIC YARD O- NilUUWATER CSENT SHIL BE 6 qLLONS PERSCKOf CilENI, E, WItrUM SIUMP S CONCREE SMLL BE 3INCHESAS OEERBINED AY ASil G1{, F, ALII COICRETE EXPOSEO IO THE q@NO fiETAER SUILEE AR ENTMINEO AEMEN +51. G. OO NOT IOAD TRUCre ABOVE UED CAPAOry, APPROXIMATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SCHEDULE. RAW-AND ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 52 ITSIALUIbN OF ERGId SEDIMENfAIbT fforcsEo stTE cilrcuxo T*R FOUNOATEN ErcAVAT6X CONSTRUCTPN !CURING ITSITUT6N A GROUNDINC AT€NNA, CdCELE IISTAIUTPN I Ui SERVICE UTILITYrcRX SIT€ FEXCING '!I$ELUIEOUS OETALS EOUIilEXT U'ILIft rcRX GiOUNdNG I EOUIruENI P& EXCAVA'DX. CONSTRUCTON {MELUXEOUS OETALS COf,TROTRilOVALA FI&CIENUP LEGEND TABLE -too- PROPOSEO CdTOURS EXIStrNGCONTOURS LIUtrS OF OFruRilrcE SILT FENCE oVERHADUIUW PROPERW UNE CT FENCE rc@EN FENCE re/aorfl Ml! EEVANONS FNISAEO GMOE EIEVANONSx $5.0 4- COLOEUER CONCRENNG SMLL 8E IN ACCORO NCEWTHACS. 5. CONTUCTOR SHALI PREPARE AT LAST FOUR CONCREE TEST CYLINOERS FAq UCH OAYS POUR, CYIINDERS HLL BE PROPERLY CUREO STffiED ANDTESEOAfT I4ANOAUYS, SUWIIRESUTTS TO ENdNEER, 6.NROUGHOUT BE AOEQUATELY OAhG OU€ TOqCE59VE LOAOING CONSTRUCNON EOUIPMENT, MTERhIS OR METHOOS,ICE, MIN, SNW, EXCESSIW HilTANDFRE2ING TEMP€RATURES ARIY ORYING OUTOF i FIRSI24 HOURS SULL GUARDEO AqINST A!! SURFACES SMLL BE ESTCUREOOR PROTECTEOUSING A MEMEUNE CURINGAGENTAPPTIEOAS SOON AS FORMS ARE REMOVEO, IF MEMBUNE CURINCAGENI IS USEO qERCISE CARE NOTTO OASGE COAIING. FP/t :" I: VOGUE TOWTRS \ verizon/ REV,DATE REVtStON o o4@t&24 ;i,i^Y"'?lSI* Jw 1 owm24 ,Ji,i^yE?EgE* Jw 2 @1stu4 ,Ji,?^Y"t?EgE* Jwr oorom:r dii#8?lV,E* ryr mag&:r ,Ji?#8?E9rE* n 4! 049521 NOT VAUD FOR CONSTRUCNON UNTESS SIq€O AND STSPEO CAECGD AY PROJECTMGR FPA PROJECTNO T, UEHE E, MqEE M, $NOIFER15u.139 VOGUE SITE W€ NORTH HUDSON LAKE voaE sffi to: NC-5024 VEREON WRELESS SIIE WE NORTH HUDSON LAKE SIEADffiESS NC HV\nr42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS GN.3 5, ALL REINfORCEMENT SMLL 8E INSPECTEOANDAPPROVEO 8Y THE ENGINEER OR HIS OESIGMTE EEFOR€ CONCRETE IS 6. ToIERANC€S FOR PUCING REINFmCING SHALL BE .1/a lNcH fOR MEMEERSWThAN EFFECTIVE DEPTH OF 24INCAES OR LESS +IzINCH FOR MEMBERS WTH AN EfFECNVE OEPTB OF MORE THAN 24INCHES 7, ffiERE CdTINUOUS BARS ARE CAILED FOR THEY SHALL BE RUN CONTNUOUSIY AROUNO CORNERSANO UPPEDAT NECESSARY SPIICES OR H@COAT OISCONTINUOUS ENDS, UPS SUIL 8E { UR OUMETERS, ilR UPS MAY BE OFFSET TOAVOIO CONTROL OR CONSTRUCTION JOINTS- I Rdxotxc cilNEcTbNs !Page 102 of 198 *+'----/NgEXSNNG RESIOENIIA! autolNG (wP)*l L, ,?s,. r I I-\ll,' --lEXISIING PROPERry UNE (nP) t*"',]r",r"iE5ffi\ I UilIT I l, I l;t,ll l, ll ORNE (ryP)n I I t I-l I lr| --l\_| -- I I, ,l I I I I I I -----I l lIIIt a0'xao't2 woE. (lo.M s. FT.l rcPOSED 70tt0'CB{tUreOfErcEO COMrcUf,O6,M S. FT.'tl MOUNO AruA @AVEL ACCESS DWE !O'WOE PROPO*D 320 {'{OVEULI: I I \ sEU3uPmrrffiR \ \ -....-- EXISNNG TREELINE I I \rcsmee- g/"c ./z-z II f-__lt- I\ \ F,F.A :I VOGUETOWERS \ verizod REV,DATE REVtStON AY o @@tM4 ,d""i^Y"'""I;E* Jryt w4 ,Ji,i^EREffE* Jry 2 osls@24 d"*"^'.tRIffE* Jru 3 @rom4 ,l'"'^':'":CI* Jry @1stn24 ,Ai,i,YE'.19I* Jry EG 049521 NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCNON UNIESS SIGNEO AND STAMPEO CBECKEO 8Y: FPA PROJECTNO T, UEHE E, SAOIEE M, SANOIFER 15%.119 VOCUE StrE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE IO NC-5024 VERtrON WRELESS SITE MME. NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE ADDRESS NC HVVY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) OVERALL SITE PLAN c-1OVERALL SITE PLAN scaLE r =l@ t--------;i'1 Il Page 103 of 198 GRAOING NOTES1 THIS PUN WAS EE9g9!-9.SEE9$9rECr. EROSTONCONTRO!OEUCES o @A PREPAREO FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF VGUE. ANO EXCIUSIVELY FOR THE TRANSfEML OF THE LASEHOLO AND TBE RIGHT Of EASEMENT SAOW HEREON AND SHALL NOTBE USED ASAN EXHIBITOR EUDENCE IN THE IRANSFEML OF THE SUBJECT PROP€Rry NOR ANY PORTION OR PORTIONS TNEREOf THE CONTOURS SrcB ON THIS PdT ARE MSED ON USGS OATUM ANO HAVE A VERNCAL ACCURACY OF tZ, CONTOURS OUTSIOE IHE IMMEOUTE SITE AREA ARE APPROXIMTE THE UTIINEs SHOM HEREIN ARE MSED UPON AN ABOVE<ROUND FIETO SURVEY, THE ACTUAL UNLIfr L@AtrONS SHOULO BE FIETO VERIFIEO BY THE CONTRACTOR AEFORE ANY CONSTRUCNON AEGINS, TAERE ARE NOreILANOS WIHIN THE PROPOSED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONFfi THIS PROJECT, THE CONTMCTOR SMIL RilOWANY R@KANO/OR UNSUITABIE UTERhL TO A OEPTH OF rc (2) FEET BETOWTHE FINISHEO GRADE OR AS DIRECTEO BY TH€ SOILS ENGINEER OR THE OEVETOPER.URTBrcRKN PERNENTSTRUCTURE ARAS SMTL 8E CWPACTEO TO AMINilW Of S* OF ThE STANONO PRSTOR WIMUM MY OENSIry {ASTMHS) OR AS OIRECI€O AY THE SOIIS ENGINEER, TO CLEARING SHALL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCNON ANO UNTIT PERMANENT OROUNO COVER IS ESTA8USHEO,2. ATL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SMLL CONFORM TO IOCAL. STATE ANO 3. EROSION CONTROTMEASURESINOICATEO ON ThESE PIANS M€ET THEMINUW REQUIREMENIS AOOITIONAL REOUIREMENTS MY B€ NECESSARY AS OETERMINEO AY FIELO CONONONS OR BY THE INSPECTOR, CUNGESANO REINFORCEMENTMY AE REAUREO ffiEN FAIIURE OF THE EROSION CONTROL MASURES PERSISTS.., CONTMCTOR SUTL PROUOE OUST CONTROL NO SHAII PROECT AOJACENTSTREETS FRS ACCUMUUTION OF SOIL,5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIALE FOR MONITOBING OOMSTREAM CONDITIONS IBROUCHOUTTHECONSNUCTION PERIOOANOCLEARINGANY OEBRIS ANO/OR SEqMENT CAUSEO BY CONSNUCNON.6. CONTRACTOR SUIL UINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT ALL NMES. COMMCTOR SHALI INSPECTAND REPAIRATL EROSION CONTROT MEASURESAT THE END OF ACA DAYANDAFIER UCH UIN EVENT,7 CONTRACTOR SUIL CLAN OUTAII EROSION CONTROLMUSURES BEFORE THEY ARE rcTHIRDS FULL OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE INSPECTOR OR ENGINEER.6, CONTRACTOR IS RESPON$ELE FOR REMOVING ANY DIRT OR MUD FROM THE trRES OF ANY CONSTRUCTION VEhICLES PRIOR TO TNEIR LAUNGTNE SITE. PERUANENI SEEqNG TREES, SHRUAS. UNES A CROUNO COVERS MUICBING RIPUP DUSTCdTROL EMPOMAY UWRSIOIS PERUNEM OIWRSIONS DIVER9ON OIE (PERIMETEF) RIGHI{F.WAY BVERSIONS UNO GRABNC TREE PRESERVANON T PROTECrcN T4PORARY GUVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTUNCffi XIT OUTLET STA&LBNON STRUCruRE TEMPMRY ROCKCAECKOAM TEMPOMRY EIOCKANOCUWT INLETPROECION -rc- -PD- -o- @ B@ @ ffi THE ESCAPE Of SEOIMENT FRil THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTEO BY THE INSIATUTION OF EROSON ANO SEOIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ANO PRACTICES PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENTWTH, IMGOISIURANG ACTMN€S. PRIORTOLANDOISTURBING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEOULEA PRE.CONSTRUCTION MEETINGWTH THE ARU EROSION CONTROL/ SITE OEVELOPMENI INSPECTOR LIMITS OF GROUNO OISTURUNCE REUNVE ARU 0,59r ac o.ffir AcLIMITS OF GROUNOOISIURBANCE REUNVE ARU OO NOTHAUL EARTHrcRKCUT OFf SITE, SPREAO CUT €WNLY THROUGNOUTiHE OISTURBEO AREA PRIOR TO SEEDINGANO qAVEUNG, I I I I\\_ |_! ,+. EXISTIN6 PROPERft LINE (ryP) I II-\r ) I I EXISTING EXIStrNG DRrVE (frP) EXISIING L lrlr illtlt llltlt t! I .J \,. I . a^,rnn.\ YSSAREA - *,"r,no\ \rssrnu ! .r,.nno\ Y^ssaRa ORCRUSHER RUT SILT EXISTING FENCE PR@OSEO !20 4" IOVEULL: SELF lto,0o0 sq fT.) PROPOSEDTorto'CMIN{NKEo FENCEO COMPOUNO 6,eoo Sq FT,) BSruBED NOTCOVEREO !o xao' r exrsrrnc\ YassaREA .l i freE [qo l,mHII SLOPEop) PROPOSED UfEtrNruBACE EXISlING TREELINE(ftP) PMVIDE 4'TCRUSAED GMVEL (TO EITENO T2'OUTSIEOf FENCEI STH ffiAFI6@XqEdABrcUNOEUIMEN' frrcUq@T FENCEO COMP@TO FPlt -'l "'-:'.:':iii:': . ^":-: VOGUETOWFRS \ verizod REV.DATE REVISION BYo re624 ,Ji,?,Y3?EgE* Jry 1 oM24 ,Ji,i,E?EffE* Jry 2 @1w. ,;ff"':""ICI* Jw off@a4 ;i,i.Y5?lSI* Jry @r@24 ,;i,i^Y"'?EVE* Jry E o49521 NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCNONUNL€SS SIGNEDANO STMPEO CHECKED BY PROJECTMGR T UEHE E, BAUEE M, SNDIFER 15228.139 V@UE SITE WE NORTH HUOSON LAKE v@uE srE to: NC-5024 VEREON WRELESS StrE WE: NORTH HUOSON LAKE SIE AOORESS: NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN c-2 NOTES NO SCALE 2 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN scaLE r _& l_____i_i 1 I I ', I I I ACCESS ROAD TO AE IMPROVEO AS NEEOEO I I I I \ ii i1 {c i ,t 3 t Page 104 of 198 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. S€E SURVEY FOR LUSE ARU BOUNOARY, lEqL OESCRIPNd, EXISIINGCONT@RS ANO AOOINOML SITE INFORMAIIq,Z ONAGE TOAU UNUNES,6NO. ACCESS AREAS ANO PROPERfr OF OTHERS OISTURBEO DURING CONSTRUCNON SHALL 8E RETURNEOTOTHE ORIGINAL CONOITION AITHE CffPENON OF THErcRK3, THE CONTRACTOR SHAIT COORDIMTE WIH THE LOCAT POreR ANO TELCO UTIINESANO THE CONSTRUCNON MAMGER TO CONFIRM THE SOURCE OF SERUCE, PRIOR TO THE INSTAIUTION OF ANY CONDUITS.4, THE CONTRACTOR SMIL INSTAII THE POffR AND TELCO SERVICE UNOERGROUNO TOTHE EAUIPMENTAS SHON ON BE ETECTRICAL PUN.5. REMOVE ANY EXISNNG WGETANON ANO ORGANIC MATERhLS FRil THE TOffR COMPOUNO,6, REGMDE AROUNO NE EAUIPMENI AS REqUIREO TO ALIOW A WUW { OF PAOTHrcXNESS EXENUNGABOVE THE FINISHEO GUWL SURFACE. REPUCE GMWL AROUNO PAOATTHE CfrPIENON OF INSTAIUTION.7- ALL ffiKSAALL 8E MNE INA SATISFACTORY ANO PRtrESSIOMLrcRMNUre MANNER. ALLrcRXSHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION DURING CONSTRUCNON AND FIMLAPPROVAL 8Y TAE CONSTRUCNON MAMGER,E, ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OF UTERIALS, EOUIPMENT. OR OEUATIONS FROM THE OESIGN PUNSOR SPECIFICANONS SHAL! 8E COORDINATEOAND APPROVEO BY THE CONSTRUCNON UMGER.9. COIOR SEIECTION FOR PAINTEO ITEMS SUTT BE UOE BY THE CONSTRUCTION SNACER.iO- THE Cq]ilClffi SMLL TIEIO WRIFY ALI UISTING DUENSIONS ANO CONMONS SHOW PRIOR TO 610 SUEMNAL, ANY CONFUCTS, OSCREPANCIES, ERRffiS, ANO/OR OMISSIONS SULL A€ EROUGHTTOfrEAIENTION OF IHE CONSTAUCNd UMGER,11. CONfMCfOR SHAI! CONTACTA SUESURfACE UTIUTIES LOCATOR FOR EUCI IOCATPNS OF ALL EXISNNG UTIUTIES WTHIN OISTUREEOAREAS PRIOR TOTHE CWMENCEMENT OF CqSTRUCTION ACTIVMES. CONTMCTOR SAALL VERIFY THE TOCATIONS OF EXISNNGUTILINES BY OIGGINGA TEST PIT.AS NECESSARY- TBE TOCATIONS OF EXISflNGUTIINES SHOM ON THESE PUNSAREAPPROXMTEANOARE FOR PUNNING PURPOSES ONLY,I2. THE CONTRACTOR SUII PROUOEANY NECESSARY PROTECNON FOR EXISTING UTITIIES OURING CqSNUCTION,r3, THE CdTRACTOR SMIL MNTANA CLAN SETOF CONSMUCNON OMWNGS AT THE SITE FOR THE PURPOSE Of OOCUMENNNGASUIIT CONOIIIONS ANO OEVhTPN9 FRq IHE ORIOML DESICN, TH€ REDLINED ORAWNG SHAII 8E TURNEO OVER TOTHE CONSTRUCTION UNAGERAT THE COMPLEIION OF IHE PROJECT.I4. THE CONTRACTOR SMLL SECURE ANO PAY FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS TOR THIS PROJECT FROM ALL APPLICASLE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. CONTRACTORSHAI AE RESPONSISLE FORABIOING BY ALITHE CONOITIONS ANO 15, THE CONTMCTOR SHALL PROTECT ALT SURVEY STATIONS AND CONTROI POINTS DURINGCONSTRUCNONAND SUIL RE.ESTABTISBANY OISTURBEDCONTROL POINTS,16, ALL rcRK SAAU 8E OONE IN ACCORDANCEWTH THE GOTRNINC I6AL BUIIBNGCOOEANOELAPPLICAELEMENNENTS, THECqTRACTOR SHAI! COOROIMTEWTH IHE LOCAT @VERNING OFFICHT FOR L&A! BUIIO CODE REAUIREMENTS, 1 7, THE CONTRACTOR SHALT VIStr THE PROJECT SITE ANO FAMILIARtrE BIMSELF WTHAlL EXENNGCONOITIONS INCTUOING STEACCESS PRIOR IO BID SUAMIIAL, ANY CMNOES DURINC CONSTRUCNON OUE TOAN EXISTING CONOITION ffiICH IS VISUALLYASCERTAINABTE PRIOR TO BIO SUBMINAL, CANNOT BE USEO AS THE BASIS FORA CAANGE OROER,16. THE CONTRACTOS SMIL BE RESPONSISLE FOR REMOUNG ALL WASTE DEBRIS AND WGEIANON FROMTHE SITE, BURNT ANO/OR BURNINGOF WASIE UTERhLS IS NOT ACCEPTABTE,I9, IOER ANO TOER FOUNUTIONS ARE SHOM Fffi ILIUSTMTIVE PURPOSED ONLY, BEFORE IHEANIENNAS, rcUNIS OR CASL€SARE PUCEO THE TOMR MUST AEAUIYZEOFq BE PROPOSED LOADS 8Y A TEENSED SIRUCTUMI ENCINEER (BY OTHERS)- INSTALLAII ANTENNAS ANO OTHER TOER{OUNTEO EQUIPMENTIN ACCORMNCEWTH THE TOtrR ANALYSIS REPORT,A, CONRCTOR SHAII NOT USE IAE EAUPMENT ARq FOR STORAGE Of TOOLS OR CONSTRUCNON MATERI&S. 21. PRoVIDE oNE 0 ) slGN, e x1 2', mlTE BACKGROUND WTH 4 BUCK LErERS To INCLUOE 1, E.gI1 STREETAOORESS INSTALL SIGN ON SITE UIN qTE USING ALUMINUM H@ RINGS, TOtrR OMER TO FURNISHANO INSTALTAOOMOML SIGNAGE AS REOUIREO 8Y CONSTRUCTION HMGER, REFER TOTOWR MER ANO CARRIER SPECSAS NEEOEO -+' - usf,Nc\ \esseau r UrSrrre\ YssaFa\ \-1 \ \ lo xao' ruRIAROUND AEA I I \ I I \ I ! \ I \ I2'MDEMVELACCESS DRVE ABC ORCRUSTER RUN FUTURE LEASE AREA (BY OTHERS) FUTUREqRRER TUSEARil (AY OTHERS) FUTURE CARRIERIUSEARA {BY OTHERS) --l- LEG A J2o a- \ \ SELF SUPPORTI \ PROPOSEO i 3O'WOEaccEss/unLtw EASEMENT FUruRE CARRIER LASE ARA (BY OTHERS) PREOSEO FIEERSANO HOLE OR AS REQNEO BYFIBERCOFAIY j - -'- - EXISING\ \uss raee CABINETORAS REOUIEO gYPOWERCOMPNY 70t70 CBdN{INXEDfENCEO COMPdNO (a,mo SQ. FT.)PROPOSED4[ PR@OSEO IO'EdPTENT fi+ME PrcPOSED IOO'XIOO'LASEAREA o!.00 sa FT.) PROPOSED EQUPreNT CABfl ET HPA ": VOGUETOWFRS \ verizon/ DATE REVISION BY o 046/12. ,,1",iJ"'",Iy#* Jrv r orum4 ,#,iJ"tD"EgE* Jry 2 @1:m4 ,3"nin'otRESE Jw 3 ryrw4 di,iJEREffE* Jru 4 61 em24 ,4,1"'A'"I$E* Jw & 049521 NOT VALIO TOR CONSTRUCNON UNLESS SIGNEDAND STAMPED cHECTOSY PROJECTMGR T, VIEBE E. MDIEE M, SANDIFER 1 5224.1 39 VOGUE SITE NAME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SITE lDl NC-5024 NORTH HUOSON LAKE SITE ADORESS: NC HVU/42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES & COMPOUND IAYOIJT c-3 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES NO SCALE 2 COMPOUND LAYOUT scAL€ I =20 t-i 1 L-OUTSIDE Of LEASE ARA (0oo SA, FT.) Page 105 of 198 NOTE SECNONS OF THE ORIVEWAYWLI HAVE CROS$SIOPE ON FULIWDTH IOWAROS O(M HILL OIRECTIONAL FLOWFOR PROPER OMINAGE 1ZO',MtN. HrHlEelq_=EXISTINGroNOTES 1. ROAO CROSS SECTION VARIES, CONTRACTOR SHALT REUEW GRAOING PUN FOR CROSS SLOPEAREAS, MINIAIN AMINIMW 2t CROSS SLOPE, 2, MINIMW 3'rc GRAVEL (RO[EqCOMPACT€O) TOPPEO WTH MINIMW ?'CRUSHER RUN (RO!IEO, MIRAEI, MIMFYGEO FAARrc/FITER FA6RIC) 3. AOOINOML ffi7 GRAVEI (ROTIED) IF OETERMINEO BY CONSTRUCIION MMtrR TU]SIECONqTPNS REAUIRE IT FILL a" BACSILL BLANKETEOGES INSTATL EEGINNING OF ROLL IN 6 IN,I 6 IN ANCHOR TRENCH, STAPLE AACKFILLAND COMPACT SOIL f- L -t RECOMMENDED FOR STEEPNESS ANO LENGTH OF SIOP€ BEING SIANGTED THE BUNKET SHOULD NOT BE STRETCHED: lT MUSTMINTAN GOOO solL coNlAcT OWRUP AUNreTENDS6 IN, MIN, WTH THE UPSLOPE BUNreO OWRLYINGTHE rcMSIOPE EUNGI {SHINqE SWIE), STAPLE SECURELY, lqEq 1, SEEO ANO SOIL MENOMENTS SHALL 8E APPIIED ACCOROING TO THE RATES IN IHE PUN DRAWNGS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE BUNKET, 2, PROUOE ANCHOR TRENCH AT TOE Of SLOPE IN SfiIUR FASHION AS AT TOP OF SLOPE, 3. SLOPE SURfACE SMU BE FREE OF R@KS, CLOOS, SNC6, ANO GUSS, ., 8UNreT SHAIL MW GOOO CONTINUOUS CONTACT WTH UNDERLYING SOIL THROUGHOUT ENIIRE LENCTH, UY 8LANreT I@SELY ANO STAre OR STAPLE IO MAINTAIN DIRECT CONIACTWTH SqL OO NOI STRETCh BUNreT, 5, ThE BUNreT SHAII 8E STAPLEO IN ACCOROANCE WTH THE MNUFACTURER'S RECfrMENOATIONS, BUNKETEDAREAS SHALL 8E INSPECTEDWEKIY ANO AFTER EACH RUNOFF EVENT UNNT PERENNhL VEGETATION IS ESTASLISHEO TOA MINIMUM UNIFORMTO* COVEUGE THROUGHOUTTHE EUNKETEO AREA, OAMAGED OR DISPUCEO SUNKETS SHAIL BE RESIOREOOR REPLACEDWTHIN 4 CALENOAR OAYS, FPlt -: "..:i:::':iiil'- ^::: VOGUFTOW[:RI; \ verizon/ACCESS DRIVE DETAIL NO SCALE 2 WRE FENCE AEBIND fABRIC MAINTENANCE: !, INSPECTURRIERSATTHE ENDOF EACHrcRreNG OAY OR AFTER EACH MIN AND REPAIR OR CLEAN AS NECESSARY,: 2. RErcVE SEOUENI FR@ BNRIER WENItqfll8ps FULL. 3- OSPOSE OF SEOIMENT SO TMT IT WIL NOT ENTERB€ EARRIERAilN NO STSIIEEWTA VEG€TATION. POSTS 4, REPUCE fILER FASRIC MEN OEERIOUTEO, 5, OESIGN LIFE OF A SYNTHETIC SILT FENCE ISAPPROXIMTEIY 6 (SX) MONTHS, 6, MAINTAIN UNTIL THE PROJECT IS VEGETATEO OR OTAEAWSE SIAAILZEO, REMOVE BARRIERS ANO ACCUMUUIED SEOIMENT ANO STAAILZE THE EXPOSED AREA WEN THE PROJECT IS STABIttrED, OATE REVtSION 8Y o w@M4 ,;i,i,'ED"ESE* Jru 1 ost@D@4 ,Jii^Y.to"E9,E* Jw 2 os15tm4 ,:||-YEBI9,E* Jw 3 61@@r ,l'"i"'"'""ISI* Jw 61em24 ,Ai,',"Y:".iS[* Jry OG 049521 SEDIMENT FENCE NO SCALE J EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NO SCALE 1 NOI VALID FOR CONSTRUCNON UNLESS SIGNEOANO STMPED CHECreO BY PROJECTMGR: FPA PROJECTNO T UEHE E. BAOIEE M. $NOIFER 1524.139 VO@E StrE N&E NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE StrE IO NC-5024 VERZONWRELESS Str€ WE NORTH HUOSON LAKE SIE AOmESSI NC HVU/42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS c-4NOT USED NO SCALE 6 NOT USED NO SCAIE NOT USED NO SCATE 4 7. Page 106 of 198 .+E GREEN GhNT s(ryP -rl PNESTMW MLCH . !" OF CLEAN STMW THR@GHOUTfrE LANDSCAPE BUFFER OWASARAORVIIAE {NP PROPOSED i5',X70'.I I.o@o-s- a--a -s -o- \ I I \ I I \ I I ar'& ! !SEE SHEETC.S FOR EOUIPMENT UYOUT \\ ( t i ! 320 {" PROVtOE4'j157 CRUSBEO 6MVEL {TO EIEND I2' OUTSIE OF FENCE) Wff MIUFI6OOX GEOFABRC 1 IOVEULL:l2a'a') \ sEu suPrcFr UNDERUYffiNT ftROUGBOUIBE FENCEOCOMPOUNO PROPOSEO SECURITY FENCE ZONE OB PLANT SZE MATURE StrE N G10 13 CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANOil LEYUNO CYPRESS 5 MIN. 1-1D"@ PLANTING/OS' HEIGHT, !5'.A'SPREAD EWRGREEN TREE N s THUJA OCCIOENTATIS.TECHNY'OFEEN OANTARBORUTAE 5 MIN, 1-112-@ PTANTING/ MIN. CATIPER EVERGREEN TREE N 2-7 6 JUNIPERUS COMMINUS COMMON JUNIPER 5125 HElCnT, 3!12 SPREAO EWRGREEN SHRUE 2-1 THUJA OCCIOENTALIS.LIME GIANT OWARF ARBORUTAE IHREE GATLON MIN. O PIANTING 3'{ HEIGHT, 35 SPREAO EVERCREEN SHRUA SYMEOL KEY N = NAnVE PUNTOF NORTH AMERICA PINESTRAWMULCH- 3" SETLED UYERS OF CLEAN STRAW t. *lu ,.12- MIN, CALIPEF AND 'MIN, HEI6HTAT PUNTING RUBBER HOSE PLY, COLOR BUCK 3) I6 RUSTPROOF CAATE SECUREDTOTREEW SINGLE LOOP '10 WRE ENCASED IN AU88ER HOSE R€MOVE ONIY 16OF BURUP FRW R@TBATT 4TAIL $"DIA.EARTH $UCER TO REIAINM€TAL FUG 1"fr3q REOrcOO STAreS PIACEO IT' APART SHREDDED BARKMULCH TOPSOIL TAMPEO FIRM TO PUNNNG NOTES:1 ALI PUNTS MUST AE HEALTHY, UGOROUSMATERIAL, FREE OF PEST AND OISEASE,2. AL! PUNTS MUST BE COMAINER-GROM M AALLEO ANO EURUPPEO AS SPECIFIEO,3- ALT TREES MUSl gE STRAIqT TRUNreD, FUIL HEAOEO ANO MEET ALT REOUIREMENTS SPECIFIEO.4, ALT PUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ilE OMERS REPRESENTATIVE EEFORE, DUFING, ANO AFTEF INSTAILATION,5. ALI TREES MUSI BE GUYEO OR STAKED,6, ALT PUNIS ANO PLANTING AREAS MUSf 8E CdPTETETY MUTCHED AS SPECIFIEO.7 PRIOR IO CONSiRUCNON, THE CONTRACTOR SMLT AE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ATT UNDERGROUND UNLIIES AND SBALLAVOID OMAGE TOALL UNUTIES DURING COURSE OF rcRK THE CONTRACIOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRINGALT OAMAGE TO UILIIES,6. THE CONTRACIOR IS RESPONSISTE FOR FULLY ffiINTAINING ALL PUNNNG AREAS ONCLUOTNG. AUT NOT IIMIED IO WATERiNG, SPRAYINC, MUICHING, fERNTBTION, EIC,) UNNTruErcRKIS FULLY ACCEPreO,O. THECONTRACTORSHALLCOMPLETELYGUARANTEEALLPUNTMATERIALEORAPERIOOOF(I) ONE YEAR EEGINNINGATfrE OATE OF TOTAT ACCEPTANCE. THE CONTMC]OR SAATT PROMPTLYUre AIT REPUCEMENTS BEFORE ORATTHE ENO OT THE CUAUNTEE PERIOD. 10, frE OMER'S REPRESENTANVE SLT APPROVE frE SIAreO I@ANON OF AIL PUNT MESUL PRIOR TOINSTALUTION,1I, AFTERBEiN6DUGATTHENURSERYSOURCE,ATLTREESINTEAFSHATTBEACCUMUUEOFORM (2) WEKS UNDER A MIST SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALUTION, 12, ANY PUNT MATERIAI THAT OIES, TURNS BRM OR OEFOTUES 1PRIOR TO TOTAI ACCEPTANCE OF AErcRrc SHATT BE PROMPTLY REMOVEO FFq THE SIIEANO REPUCEOWTH MERhI OFilE SAME SPECIES. OUANNfr, SEE ANO MEETING ALI SPECIFrcANONS, 13, STANDAROS SEI fORIH IN "AM€RICAN STANOARO FOR NURSERY STOCK" LATEST EDItrON REPRESENIS GUIOETINE SPECIFICANONS ON!Y AND SHATL CONSNTUTE MINIMUM OUALIIY REOUIREMENTS Fq PLANT MATERIALI', AtL REOUiREOTREE PROECTION MEASURES SULL BE INSTALLEO PRIOR TO GRAOING OR 15, UNDISTURBEO BUFFERS SHALL 8E REPUNTED TO BUFFER STANDAROSMERE SPARSETY WGETAIEO OR WERE OISTURBED ATAPPROVED UTILIil CROSSIN65. R€PLANTING IS SUBJECT TO COUNN ARBORIST APPROVAL16. TREES TO 8E A MINIMUM OF 5 IN HEIGHT AT TIME OF PUNNNG- VOGUE TOVVFRS cMr^l@^. fr s7.@ \ verizod REV OATE REVISION BY o re/&2. ,;i,i^Y5?I$E* Jry o5J@4 ,;ii"y3""ISE* Jw 2 o5lstt24 ,Ji,i#3?E9,[* Jw 3 61@24 ,Ji,i^!"to"EgE* Jry 4 @1s@21 .Ji,i^i3?EffE* Jw s tt,nz4 ,Jii,uo'?E9,E* Jw PLANTING NOTES AND DETAIL NO SCALE 1 !.9!ES I, BARRIERS SHALL gE INSTATLEOALONG THE OUTER EreE OT AND COMPTETELY AROUND TAE CRITICAT ROOT ZONES OF ALL SPECIMEN TREES, OR OTHERWSE OESIGNATEO TREE PROECNVEZONES.2, ATLEUFfERSANONEESAW AREASARE TO BE CLEARIY IDENTIFIEOWTH FUGOING ANO/OR FENCING PRIOR TO CfrMENCEMENT OF ANY UND OISTURSANCE,3, ALL IFEE FENCING SHALL AE MAINTAINED THROUGffOUT THE IAND OISTUFBANC€ ANO EUITOING CONSTRUCT@N ANO SHOUTO NOT BE REMOVED UNTII ALI CONSTFUCNONANO LANOSCAPING IS COMPLETE,{. CEISAPPROXIMTLYl'OFMOAL OISTANCE FOR EVERYI'OF TREE'S OBH (O'MIN),5, IBEREWLLBENOEURNINC OR BURIAL OF OEERIS ON SITE. POTYETHYLENE --i r\ti \ii AREA" SINAGE €VERYT' (nP) 'l I t I rencr ro.rrcr -l{LMITS OF CRITICAL ROOTZONE) NOI VALIO FOR CONSTRUCNON UNLESS SIGNED ANO SIMP€O CHECGO BY PROJECTMGR FPA PROJECTNO' T, UEHE E, BAOIEE t522a 139 VOCUE SIIE MME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE StrE IO NC-5024 VERIZON WRELESS StrE NNE NORTH HUDSON LAKEslE aOORESST NC HW/42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) LANDSCAPING PLAN L-1 LANDSCAPING PLAN SCATE 1" = 20 t:i-'J TREE PROTECTION DETAIL (AS NEEDED)NO SCALE 2 ROWS OF NEW LEYUNO \ 3 PR€V€NTTREE SENLEMENT ta Page 107 of 198 TOP Et. @ 325',{6' LIGHTNING FUSH HEAD LGNNNG PER TOP E!. e3&{ PROPOSEO VERIZON ANTENMS SPECTTAnONS MOUNT CENTER e 315r0', A FUURE CARRI€R I8Y OTHERSI V uourt cexrea o ma" A FWURE CARRIER I8Y OfrERS)Y uortcerr:a o as'r A FFURE CARRIER IBY OTHERSIV uourtceum 6 zro+ ,t ,t PROPOSED FMAPPROVED SDE MAreR UGHTING PER MNUfACIURER'S {ovEMLL:326',{)SELF SUPPORT TOWER PROPOSED HYB&O CABIE(S} ROUTED UP TOWER PROPOSED rcE BruOGE FINISHEO ELEV - o{- (514 AMSL) PROPOSED ErcSSON AF6419AilIENNA ITYP POSITPN 2 EACH SECTOR, 1 PER SECIOR IOTAL OF 4' I.J EIP "l ANTENtrA (TP POSMON 1 frO I ilCH SECIOR,2 PER SECTOR, TOIAL OF 8I PROPOSEO EruCSSON LEG Amuaa9o {ryP l PER SECTOR, TOIALOF ') EI PROCOSEO COWSCOPERR+A2IMU rcUNT (TYP I PER SECIOR, TOTAL Of ') B€TA SEC, PROPOSED EECSSONBU (IO {IYP 1 PENSECIOR. IOTAL tr ''02 B2 OELTA SEC SIIEPROl VFAE{O (fr APPROVEOEautvaLENr) ltP a sEcToRs) CWP SET lslIEPRol PffiTr:DCPlaX IOR fPROVED EAUNAENI) DI STD PIPE MOUNT $ L G2 PIPE MOUNTXITW I"X96" PIPE SITEPRoI PART /:SP2i936H loR VOGI-]E'r(JwIR:; \ verizon/ DATE REVtStON 8Yo rretu4 .Ji,i,'3?[fl8* JTV t offiazo24 ,d"^ir,'"t?E9,E, Jrv @15m24 ;""i"'X""iY,E* Jw @1@24 ,.1'.i"""'?:Y#* Jry od1ilN24 rJi,"^'"t?E9,E* Jrv ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN NO SCALE 1 ,SEE LATEST RFDS FORE'MUIH INFORMATION AT TIME OF SUILO LEG ANTENNA CABLE EXISNNG OR CENTER MECH. TILT ELEC, TILT MODEL NUMB€R PROPOSED frAWREI€SS. MX6FHGE6CHC o'315r0'0"2' o) coMMscoPE-(2) eDREW-1&d HYSRID CAALESERTCSSON - AtR541S o'315-0"0'3'ERICSSON. RRU 44$ PROPOSED o'315{-0' a BI PROPOSEO JMAWreIESS- U06FHG86'HC 90'315:0"0'2', SHAREOWIB 82 PROPOSEO ERICSSON " ARA19 9o'315 0"o'3'ERICSSON, RRU 44$ a3 PROPOSEO M WREIESS. MX6TB@'HG s'315:0"0' G]PBOPOSED l 80'315{"0' G2 PROPOSED ERTCSSON - 4R6419 180'315-0 0'3'ERICSSON. RRU44S G3 PROPOSED JUUfftESS- g6fH@tHG 80'315q o' c ot JM WREIESS " MX6FHGS'HG 3r5{"o'2' o2 ERICSSON -A1R6419 210'315{"3'ERTCSSON - RRU44$ D3 PROPOSED 210'315{"o' lgrEs 1, CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAT CONSTRUCTION REOS FOR AL! RF OETAILS, 2, ANIENMANO RRH MOOELS MAY CHANq OUE TO EAUIPMENTAVAWILIB' AlI EQUIPMENT CNGES MUST 8€ fPROVEOANO REMIN N CqPUNCE WTH THE PROPOSEO OESIGN AND STRUCTUML AWYSES, NOT VALID fOR CONSTSUCTION UNTESS SICNEO ANO STAMPEO chEcreo aY PROJECTM6R I.VIEHE 6. a^DtEE M, SANOIfER 152A,1X5 VOGUE SIIE NME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SIIE ID NC-5024 VERIZON WRELESS SITE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE AODRESS NC HW/42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) TOWER ELEVATION & ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN s-1 TOWER ELEVATION NO SCALE J ANTENNA SCHEDULE NO SCALE 2 B3 GIG3 la MWEIESS- W6FH66H( frA WRETESS. MXO6f HGA6'H( IM WRELESS. B6FHG6'H( Page 108 of 198 t, t- \ reMTIffioL& REQUIRED ,.. I l, l.I @ VOGUEIOV,/[ R5; !6" Oh. TRUSS 1r/4" OlA. HORUONTAL PIPE BRACE AT TOP (frP)? MESH, 12 qUGE WRE FENCING(TP)BARBEOWR€ (NP)w4URNSUC&E lN SOTH PUNES ATCORNERS (NP)x-x-x x-x-x -x x-xx-x x x x x x x x-x -x- STRETCH 8AR }IZ M, CORilER POST (ryP) SNETCH UR CONNECTOR PROUDE 4MIN. ATENOS (WP) 1Nl4 DIA, HORE. PIPE BMCE BOTH PUNES ATCORNERS (ryP) 4" THICKSYER OF6TINCh STONE THROUGHOUI CilPOUNO ]d oh. TRUss Roo w[URNBUCKLE ATqrE PosT (frP) AA' DIA- TRUSS ROD WTURNBUCIEAT OOUELE SWNG eTE (frP) DIA. PIPE GATE fINA! GRAOE 17 MUGE TENSION WRE IN 2iz'otA. UNE PosT(ilP)@PStPLANES ATCORNERS (ilP)11/? oh. qTE @ PSI CAST]N.PUCE CONCRETE FOOTING (WP. FOR LINE POSTS) i (MlN) (ryP)100x2{ coNcRETE MUSHROOM STOP BASE CONCRETE FOOTING(WP FOR CORNER & GATE POSTS) FENCE DETAILS INSIDE OUTSIDE COMPOUNO FENCE LINK FENCE FENCE NOTES: 1, TENCING MTERIAIS ANO BARBEO WRE SHAII 8E GALVANEEO STEE!,PROVIDE DOT67 GRAVEL THROUGHOUI COMPOUNO (nP) 2. POSTS, BRACES, AND qTE FRAMES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 4 PIPE, SIZES SPECIFIEO ARE NOMINAI DMETER, 3, DOUBTE SWNG qTE SMLL BE PROUOEO WTH IUBUUR PIUNGER BARS, 1 IOCKKEEPER, l LOCKreEPER GUIOE,2 UTCH fORKS,2 FORKCATCHES 1 CATCh fOR BE PTUNCER MR, ANOgTE STOPS PROVIOED FOR THE OPEN ANOCLOSEO POSINONS TOCATEOAS DIRECTEO BY THE CONSTRUCtrON MMGER, COORDIMTE LOCKWPE ANO reY/CWBIMTION WTH THE CONSMUCNON MMGR 4, ATL POSTS CAPS ANO OTHER NECESSARY FENCE FIMNGSANOMROMR€ SMTL BEAS ENUFACruRED BY BE FENCE MNUFACTURER OR EOUAL, AINCS SMLL BE OLVANEED S]EET, PROVIOE MIUf IOX GEOFABRIC OR EOUA! UNOERUYMENT THROUGHOUT FENCED COMPOUND 5. LINE rcSTS S&L AE SPACED EOUIqSTAffi, A[ rcI rcREMN |qf ONCENER. NOTES: I, INSTATTMIMFIGEtrABREffiH 16'UN.UP JOMSONFUT HORPONTA! SURFACESOR PER THE MNUFACTURER'S SPECIFrcANOf, S FOR SI@EO SURFACES.6. FOUNOANONS ARE OE$AEO TO EMBEO INTO CdPAC]EO COARSE SANO, MEOIUM SNFF CUY. OR URO DENSE CUY. THE SqT TPE SULL 8E WRIFIEO IN BE TIELD PRIOR IO CONSNUCTPN, IF UNUSUAL CONOMONS ARE FOUNO lHE ENGINEER SULL BE NONFIEO PRPR TO CONSTRUCNON. 2, IEVEI ANO CfiPACT GRAVEL TO PREVENT SHIFTING, COMPOUND EDGE DETAIL7, FENCE OETAIS SHOM EOVE ARE WPICI AND SMtt APPLY TO StnUB CONSnUCION APPITAnOf,S WEfiER SPECIFICALLY STAEO OR NOT, F.PA- ':'^I: VOGUE IOWFRS \ verizon/ OATE REV|StON 8Y o w@4 ,;i,i^YE""I$E* n1 oslw4 ,Ji,i-'5?FS!* Jw 2 @1:rc4 ,Ji,i.'5REffE* rw3 @1cm4 ,A,|Y:BI$I* Jry @t1912024 &l 049521 NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCNON UNLESSSIGNEDAND STAMPED CHECGD BY PROJECT MGR FPA PROJECT NO T. UEHE E, BADIEE M. SANOIFER 152U.139 VOGUE SITE NME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SIIE ID NC-5024 VERIZON WRELESS SITE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE AOORESS NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY) FENCE DETAILS s-2FENCE DETAILS NO SCALE 1 x-x rclMOilV --E@;-E;;.ffie- Page 109 of 198 !@ 'rl LIGHTING D ! ! SUPPRESSEN AMONITORING TOGAOUNO R@(ryP) POST (TYP) GANG METER PANEL INSTALLEO BY CONTFATOR. COOROINATE WTHI@AL UII(ry PROVOER FOR MANUFACTURER ANO MOOEI NUMBER MOUNT PSOTOCEtL FOR TOMR LIGHTING SYSTEM 2 AAOVEUT[Iry RACKFACING NORTH !gES- ^ {-,-l (FIELO VERIFY)CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD LOCAI€ THE METER PEDESTALAS SHOM ON SITE PLAN, INSTALT THE METER PEDESTAL NAR THE PERIMETER OF T8E FENCED COMPOUNDWTH IHE METERS FACING THE FENCE,ENO 2, THE CONTRACTOR SUIL COORDIMIE WTH THE L@AL UNTIry CWPANY FOR IHE CONDUIT RUN TO THE MAIN SERVICE CONNECTION ORIUNSFORMER tz o.D. scH &NE CONTRACIOR SMTL C@RDIMTE WH THE !@AL UTIIIW CilPANY FOR THE GROUNO ROO REOUIREMENTS, IF REOUIREO, THE CONTRACTOR SAAL! OROER ANO PAY FG NECESSRY GROUNDESTS, 4, SUPPORT POSTS ANO UNISTFUIS SUU BE qLVANEEO. PIPE CLSPS ANO HAROWARE SHALT AE GAIVANEEDOR STAINIESS STEEL, AOJUSruENTS TOTHE METER P€O€STAL OESICN MAY BE REOUIRED OEPENOING ON THE EUCT M6IER PANELINSIALLEO. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELO COOROIMTE AOJUSilENTSAND INFORM THE ENGINEER IF ANY UNUSUALCONOITIONSARE FOUNOTOEXIST, UNISTRUT 6, REFER TO ELECTRICAI SAEETS FOR ADOiNONAL EOUIPMENTINFORMANON, END CAP (BP) 'E PIM UNISTRUTATACHED W STANDARO PIPE CLAMP (ryP) a t UNISTAUT PIPgCONOUIT CUMP P1119 OR P6ffi (qrv.) (IP) FOLLOW UNUFACTURER RECOMMENDANONSFOR BOLT TOROUE 3 1/2" O.O. SCH & SUPPORT PIPE t?SECTION A CONCREE POSTfOONNC(rP) (s PSr MtN) 14" O FRONT EPA ;: @;;r;;.;;;; VOGUEIOWERS \ verizon/ REV,OATE REVTStON 8Y o @@/a24 ,J""i"'EBE9,E* Jw 1 wm24 ,Jii^'jo"EfiE* Jry 2 @1w1 ,;"""*'^tBEgE- Jw @1cml ,;i,i.Y:',i#- Jw 4 ar9@4 ,;i,i,"E".IYE* n @t trlrtlra 04952',| NOT VAUO FOR CONSIRUCNq UNL€SS SIGNEO ANO ST&PEO CHECGOBY PROJECTMGR FPA PROJECTNO 1 VIEHE E BAOIEE 15228.139 VOGU€ SITE NAME NORTH HUDSON LAKE VOGUE SIIE ID NC-5024 VEREON WREIESS SITE MME NORTH HUDSON LAKE SITE AOMESS: NC HWY42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 (RANDOLPH COUNTY} MULTI-TENANT UTILITY H+RAME OETAILS s-3MULTI.TENANT UTILITY H-FRAME DETAILS NO SCALE 1 i,: @ Page 110 of 198 Vogue Towers II, LLC, Special Use Permit Request STREAM WA T C H T RL NC H W Y 4 2 S Ric hla n d Creek R ichland Creek Squirrel Cr e e k 1 inch equals 500 feet ?d ?dLegend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains Page 111 of 198 Vogue Towers II, LLC, Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Property across road from request location. Picture 3: Request location on left as seen looking toward Picture 4: Request location on left as seen looking toward Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking toward Woodhaven Dr. Picture 6: Request location on right as seen looking toward Stream Watch Trl. Page 112 of 198 7/8/2024 Randolph County GIS Current Owner Information Randolph County, Its Agents and Employees make not warranty to the correctness of the information set forth on this document. PIN TAX_ACRESDESCRIPTION DEED_BOOK/PAGE OWNER ADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY_STATE_ZIP 7688372713 35.14 LEONA BYRD;TR3 COM ACC 002845/01017 HANCOCK, SCOTT RAY (HANCOCK, KIMBERLY I 1402 TWIN CRYSTAL TRL ASHEBORO, NC 27203 7688393871 36.5 R42;S 002068/01181 FOGLEMAN, WILLIAM A (FOGLEMAN, NANCY B 421 ASHMONT CT ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688470465 35.14 LEONA BYRD;TR4 COM ACC 002845/01017 HANCOCK, SCOTT RAY (HANCOCK, KIMBERLY I 1402 TWIN CRYSTAL TRL ASHEBORO, NC 27203 7688491314 46.78 R42;S 002536/00215 NEWCOMB, GARY FRANKLIN (NEWCOMB, REBECCA HUDSON)3872 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688494855 0.5 R42;S NO RD FRTG 002536/00209 NEWCOMB, GARY FRANKLIN (NEWCOMB, REBECCA HUDSON)3872 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688495883 1.69 R42;S NO RD FRTG 002536/00212 NEWCOMB, GARY FRANKLIN (NEWCOMB, REBECCA HUDSON)3872 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688499757 3.8 R42;S 002024/00849 COCKERHAM, GEORGE A LIFE ESTATE 3894 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688581537 31.16 J PAUL SMITH; DEEDED ACCESS TR 4002407/01492 FESMIRE, BILLIE JOE 3810 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7688590173 1.12 R42;S NO RD FRTG 002081/01548 HUDSON, BILLIE JO SMITH 3810 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7689400695 1.12 R42;S 002598/01089 HUDSON, JONATHAN D (HUDSON, BILLIE JO SMITH)3810 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7689401856 0.9 R42;N 002627/00905 LEONARD, DEBBIE H 3819 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7689404832 1.52 R42;N 001938/02880 CLARK, JANICE W 1012 POSSUM TROT RD APT B9 NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29582 7689405472 0.96 R42;S DEEDED ACCESS 001979/02994 HUDSON, JONATHAN DOUGLAS 3810 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7689407105 3.15 R42;S COMMON ACCESS 002536/00206 NEWCOMB, GARY FRANKLIN (NEWCOMB, REBECCA HUDSON)3872 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 7689413360 26.27 R42;N 002791/00308 BROWN, KATIE HUDSON (BROWN, CHRISTOPHER MADISON)3759 NC HWY 42 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Page: 1 of 1Page 113 of 198 \ VCGU E TCWERS APPTICATION FOR APPROVAL BY VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC, AND CEttCO PARTNERSHIP, dlbla VERIZON WIRELESS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WIRETESS COMMUNICATION FACILIW Application: For Randolph County approval by Vogue Towers ll, LLC ("Vogue Towers") and Cellco Partnership, d/blaYerizon Wireless ("Verizon"), together "Applicant" for a Special Use Permit for a proposed multi-provider wireless comm unications facility. Site Name: North Hudson Lake, #NC-5024 Project Description: Vogue Towers proposes to construct a multi-provider 320'self-supporting tower (325' overall with lightning rod) within a fenced compound area (see attached design drawings for details). This facility will have provisions for multiple carriers, satisfying the Purpose of the County's ordinance to reduce the need for new towers. Parcel Address: Hwy 42, Asheboro, NC 27205 (Pending E911, nearby address is 3872), Parcel lD #76884973L4 Property Owner: Gary Franklin Newcomb & Rebecca Hudson Newcomb Narrative: The wireless industry is continually improving networks to best meet the needs of the community. ln the present case, the increase in usage at existing locations requires a new tower. The purpose of this proposed wireless communications facility will be to provide improved wireless service quality and safety to the area, specifically to customers and residents in and around this area of Randolph County. As the demand for wireless continues to increase with the use of "smart phones" (24.3% increase in voice, 19.6% increase in data in 2020, per CTIA), there is an increased need for wireless telecommunications infrastructure to keep up with the demand. As network traffic increases on a given wireless network, additional facilities are needed to provide consumers with quality, high-speed mobile broadband. Each wireless telecommunications facility can handle only a fixed amount of demand and/or cover so far, and this tower is needed to provide additional coverage and capacity for this portion of the community. Greater signal strength is needed to adequately penetrate the buildings and provide reliable voice and improved data throughput rates for wireless subscribers. Page 114 of 198 This proposal is to construct a multi-provider wireless communications facility. Applicant will lease the use of space and access as shown on the site plan. Within that area, there will be an approx.4,9OO sq/ft fenced compound providing room for Verizon Wireless and other wireless providers such as AT&T, T-Mobile, and DISH to place equipment cabinets/buildings within the compound of the new tower. ln addition, Vogue Towers makes space available to local E91.1 and first responders at no cost, whenever possible. Consideration of this application should not, however, be limited to examining how successfully Vogue Towers has mitigated any negative impact through design and location. The positive impact of the site should be given full weight as well. We live in a society where our wireless devices have become an essential tool for daily living, a necessity with approximately 80% of E911 calls (est. 240 million) being made from wireless devices each year and more than 7 out of L0 adults living in wireless-only households,72.6% as of 2022 (Notional Center for Health Stot/stics). Statistics are similar for "wireless-only adults" (71.7% or 183 million), or an adult who personally had a wireless telephone and lived in a household that did not have a landline. These figures peak among younger demographic ranges for wireless only adults, the next generation of homebuyers and entrepreneurs, with 25-29 {87.6%) and 30-34 (88.4%1. Furthermore, the benefits of this site to the community go beyond just convenience for residents and businesses where 80% of consumers now consider wireless service indispensable (CTIA). Quality wireless service is part of the critical infrastructure necessary for public safety and first responders in emergency situations such as accidents, crimes, health incidents and storms. Given the design, location and benefits provided by this proposed site, and lack of significant impacts, approval of this application is respectfully requested. TE LECOM M U N ICATION TOW E R Zoning Districts:All districts. G uide lines o n d Require ments Except os expressly stoted, nothing in this Ordinonce sholl limit Randolph County from regulating applications to construct, modify, or mointoin wireless support structures, or construct, modify, mointoin, or collocote wireless focilities on o wireless support structure bosed on considerotion of lond use, public sofety, and zoning considerotions, including oesthetics, londscoping, structurol design, setbocks, ond foll zones, or Stote ond locol building code requirements, consistent with the provisions of federol low provided in NCGS I 160D-9i0. For purposes of this Ordinonce, public safety includes, without limitotion, federol, Stote, ond locol safety regulotions but does not include requirements reloting to rodiofrequency emissions of wireless focilities. Any person who proposes to construct o new wireless support structure or substontiolly modify a wireless support structure within the plonning ond development regulotion jurisdiction of a locol government must do both of the following: (1i Submit a completed applicotion with the necessory copies ond ottochments to the oppropriate planning outhority; ond Comply with ony local ordinonces concerning lond use ond ony opplicoble permitting processes. {2} Page 115 of 198 Purpose ond Compliance: Minimum Lot Size: Administrative Approvols: Required Plons The purpose of this section is to ensure the sofe ond efficient integrotion of focilities necessory for the provision of advonced mobile broodbond and wireless telecommunicotions services throughout the community and to ensure the reody ovoilobility of relioble wireless service to the public, government ogencies, ond first responders, to further the public sofety ond generol welfare. The deployment of wireless infrostructure is critical to ensuring first responders can provide for the health ond sofety of oll residents of North Carolino ond, consistent with section 6409 of the Middle-Closs Tox Relief ond Job Creotion Act of 2072, 47 USC I 1455 (o), create a notionol wireless emergency communications network for use by first responders that in lorge meosure will be dependent on focilities ploced on existing wireless communications support structures. Therefore, it is the policy of this State to facilitote the plocement of wireless communicotions support structures in oll oreas of North Corolina. The following standords sholl opply to Rondolph County's octions, os a regulatory body, in the regulotion of the placement, construction, or modification of a wi re less com m u n i cotion s faci lity. The plocement, construction, or modificotion of wireless communicotions facilities sholl conform with the Federal Communications Act, 47 USC $ j32, os omended, section 6409 of the Middle-Closs Tox Relief and lob Creotion Act of 201.2, 47 USC I 1455 (a), ond per the rules promulgoted by the Federol Co m m u n icotions Co m m i ssion. The minimum lot size requirement sholl be per the Zoning District in which it is locoted. The following uses moy be opproved by the Randolph County Plonning Director after conducting on odministrative review: NIA The site plon drown to scole must include, but is not limited to, the following informotion:See attached design drawings. Property lines; Proposed structures; Existing structures within five hundred feet of ony port of the tower structure; Proposed points of egress ond ingress; Fencing ond setbocks; ond Proposed buffers. The site plon sholl indicate all locotions for equipment buildings in oddition to that proposed for use by the applicont. ln areos where o visuol block from odjacent properties is necessory, o Level lll buffer sholl be required. Applicant has located the site approx. 1,000' back from Hwy 42 to reduce visual impact from the road and adjoining properties. Per feedback from Staff, Level lll Buffer landscaping added along the northern side to buffer facility from residents along Hwy 42. a. b. c. d. e. f. Buflers: Page 116 of 198 Fencing: Setback Requirements: The bose of the tower ond each guy anchor shall be surrounded by a security fence or wall ot least eight feet in height unless the tower ond all guy anchors ore mounted entirely on o building over eight feet in height. The tower's guy onchors moy be screened or fenced separately to comply with the requirements of this subsection. See attached design drawings. Setback of the base of the tower from oll odjacent property lines sholl be one foot for each foot in height. This setback moy be reduced by the Rondolph County Plonning Boord of Adjustment upon o finding thot foilure to grant a setbock reduction would hove the effect of prohibiting the provision of personol wireless services, thot the reduction serves the general intent ond purpose of this section ond the odopted Randolph County Growth Monagement Plan ond that the reduction will not substantiolly interfere with or injure the rights of others whose property would be offected by the reduced setbock. ln no cose sholl be setback be reduced to less thon fifty percent of the tower height. To encouroge shored use of towers, opplicotionsfortowersthatwill operote with more than one user immediately upon completion moy hove a ten percent reduction in the required setbocks, but in no cose shall the setbocks be less thon those required for the underlying zoning district. Also, to encouroqe the construction of monopole structures, monopole towers moy hove o twenty percent reduction in the required setbocks. To encourage the locotion of towers in existing forested oreas with a minimum depth of sixty-five feet, the tower moy hove o twenty percent reduction in the required setbacks. ln no case sholl the setbock be less thon those required for the underlyingzoning district. Said setbock reductions sholl only be allowed upon o professional engineering certificotion that stotes that the structure'sconstruction will cause the towerto crumble inword so thot in the event of o collopse no domoge to structures on odjocent zoning lots will result. As depicted in the attached design drawings, the tower is located such that the entire 325' structure can be maintained within the property owne/s boundaries. ln addition, per the attached and sealed "Fall Zone" letter, the tower will be designed such that the top 50% will collapse over onto itself in the event of a catastrophic failure, reducing the impacted area via a reduced "fall zone" or setback area. This is accomplished by overdesigning the bottom portion of the structure. Specifically, the tower base and its foundation are designed to carry the entire force applied to the tower (Force X); however, when the top 50% of the tower collapses, only a maximum of 25% of Force X will be applied to the tower base and foundation that are designed lor LOO% of Force X. In layman's terms, the tower base and its foundation are almost 4 times stronger lL0O%125%l than the maximum force that can be applied to them when the top 50% of the tower collapses. lncorporating this engineering into the design, the fall zone is greatly reduced. Towers sholl hove o minimum setbock of 1,500 feet from other towers unless evidence is provided thot demonstrotes thot reasonoble efforts hove been made to leose spoce on an existing tower or thot on existing tower will not technicolly sotisfy the applicont's needs to provide coveroge in the oreo. As noted in the attached nearby structures map and table, there are no existing structures within 1 mile of the proposed facility. The closest documented filings (FAA or FCC) all appear to be filed only and not constructed. No outside storoge sholl be ollowed telecommunicotion facility site. Applicant will comply. on any Associoted buildings locoted in ony residentiol district sholl not be used os on employment center for ony worker. This provision does not prohibit the periodic Site Considerqtions: Page 117 of 198 Other Requirements: mqintenonce or periodic monitoring of equipment ond instruments. Applicant will comply. The color of the tower sholl be neutrol, except to the extent required by Federol law, to minimize its visual impoct. Applicant will comply. No commerciol odvertising sholl be ollowed on the focility's site. Applicant will comply. Communication componies ore encouroged to locote telecommunicotion ontennos on or in structures other than o tower. Such structures may include church steeples, transmission line towers, utilitylight poles, and woter towers. Where such focilities ore not ovailable, co-locotion of focilities is encouroged. Priority for co-locotion on the proposed tower sholl be given to ontennos thot will serve o public sofety need for Rondolph County. As noted above, there are no existing structures within the geographic area capable of supporting Applicant's equipment or meeting the coverage objective. Applicant makes space available to local E911 and first responders at no cost, whenever possible. Evidence thot the opplicant hos investigoted the possibilities for locoting the proposed facilities on on existing towerwhere o minimol level of coveroge can be provided. Such evidence sholl consist of: Copies of letters sent to owners of oll existing towers within a one-mile rodius of the proposed site, requesting the following information: N/A, no existing structures within the 1 mile radius. A copy of all responses required by subsection 4a (7); NlA, no existing structures within the 1 mile radius. A summary explonotion of why the applicant believes the proposed focility connot belocoted on on existing tower. NlA, no existing structures within the 1 mile radius. A summary explonotion of why the opplicant believes thot the use of on alternotive tower structure is not possible. N/A, no existing structures within the 1 mile radius Provision of sound engineering evidence demonstroting thot locotion in the proposed district is necessary and in the interest of public sofety or is o procticol necessity. See attached propagation map and information from co-Applicant, Verizon Wireless. Per Verizon's RF Engineer, the coverage objective for this site "cannot be achieved by the nearby VZ sites." Evidence that the tower will be utilized by o wirelessprovider. Under section 6409 of the Middle-Closs Tox Relief ond lob Creotion Act of 2012, 47 USC I U55 (a), Rondolph County moy not deny ond shall opprove any eligible focilities request os provided in this section. Nothing in this Port requires on application ond opprovolfor routine maintenance or limits the performonce of routine mointenonce on wireless support structures and facilities, including in-kind replocement of wireless focilities. Routine mointenance includes activities ossocioted with the regular and generol upkeep of tronsmission equipment, including the replocement of existing wireless focilities with focilities of the some size. Rondolph County may require on applicotion for collocotion or on eligible focility request. Verizon Wireless is a co-Applicant to this Special Use Permit application and a. b. c. d. e. Page 118 of 198 their equipment is noted within the design drawings. A collocotion or eligible facilities request opplicotion is deemed complete unless Randolph County provides notice thot the opplicotion is incomplete in writing to the opplicont within 45 days of submission or within some other mutually ogreed upon period. The notice sholl identify the deficiencies in the applicotion which, if cured, wouldmoke the opplicotion complete. Rondolph County may deem an opplicotion incomplete if there is insufficient evidence provided to show thot the proposed collocotion or eligible focilities request will comply with federol, Stote, ond local safety requirements. Rondolph County moy not deem an opplicotion incomplete for ony issue not reloted to the octuol content of the opplication ond subject motter of the collocotion or eligible focilities request. An opplication is deemed complete on resubmission if the additionol moteriols cure the deficiencies indicated. Rondolph County shall issue o written decision opproving an Eligible Focilities Request Application within 45 days of such opplicotion being deemed complete. For a collocotion opplication thot is not on eligible focility request, Rondolph County sholl issue its written decision to opprove or deny the opplicotion within 45 days of the opplication being deemed complete. Rondotph County moy impose o fee not to exceed 51,000 for technicol consultotion ond the review of a collocotion or eligible focilities request on opplication. The fee must be based on the octuol, direct, ond reosonable odministrative costs incurred for the review, processing, ond opprovol of a collocotion applicotion. Randolph County moy engoqe othird- porty consultant for technicol consultotion ond the review of o collocotion opplicotion. The fee imposed by Randolph County for the review of the opplication may not be used for either of the following: (1) (2) Trovel expenses incurred in o third-portyreview of o collocotio n a p plication ; or Reimbursement for o consultotion or other third porty based on a contingent fee bosis or results- bosed orrqngement. Evidence thot the communicotions tower is structurolly designed to support ot leost one odditional user ond the specialuse opplicotion includes a stotementthot the owner of the tower is willing to permit other users to ottach communicotion focilities, on a commerciolly reasonoble basis, which do not interfere with the primary purpose of the tower. Towers over 180 feet in height sholl be structurolly designed ond constructed to accommodote at leost two qdditionol users. The tower owner moy require thot such other users qgree to negotiate regording reasonable compensation to the owner from any liability that moy result from such ottochment. As depicted in the design drawings, Applicant has designed the proposed wireless communications facility to support a minimum of four wireless providers, one being Verizon Wireless, co-Applicant. Applicant has also provided a letter confirming the intent for this facility to be made available to all wireless providers. The telecommunicotions tower shall meet oll opplicoble FAA stondords, Rondolph County Municipol Airport Overloy District Stondards, ond shall not restrict or interfere with oir troffic or oir travel from or to ony existing or proposed oirport. Applicont must provide evidence thot the tower would meet oll FAA stondords, before issuonce of permits to construct. Any lighting sholl not project onto the surrounding residentiol property. Applicant has received the FAA Page 119 of 198 Determination for this proposed tower (2024-ASO-10017-OE) and the tower will require lighting based on 3ts height. However, as noted in Applicant's analysis provided by Airspace Safety Analysis and Compliance (ASAC) and FAA Determination, while marking and lithting will be required, the proposed tower was found to not be a hazard to air navigation (evaluated in accordance with the requirements specified by the FAA under Federal Aviation Rules part 771. The Randolph County Plonning Director shall notify ollknown oirports within o five-mile rodius of the opplicotion to locote o tower. Per the above mentioned ASAC analysis, the nearest public use or government use facility is Asheboro Regional (8.2 NM) and the nearest private use facility is Smith Air Strip (0.9 NM}. To protect the public from unnecessory exposure to electromagnetic rodiotion, the tower owner sholl provide documentation, such os a signed offidovit, indicating thot the power density levels do not exceed levels certified by the FCC. As a licensed FCC communications provider, Verizon Wireless operates its network within applicable rules and regulations imposed by the FCC and/or FAA. See attached compliance information provided by Verizon Wireless. Notice sholl be provided to the Rondolph County Plonning Director when the tower is placed out of service. Towers that ore not used for six months or more sholl be removed by the property owner within 120 doys. Applicant will comply. Rondolph County's review of an opplication for the plocement or construction of o new wireless support structure or substontiol modificotion of o wireless support structure sholl only oddress public safety, lond development, or zoning issues. ln reviewing an opplicotion, Rondolph County may not require informotion on or evoluote on opplicont's business decisions about its designed service, customer demond for its service, or quolity of its service to or from on oreo or site. Rondolph County moy notrequire informotion thot concerns the specific need for the wireless support structure, including if the seruice to be provided from the wireless support structure is to odd additional wireless coveroge or odditionol wireless copocity. Randolph County moy not require proprietory, confidentiol, or other business informotion to justify the need for the new wireless support structure, including propogotion mops ond telecommunicotion traffic studies. ln reviewing on opplicotion, the locol government moy review the following: (1 ) Applicable public safety, lond-use, or zoning issues oddressed in its odopted regulotions, including oesthetics, landscoping, land-use- bosed locotion priorities, structural design, setbocks, ond foll zones; (2) lnformation or moteriols directly reloted to on identified public sofety, land development, or zoning issue including evidence thot no existing or previously opproved wireless support structure con reasonobly be used for the wireless focility placement instead of the construction of o new wireless support structure that residentiol, historic, ond designoted scenic oreos cannot be served from outside the oreo or that the proposed height of o new wireless support structure or initiol wireless focility plocement or o proposed height increase of o substantiolly modified Page 120 of 198 (3i wireless support structure or replocement wireless support structure is necessory to provide the opplicant's designed service; ond Rondolph County may require opplicants for new wireless facilities to evoluote the reasonoble feasibility of collocating new ontennas and equipment on an existing wireless support structure or structures within the opplicont's seorch ring. Collocotion on on existing wireless support structure is not reosonably feosible if collocotion is technicolly or commerciolly impractical or the owner of the existing wireless support structure is unwilling to enter o controct for such use ot foir morket volue. Randolph County moy require the informotion necessory to determine whether collocotion on existing wireless support structures is reosonobly feosible. Speciol Use Permit The use will not moteriolly endanger the public heolth or sofety if locoted where proposed and developed according to the plon os submitted ond opproved; Applicant's use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, however, the facility will have a positive effect on public health, safety, and general welfare. As noted above, 8O+% ol E911 calls are made from wireless devices and over 70% of adults now live in wireless only households. Quality wireless service is part of the critical infrastructure necessary for public safety and first responders in emergency situations such as accidents, crimes, health incidents and storms. ln additaon to the benefit of improved wireless service, the site itself is designed with safety in mind, including a reduced fall zone design for the tower where in the event of a catastrophic failure, the top portion of the tower will collapse over upon itself. The use meets all required conditions and specificatlons; Applicant's request can meet the conditions and specifications of the ordinance. The use will not substantidlly injure the volue of odjoining or obutting property, or that the use is o public necessity; ond Applicant's use will not have an adverse effect on other property in the area or contribute to traffic, parking, or utility resources in a material way. Once constructed, the wireless telecommunications facility is unmanned, and will not increase congestion in the area. Additionally, this facility will improve wireless service in the area for residents as well as EMS and first responders. ln terms of property value, reliable wireless communication is now considered indispensable by 80% of consumers. Thot the location ond chorocter of the use if developed occording to the plon os submitted and opproved will be in hormony with the areo in which it is to be locoted and in generol conformity with the Growth Monogement Plan for Rondolph County. The wireless communications facility is located back on the property, away from the road and adjoining properties, is unmanned and self-contained once operationa!, and will not interfere with the development or use of adjacent properties. The nature of wireless communications infrastructure is unique to meet RF coverage obiectives, the need is air vs. land as most uses. The height is consistent with the nature of this use. As previously noted, the location is unmanned, requiring technician visits every 5-8 weeks, and will not add congestion to the area. tmproved safety is one of the primary benefits of expanding wireless communications facilities. As noted above, more than 80% of E911 calls now originate from a wireless device. As provided for in this application package, Vogue Towers is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit as identified above per the conditions and specifications of the County's Ordinance, Section 621, Detoiled a a a a Page 121 of 198 i Regulations for Specific Uses - Telecommunications Tower. Wireless service is increasingly being considered a public necessity as it is often the only means citizens have to emergency services. The location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted and recommended, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located. The proposed wireless communications facility will meet the infrastructure needs of this area of the area and will provide additional access to emergency services, if needed. Respectfully submitted, 7*t 7r"o-Z7r* Pat Troxell-Tant President Vogue Towers ll, LLC Page 122 of 198 \ VCGUE TOWERS 430 Chestnut Street - Suite 101-8 Chattanooga, TN 37402 423-269-7455 Voguetowers.net May L5,2024 Randolph County Planning & Engineering Attn: Eric Martin 204 E Academy Street Central Permitting Building Asheboro, NC 27205 Subject:Proposed Tower, Section 621, Detailed Regulations for Specific Uses - Telecommunications Tower, Collocation Letter of lntent Vogue Tower Site - North Hudson Lake Vogue Tower Site # - NC-5024 Parcel lD: 7688497374 Dear Mr. Martin This letter is provided as a confirmation that the new Tower will be designed to accommodate the collocation of additional antennas for future users and Applicant confirms to leasing excess space on the Tower to such users utilizing standard industry terms and rates, per the County's ordinance. Vogue Towers is not a wireless provider but is a developer of multi-provider wireless communications facilities. As such, Vogue's facilities are designed to accommodate multiple providers. The current design drawings and tower design detail included in this application package substantiate this design intent. Respectfully submitted, 7*A;"* %"*"e7*d Patricia Troxell-Tant President Vogue Towers ll, LLC Page 123 of 198 Vogue Towers l{orth Hudson Lake site Existing lrbarby Structures 1 mile radius American ::sftl 6,$5 =-<D R6ac!.Baptrst Church I @@RrchlaCreek Zilhne Canopy Tour Vogue bp fo*.r. n3 .lfiier:Group LIC (2 ) o >t tuG .o-* cf .3 INorth Catglina Zoo \'€t o-b' o-mmunications Tower Group LIC Google Earth A N lrBge O 2024 Airbus 1mi t t,l' Stflckland's 42 lt4ower Sales & Servrce ) .z_z a to","*rr'osheboro cabins ) I a, @ Page 124 of 198 Vogue Towers 3 Mile Seach Name Latitude Longitude FCC ASR#Distance Comments Vogue Towers 35.642366 -79.726L33 Pending N/A Condidate Locotion American Towers, LIC 35.6554 -79.7329 L227L82 N/A Shows still in "Granted" stotus, no towet on satellite imogery Communications Tower Group LIC 35.6225 -79.752 L313252 N/A Shows still in "Granted" status, no tower on satellite imogery Communications Tower Group Lrc (2)35.6295 -79.7679 1313253 N/A Shows still in "Gronted" stotus, no tower on sotellite imogery Page 125 of 198 100 North Point Center East, Suite 125 Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 T:470.318.6119 F:732.312.9801 fpaengineers.com FRENCH & PARRELLO ASSOCIATES June L9,2024 VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC 430 Chestnut St., Suite L01B Chattanooga, TN 37402 RE: Fall Zone Letter for Proposed 320' Self Support Tower (325' Overal) Site Name: Site Address: Building Code: Design Standard: North Hudson Lake NC Hwy 42, Asheboro, NC 27205 rBc 2018 ANSr/TrA-222-H Dear Vogue Towers ll French & Parrello Associates (FPA) has reviewed the proposed Vogue Tower communications tower installation at the above referenced site. The project will contain a Self Support Tower -type antenna support tower with a height of 320' plus 5' lightning rod above ground level (AGL). The Self Support Tower structure is made up of hot dipped galvanized high strength structural steel members. The antenna cables will be routed from the ground-based equipment up attached to the side of the Self Support Tower to the proposed antenna rad center. The tower manufacturer shall supply structural design drawings prepared by a licensed Structural Engineer in the State of North Carolina at the time of Building Permit submission for review by the County before construction can commence. The tower will be designed in accordance with the North Carolina State Building Code and lnternational Building Code (lBC). Both of these codes have adopted the Telecommunications lndustry Association/Electronics lndustry Association Standards (ANSI/T|A-222-H). These standards dictate the design of all communications towers and take into consideration the following parameters: 1. Structure Risk Category/Class Cotegory/Class is chosen based upon the function of risk to human life, potential domage to property in the event of foilure ond the type of services thot the tower will provide (i.e. essentiol communicotions vs. services thot ore optionol)2. Environmental Loading lncludes wind, ice, ond seismic loads based upon local county-based doto3. Site Exposure Category Category is chosen bosed upon "surfoce roughness" of local surrounding vegetation, structures ond noturaltopogrophy. This olso impocts wind loading calculations4. Topographic Category Category is chosen bosed upon wind "speed-up" effects from surrounding topogrophy, such os towers being located within gently rolling terroin or ot the top of o hill or ridge ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SINCE 1974 Page 126 of 198 FPAr The design of the tower shall be such that in the unlikely event of structu ral failure, the Self Support Tower tower will collapseontoitselfandnotontoastreetorabuilding. lnotherwords,structuralfailurewouldbetypical ofthatofa straw bending onto itself, rather than a bowling pin being knocked over. Vogue Partners shall stipulate to the tower manufacturer/designer that the area of probable failure be located atSO% of the tower height (150'-0" AGL) so that only the top 50% of the tower plus the lightning rod (top 165'-0") would collapse onto itself. This is done by over- designing the tower sections below the failure point as necessary. ln regard to the possibility of any future corrosion of the structure, the Self Support Tower tower shall be constructed with hot dipped galvanized structural steel, similar to that of highway signs and traffic signal poles. The ANSI/T|A-222- H standards have been based in part on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards which govern the construction and design standards for those structures (which have an extremely rare rate of corrosion related failures). Furthermore, the tower owner will be required to inspect the structure at intervals stipulated by ANSI/TIA-222-H standards or as may be stipulated by the underlying municipal authority, whichever is more stringent. A geotechnical evaluation will be conducted that will explore the subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the proposed tower and develop geotechnical engineering recommendations to facilitate the design of the tower foundation. A report will be generated that shall be utilized by the tower manufacturer/designer to prepare foundation design drawings to be submitted at the time of Building Permit submission for review by the County before construction can commence. The geotechnical report and design drawings shall all be prepared by licensed Geotechnical Engineers in the State of North Carolina. ln summary, Self Support Tower -type antenna support structures are designed for extreme wind conditions with factors of safety that result in a design that is extremely conservative. The occurrence of guyed tower failure is exceptionally rare and historically these structures have survived after experiencing wind speeds considerably higher than their design speeds. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully Su bmitted, FRENCH & PARRELLO ASSOCIATES, P.A. Emad Badiee, P.E. Project Manager NC PE # 04952L (Exp: L2l3Ll2O24) DB Vogue Towers ll, LLC Page 2 Page 127 of 198 Designed Tower Fa ll Zones FPAr . Towers designed perIlA-222 standards (currently Revision"H'). The load calculated at the base of the tower does not cha nge. Reduction of 50% of tower height results in applied force reduction of 75%o, the remaining pole now only carries 25% of the original applied load. Layman's terms, the remaining portion of the tower has a constant capacity, while the applied force is significantly decreased to 1/4th of the original applicable force. ln another word, the base following a failure event is approx.4x stronger because of the reduced applied force exerted on the tower. Reduction of 40% of tower height from the top (bottom 60% remaining) results in applied force reduction of 64% t W+€€ FNE}lCH & PARRELLO ASSOCIATES ;s1q = (Wt^2)/2 4IulkdhturyL = lwluzlazll2 = lwlL^zlalllz = (WL^2)/8 vMo ufi;* "" \-/Mo idah d tu mrsL b. lw {aaf.yt f{ldc6dtlgvblth: Page 128 of 198 NORT HUDSON LAKE Zoning Meetings May -2024 '/Verizon @nfidentialand proprietary. Unaulhdizeddi$lo$re, reprodrctionor otherus prohibited. Page 129 of 198 PIots - Pre and Post RSRP Coveraoe Pre Post ytf, \h 4.{ ft.''i ! '*' rt ,/Vsi26 @nfid6ntial ard proprielary. Umuthdiz€d di$loGure regodrction or other u$ prohbited. cova'rgs Lrvcl Color ln-Eulldinc ln-Vshicl? On-Str..t il $ & & I }ItrrrI#3 EII Page 130 of 198 Site Objective o Goverage and Gapacity site to serve the mobility users on the HWY-42 at Asheboro and surrounding area.o Major gap in current coverage due to high intersite distance between neighboring sites.. Additionally, it will provide coverage to the rural home communities. ,/Verizo @fidential ard proprietay. Uduthdized di$l@rq r€prod6tim or other ue prohbrted. Page 131 of 198 tlverlzonv tu May 07,2024 RE: Proposed Cellco Partnershig d/b/a Verizon Wireless telecommunications tower facility on 911 TBD 3872 NC Highway 42 South, Asheboro, NC 27205 {Site Name: NORT HUDSON LAKE). Dear Planning & Neighborhood Development, I am the Verizon RF Engineer responslble for this site. I am writing this letter to support Verizon's Zoning application for a wireless telecommunications tovyer facility proposed at 911 3872 NC Highway 42 South, Asheboro, NC 27205. The proposed centerline would be 315 feet. The proposed site would provide reliable coveraBe and capacity in the immediate area nearby, which cannot be achieved by the nearby VZ sites. Thank you for being so considerate, Nikunjkumar Patel (Nik) RF Engineer - Raleigh/Greensboro Verizon Wireless 8921 Research Drive Charlotte, NC 28262 M7@,97fr26l nikunikumar.patel @verizonwireless.com Page 132 of 198 verizon/ May 22,2024 To: Whom it may concern Transmitted via email to: Monica. Reyes@verizonwireless.com RE: Verizon Monopole Macro Site Located at:3872 NC Highway 42 South, Asheboro, NC 27205 To Whom lt May Concern, This is in response to your inquiry to Verizon concerning interference to your existing telecommunications devices and services, as well as your concerns regarding radiofrequency (RF) exposure related to Verizon's proposed facilities at [3872 NC Highway 42 South, Asheboro, NC 27205]. Verizon provides Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) under licenses granted by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). The FCC exclusively regulates all technical aspects of Verizon's operations and network and preempts all state and local regulation of radiofrequency transmissions. The FCC rules protect co-channel and adjacent licensees against harmful interference. The FCC has established safety guidelines relating to potential RF exposure from cell sites, known as Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. The above noted proposed Verizon facility is compliant with all applicable FCC requirements. The points below cover Verizon's practices pertinent to complying with the FCC requirements: 1. Verizon locates its transmitting antenna(s) in order to maximize vertical and horizontal separation from other operator's systems to minimize interference potential. 2. All equipment at the proposed facility is designed and certified to operate within the frequencies licensed to Verizon by the FCC, and to operate in a manner approved by the FCC. 3. The power levels generated by the facility's radios and corresponding effective radiated power (ERP) from the transmitting antenna(s) are within the limitations specified by Part 22 (f or cellular), Part 24 (for PCS), Part 27 (for 700 MHz, AWS or C-Band), Part 96 (for CBRS), Part 30 (UMFUS/mmWave) or Part 101 (for microwave) of the Commission's Rules. 4. Verizon performed an RF compliance pre-construction evaluation. The results of the evaluation demonstrate the site will be compliant with FCC (RF) safety standards. The FCC has established safety rules relating to potential RF exposure from cell sites. The rules are codified at 47 C.F.R 5 1.1310. The FCC provides guidance on how to ensure compliance with its rules in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 (available at https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Eneineerins Technolosv/Documents/bulletins/oet55/oet65.pdf). The FCC provides information about the safety of radio frequency (RF) emissions from cell towers on its website at: htt ps://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technologv/electromagnetic-compatibilitv-division/radio-frequencv-safetv/faq/rf- safetv. Page 133 of 198 75 MILE RADIUS .5 MILE RADIUS 25 MILE RAOIUS PROPOSED SELF SUPPORT TOITER PHOTO LOCATION PLAN PHOTO LOCATION NO TO SCATE # g PAHRELLO_ASS lmbg.S lG.frlklqml8E7g12lm t7pgzm ROJECI PHCTCSIMS SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE NC HWY 42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 DRAW NG TITLE: PHOTO LOCATION PLAN DRAWN BY: T.J.A CHECKED BY: M.S. SCALE AS SHOWN DATE 05/17 /24 JOB NO 15228.139 DRAWING NO PHOTO SHEET 1 Page 134 of 198 The FCC developed these standards in consultation with numerous other federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standards have wide safety margins and are designed to protect everyone, including children. The FCC adopted the standards after examining the RF research that scientists in the US and around the world have conducted for decades. The research continues to this day, and agencies continue to monitor it. Based on that research, federal agencies have concluded that equipment and networks that comply with the safety standards pose no known health risks. You can obtain further information about the safety of RF emissions from wireless network equipment and devices on the FCC's website, which you can access via this link: http://www.fcc.eov/oet/rfsafetv/rf-faqs.html. Additionally, www.wirelesshealthfacts.com is a good resource. Questions related to compliance with federal regulations should be directed to VZW RFCompliance@VerizonWireless.com. incerely, U*Zr* ya Duggirala (Signed by Jignesh Choksi on behalf of Vidhya Duggirala) Manager-RF System Design Verizon Contact Name Contact Email Contact Phone SE Regulatory SE-Regu latorv@verizonwireless.com NA Please contact your local Verizon resource below if you have additional site-specific questions. Page 135 of 198 EXISTING PHOTO LOCATION #1 PROPOSED 520, SELF SUPPORT TOWER FFENCHS PAHHELLO lmtu3.$@ 1O1^frlklqP19o:7P312.S@ t73?31?N ROJLC I PHOTOSIN/S SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE NC HWY 42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 DRAWING TI TLE PH0T0 LoCATToN #1 DRAWN BY: T.J.A CHECKED BY M.S SCALE AS SHOWN DATE 05/17 /24 JOB NO 15228.139 F I tt-ir,-l i - ,:'.i $ I rl*a!,. \: PROPOSED PHOTO LOCATTON #1 l1... - -, - I _i! f Earth 1 &: a a? I t'* DRAW NG NO.: PHOTO SHEET 2 Page 136 of 198 E PROPOSFD PHO To loc ATI ON 4? mFRENCHAPAHFELLO -*{sSoclaTEs-lmtu9,$b lfr.hlkeqmiB or 7321)129q8 t 73231eS rR-OJECT PI_]OTOS]MS SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE NC HWY 42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 DRAWING TITLE PH0T0 L0CAI0N #2 DRAWN 3Y: T.J.A. CHECKED BY: M.S. SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE 05/17 /24 JOB NO 15228.139 DRAWING NO,: PHOTO SHEET 3 r! -- r.rl-lgz***&r rn-] 'Il .aIj *j' .' PROPOSED J2O' SELF SUPPORT TOWER .,,:III Page 137 of 198 EXI STI NG PHOTO I OCA TroN #3 (Nor vsrsrr) mFEENCHEPAHHELLO 1mIM34,$b lO1.hl.ksqmlg o: 73a312'98O t 732.312'81 ROJLC I: PHOTOS]l\/S SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE NC HWY 42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 DRAWING TITLE PH0T0 L0CAII0N #J DRAWN BY: T.J.A. CHECKED BY M.S. SCALE AS SHOWN DATE 05/17 /24 JOB NO 15228.139 DRAWING NO PHOTO SHEET 4 s..'it\ ,. ,rt't. ra. ,11 .;..t. .t'j. t- .&. \\\ -t E Page 138 of 198 EXISTING PHOTO LOCA TtoN #+ P T ATI N 4 I FPENCH E PAFFELLO lmrl* {.$4t0.hl,k.@PlSo '?.312.Sm t 79329 ROJLC I PHCTCSIN/S SITE NAME: NORTH HUDSON LAKE NC HWY 42 ASHEBORO, NC 27205 DRAWING TITLE PH0T0 LoCAn0N #4 DRAWI. T.J.A CHECKED BY M.S. >UALL: AS SHOWN DATE: os/17 /24 JOB NO.: 15228.139 DRAWING NO,: PHOTO SHEET 5 I b"-,r' Earth t II Page 139 of 198 ASAC SITE SPEGIFIG EVALUATION FOR Site Name: North Hudson Lake Site Numben TN.5O24 Site Location: Trade, TN Requestors Name: Michael Sandifer Gompany Name: Vogue Towers ll, LLG Street Address: 43O Ghestnut Street, Ste lOl.B Gity and Zip: Ghattanooga, TN. 37402 This is an evaluation based on application of surfaces identified in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part77 and Federal Gommunication Gommission (FCC) Rules Pafi17. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I The max height that can be built at this site without notice to the FAA is 2OO feet AGL or 714 feet AMSL. { The max No Extended Study height at this site is 499 AGL, or lol3 AMSL. I The max no hazard height at this site is 499 AGL' or lO{3 AMSL. + The max no marking and lighting height at this site is 2OO AGL' or 714 AMSL. SITE DATA Structure Type: Antenna Tower Goordinates of site: Site ground elevation: Total height above the ground of the entire structure (AGL): Total height above mean sea level (AMSL): Lat: Long: Datum: 35"38'32.52'' 79"43r34.O8tt NAD 83 514 325 a29 TN-5025 ASACSafety.com 3i2 1i2021 Page 140 of 198 AIRPORT/HELIPORT INFORMATION Nearest public use or Government Use (DOD) facility: Asheboro Regiona!. This structure wi!! be located 8.2 NM or 5O285 FT from the airport on a bearing of 275 degrees true to the airport. Nearest private use landing facility is: Smith Air Strip. This structure will be located O.9 NM from the airport on a bearing of 124 degrees true to the airport. STUDY FINDINGS FAA fAR Part 77 paragraph 9 :(Gonstruction or Alteration requiring notice.) (These are the imaginary surfaces that the FAA has implemented to provide general criteria for notification purposes.) This structure does require notification 1e tfts fAA. FAA FAR Part 77 parasraph 17(FAR 77.17): (Standards for Determining Obstructions.)(These are the imaginary surfaces that the FAA has implemented to protect aircraft safety. !f any of these surfaces are penetrated, the structure may pose a Hazard to Air Navigation.) This structure does not exceed these surfaces. FGG Notice Requirements: (FGG Rules, Part {7) This structure does require notification to the FAA or FGG based on these rules. FAA EMI: (The FAA protects certain air navigational aids, radio transmitters, and RADAR facilities from possible interference. The distance and direction are dependent on the type of facili$l being evaluated. Some of these transmission and receiver facilities are listed in the National Flight Data Genter (NFDG) database.) This site would not affect any FAA air navigationat aids or transmitters. TN'.-502 5 ASACSafety.com 3 21 2021 Page 141 of 198 Militarv Airspace: (This would include low Ievel visual and instrument routes along with operations areas and special use airspace.) This structure wil! not affect this airspace. AM Facilities: (The FGG protects AM radio stations from possible interference for a distance of 3.O km for directional facilities, and l.O km for non-directionat facilities. New changes to the FGG critical distances are calculated based on the AM transmission Movement Method Proof evaluation.) This site was evaluated against the FGG's AM antenna database using the Movement Method proof calculations and no further action is required. MARKING AND LIGHTING FAA Advisorv Gircular 7O17460-{: Marking and lighting is required for this structure. RECOMMENDATIONS This site was evaluated in accordance with the requirements specified by the FAA under Federal Aviation Rules part 77, and found not to be a hazard to air navigation. TN-5025 ASACSafety.com 3i2 I i2021 Page 142 of 198 Page 143 of 198 Mail Processing Center Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth,TX 76177 Aeronautical Study No. 2024-ASO-10017-OE Prior Study No. 2024-ASO-6343-OE Issued Date: 06 I 24 / 2024 Michael Sandifer Vogue Towers II, LLC 100 North Point Center East, Suite Alpharetta, GA 30022 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAYIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part77, concerning: Structure: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: Antenna Tower TN-5024 North Hudson Lake Trade, NC 35-38-32.52NNAD 83 79-43-34.08W 514 feet site elevation (SE) 325 feet above ground level (AGL) 839 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: Emissions from this site must be in compliance with the parameters set by collaboration between the FAA and telecommunications companies and reflected in the FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process (such as power, frequencies, and tilt angle). Operational use of this frequency band is not objectionable provided the Wireless Providers (WP) obtain and adhere to the parameters established by the FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process. Failure to comply with this condition will void this determination of no hazard. As a condition to this Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 7017460-l M, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, a med-dual system-Chapters 4,8(M-Dual),&15. Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notiff the same number. It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least l0 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part l) _X_ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2,Part2) See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. Page I of7 Page 144 of 198 a This determination expires on 12/2412025 unless: (a) (b) (c) the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office. the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTTVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTTVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power, except those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best Practices, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA.This determination includes all previously filed frequencies and power for this structure. If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Robert Kiser, at (404) 305-6616, or Robert.K- CTR.Kiser@faa.gov. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2024- ASO -l 00 I 7-OE. Signature Control No: 621 152829-62533047 I Eric F Johnston Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group Attachment(s) Page2 ofl (DNE) Page 145 of 198 CC: FCC Page 3 of7 Additional Information Frequency Data Map(s) Page 146 of 198 Additional information for ASN 2024-ASO-10017-OE Part77 authorizes the FAA to evaluate a structure or object's potential electromagnetic effects on air navigation, communication facilities, and other surveillance systems. It also authorizes study of impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under visual or instrument flight rules, as well as the impact on airport traffic capacity at existing public use airports. Broadcast in the 3.7 to 3.98 GHz frequency (5G C band) currently causes errors in certain aircraft radio altimeters and the FAA has determined they cannot be relied upon to perform their intended function when experiencing interference from wireless broadband operations in the 5G C band. The FAA has adopted Airworthiness Directives for all transport and commuter category aircraft equipped with radio altimeters that prohibit certain operations when in the presence of 5G C band This determination of no hazard is based upon those mitigations implemented by the FAA and operators of transport and commuter category aircraft, and helicopters operating in the vicinity of your proposed location. It is also based on telecommunication industry and FAA collaboration on acceptable power levels and other parameters as reflected in the FAA 5G C band evaluation process. The FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation is a data analytics system used by FAA to evaluate operational hazards related to aircraft design. The FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process refers to the process in which the telecommunication companies and the FAA have set parameters, such as power output,locations, frequencies, and tilt angles for antenna that mitigate the hazard to aviation. As the telecommunication companies and FAA refine the tools and methodology, the allowable frequencies and power levels may change in the FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process. Therefore, your proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft provided the equipment and emissions are in compliance with the parameters established through the FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process. Any future changes that are not consistent with the parameters listed in the FAA 5G C band compatibility evaluation process will void this determination of no hazard. Page 4 of7 Page 147 of 198 Frequency Data for ASN 2024-ASO-10017-OE LOW FREQT]ENCY IIIGH FREQTIENCY FREQT]ENCY T]I\[IT ERP ERP T]NIT 6 6 10 l0 17.7 17.7 21.2 21.2 614 614 698 806 806 824 851 869 896 901 929 930 931 932 93s 940 1670 17t0 1756 I 8s0 I 850 1930 1990 2lt0 2305 2305 2345 2496 3450 35s0 3700 27500 29100 3 1000 7 7 tt.7 tt.7 19.7 19.7 23.6 23.6 698 698 806 901 824 849 866 894 901 902 932 931 932 932.5 940 941 1675 1755 1780 1910 1990 1990 2025 2200 2360 2310 2360 2690 3550 3700 3980 28350 292s0 31300 GHz GHz GHz GHz GHz GHz Gllz GHz MHz MHz MHz MIlz MHz l&{Hz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz IfudHz Wz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz INdHz MHz MHz MHz MHz i&.dHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz 42 55 55 42 42 55 55 42 1000 2000 1000 500 500 500 500 s00 500 7 3500 3500 3s00 t7 1000 3500 500 500 3280 1640 1640 1640 s00 500 2000 2000 2000 500 3280 50 3280 31623 31623 31623 dBw dBw dBw dBw dBw dBw dBw dBw w w w w w w w w w w w w w dBw w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w Page 5 of7 Page 148 of 198 38600 40000 MHz 31623 w Page 6 of7 Page 149 of 198 a I , I ?.'a I \"/ Sectional Map for ASN 2024-ASO-10017-OE ll tq/tl I 18 r. e a l a atll 7 t3t { LAGL S ITH Cslerid 75.2 A 9.23 {343}{h ctwMwos-3 15'L50' 22 1R BALEI II 3s tLrstHw r 't I g. ri*$t' zl"ulat!S.,. i(ru\ a Extensive Mir L.t frlsg I 23Sl lt PageT of7 r ,i60 I u 22,7 , I Page 150 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the following findings of fact: 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved; 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance; 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use Permit. In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable. When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were NOT met. Page 151 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2024-00022021 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on August 6, 2024, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located on NC Hwy 42 S for the purpose indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR VOGUE TOWERS II, LLC BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. Page 152 of 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 153 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 154 of 198 MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 155 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 5 RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2024-00022010 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by BOBBY EARNHARDT, Asheboro, NC, and their request to rezone 32.17-acres at US Hwy 311, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed, Tax ID #7746123319, Primary Growth Area and Secondary Growth Area, from HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA - Residential Agricultural District to LI - Light Industrial District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the LI - Light Industrial District. Property Owner: Gary Welch GENERAL INFORMATION Property Owner: Gary Welch Hearing Type: Legislative Small Area Plan: None Flood Plain Overlay: None Airport Overlay: None Existing Use: Vacant SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use North RA - Residential Agricultural District Vacant South RA - Residential Agricultural District Vacant East LI - Light Industrial District and RA - Residential Agricultural District Automotive Salvage Yard West RA - Residential Single-family residence Page 156 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 5 Agricultural District TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT): A driveway permit will be needed before the development of the property. ZONING INFORMATION Zoning History: In March 1995, the Randolph County Commisioners approved the rezoning of 8.00-acres of this property from RA- Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD – Highway Commercial- Conditional District for a 70 ft by 100 ft building for horse sales with a restaurant and tack shop. Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.): LI: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) District is to provide a place for light industrial, warehousing and distribution, and sales of large-item products. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at building line Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. Page 157 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 5 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. Possible allowed uses in the LI - Light Industrial District include the following from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance: 1. Accessory uses; 2. Agricultural uses; 3. Amusements, indoor commercial (ex. Bowling alleys, skating rinks); 4. Amusements, out-of-doors commercial (ex. Roller coasters, fairgrounds); 5. Apparel and accessory sales; 6. Auction sales, yards, permanent; 7. Auction sales, temporary, one-time use; 8. Automobile and truck rental; 9. Automobile body shops (excluding open storage of wrecked vehicles); 10. Automobile carwash, drive-through, requiring vehicle stacking; 11. Automobile part sales; 12. Automobile sales; 13. Automobile service stations; 14. Automobile storage (excluding open storage of wrecked vehicles); 15. Bakery; 16. Boats, recreational vehicle sales, and service; 17. Bottling plants; 18. Builders supply sales; 19. Cabinet making; 20. Churches and their customary uses including childcare on-premises; 21. Compartmentalized storage for individual storage of residential and commercial goods; 22. Contractor’s yard and outdoor storage area; 23. Corporate offices or headquarters; 24. Dairy products, wholesale, and processing; 25. Daycare facility (corporate); 26. Farm machinery sales; 27. Fire, sheriff, and emergency services; 28. Food freezer operations; 29. Home occupations; 30. Industrial equipment sales and service; 31. Kennels; 32. Laboratory, research; 33. Machine shop, welding shop; Page 158 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 5 34. Mini-warehouse; 35. Mixed commercial and residential use where commercial use is primary and both occupy the same structure or lot; 36. Mobile home, travel trailer, camper, marine, recreational vehicle sales; 37. Monument and cut stone manufacture and sales; 38. Nursery and plant cultivation and sales; 39. Outdoor storage yard; 40. Pottery manufacturing and sales; 41. Printing and reproduction shop; 42. Radio or television studio; 43. Service stations; 44. Sheet metal fabrication; 45. Sign, directional gateway; 46. Sign, on-premise; 47. Sign, outdoor advertising (off-premises); 48. Temporary buildings, incidental to the development; 49. Temporary carnivals, rides, Ferris wheels; 50. Theater, drive-in; 51. Tobacco sales and warehousing; 52. Trailer rentals; 53. Truck terminal; 54. Upholstering and furniture refinishing; 55. Veterinary clinics; 56. Warehouses, sales, or service; and 57. Wholesale sales, not otherwise listed. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The Technical Review Committee has reviewed this request finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 5.1: Encourage new and expanding industries and businesses which diversifies the local economy by utilizing a more highly skilled labor force which increases area residents’ income and increases the tax base. Consistency Analysis: The property is located along US Hwy 311 where expansion of diverse businesses is encouraged. Page 159 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 5 of 5 Policy 5.5: The benefits of economic development and employment opportunities should be balanced against the surrounding effects such development may have on the quality of life enjoyed by area residents and the health of the environment. Consistency Analysis: The proposed rezoning of the property would be balanced by employment opportunities and quality of life for surrounding residents and also allow expansion of industrial and commercially zoned properties in this area. Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. It should be noted that this recommendation is only the opinion of the Technical Review Committee based on information supplied by the applicant before the public hearing. Additional information provided at the public hearing could cause the Planning Board to either accept or reject these recommendations. Page 160 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710774600J Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA Growth Management Areas:SECONDARY GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS:6/6/24 - UPDATED APPLICATION INFO / MB REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 32.1700 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: LI-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): Condition(S): Applicant: EARNHARDT, BOBBY City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Address: 1825 MOUNTAIN MEADOW DR Owner: WELCH, GARY Address: P O BOX 10 City, St. Zip: NORMAN, NC 28367 Permit #: 2024-00022010 Parcel #: 7746123319 Date: 06/03/2024 Location Address: Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:EARNHARDT, BOBBY Contact Phone:336 215-3027 Acreage: Township:32.1700 13 - NEW MARKET Subdivsion: Lot number: Timothy Mangum Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page 161 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request Location Map U S H W Y 3 1 1 ETTACT G R A Y F A R M R D I N T E R S T A T E H W Y 7 4 FREDFRANKTRL N E L S O N P A R K R D ALLEN DR 1 inch equals 500 feet KÃ KÃ !"a$ Directions to site: US Hwy 311 - Site on (R) approx. 1,000 ft. past Allen Dr. Page 162 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ETTACT U S H W Y 3 1 1 ALLEN DR NE L S O N P A R K R D FREDFRANKT R L The request is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet SUP for auto repair (1993) SUP for auto dealership (2005) Request location Allendale Heights S/D KÃ Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts CLOE HC LI RA RM Page 163 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ETTACT U S H W Y 3 1 1 ALLEN DR NE L S O N P A R K R D FREDFRANKT R L The request is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet SUP for auto repair (1993) SUP for auto dealership (2005) Allendale Heights S/D KÃ Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts CLOE HC LI RA RM Sophia Fire Department Page 164 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request ETTACT U S H W Y 3 1 1 ALLEN DR NE L S O N P A R K R D FREDFRANKT R L The request is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet SUP for auto repair (1993) SUP for auto dealership (2005) Allendale Heights S/D KÃ Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Sophia Fire Department Page 165 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request ET T A C T WALKER MILLRD LOFLIN DAIRY RD MARY VIOLA DR FRED FRANKTRL A L LEN DR ST E W A R T S T N E L S O N P A R K R D U S H W Y 3 1 1 G R A Y F A R M R D IN T E R ST A TE H W Y 7 4 The request is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 750 feet KÃ Legend Roads Growth Management Primary Growth Area Secondary Growth Area Rural Growth Area KÃ !"a$ Page 166 of 198 Earnhardt Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent junkyard. Picture 3: Request location on left as seen looking toward Picture 4: Property across the road from request location. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Marlboro Church Rd. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Allen Dr. Page 167 of 198 Justus, Austin Chaz P.o. Box 43 Randleman, NC 27317 Frank, Freddie Paul (Frank, Edith Donnet) 4707 Fred Frank Trl Sophia, NC 27350 Frank, James Robert (Frank, Melonie G) 4711 Fred Frank Trl Sophia, NC 27350 Lantern Holdings Inc 5 Hobbs Pl Greensboro, NC 27403 Le, Pho Duc (Pham, Thuy Hang Thi) - Additional Owners 521 Julian Ave Archdale, NC 27263 Le, Pho Duc (Pham, Thuy Hang Thi) - Additional Owners 521 Julian Ave Archdale, NC 27263 Loflin, Clifford W Jr 2410 Loflin Dairy Rd Sophia, NC 27350 Ana M Barrientos Family Trust 2511 Mary Viola Dr Sophia, NC 27350 Welch, Gary P O Box 10 Norman, NC 28367 Page 168 of 198 EX I S T I N G CO N D I T I O N A L DIS T R I C T PE R M I T Page 169 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY BOBBY EARNHARDT REZONING REQUEST #2024-00022010 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to LI - Light Industrial District as described in the application of Bobby Earnhardt are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area and Secondary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 311 which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 5.1: Encourage new and expanding industries and businesses which diversifies the local economy by utilizing a more highly skilled labor force which increases area residents’ income and increases the tax base. Consistency Analysis: The property is located along US Hwy 311 where expansion of diverse businesses is encouraged. Policy 5.5: The benefits of economic development and employment opportunities should be balanced against the surrounding effects such development may have on the quality of life enjoyed by area residents and the health of the environment. Consistency Analysis: The proposed rezoning of the property would be balanced by employment opportunities and quality of life for surrounding residents and also allow expansion of industrial and commercially zoned properties in this area. Page 170 of 198 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 171 of 198 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA UPON REQUEST BY BOBBY EARNHARDT WHEREAS, a 32.17-acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7746123319 is currently zoned HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 6, 2024, to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2024-00022010, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to LI - Light Industrial District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map are hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 172 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE A REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 173 of 198 MOTION TO DENY A REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 174 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 5 RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2024-00022018 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified legislative hearing on the request by JAMIE DIXON, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 1.01-acres at 6319 Davis Ctry Rd, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #7747936653, Rural Growth Area, from RR - Residential Restricted District to RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the RA - Residential Agricultural District. GENERAL INFORMATION Property Owner: Jamie Christopher Dixon Hearing Type: Legislative Small Area Plan: None Flood Plain Overlay: None Airport Overlay: None Existing Use: Single-family residential SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use North RA - Residential Agricultural District Vacant South RR - Residential Restricted District Single-family residential East RR - Residential Restricted District Cedar Square Apartments West RA - Residential Agricultural District VAcant Page 175 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 5 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT): A driveway permit will be needed before the development of the property. ZONING INFORMATION Zoning History: There is no history of a rezoning, Variance or Special Use Permit at the request location. Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.): RA: RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Residential Agricultural (RA) District is to provide a place for agricultural operations, forestry, and scattered non-farm residences on traditional rural lots while preserving rural open space and natural heritage assets. To maintain rural character only minor conventional residential subdivisions are allowed in this District. Requests for higher-intensity residential use are considered through standards established in this Ordinance and found to be consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at the building line Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. Page 176 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 5 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. Possible allowed uses in the RA - Residential Agricultural District include the following from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance: 1. Accessory uses; 2. Agricultural uses; 3. Athletic fields, recreation buildings, playgrounds, swim, and racquet clubs (no commercial gain); 4. Auction sales, temporary, one-time use; 5. Cemetery; 6. Churches and their customary uses including childcare on-premises; 7. Clubs and lodges, private, non-profit; 8. Community centers, public or private non-profit, for assembly and recreation; 9. Daycare facility (freestanding); 10. Family care home; 11. Farm supplies sales (feed, seed, fertilizer); 12. Fire, sheriff, and emergency services; 13. Golf Courses; 14. Home occupations; 15. Kennels; 16. Livestock sales; 17. Mobile home on individual lot Class A, B, or C; 18. Mobile home on individual lot Class A; 19. Mobile home on individual lot Class A or B; 20. Mobile home in minor subdivision Class A; 21. Mobile home in minor subdivision Class A or B; 22. Modular home, conventional; 23. Modular home, on-frame; 24. Nursery and plant cultivation and sales; 25. Pottery manufacturing and sales; 26. Residence, duplex; 27. Residence, single-family detached; 28. Residence, townhouse; 29. Residential solar collector; 30. Riding academy, commercial stables; 31. Rooming house; 32. Sawmills, planing mills – temporary; 33. Sign, on-premise; 34. Solar energy residential use; 35. Special events; Page 177 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 5 36. Subdivisions, Minor (residential); 37. Temporary buildings, incidental to the development; 38. Temporary healthcare structures; and 39. Veterinary clinics. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The Technical Review Committee has reviewed this request finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 8.3 (a): Protection of public water supply watersheds and the water-critical areas shall be considered in rezoning and development proposals. Consistency Analysis: The TRC recognizes that this request location is in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. The “protection of public water supply watersheds” is critical and should be considered as part of the rezoning process. Policy 8.6: Site planning and engineering and as-built design should minimize stormwater runoff impacts on streams and other receiving areas. Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the TRC recognizes that this request location is in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area, and all efforts should be utilized to minimize runoff impacts. Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. It should be noted that this recommendation is only the opinion of the Technical Review Committee based on information supplied by the applicant before the public hearing. Additional information provided at the public hearing could cause the Planning Board to either accept or reject these recommendations. Page 178 of 198 Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 5 of 5 Page 179 of 198 PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: RANDLEMAN LAKE WATER QUALITY CRITICAL AREA Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710774600J Growth Management Areas:RURAL GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 1.0100 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): Condition(S): Applicant: DIXON, JAMIE City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Address: 6319 DAVIS CTRY RD Owner: DIXON, JAMIE CHRISTOPHER Address: 6293 DAVIS CTRY RD City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Permit #: 2024-00022018 Parcel #: 7747936653 Date: 06/26/2024 Location Address: 6319 DAVIS CTRY RD RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:DIXON, MISTY Contact Phone:336 899-4632 Acreage: Township:1.0100 13 - NEW MARKET Subdivsion: Lot number: Timothy Mangum Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page 180 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request Location Map DAVI S C T R Y R D BRANSONDAVISRD RIVERWOOD RD 1 inch equals 500 feet Directions to site: US Hwy 311 - (R) Cedar Square Rd - (R) Davis Ctry Rd - Site on (R) just past Riverwood Rd at 6319 Davis Ctry Rd. Page 181 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( RIVERWOOD RD D A V I S C T R Y R D The request is located in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 250 feet Welborn S/D (2023) Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Multi-address Structure !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Duplex/Complex Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts RA RLOM RR Page 182 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( RIVERWOOD RD D A V I S C T R Y R D The request is located in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 250 feet Welborn S/D (2023) Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Multi-address Structure !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Duplex/Complex Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts RA RLOM RR Page 183 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request RIVERWOOD RD D A V I S C T R Y R D The request is located in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 250 feet Legend Parcels Roads USGS Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Page 184 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request KNOLLDR LE W I S D A V I S R D D A VI S C T R Y R D DAVIS FARMTRL B R ANSO N DAVISRD DAVISAC R E S T R L R I V E R W O O D R D The request is located in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 1,000 feet Legend Roads Growth Management Rural Growth Area Page 185 of 198 Dixon Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking toward Riverwood Rd. Picture 6: Request location on right as seen looking toward Ed Davis Ln. Page 186 of 198 6/28/2024 Randolph County GIS Current Owner Information Randolph County, Its Agents and Employees make not warranty to the correctness of the information set forth on this document. PIN TAX_ACRES DESCRIPTION DEED_BOOK/PAGE OWNER ADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY_STATE_ZIP 7747932056 24.5 R1926;W 001102/00779 DIXON, CHARLES LEE JR HEIRS 6281 DAVIS CTRY RD RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 7747936471 2 R1926;W 002287/01466 DIXON, JAMIE (DIXON, MISTY)6319 DAVIS CTRY RD RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 7747936653 1.01 R1926;W 002747/01524 DIXON, JAMIE CHRISTOPHER 6319 DAVIS COUNTRY RD RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 7747938961 3.73 R1926;E 001889/00800 BAO, TRAN 30641 SHADETREE LN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 Page: 1 of 1 Page 187 of 198 COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY Click or tap here to enter text. REZONING REQUEST #Click or tap here to enter text. NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to RA - Residential Agricultural District as described in the application of Jamie Dixon are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Rural Growth Area which generally are characterized by traditional agricultural operations, pasture land, forestry, rural lot subdivisions, and open space scattered non-farm residences on large tracts of land. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 8.3 (a): Protection of public water supply watersheds and the water-critical areas shall be considered in rezoning and development proposals. Consistency Analysis: The TRC recognizes that this request location is in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area. The “protection of public water supply watersheds” is critical and should be considered as part of the rezoning process. Policy 8.6: Site planning and engineering and as-built design should minimize stormwater runoff impacts on streams and other receiving areas. Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the TRC recognizes that this request location is in the Randleman Lake Critical Watershed Area, and all efforts should be utilized to minimize runoff impacts. Page 188 of 198 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 189 of 198 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA UPON REQUEST BY Click or tap here to enter text. WHEREAS, a 1.01-acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7747936653 is currently zoned RR - Residential Restricted District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 6, 2024, to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2024-00022018, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to RA - Residential Agricultural District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map are hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on August 6, 2024. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board Page 190 of 198 MOTION TO APPROVE A REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 191 of 198 MOTION TO DENY A REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Page 192 of 198 Summary of Commercial Zoning Changes June 26, 2024 Page 1 of 4 Summary of Commercial Zoning Changes in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance 102: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE DEFINITIONS Add the following definitions to Section 102: Taxi Stand – Park and Ride Lot: A system for reducing traffic congestion in which drivers leave their vehicles in parking lots and travel to other locations on various means of transportation. Towing Service: A temporary holding place for vehicles that have been towed or impounded. This definition does not include the permanent storage or dismantling of vehicles. Transitional Housing: Housing designed for the transition from a treatment program back into their community. Transitional housing is intended for individuals and families who are in recovery and require further assistance before living independently. 613: ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED A. INTENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS The following pages include detailed descriptions of the base zoning districts contained within this Ordinance. Overlay Zoning Districts are not included in the following charts since the districts lay over the base districts and the specific guidelines are covered in more detail later in this section. Conditional Districts are not listed below as there are notes on each page that addresses the Conditional Districts. After the adoption of GC: General Commercial District, LC: Limited Commercial District, and CC: Community Commercial District, the HC: Highway Commercial District shall not be used in Randolph County zoning jurisdiction for future rezonings. B. MINIMUM LOT SIZES For this Ordinance, all minimum lot sizes shall be computed by excluding any area in a designed right-of-way, and land subject to flooding or land that may aggravate the flood hazard. Add the following tables to Section 613: Page 193 of 198 Summary of Commercial Zoning Changes June 26, 2024 Page 2 of 4 : GC: GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the General Commercial (GC) District is to provide a place for regional commercial uses and for which a full range of commercial and professional uses may be located that attract customers from a larger service area. The district regulations are designed to protect and encourage the transitional character of the district by permitting uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. Landscape buffer Level II will be required along adjacent residentially zoned property or adjacent residential uses and a landscape buffer Level III along all property lines for all manufacturing uses. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at the building line Front setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. The minimum lot size requirements within Secondary Growth Areas are 40,000 sq. ft. 6. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 7. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 8. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 9. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. Page 194 of 198 Summary of Commercial Zoning Changes June 26, 2024 Page 3 of 4 LC: LIMITED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Limited Commercial (LC) District is to provide a place for low to medium-intensity crossroad businesses and community shopping establishments. The district regulations are designed to protect and encourage the transitional character of the district by permitting uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. Landscape buffer Level III will be required along adjacent residentially zoned property or adjacent residential uses. No building within this district shall exceed 40,000 square feet, including all floors. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at the building line Front setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. The minimum lot size requirements within Secondary Growth Areas are 40,000 sq. ft. 6. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 7. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 8. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 9. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. Page 195 of 198 Summary of Commercial Zoning Changes June 26, 2024 Page 4 of 4 CC: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Community Commercial (CC) District is to provide a place for crossroads commercial services to residences with basic trade and personal services that occur regularly. The district regulations are designed to protect and encourage the character of the district by permitting uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. Landscape buffer Level II will be required along adjacent residentially zoned property or adjacent residential uses. No building within this district shall exceed 10,000 square feet, including all floors. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at the building line Front setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from the right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. The minimum lot size requirements within Secondary Growth Areas are 40,000 sq. ft. 6. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 7. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 8. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 9. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. Page 196 of 198 Commercial Uses GC LC CC Amusement, Indoor - (e.g., bowling alleys, skating rinks)   Amusement Out of Doors - (e.g., roller coasters, fairgrounds, Theater, Drive-In, Ferris Wheels)  Assembly - (e.g., Event Center, Community Center, public or non-profit club and recreation, Fitness and recreational sports center)   Auction Sales, Temporary, One-time use    Automobile carwash, drive-through, requiring vehicle stacking  ` Bus station  Clubs and Places of Entertainment - commercial  Consumer Services (Dry cleaners/laundry, veterinary Clinic, locksmith, post office government offices, repair shop, cabinet making, Bakery, Barber/Beauty Services, bank, restaurant, exterminating services, library, gunsmith, tailor)    Daycare - Freestanding    Drive-in Window services (banks, laundries, fast food) if permitted in the district   Funeral Home    Health and social services centers   Home Occupation    Hotel/Motel  Manufacturing (e.g., Glass Manufacturing, Bottling Plant, , upholstering and furniture refinishing)   Mixed Commercial and residential use where commercial use is primary and both occupy the same structure or lot   Outdoor Storage Services (Service Stations, Auto Body Shops, Contractor’s Yard with outdoor storage, Tow yards, Boats, RV, Service and Sale)    Planned Business Development   Pottery manufacturing    Page 197 of 198 Commercial Uses GC LC CC Professional Offices (Laboratory, Clinic medical/dental, law office, accountant, printing/reproduction shop)    Professional Services (e.g., Veterinary clinic including Boarding, automobile repair/service station, machine/welding shop)   Public Utilities Substation S S S Radio or Television Tower S S S Religious Facility (Churches and customary uses including childcare on site)    Sales - ( e.g., Drugstore, convenience store, Flea market indoors, retail sales - apparel, accessories shoes, auction sales -permanent, grocery store, Florist)    Sales with Outdoor Display - ( e.g., Farm supplies/machinery sales, mobile homes sales, accessory building sales, builders supply sales, Flea market outdoors, Automobile sales, automobile/trailer rentals, auction yards-permanent, nursery, monument and cut stone manufacturer sales, industrial equipment/service, Wholesale sales)    School (e.g., Schools, Business/Trade) S S S Sign - Directional Gateway    Sign - On-premises    Sign - Outdoor advertising (off-premises)   Skills, Games of Chance S S S Storage (e.g. mini warehouse, automobile storage)    Telecommunication Tower S S S Transportation (e.g., Taxi Stand, park and ride lot)    Warehouse sales or service    Page 198 of 198