08AugustCC
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
TO: Randolph County Board of Commissioners
FROM: Jay Dale, Planning Director
DATE: August 10, 2020
SUBJECT: Appeal of the Decision of the Randolph County Planning Board
The Randolph County Board of Commissioners will hold a Legislative Hearing on the
appeal by COLLIN TOMLINSON of the decision by the Randolph County Planning Board
to rezone 4.09 acres located on Cedar Square Rd for TANYA RAYLE COOK, Jamestown,
NC, New Market Township, Tax ID# 7737648137, Randleman Lake Critical Area, owned
by Virginia Cranford, from RA Residential Agricultural to HC CD Highway
Commercial Conditional District.
storage yard for a hauling business for eight employees, eight dump trucks in a 20 ft. by
40 ft. building as per site plan.
The Randolph County Planning Board held a public hearing on July 7, 2020, on the above
request and unanimously approved the rezoning request as consistent, reasonable and
in the public interest as required by the Randolph County Unified Development
Ordinance, the Randolph County Growth Management Plans and as required by North
Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342.
Attachments
http://www.randolphcountync.gov
August Request Location Map
Tomlinson
k
031
LÄ
@w
k
j
Archdale
"%a#
"%d#
Liberty
@ù
Trinity
"%b#
LÉ
Randleman
Staley
@ù
@l
"%a#
Franklinville
J¥
"%b#
Ramseur
J¥
Asheboro
"%b#
@ù
@l
@e
@è
@ù
@j
@e
@Û
"%a#
"%b#
Seagrove
@Å
Æ
Legend
Roads
Reservoirs
County line
Municipal Zoning
01.252.557.510
Miles
Tomlinson Request Location Map
"%b#
Directions to site: US Hwy 311 N -
(R) Cedar Square Rd - Site on (R)
approx. 4/10 mile past Muddy
Creek Rd.
1 inch = 1,000 feet
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY TANYA RAYLE COOK
REZONING REQUEST #2020-00001681
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HD–CD–
Highway Commercial –Conditional Districtas described in the application of Tanya Rayle
Cookare consistent with theRandolph County Unified Development Ordinanceand the
2009 Randolph County Growth Management Planand are reasonable and in the public
interest for the following reasons:
1.Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A.Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Planmap for the northwestarea
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as RuralGrowth Area. Rural
Growth Areasare areas where significant highintensityresidential growth is
discouraged or not anticipated for ten (10) to fifteen (15) years. They are also areas
wheremaintaining the rural character and the natural heritage asset resources are
important.When developing the Randolph CountyGrowth Management Plan,it
was determined to buffer all reservoirs in the County by 500 ft. outside of the
reservoiras a way to protect theseimportantsources of drinking water.
B.Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 2.7 The County should ensure that land development decisions are made
to protect surface and groundwater resources through protection, preservation,
and development enhancement.
Consistency Analysis: The applicant, along with their surveyor,has worked with
staff to ensure that the proposed development, if developed according to the
proposed site plan, would have as minimal an impact on Randleman Lake as
possible. The applicant has reduced the size ofthe development to ensure
compliance withimpervious surface regulations as outlined in the Randolph
County Unified Development Ordinance.
Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions
will depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it relates to the specific
site and location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis:As stated previously, the applicant has worked with staff
to ensure that the proposed development complieswith the impervious surface
regulations. Thesurrounding propertyis mostly residential but, if developed
according to the proposed site plan, should have little impact on the adjoining land
uses.
2.Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan and applicable General Statutes.The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
______________________________________________________________
Randolph County Planning DirectorChair, Randolph County Planning Board
______________________________________________________________
Clerk to Planning BoardDate