03MarchPB
http://www.randolphcountync.gov
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
DUE TO COVID-19, WE WILL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO FOLLOW
SOCIAL DISTANCING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR
CITIZENS, BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF.
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
AGENDA
March 2, 2021
1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board.
2. Roll call of the Board members:
Reid Pell, Chair;
Wayne Joyce, Vice Chair;
John Cable;
Keith Slusher;
Kemp Davis;
Melinda Vaughan;
Ralph Modlin; and
Reggie Beeson, Alternate.
3. Consent Agenda:
Approval of minutes from February 9, 2021, Planning Board meeting.
Approval of agenda for March 2, 2021, Planning Board meeting.
Approval of the Order of the Board to Approve the Special Use Permit for
Paul Scarlata, and the Consistency, Reasonableness and in the Public
Interest Statements for the Rezoning Requests by David Lewis, MERIC,
Inc., Derksen Poultry, LLC, and Mac Wilson Property, LLC.
4. Old Business.
5. New Business.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2020-00003470
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold an Evidentiary Hearing on
the request by ROBERT LEE EVANS COMER, Asheboro, NC, and his
request for a Special Use Permit at his residence at 7243 US Hwy 220 S,
http://www.randolphcountync.gov
Richland Township, Tax ID# 7666501994, RR – Residential Restricted
District and RA – Residential Agricultural District. The proposed Special Use
Permit would specifically allow a landscaping business with a produce stand
as per site plan.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2020-00003643
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold an Evidentiary Hearing on
the request by BRANDON HOLLINGSWORTH, Asheboro, NC, and his
request for a Special Use Permit at his residence at 786 McDowell Ctry Trl,
Franklinville Township, Tax ID# 7782367405, RA – Residential Agricultural
District. The proposed Special Use Permit would specifically allow a federal
firearms license for a gun smith shop with in-person and internet sales with
no firing range as per site plan.
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000241
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the
request by GLANDON FOREST EQUITY, LLC, Raleigh, NC, and their
request to rezone 2.00 acres at the intersection of US Hwy 311 and Cedar
Square Rd, New Market Township, Tax ID #7737131258 and 7737133652,
L A Bowman subdivision lots 2-7, 61-64 plus another tract, Primary Growth
Area, Randleman Lake Watershed, from RA – Residential Agricultural
District to HC-CD – Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The
proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a retail store
as per site plan. Property Owner: Kermit R Hayes
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000246
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the
request by TJTR PROPERTIES, LLC, Asheboro, NC, and to amend the
existing Conditional Zoning District at 2863 NC Hwy 134, Tax ID#
7657589747, 21.24 acres, Secondary Growth Area, LI-CD – Light Industrial
– Conditional District, to also allow two 40 ft. by 100 ft. warehouses and a
14 ft. by 28 ft. accessory building as per site plan. (The existing Conditional
Zoning District permit allows a 40 ft. by 100 ft. building for the sale and
manufacturing of portable accessory buildings as per site plan along with
no billboard advertising signs.)
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000075
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the
request by NORMA C PIERCE HEIRS, Trinity, NC, and their request to
rezone 29.04 acres located between Flint Hill Rd, Beeson Farm Rd and
Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, be rezoned from RA – Residential
Agricultural District to CVOE-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay
Exclusive – Conditional District. Tax ID # 7724675402. Secondary Growth
Area. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a
27-lot site-built subdivision with minimum house size of 1,300 sq. ft. as per
site plan.
6. Adjournment.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 1 of 15
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES
February 9, 2021
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, February 9,
2021, at 6:30 p.m. in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St,
Asheboro, NC.
Vice-Chairman Joyce called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in
attendance. Joyce called for a roll call of the members.
Jay Dale, Randolph County Planning and Zoning Director, called the roll of the members.
• Reid Pell, Chairman, absent;
• Wayne Joyce, Vice Chairman, present;
• John Cable, present;
• Keith Slusher, present;
• Kemp Davis, present;
• Melinda Vaughan, present;
• Ralph Modlin, present; and
• Reggie Beeson, Alternate, present.
County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was also present.
Dale informed the Chairman that there was a quorum of the members present for the
meeting.
Joyce called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Consent Agenda:
• Approval of minutes from January 5, 2021, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of agenda for February 9, 2021, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of the Consistency, Reasonableness, and in the Public Interest
Statements for the Rezoning Requests by Roddy Crosgrove, Denny Romero,
Dania Puente, and Victoria Richards.
• Amend 2021 Planning Board Meeting Schedule to change April meeting to
April 13, 2021, and July meeting to July 13, 2021, due to unforeseen
scheduling conflicts.
Cable made the motion to approve the consent agenda as presented with Modlin making
the second to the motion. The motion was adopted unanimously.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 2 of 15
Joyce called for any old business to be brought before the Board. Hearing none, the Board
moved forward with the cases on the agenda.
Dale presented the first case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and
surrounding properties.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2020-00003642
PAUL SCARLATA, Asheboro, NC, is requesting a Special Use Permit at his
residence at 1923 Wood Bluff Trl, Cedar Grove Township, Tax ID# 7639648958,
Wood Bluff subdivision lot six, CVOE-CU – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive – Conditional Use District. The proposed Special Use Permit would
specifically allow a federal firearms license with no storefront or shooting range
as per the site plan.
Dale explained that Scarlata writes reviews for firearms after he has received them and would
occasionally sell one if someone approached him with interest. Dale told the Board that the
developer, Larry McKenzie, had been contacted to make sure Scarlata would comply with his
restrictive covenants. He said Mr. McKenzie did not have a problem with the request but asked
that it be brought before the Board so the community could weigh in on the decision.
Joyce opened the public hearing and asked if anyone was present in favor of the Special
Use Permit request. Hearing none, Joyce asked if there was anyone in opposition to the
request. Hearing none, Joyce closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board
members and a motion.
Slusher said he has questions about the request. He said although there is no request for
a storefront, there appears to be a parking area located on the side of the road at his
property. Dale said he had also seen the area Slusher is referring to and is not sure for
what the area is used. He said Scarlata has not indicated that he would like to have a full-
scale business. He said he told Eric Martin, at the time of the application, that he currently
writes reviews for the product and would like to obtain a Federal-Firearm License to sell
them occasionally.
Slusher asked if there have been any calls in opposition to the request. Dale said that he
had not received any calls and mentioned again that the developer had been contacted
regarding the private deed restrictions and with Scarlata’s request being of such low
impact, moved forward with his request.
Beeson said if the request is approved, it should be stated that the approval is for internet
sales, not having a storefront.
Cable said he finds it odd that the applicant did not show up for the hearing. Dale said he
was unsure of Scarlata’s absence and knew he had been in regular contact with Eric Martin
during the process. Eric Martin announced that Scarlata was absent due to heart surgery.
Cable said the restriction should be placed on the request to have internet sales only.
Joyce agreed that it would be part of the motion.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 3 of 15
Modlin made the motion to approve the Special Use Permit request on the specified
parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony
that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon
revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use
meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the
value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character
of the use, if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in
harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Slusher made a second to the motion to approve the Special
Use Permit request.
Joyce called the question on the motion to approve the Special Use request for Scarlata.
The motion was adopted unanimously, and the Special Use was granted.
Dale presented the second case of the night along, with site plans and pictures, of the site
and surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2020-00003643
DAVID LEWIS, Franklinville, NC, is requesting to rezone 16.33 acres, at 3411
Mack Lineberry Rd, Franklinville Township, Tax ID# 7774998694, Rural Growth
Area, from RA – Residential Agricultural to RBO-CD – Rural Business Overlay -
Conditional District. The proposed Conditional District Permit would specifically
allow a machine shop as per the site plan. Property owner: Joy Lewis
Joyce opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present for the Rezoning
request.
David Lewis, 3411 Mack Lineberry Rd, Franklinville, NC, said he would like to add a couple
of manual mills and lathes and possibly a computer-controlled mill to an existing building
on his property so that he may add additional income for his family.
Joyce asked Lewis his planned hours of operation and how many employees he planned
to have. Lewis said he could possibly work Monday through Thursday from 6:00 a.m. until
as late as 5:00 p.m. and has no employees currently but is planning the possibility of up to
five within the next several years.
Modlin asked if his work would be an automotive machine shop. Lewis said his shop would
be geared more toward agriculture and furniture, making brackets and specialty pieces,
possibly some for automotive.
Modlin asked about the amount and frequency of material being delivered to the site.
Lewis said the deliveries would not be frequent because you keep an abundance of
material on site. He said he may have a box truck or UPS truck delivery once a month or
so.
Davis asked about the location of the building on the property. Lewis said his building
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 4 of 15
would be approximately thirty to forty yards from the property line and he also planned to
install a buffer.
Ed Lewis, 3128 Benny Lineberry Rd., Climax, NC, father of David Lewis, said he was also
in favor of the request. He said that all the necessary requirements will be met, a buffer will
be installed out of consideration of his son’s neighbors, and feels it is a good proposition.
Joyce asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request.
Hearing none, Joyce asked if there was anyone in opposition to the request. Hearing none,
Joyce closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Joyce said there is another machine shop located not too far from this location that has
been there for several years.
Cable said all the right permits have been applied for and he seeing someone make their
dream a reality is what Randolph County is all about.
Slusher said the proposal seems to make perfect sense. He said Lewis has a large tract
of land, he is planning to provide a buffer for the neighbors and there is no opposition.
Slusher made the motion to approve the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s)
on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that
are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as
well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the
motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Cable made a second to the motion to approve the rezoning request.
Joyce called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request for Lewis and the
motion was adopted unanimously and the rezoning was granted.
Dale presented the third case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and
surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2020-00003644
MERIC, INC., Randleman, NC, is requesting to amend the Conditional District
Permit on 8.63 acres at 9755 US Hwy 220 Bus N, Level Cross Township, Tax
ID# 7767265344, Randleman Lake Watershed, Primary Growth Area. The
existing Conditional District Permit allows an event center as per the site plan.
The proposed Conditional District Permit amendment would specifically allow
lumber and manufactured home sales as per the site plan.
Joyce opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor
of the request.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 5 of 15
Eric Davis, Randleman, NC, president of MERIC, Inc, said they have a new proposed
tenant that would like to lease the existing building for lumber sales and no manufacturing.
He said they would also like to have manufactured home sales on the front of the property
and back parking lots.
Joyce asked if the original zoning allowed lumber sales. Eric Davis answered yes. He
said most recently it was an event center and by allowing this change, it would be less
noisy and would probably make the neighbors happy.
Vaughan asked if there would be any manufacturing allowed. Eric Davis answered no.
He said it would strictly be lumber sales.
Kemp Davis asked if the original zoning allowed truss manufacturing. Eric Davis
answered yes.
Cable asked what type of manufactured homes would be on the property. Eric Davis said
there would be singlewides, doublewides, and some modular homes on display for sale.
Cable asked if he would be the dealer for those homes. Eric Davis answered yes. He said
he has a dealer’s license. Cable asked if there would be any vehicles obstructing traffic
onto Bus 220. Eric Davis answered no. He said everything would be located behind the
entrance gate.
Joyce asked if there was anyone else present in favor of the request. Hearing none, Joyce
asked if there was anyone in opposition to the request. Hearing none, Joyce closed the
public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Kemp Davis said he was not sure how many more times this property would have to come
before the Board before something works. He said Eric Davis has made an effort in trying
to find a fit for the property and make it work.
Kemp Davis parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the
rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph
County Growth Management Plan. Beeson made a second to the motion to approve the
rezoning request.
Joyce called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion
was adopted unanimously, and the rezoning was granted.
Dale presented the fourth case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site
and surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000003
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 6 of 15
DERKSEN POULTRY, LLC, Asheboro, NC, is requesting to rezone 11.92 acres
at 4656 US Hwy 64 E, Franklinville Township, Tax ID #7781997135 and
7791092197, Roger Byers subdivision lots one and two, Primary Growth Area,
from HC – Highway Commercial District, HC-CD – Highway Commercial –
Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District to LI – Light
Industrial Development. Property owner: Byers Family Trust (Kathy B Allen,
Trustee)
Joyce opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor
of the request.
H R Gallimore, 231 S. Fayetteville St., Asheboro, NC, representing the applicant,
submitted a photograph (Exhibit 1 at the end of these minutes), reflecting an existing
operation of the applicant, located on Old Cedar Falls Rd, with currently over twenty
employees. He said this business would allow new employment opportunities as well, even
though he was not sure how many at this time.
Gallimore said the applicant’s request for rezoning meets all the Zoning and Growth
Management requirements and understands they will have to meet any additional County
and State regulations including water quality, buffers, and appropriate permitting. He
pointed out that there are multiple properties in the surrounding area that are already zoned
commercial as well.
Joyce asked where the photos had been taken that had been submitted. Gallimore said
they were taken at Dura-Built, LLC, Old Cedar Falls Rd, Franklinville, also owned by the
applicant. He said the applicant has several companies and is an asset to Randolph
County.
Joyce asked if this property had originally been rezoned for the Kubota dealership.
Gallimore answered yes. He said after Mr. Millikan had the rezoning approved, he found
a different site for the dealership.
Davis asked if there is a current business plan for the property. Gallimore said they are
planning a manufacturing business for metal roofing. Cable asked how far the building
would be set back on the property. Gallimore said there are no preliminary engineered
site plans available at this time because it has not been rezoned, they felt it would be pre-
mature. Dale said because they have not requested conditional zoning, site-plans were
not required at this time even though all the setback regulations will still have to be met.
Gallimore said he feels it will be low-impact for the area.
Davis asked if this business would be similar to the roofing business nearby. Gallimore
said it would be similar and probably a competitor. Joyce asked if raw materials would be
brought in and stamped out. Gallimore said he is not familiar with the process but there
would be minimal noise. Joyce said he has been in the plant up the street multiple times
and it is a clean operation and minimum noise.
Vaughan asked how many employees would be needed for this operation. Gallimore said
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 7 of 15
the number of employees would be dependent upon the success of the business.
Joyce asked if there was anyone else present in favor of the request. Hearing none, Joyce
asked if there was anyone in opposition to the request.
Sam Reiner, 3105 Indian Springs, Asheboro, NC, said without seeing the location of a
building, parking area, metal storage areas, traffic, buffers needed, and anything to do with
possible drainage, he feels it is premature to rezone the property and they would like to
see it remain agricultural zoning. He said several adjoining properties currently have
drainage issues and is concerned that run-off from this property will worsen.
Dean Staley, the pastor of First Pentecostal Church, located down the street, asked if there
were any plans for water and sewer. Joyce said the Board would not be able to answer
that question. Dale said the County does not provide public utilities and would not know of
any plans to provide that service. Joyce said this property would have to meet all
regulations through the Randolph County Health Department for septic and well approval.
Terry Dezern, 3145 Indian Springs Rd, Asheboro, NC, expressed his concerns for
additional water runoff from developing the property. He said the property is currently
wooded and there is already a severe problem of water runoff to the adjoining properties.
He said clearing the property, grading, adding structures and pavement will worsen the
situation. Dezern said he is firmly against the rezoning of the property.
April O’Brien, 3119 Indian Springs Rd., Asheboro, said she is strongly against the
rezoning. She said her family has invested a tremendous amount of money into their
property to provide an oasis for their children during this pandemic because that is all they
have right now. She also said that her property is one of the lower adjoining properties
which is already having major issues with water runoff.
Evelyn Ford, 3144 Indian Springs Rd, Asheboro, said she has experienced issues with
her well due to surrounding development and had to add a filtration system due to trash in
her water. She said she has concerns about having even more issues because of
additional wells and septic.
Jonathan O’Brien- 3119 Indian Springs Rd, Asheboro, said the previous rezoning request
had detailed drawings for the use of the property and he has concerns about the uncertainty
of this request. He said they do not know the hours of operation and there are no lighting
plans that may affect adjoining property owners who will be in direct sight of this location.
Dale said Mr. O’Brien has made the right observation. He said the applicant has disclosed
his intended use, however, with straight zoning, anything within the permitted uses of light
industrial zoning would be allowed with no conditions.
Modlin asked what the required buffer requirements would be for this zoning. Dale said he
was unsure of the exact buffer requirement, but some minimums would have to be met.
Modlin asked about the drainage issues. Dale said the drainage issues would be handled
by the State. Joyce said the State would look at the situation and their requirements will
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 8 of 15
sometimes improve an existing situation. Modlin mentioned his personal experience with
a situation of water runoff. He said if your property has created a situation of interfering
with the natural flow of water, the State will get involved to resolve the issues. Beeson
asked if grading permits would be issued for the job site. Dale said there would be building
permits issued by the County and the Building Inspections Department may look at grading,
but water issues would be handled by the State.
Morgan said the County would regulate some of his concerns. He said there will be
regulated setbacks for the structures and buffer requirements to be followed but the specific
hours of operation and lighting would be dependent on the use of the property.
Joyce asked if there was anyone else present in opposition to the request. Hearing none,
Joyce asked Gallimore if he could come up and address some of the questions regarding
the request.
Gallimore said there would be no Sunday hours of operation and no third shift. He said
their current plan is to be in operation from 6:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. He said there would
be lighting for theft prevention but nothing excessive. He also said that if he were living in
the adjoining neighborhood, knowing Derksen as well as he does and his operations, he
would have no reservations about his development plan.
Cable asked Gallimore if anyone from the audience had reached out to him with concerns.
Gallimore said someone had contacted Derksen with concerns about a poultry business
because of the name of his company, which is not his initiative.
Joyce commented on the photo presented to the Board as being a clean-looking operation.
Gallimore said he provided the photos for that reason, it usually helps to see how someone
maintains their current operation and Derksen does a great job.
Cable asked Gallimore if he thought there would be any lighting issues. Gallimore
answered no. He said he is not aware of any complaints from the neighbors at Derksen’s
other business location on Old Cedar Falls Rd. He said they must be mindful of potential
visibility problems for highway traffic due to lighting as well.
Gallimore said that Derksen will work with the County and the State to ensure that all rules
and regulations are met, and he wants to be a good neighbor.
Davis said there is no doubt that the properties in the area are commercial-type properties
and will continue to increase due to the location of the highway. He said this property is
located adjacent to a subdivision and with the request of straight zoning, the neighbors are
skeptical of the result. Gallimore said he could understand their concerns but when
someone spends this kind of money on a piece of property, they need a little flexibility on
the use of the property without specific conditions in the event the original plan is not
successful. Davis said there are problems with having conditions on a piece of property if
the proposal does not work out. He referred to the previous case where MERIC, Inc. has
been before the Board multiple times because a specific condition to the zoning has not
worked out although the Board does want to try and protect the adjoining homeowners.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 9 of 15
Gallimore said he understands the concerns and feels if the right buffers are put into place,
they can both co-exist. Davis said he would hope that Derksen would provide ample
buffering to protect the homeowners. Gallimore said he thinks the Board can rest assured
of that. He also said that he did not feel that the topography would allow anything too close
to the adjoining homes.
Having no additional questions for the applicant, Joyce closed the public hearing for
discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Cable said his main concern is one of the ladies with small children. He said he knows it
would not be the same but would like to see a good buffer that allows them to co-exist.
Beeson said in regards to the water runoff and drainage, the permitting requirements and
regulations from the County and State for this development, will hopefully improve the
existing situation for the adjoining properties. Joyce agreed.
Cable said the Board has seen multiple times where the development of a project has
improved a situation for adjoining properties. He also said that Gallimore has come before
the Board on multiple occasions to represent a developer and has not known him to be
untruthful and represents clients that are straight and honest and does not see why his
current client would be any different. He said his biggest concerns are the buffers and
lighting and feel the applicant will do what is necessary to co-exist.
Modlin said this project would also be in the right area for commercial traffic rather than
being located on a rural road in a country setting. Joyce said there is good visibility in both
directions as well.
Cable made the motion to approve the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s)
on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination
of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that
are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as
well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions (including the water study,
all NCDOT approvals and changes to residential covenants as discussed), also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph
County Growth Management Plan. Slusher made a second to the motion to approve the
rezoning request.
Joyce called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request for Derksen
Poultry, LLC, and the motion was adopted unanimously, and the rezoning was granted.
Dale presented the last case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and
surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000014
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 10 of 15
MAC WILSON PROPERTY, LLC, Franklinville, NC, is requesting to rezone 3.62
acres located at 1815 Pleasant Ridge Rd, Coleridge Township, Tax ID#
8700198488, Secondary Growth Area, from LI-CU – Light Industrial –
Conditional Use and RA – Residential Agricultural District to LI - CD – Light
Industrial – Conditional District. (The existing Conditional Use Permit allows the
construction of a 40 ft. by 80 ft. building for warehouse storage for related furniture business.) The proposed Conditional District Permit would specifically
allow the assembly of purification cartridges and replacement parts and service
items for high-pressure breathing compressors as per the site plan. Property
owner: Hellenic Property Ventures, LLC
Joyce opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor
of the request.
Gary Williams, president of Mac Wilson Properties, LLC, and one of his partners, William
Johnson, were both present. Williams said he and his partners are currently in the process
of trying to purchase the property located on Pleasant Ridge Rd for one of their companies,
(Blue Spartan Products), which manufactures different styles and sizes of disposable
filtration cartridges for special breathing air compressors, used by firemen, scuba divers,
and even paintball participants. He said in addition to their manufacturing, they buy and re-
sell other types of air filters, compressor oils, and parts. He explained the process and
showed the product to the Board.
Williams said Blue Spartan Products have been in business for about one and one-half
years and currently have only about five to six hundred square feet of space dedicated to
the assembly of these products within another building, located on Faith Rock Rd,
Franklinville, NC, which they have outgrown.
Williams said the rezoning would be low impact and positive for the neighborhood. He said
they would have to renovate the building to accommodate their needs and clean up the
outside of the property for better curb appeal. He said all the manufacturing would be done
inside the building, there would be four to six employees, shipments would be handled by
UPS and FedEx trucks, and an occasional tractor-trailer. He said most of the shipments
needing a tractor-trailer would be re-located to their business on Faith Rock Rd.
Cable asked about hours of operation. Williams said they currently work Monday through
Thursday, ten hours a day although currently they have had to work some overtime on
Fridays and this past Saturday was the first Saturday they have had to work. He said the
normal should be Monday through Friday, eight to ten hours a day with only one shift. He
said in the event they needed to work additional shifts, the neighbors would not even know
they were there. He said there is nothing loud and obnoxious about the facility and
everything is done inside the building.
Cable asked if there would be any compressor noise. Williams said they may be a low-
pressure compressor, but the current building already has a covered area where a
compressor was previously located on the backside of the building. He said it would not be
any different or above and beyond what was already there.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 11 of 15
Cable asked if by moving to a new facility, they would become more efficient and possibly
scale back the hours. Williams said it would probably not scale back the hours because
they are in the infancy stage of the business and orders continue to grow because there
are not but a few companies that manufacture the product.
Davis asked if he was handling chemicals. Williams answered no. He said they assemble
the product from purchased materials.
Joyce asked if there was anyone else present in favor of the request. Hearing none, Joyce
asked if there was anyone in opposition to the request.
Brenda McMasters, 1366 Park Rd, Ramseur, NC, said her property backs up to this
property. She said when the property was rezoned last time, it was supposed to be used
for warehouse storage for the furniture business and has changed to what appears to be
a trucking terminal. She submitted photos (Exhibits 2A – 2H at the end of these minutes),
to demonstrate the number of trucks and the current appearance of the property. She said
the warehouse was only used for a month or two as it was originally approved and then
remained empty until this trucking terminal moved to the location. She also said constant
traffic and noise is coming from the property and they would like to see it used for
agriculture.
Davis asked who is the current tenant of the property. Brenda McMasters said she was
unsure, but it appears that it is being used as a trucking terminal. Davis said the applicant
is not asking to continue to use the property in the same manner as it is currently being
used. Brenda McMasters said they still do not want noise in the area, and they want the
property to remain agricultural.
Modlin asked if the photos that were submitted were taken currently. Brenda McMasters
said they were taken earlier today. She said the building is supposed to be used for storage
and has only one box truck on the property.
Dale said he thinks the complaint is a separate issue and something Code Enforcement
may need to look at. He said the current applicant is not operating the trucking terminal,
and what he is requesting seems less intense than even the warehouse that was approved.
Brenda McMasters said again, they are concerned about the noise and want to see it
used as agriculture. Dale said he would have Code Enforcement investigate it.
Ronald McMasters, 4430 Ridgetop Rd, Ramseur, NC, said he lives adjacent to the
proposed property and has concerns about air compressor noise because his bedroom is
less than 175 ft. from the building. He said currently trucks are coming in and out all hours
of the night, blowing horns, leaving trucks running for an hour or hour and a half at the time,
rattling his house. He said he would like something to be done about the current situation.
Joyce said he understands if the applicant purchases the property, the trucks currently on
the property will be removed and there will be a low-pressure compressor on the property,
with only four to six employees. Robert McMasters said if everything is located inside,
there should not be any noise, but he understood the applicant to say he would have a
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 12 of 15
high-pressure compressor, which sounds like it will be a lot of noise.
William Jarman, 1820 Pleasant Ridge Rd, Ramseur, said he moved here from Concord
to get away from the City. He said he raises cows, goats, and chickens. Jarman said a
small number of employees was mentioned and then it was made clear that the business
was growing. He questioned the number of employees that would be allowed due to
growth. He said when he moved here, he was told the building would be used for storage
and only one box truck on the property, and trucks are coming and going and partying all
hours of the night. He also said he has installed a $7,000.00 privacy fence between his
home and the business because employees come out to eat lunch and throw down trash
that blows onto his property. He said he has worked hard all his life to get where he is and
cannot keep moving. He also said adding more industry is going to lower his property value.
Ronnie Kidd, 1857 Pleasant Ridge Rd, Ramseur, NC said he has lived on his property for
over forty years. He said the agreement for the warehouse building was that it was
supposed to be used for cushion cutting and then hauled off and as far as he knew the
property has never been rezoned. He said it should be agriculture zoning. He said he
knows Williams and does not blame him for wanting to make a living, but the noise and
wastes will affect the neighbors. He asked what guarantees he would have that the
business will not affect his farm and water run-off will not affect his property. He said the
neighbors are currently having issues with noise from this property and they do not know
what type of noise will be created from this new business.
Kidd said he would like for the Board to understand where the neighbors are coming from.
He said the property has been agricultural for years and asked for it to remain agricultural
because bringing industry into a residential area does not help property values.
Modlin said he knew exactly where Kidd was coming from because the farm that he grew
up on was taken by the State for a highway.
Cable asked Kidd if he or any of his neighbors have contacted the County to complain
about the current situation. Kidd answered no. Jarman spoke out from the audience, he
said he called the County and was told to bring proof of the problem and it would be
investigated.
Robert McMasters said Williams had mentioned there may have been an air compressor
on the backside of the building and it was a band saw at one time.
Jarman said he already has problems with run-off onto his property which he bought into
but if they build an additional building and additional parking it will worsen the situation for
him.
Joyce asked the applicant if he was planning on building an additional building or
expanding the existing building on the property. Williams answered no. Joyce told Jarman
if expanding or new construction is needed in the future, the applicant will have to come
back before the Board.
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 13 of 15
Cable said the neighborhood agrees that there is an undesirable situation on the property
now and the applicant’s request may be a solution to the problem.
Kidd said he did not get an answer regarding the water run-off and if anything would be
done about the current situation. Joyce said it is the Board’s understanding that there will
be no grading or building on the property that will require changes for the applicant.
Joyce asked Williams if he would come back up to the podium and answer some of the
Board’s questions.
Modlin asked what would be done with the debris from sawing the plastic parts and if it is
collected and contained. Williams answered yes. He said in a full eight-hour day there is
little waste. He said it is mainly a sweeping cleanup and a final clean-up by vacuum.
Cable asked Williams if he was aware of the trucking problems that are currently on the
property. Williams said he is familiar and would like the neighbors to know that all the
current issues will be gone, he intends to improve the curb appeal and he knows that he
will not be allowed to build a new building or expand the existing building on the property
without coming before the Board again. He said he would be making the parking situation
better by adding gravel, large trucks will no longer be on the property, only his employees
will be parked on the property during the day.
Williams said he would also like to address the compressor concerns. He said if the
compressor located on the outside of the building is a concern, he can locate one inside of
the building. He said mowing lawns will more than likely make more noise than his entire
business will generate.
Cable asked if his business would own the property and have full access to the property.
Williams answered yes. Cable asked if he would enforce security on the property and
prosecute to the full extent of the law for trespassing. Williams answered yes. Cable said
the neighbors have legitimate concerns regarding the current situation. He said when the
property was rezoned, it was not approved for what is currently taking place on the
property. He said the pictures that have been presented tell the story, but the Board was
unaware of the situation. He said Williams has heard the concerns and feels he can remedy
the situation with his request. Williams agreed. He said he feels he will improve the current
situation for the neighbors. He said would like to offer an open invitation to anyone that
would like to see the operation in action.
Beeson said there were questions regarding the growth of his company and asked if Dura-
Built would remain at the other location. Williams answered yes. He said all the neighbors’
complaints should go away if they are approved to move forward with the request.
Cable said sometimes people accuse the Board of having their minds made up before the
hearing process has even begun and he has expressed many times that is not the case.
He said he feels the neighbors have come before the Board with legitimate complaints. He
said if the complaints had been made known to the Planning Department, someone could
have addressed the situation because the current use of the property was not intended by
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 14 of 15
the Board’s approval. He said Williams has shined a light on the entire situation and this
should become a much better situation for the neighbors.
Cable said the Board wants business, agriculture, and families in Randolph County and
everyone must co-exist, and this request may be delivering the perfect solution.
Williams said he has driven by the property multiple times within the last thirty days and
realized the current use was not intended for the property. He said it appears to be nothing
more than a parking lot for tractor-trailers that are continuously moving in and out. He said
all of that will be gone and the neighbors will never have to see it again.
Cable asked if anyone were to trespass, would he prosecute to the full extent of the law.
Williams answered yes. He said they have their camera systems that will be located on
the property. Cable asked if Williams would still have an open invitation for the neighbors
to see his operation. Williams answered yes. He said if they have questions or concerns
regarding his operation, he welcomes them to come by and see it for themselves.
Modlin asked Williams if he was planning to pave the parking because there are questions
about water run-off. Williams said that he would be graveling the parking at this time
because of the poor conditions due to the large trucks and would follow all necessary rules
and regulations if decided to pave in the future.
Joyce said they feel bad for the neighbors and what they are currently going through, and
this should be a welcomed improvement for them.
Having no additional questions for the applicant, Joyce closed the public hearing for
discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Beeson said he feels Williams proposal will be a much better situation for the neighbors.
Joyce agreed. He said the change will be low impact, improve traffic, and an overall
improvement to the area. Vaughan said she also agrees and likes to see a positive
outcome in any situation.
Slusher said in all his years on the Board, he has not seen a business owner give his
business card to someone who was originally in opposition of a request. Vaughan said
that is a good way to start a relationship. Cable said he feels good about the results and
would like to make a motion.
Cable made the motion to approve the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s)
on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination
of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that
are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as
well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions (including the water study,
all NCDOT approvals and changes to residential covenants as discussed), also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph
County Growth Management Plan. Vaughan made a second to the motion to approve the
Planning Board Minutes February 9, 2021 Page 15 of 15
rezoning request.
Joyce called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request for Mac Wilson
Property, LLC, and the motion was adopted unanimously, and the rezoning was granted.
Joyce announced that Reid Pell, chairman, should have completed his surgery and
recovery and should be present for the next Board meeting.
Having no further business, Joyce called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Modlin made
the motion to adjourn with Slusher making the second to the motion.
Joyce called the question on the motion to adjourn and the motion was adopted
unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m. with 24 citizens present.
RANDOLPH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
_________________________
Planning Director
_________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to the Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
ORDER APPROVING SPECIAL USE PERMIT
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
BY PAUL SCARLATA
SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2020-00003642
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on February 9,
2021, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the
application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County
Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the
application to make use of the property located at 1923 Wood Bluff Trl for the purpose
indicated is hereby APPROVED, subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph
County Unified Development Ordinance.
HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH
COUNTY PLANNING BOARD APPROVES THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR PAUL SCARLATA BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING:
1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where
proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved;
2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications;
3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property,
or that the use is a public necessity; and
4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located
and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special
Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this
Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their
successors in interest.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY DAVID LEWIS
REZONING REQUEST #2020-00003643
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to RBO – CD –
Rural Business Overlay – Conditional District as described in the application of David
Lewis are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public
interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Rural Growth Area. Rural
Growth Areas and rural and agricultural in nature and consists on large
undeveloped tracts of land.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 1.7 Planning and development decisions should be based on the principal
of promoting investment in Randolph County to expand employment opportunities
while preserving and improving the quality of life for all county residents.
Consistency Analysis: The parcel for this request is a large tract of land and by
approving the request it would promote investment in the community and also
potentially expand employment opportunities for citizens in the community.
Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions
will depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it relates to the specific
site and location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis: The request is on a large parcel of land and would provide
for buffers for the adjacent rural land uses and residences.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY MERIC, INC
REZONING REQUEST #2020-00003644
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC – CD –
Highway Commercial – Conditional District as described in the application of MERIC, Inc.,
are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest
for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
B. The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area.
Primary Growth Areas generally lie along major transportation corridors and have
access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 220 Bus N which is a major
transportation corridor.
C. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural
commercial activity can locate; with the goal of increasing economic activity; job
creation, and the provision of services to the rural community.
Consistency Analysis: The property at the request has been used commercially
for several years with the last approved use being as an events center. The new
proposed use would allow the existing building to be reused increasing economic
activity, job creation and also provide surfaces such as lumber and mobile home
sales to the surrounding community.
Policy 4.2 Highway oriented commercial uses should be clustered along segments
of arterial streets and contain land uses that are mutually compatible and
reinforcing in use and design. They should be designed in a way that minimizes
signage, access points and excessive lengths of commercial strip development.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the property at the request location
has been zoned for commercial activities for some time. The area also has other
commercial operations. The approval of this request would be less intense than
the events center and produce less noise pollution.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY DERKSEN POULTRY, LLC
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000003
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to LI – CD –
Light Industrial – Conditional District as described in the application of Derksen Poultry,
LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public
interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area.
Primary Growth Areas generally lie along major transportation corridors and have
access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 64 E which is a major
transportation corridor.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural
commercial activity can locate; with the goal of increasing economic activity; job
creation, and the provision of services to the rural community.
Consistency Analysis: The property at the request location has been zoned HC
– Highway Commercial, HC – CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District for
several years with one of the parcels being used for commercial activities and the
other rezoned for commercial uses but the property was never developed. The
property is also located in an area that has a large amount of industrial and other
commercial operations. Since the land use patterns have long been established
for this area of the County, this request will further increase economic activity and
job creation in the area.
Policy 4.2 Highway oriented commercial uses should be clustered along segments
of arterial streets and contain land uses that are mutually compatible and
reinforcing in use and design. They should be designed in a way that minimizes
signage, access points and excessive lengths of commercial strip development.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the property at the request location
has been zoned for commercial activities and has had commercial activities for
some time. The area also has industrial and other commercial operations. The
approval of this request would be mutually compatible with the existing land uses
and would minimize the “excessive lengths of commercial strip development.”
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY MAC WILSON PROPERTY, LLC
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000014
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to LI – CD –
Light Industrial – Conditional District as described in the application of Mac Wilson
Property, LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance
and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the
public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Secondary Growth Area.
Secondary Growth Areas generally are transitional in land uses and may have
mixed development types.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural
commercial activity can locate; with the goal of increasing economic activity; job
creation, and the provision of services to the rural community.
Consistency Analysis: The property at the request has been zoned LI – CU –
Light Industrial – Conditional Use since 1991 and the existing Conditional Use
allows the construction of a 40 ft. by 80 ft. building for warehouse storage for
related furniture business. The warehouse has been closed for several years.
Approving this request would allow the existing building to be reused increasing
economic activity, job creation and also allow for the creation of a business that
could be of less impact to the surrounding residential community.
Policy 4.2 Highway oriented commercial uses should be clustered along segments
of arterial streets and contain land uses that are mutually compatible and
reinforcing in use and design. They should be designed in a way that minimizes
signage, access points and excessive lengths of commercial strip development.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the property at the request location
has been zoned for industrial activities and has had commercial activities for some
time. The area also has industrial and other commercial operations. The approval
of this request would be less intense than other commercial operations and
produce less noise pollution.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
Request Location Map
0 2.5 5 7.5 101.25 Miles
Archdale
Trinity
Randleman
Asheboro
Seagrove
Liberty
Staley
Ramseur
Franklinville
/0j2
?v!"c$
KÃ !"`$
I¤I¤!"`$
KÈ
?k
?ø
?ø
?k
?i
?Å
?Ú
?Ä
?ç ?d
?ø
?ø?d
!"a$
!"a$
!"`$
!"a$
Legend
Roads
Reservoirs
County line
Municipal Zoning
kj
Pierce
kj
Comer
kj
Glandon Forest
kj
Hollingsworth
TJTR Properties kj
CASE SUMMARY FOR
SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2020-00003470
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold an Evidentiary Hearing on the request by
ROBERT LEE EVANS COMER, Asheboro, NC, and his request for a Special Use Permit
at his residence at 7243 US Hwy 220 S, Richland Township, Tax ID# 7666501994, RR –
Residential Restricted District and RA – Residential Agricultural District. The proposed
Special Use Permit would specifically allow a landscaping business with a produce stand
as per site plan.
ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE
SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
3710766600JFlood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the
Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work
may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all
conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed
shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest.
SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW A LANDSCAPING BUSINESS WITH A PRODUCE STAND AS PER
SITE PLAN
Signature of Applicant:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official
Applicant: COMER, ROBERT LEE EVANS
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Address: 7243 US HWY 220 S
Owner: COMER, ROBERT LEE EVANS
Address: P O BOX 3106
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27204
Permit #: 2020-00003470
Parcel #: 7666501994
Date: 02/02/2021
Location Address: 7243 US HWY 220 S
ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Permit Type Code: PZ 3
CONTACT
NAME:COMER, ROBERT Contact Phone:336 872-4029
Acreage: Township:2.6200 17 - RICHLAND
Subdivsion: Lot number:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Development
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Comer Request Location Map
US HW
Y 220 S
RICHLAND PARK DREM M ANUEL CHURCH RDOAK VIEW LN
1 inch = 400 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 220 S - Siteon (L) approx 400 ft past EmmanuelChurch Rd at 7243 US Hwy 220 S.
Comer Special Use Permit Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(RICHLAND PARK DREM M ANUEL CHURCH RDUS H
W
Y 220 S
OAK VIEW LN
1 inch = 300 feet
David MaxtonKing S/D
OakviewAcres S/D
RichlandPark S/D
Seagrove Lumber& Building S/D
Requestlocation
Legend
ParcelsStructures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream bufferCounty zoningDistricts
HC
LI
RA
RR
Comer Special Use Permit Request
EM M ANUEL CHURCH RDUS H
W
Y 220 S
OAK VIEW LN
1 inch = 200 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Comer Special Use Permit Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 6:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward Oak View Ln.
MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit
request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not
materially endanger the public health or safety, the use
meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will
not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that
the use is a public necessity and the location and character
of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as
submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area
and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request
on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may
materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use
does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or
the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining
property, that the use is not a public necessity and the
location and character of use if developed according to the
plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in
harmony with the area and in general conformity with the
Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
CASE SUMMARY FOR
SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2021-00000233
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold an Evidentiary Hearing on the request by
BRANDON HOLLINGSWORTH, Asheboro, NC, and his request for a Special Use Permit
at his residence at 786 McDowell Ctry Trl, Franklinville Township, Tax ID# 7782367405,
RA – Residential Agricultural District. The proposed Special Use Permit would specifically
allow a federal firearms license for a gun smith shop with in-person and internet sales
with no firing range as per site plan.
ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE
SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District:
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
3710778200JFlood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the
Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work
may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all
conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed
shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest.
SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW A FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSE FOR A GUNSMITH SHOP WITH
IN-PERSON AND AND INTERNET SALES WITH NO FIRING RANGE AS PER SITE PLAN
Signature of Applicant:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official
Applicant: HOLLINGSWORTH, BRANDON
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27203
Address: 786 MCDOWELL CTRY RD
Owner: HOLLINGSWORTH, BRANDON
Address: 786 MCDOWELL CTRY TRL
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27203
Permit #: 2021-00000233
Parcel #: 7782367405
Date: 02/03/2021
Location Address: 786 MCDOWELL CTRY TRL
ASHEBORO, NC 27203
Permit Type Code: PZ 3
CONTACT
NAME:HOLLINGSWORTH, BRANDON Contact Phone:336 929-0725
Acreage: Township:19.6600 08 - FRANKLINVILLE
Subdivsion: Lot number:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Development
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Hollingsworth Request Location Map
OLDCEDARFALLSRDLOFLINPONDRDCEDARFALLSCHURCHDR
MCDOWE L L C T R Y TRL
1 inch = 500 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 64 E -(L) Loflin Pond Rd - (R) McDowellCtry Trl - Site on (L) at 786McDowell Ctry Trl.
Hollingsworth Special Use Permit Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
DeepRiverDeepRiver
MILL HOUSE LNLOFLINPONDRDMCDOW E L L C T RYTRL
1 inch = 500 feet
SaponaManufacturing
Requestlocation
Cedar Falls UnitedMethodist Church
Cedar FallsBaptist Church
Legend
ParcelsStructures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Flood plains
Town of Franklinville ZoningCounty zoning
Districts
LI
RA
RR
Hollingsworth Special Use Permit Request
1 inch = 200 feet
Legend
Parcels
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Applicant'sresidence
Hollingsworth Special Use Permit Request
M C D O W E L L CTRYTRL
1 inch = 300 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Flood plains
Hollingsworth Special Use Permit Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Request location to
right as seen looking
toward Loflin Pond
Rd.
Picture 6:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward end of
McDowell Ctry Trl.
MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit
request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not
materially endanger the public health or safety, the use
meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will
not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that
the use is a public necessity and the location and character
of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as
submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area
and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request
on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may
materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use
does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or
the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining
property, that the use is not a public necessity and the
location and character of use if developed according to the
plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in
harmony with the area and in general conformity with the
Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000241
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the request by
GLANDON FOREST EQUITY, LLC, Raleigh, NC, and their request to rezone 2.00 acres
at the intersection of US Hwy 311 and Cedar Square Rd, New Market Township, Tax ID
#7737131258 and 7737133652, L A Bowman subdivision lots 2-7, 61-64 plus another
tract, Primary Growth Area, Randleman Lake Watershed, from RA – Residential
Agricultural District to HC-CD – Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed
Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a retail store as per site plan. Property
Owner: Kermit R Hayes
The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case,
and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the
Technical Review Committee finds that this request:
Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
Should be approved by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion.
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial
activity can locate; with the goal of increasing economic activity; job creation, and the
provision of services to the rural community.
Policy 4.6 Compatible land uses such as rural neighborhood retail and service
establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered during
the rezoning process with the general goal of reducing automobile travel distances and
promoting better livability in the community.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710773700J
Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 2.0000
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A RETAIL STORE AS PER SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: GLANDON FOREST EQUITY LLC
City, St. Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27609
Address: 3825 BARRETT DRIVE
Owner: HAYES, KERMIT R
Address: 4995 EDGAR RD
City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350
Permit #: 2021-00000241
Parcel #: 7737131258
Date: 02/03/2021
Location Address:
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:PURDUM, BRENT Contact Phone:919 235-7858
L A BOWMAN SC12-7
Acreage: Township:0.5400 13 - NEW MARKET
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, Request Location Map
USHWY311 CEDARSQUARERDJ OHNSON STEXT
GLENOLAINDUSTRIALDROLDGLENOLA RDBELORUSHDR POOLE RD
JOHNSON STOLD CEDARSQUARERD
INTERSTATE HWY 74
B O W M A N L O O P DR
1 inch = 400 feet
Archdale
KÃ
KÃ
!"a$
!"a$
Directions to site: US Hwy 311 - (R) Cedar Square Rd - Site on immediate (L).
Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
JOHNSON STEXT
OLDGLENOL ARDUS HWY 311
BELORUSH
DRPOOLE RD
JOHNSON STO L D C EDAR SQUARE RD
INTERSTATE HWY 74
B O W M A N LO OPD
RCEDARSQUARERDThe request is located in Randleman Lake Watershed Area.1 inch = 400 feet
!"a$
!"a$
KÃ
KÃ
Thurston GWilliams Estate
L W Bowman S/D
Requestlocation
Legend
ParcelsStructures
Type
!(Multi-address Structure
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Duplex/Complex
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
City of Archdale Zoning
County zoningDistricts
HC
LI
RA
RBO
RM
RR
Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, Rezoning Request
JOHNSON STUSHWY311
B O W M A N L O O P D RCEDAR SQUARE RDThe request is located in Randleman Lake Watershed Area.1 inch = 200 feet
KÃ
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Request location on
left.
Picture 3:
Nearby industrial
park.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 6:
Adjacent
residence.
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY GLANDON FOREST EQUITY, LLC
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000241
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD –
Highway Commercial – Conditional District as described in the application of Glandon
Forest Equity, LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development
Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable
and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the northwest area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area.
Primary Growth Areas generally lie along major transportation corridors and have
access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 311 and is also close to
Interstate 74 which is a major transportation corridor.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural
commercial activity can locate; with the goal of increasing economic activity; job
creation, and the provision of services to the rural community.
Consistency Analysis: The proposed location for this proposed retail store is
supported by the Randolph County Growth Management Plan by allowing for the
orderly development of an area of the property that will increase economic activity,
job creation and the provision of services and goods to this rural community.
Policy 4.6 Compatible land uses such as rural neighborhood retail and service
establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered
during the rezoning process with the general goal of reducing automobile travel
distances and promoting better livability in the community.
Consistency Analysis: The proposed location for this retail store would help
reduce the travel distances that citizens must now undertake to be able to have
the necessities of living in this area. There are some small retail stores currently in
the area and the addition of another retail store could possibly help the existing
stores and promote better livability in the area.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning
request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the
rezoning application to the requested zoning district
based upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning
application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000246
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the request by
TJTR PROPERTIES, LLC, Asheboro, NC, and to amend the existing Conditional Zoning
District at 2863 NC Hwy 134, Tax ID# 7657589747, 21.24 acres, Secondary Growth Area,
LI-CD – Light Industrial – Conditional District, to also allow two 40 ft. by 100 ft.
warehouses and a 14 ft. by 28 ft. accessory building as per site plan. (The existing
Conditional Zoning District permit allows a 40 ft. by 100 ft. building for the sale and
manufacturing of portable accessory buildings as per site plan along with no billboard
advertising signs.)
The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case,
and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the
Technical Review Committee finds that this request:
Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
Should be approved by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion.
Policy 3.1 Industrial development should be on land that is physically suitable and has
unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the identification of such
land should be encouraged.
Policy 3.4 Warehousing, storage and distribution facilities should have direct access to
appropriate thoroughfares and should be visually buffered according to their location.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: LI-CD-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710764600J
Growth Management Areas:SECONDARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 15.0000
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: LI-CD-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): AMEND THE CONDITIONAL DISTRICT PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR
TWO 40 FT X 100 FT WAREHOUSES AND A 14 FT X 28 FT
ACCESSORY USE BUILDING AS PER SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: TJTR PROPERTIES LLC
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27204
Address: P.O. BOX3207
Owner: TJTR PROPERTIES LLC
Address: P O BOX 3207
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27204
Permit #: 2021-00000246
Parcel #: 7657589747
Date: 02/03/2021
Location Address: 2863 NC HWY 134
ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:SCHNEIDER, THOMAS Contact Phone:336 953-5414
PORTABLE STRUCTURES, LLCPT1
Acreage: Township:21.2400 04 - CEDAR GROVE
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
TJTR Properties, LLC, Request Location Map
US
H
W
Y
220
S
ZOO PKWYNCHWY134SANDTRAP
LN
MONTEREYRD
INTERSTATE
H
W
Y
73/74
NASSA U TRL
1 inch = 500 feet
?Ú
?Ú
!"`$!"a$
Directions to site: US Hwy 220 S -(L) NC Hwy 134 - Site on (L) at2863 NC Hwy 134.
TJTR Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
ZO O PKWY
IN
TERSTATE
H
W
Y
7
3
/
7
4
MONTEREYRD
NASSAUT R LNC HWY 134US
H
W
Y
220
S
1 inch = 500 feet
Pinewood Golf& Country Club
Cox's HarleyDavidson
SouthardLandscaping
Requestlocation
?Ú
?Ú
!"`$
!"a$
!"`$
!"a$?ç
Legend
ParcelsStructures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream bufferCounty zoning
Districts
HC
LI
RA
RR
TJTR Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
US
H
W
Y
22
0
S
NCHWY134IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
H
WY
7
3
/
7
4
1 inch = 300 feet
Pinewood Golf& Country Club
Cox's HarleyDavidson
?Ú
?Ú
!"`$
!"a$
!"`$
!"a$
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
TJTR Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
Cox’s Harley
Davidson.
Picture 3:
Nearby landscaping
business.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Dawson
Miller Rd.
Picture 6:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Monterey
Rd.
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY TJTR PROPERTIES, LLC,
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000246
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to LI-CD – Light
Industrial – Conditional District as described in the application of TJTR Properties, LLC,
are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest
for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southwest area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Secondary Growth Area.
Secondary Growth Areas are predominately areas that are transitional in nature in
that they are changing from a rural, agricultural area to more of a mixed use type
of development.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 3.1 Industrial development should be on land that is physically suitable and
has unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the
identification of such land should be encouraged.
Consistency Analysis: The property for this request is suitable for this type of
operation as the property was rezoned for this type of operation several years ago.
The location of the request, along with the adjoining commercial uses, encourages
commercial development in this area and prevents having pockets of commercial
or industrial zoning scattered through-out the County.
Policy 3.4 Warehousing, storage and distribution facilities should have direct
access to appropriate thoroughfares and should be visually buffered according to
their location.
Consistency Analysis: The request location, with its proximity to NC Hwy 139,
Interstate 73 74, and US Hwy 220 S, affords the site to direct access to major
transportation corridors and would limit the amount of commercial traffic in
residential neighborhoods.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning
request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the
rezoning application to the requested zoning district
based upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning
application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000075
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a Legislative Hearing on the request by
NORMA C PIERCE HEIRS, Trinity, NC, and their request to rezone 29.04 acres located
between Flint Hill Rd, Beeson Farm Rd and Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, be
rezoned from RA – Residential Agricultural District to CVOE-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive – Conditional District. Tax ID # 7724675402. Secondary
Growth Area. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a 27-lot
site-built subdivision with minimum house size of 1,300 sq. ft. as per site plan.
The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case,
and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the
Technical Review Committee finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be approved by the Randolph County Planning Board.
Based upon information available at the time, the Technical Review Committee
recommended approval of the rezoning request. However, after further review of issues
raised by the community and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, the
Technical Review Committee is now split on the recommendation for this rezoning request. Specifically, North Carolina General Statutes 153A, Part 3, that authorize County
zoning states, “for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare” and part of the Technical Review Committee now has safety concerns regarding
the number of connections to the existing State maintained roads.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion for approval
of the request.
Policy 6.13 Conventional Residential subdivisions are anticipated of similar housing characteristics to the community.
38
Policy 6.14 Residential subdivisions should, in order to promote efficiencies in the
delivery of urban services, be encouraged to develop in a fashion which minimizes “leap
frog” development (i.e. leaving large vacant areas between developments).
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion for denial of
the request.
Policy 6.12 Factors to be considered in major subdivision approval in Primary and
Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major
thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and community
compatibility.
Policy 6.22 New driveway connections should be designed in a way to minimize new
locations on existing public roads.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710772400J
Growth Management Areas:SECONDARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 29.2000
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: CVOE-CD-CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY EXCLUSIVE
CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A 27 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR SITE BUILT HOMES
WITH A MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE OF 1,300 SQ. FT. AS PER SITE
PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: NORMA C PIERCE HEIRS
City, St. Zip: TRINITY, NC 27370
Address: 1874 THAYER RD
Owner: PIERCE, NORMA C
Address: 1874 THAYER RD
City, St. Zip: TRINITY, NC 27370
Permit #: 2021-00000075
Parcel #: 7724675402
Date: 01/13/2021
Location Address:
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:PIERCE, BEVERLY Contact Phone:336 909-8166
Acreage: Township:29.0400 02 - BACK CREEK
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Timothy Mangum
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Pierce Request Location Map
LIBERTYS RUN DR
FLINTHILLRDBEESO N FARM RD
WIL
LI
A
MHE
N
LEYPLBECKERDITERD
1 inch = 400 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 311 - (L)Beeson Farm Rd - Site on (L) at end.
Pierce Heirs Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(JES S S M IT H R DWILLIAMHENLEYPLLIBERTYSRUNDRFLINTHILLRD BEE S O N F A R M R D
BECKERDITERD
1 inch = 500 feet
O W Spencer S/D
Liberty's Run S/D CarawayBaptistChurch
Flint Hill UnitedChurch of Christ Requestlocation
Legend
ParcelsStructures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream bufferCounty zoning
Districts
RA
RR
100.00 100.00 100.00
73.02272.54
267.64
401.60100.00105.00105.00108.00177.58 260.15102.6347.91 96.82 3.10 100.03 10.75 89.28 99.67356.7750.42198.07 41
3.9
64
05.8740
4.0
8406.91
75.88
406.00
75.88
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLEC1 142.96 100.95 98.87C2 317.32 100.42 100.00C3 317.32 106.63 106.13C4 60.00 38.86 38.19C5 60.00 38.14 37.50C6 60.00 38.14 37.50C7 60.00 38.14 37.50C8 60.00 38.14 37.50C9 60.00 38.14 37.50C10 60.00 38.14 37.50C11 60.00 46.18 45.05C12 257.32 221.86 215.05C13 317.32 72.61 72.45
C2
C3
C12
10x70SightTriangle
10x70SightTriangle
Notes:
1. No NCGS Monuments found within 2000' of property.2. This project is not located within a special flood hazardarea.
3. Area calculated by coordinate geometry.4. No Field Work performed at this time. Map drawn fromRandolph County GIS
5. No attempt was made by this survey to locate allunderground utilities nor any other easements that
would be revealed by a title search.6. Zoning: RA7. Tax PIN: 7724675402
8. Total Acres: 28.854 AcresAcres in Proposed R/W: 1.262 Acres
Acres in Lots: 27.592 Acres
Number of Lots: 27Average Acres per Lot: 1.022 Acres
9. 785 Linear Feet of Road
Location Map
(Not to Scale)
Legend
Property Line
Computed Property Line
Right of Way Line
Easement Line
Old Plat Book Line
Existing Iron Rod/Pipe
New Iron Rod/Pipe
Point Not Set/Computed Point
Well
Tie Lines
PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES Job #: 12476
Proposed Subdivision For:
Pierce Estates
Back Creek Township Randolph County
North Carolina December 15, 2020
Deed Book:857 Pg:320
Scale: 1" = 100 US Survey Feet
Bar Scale:
,
Firm #: P-1110
Dan W Tanner II L-4787
Owners:
Norma C Pierce
1874 Thayer RdTrinity, NC 27370
154 S. Fayetteville St, Suite B, Asheboro, NC 27203
Phone Number: 336 625-8000
Email: mail@surveycarolina.com
10' Utility Easement
Typical Utility Easement, Buffer and
Setbacks Layout
Road R/W
Road R/W 10'60'35'10'30'35'35' "No-Cut" Buffer Along R/W
Lot 11.030 Acres
Lot 241,466 Sq. Ft.
Lot 3
41,951 Sq. Ft.
Lot 4
42,852 Sq. Ft.
Lot 5
1.020 Acres
Lot 6
42,191 Sq. Ft.
Lot 71.027 Acres
Lot 842,796 Sq. Ft.
Lot 9
1.047 Acres
Lot 10
40,501 Sq. Ft.
Lot 11
41,275 Sq. Ft.
Lot 1340,347 Sq. Ft.Lot 14
40,362 Sq. Ft.Lot 15
40,454 Sq. Ft.
Lot 16
40,375 Sq. Ft.
Lot 20
1.337 Acres
Lot 19
41,506 Sq. Ft.Lot 1840,524 Sq. Ft.Lot 17
40,350 Sq. Ft.
Lot 27
40,198 Sq. Ft.
Lot 26
1.040 Acres
Lot 251.222 Acres
Lot 24
1.245 Acres
Lot 23
1.391 Acres
Lot 22
41,630 Sq. Ft.
Lot 21
1.184 Acres
Lot 12
41,329 Sq. Ft.
60.0'60.0'
0 100 200 300
Beckerdite RdSR 1524 60' Public R/W
Beckerdite Rd
Libertys Run Dr
Site
Cameron Mark Allen
Jeffrey Lee Arnold Cooper2482-332
Jimmy D Canoy Jr2641-138PB 19 Pg 38
Pierce Estates Drive (Proposed)60' Public R/W
50' Creek No BufferC5
C9C1
0
320.36100.0017.0182.99100.00122.91409.97
414.04
412.96
404.48
Pierce Heirs Rezoning Request
LIBERTYS RUN DR
BEESON FARM RDBECKERDITERD
FLINTHILLRD1 inch = 300 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Pierce Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 6:
Adjacent
residence.
Page 1 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS
County of Randolph, North Carolina
Department of Planning & Development
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro, NC 27203
(336) 318-6555 planning@randolphcountync.gov
Development policies outlined in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan are specifically designed to encourage
long-term planning among property owners, developers, and the County. The Development Impact Analysis is a key
component of this Plan and its use will increase public awareness of the relationship of growth, rural environmental impacts, and the capacity of local government to provide adequate public facilities based on future land use demands. The
information contained in the Development Impact Analysis comes from the best available public data sources.
Preliminary Plat Name
Plat name and section: Pierce Estates
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Developer:
Name: Norma C Pierce Estate Name: Norma C Pierce Estate
Address: 1874 Thayer Rd Address: 1874 Thayer Rd
City, ST ZIP: Trinity, NC 27370 City, ST ZIP: Trinity, NC 27370
E-mail: E-mail:
Phone: Phone:
Representative: Engineer/Surveyor:
Name: Janice Spainhour Name: Survey Carolina, PLLC
Address: 118 Trindale Rd Address: 154-B S Fayetteville St
City, ST ZIP: Archdale, NC 27263 City, ST ZIP: Asheboro, NC 27203
E-mail: janice.spainhour@gmai.com E-mail: mail@surveycarolina.com
Phone: 336 681-2791 Phone: 336 625-8000
Property Description
Parcel: 7724675402 Acreage: 29.20 acres
Growth Management Area: Secondary Growth Area Township: Back Creek
Fire District: Guil-Rand Existing Zoning: RA
Existing conditions:
Waterway Description
Does the site contain any streams or rivers? Yes Stream name: Unnamed
Does the site contain any flood zone area? No Approximate acreage: 0.00 acres
Does the site lie within a watershed? No Watershed: N/A
Does the site contain wetlands? No Type: N/A
Other comments:
Page 2 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
Project Description
(If appropriate, attach a letter outlining in detail, the scope of the request.)
Subdivision type: ....................................................................................................................... Site built
Total acreage of development: ............................................................................................. 29.20 acres
Total number of building lots: .............................................................................................................. 27
Minimum housing size: ........................................................................................................ 1,300 sq. ft.
Total acreage of proposed open space (if applicable): .......................................................... 0.00 acres
Total road frontage of proposed development: ..................................................................... 1,773.20 ft.
Average frontage of lots: .......................................................................................................... 102.46 ft.
Width of the lot with smallest amount of road frontage: ............................................................. 38.14 ft.
Width of the lot with greatest amount of road frontage: ............................................................ 370.35 ft.
Is the 1:4 ratio maintained for Rural Growth Areas? ......................................................................... N/A
Property is currently being used as:
Residential Commercial
Industrial Farming
Leased hunting Vacant
Other
Features unique to this property:
Ravines Hills
Mountains Rights-of-way
Easements Cemeteries
Other
Utilities Impact
Water source: Public water
Sewer source: Septic system
The distance, location, and provider of the nearest public water and sewer source.
Service type Distance Location Provider
Public water 0.00 ft Flint Hill Rd/Beeson Farm Rd Davidson Water
Public sewer 4.90 miles Leyland Ter City of Archdale
Page 3 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
Public Education Impact (Provided by the Boards of Education)
School system: Randolph County Schools
School impacted Grade
level DPI Capacity Current
membership Impact
New Market Elementary K-5 586 420 6
Randleman Middle 6-8 969 851 3
Randleman High 9-12 705 878 2
Current mobile classrooms present:
School Number of mobile classrooms
New Market Elementary
Randleman Middle
Randleman High
Current traffic assessment:
School Traffic assessment
New Market Elementary Congested
Randleman Middle Congested
Randleman High Congested
School construction plans:
School Construction plans
New Market Elementary None
Randleman Middle None
Randleman High None
Traffic Analysis Impact (Provided by NCDOT GIS data services)
Road(s) directly accessed by development:
Road name Speed limit Average daily traffic count
Beckerdite Rd 55 mph 1,600
Beeson Farm Rd 55 mph 390
Flint Hill Rd 55 mph 1,400
Condition of the road accessed by the development: Beckerdite Rd: Poor; Beeson Farm Rd: Good;
Flint Hill Rd: Fair
Characteristics of the road(s) directly accessed by development:
Paved Curves
Graveled Blindspot(s)
Single lane Intersection(s)
Bridge(s) Hill(s)
The proposed development with 27 lots will generate an additional 162 total vehicle trips per day.
Does the ADT count greater than 4,000 which would require a turning lane? No
Page 4 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
Housing and Community Impacts (Within one mile of the proposal)
Housing patterns in subdivisions:
Subdivision Type Number of lots Average acreage
Adam F Hedrick Estate n/a 1 0.11
Bridge Point Site built 19 0.96
D W Canoy Estate Mobile home 24 5.18
Dylan Place Site built 7 3.80
E J Smith Estate Site built 7 9.98
Hearthwood at Sylvan Grove Site built 39 0.51
Hedrick Hills Site built 11 0.86
Indian Creek Development Site built 3 1.07
Keyauwee Forest Site built 21 1.00
Libertys Run Site built 39 1.01
Lloyd Canoy Estate n/a 5 6.45
O W Spencer Site built 9 3.74
Paul W Key Site built 4 1.72
Pinecrest Site built 7 3.00
Walter Farlow Site built 10 2.94
Windson Site built 5 2.94
Total number of site-built homes ...................................................................................................... 235
Average square footage of site-built homes ................................................................... 1,741.95 sq. ft.
Largest site-built home by square footage ..................................................................... 4,145.00 sq. ft.
Smallest site-built home by square footage ...................................................................... 672.00 sq. ft.
Total number of mobile homes ........................................................................................................... 27
Percentage of site-built homes .................................................................................................. 89.70 %
Percentage of mobile homes .................................................................................................... 10.30 %
Total number of acres .................................................................................................... 2,495.36 acres
Average acreage ................................................................................................................... 5.96 acres
Total acreage in tax-deferred farms .................................................................................. 475.25 acres
Community Land Uses
Commercial Farming
Forestry Industrial
Residential Church facilities
Other:
Page 5 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
Special Community Districts
Airport Overlay District Cluster Subdivision Overlay District
E-1 Districts Rural Lot Subdivision Overlay District
Rural Business Overlay District Industrial Overlay District
Scenic Corridor Overlay District Commercial Environmental Overlay District
Voluntary Agricultural District Conventional Subdivision Overlay District
Unique Rural Land Uses in the Community
HLPC Landmark/Cultural Heritage Site National Historic Landmark
National Forest Natural Heritage Designated Sites
Trailway as part of the County Greenway Plan Youth Camp(s)
Agricultural Impact (Within One mile of the proposal)
Adjoining farm properties:
• Norma C Pierce Estate (7724675402)
• Marie Murray Hollingsworth Life Estate (7724778656)
Are all well minimum setback lines noted on plat? Yes
Tax-deferred farm properties:
Property owner Parcel ID Location
William S and Betsy M Beeson 7735302709 R1525; R1526
Betty R Farlow 7724995532 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 17
Betty R Farlow 7724996751 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 18
Betty R Farlow 7724997833 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 19
Betty R Farlow 7724998905 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 20
Betty R Farlow 7725905334 R1716; N
Betty R Farlow 77225908251 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 22
Betty R Farlow 7725909055 Keyauwee Forest; PH3 Lo 21
Betty Rush Farlow 7725919635 R1525; Both
Jesse and Amy Lou Smith Frye 7724547699 Amy Lou Frye Tr New 2
James and Elizabeth G Harris 7725527158 R1004; N
Christopher H and Karen Louise Beeson
Hinshaw
7725523976 R1004; E
Marie Murray Hollingsworth Life Estate 7724778656 R1524; Both
Terrence and Phyllis Ann Lanier 7724077669 Terrence & Phyllis Lanier; Tr 2
Joseph Benjamin and Anita B Millikan 7725945383 R1536; E Deeded Access
Norma C Pierce 7724675402 R1004; E
Glenda Gayle Smith 7724468582 R1540; N
Glenda Gayle and William Jeffrey Smith
Life Estate
7724458004 R1540; S
Farm operations that begin after the development of a major residential subdivision must
abide by the 100 ft. waste setback rule on the farm property.
Page 6 of 6 Development Impact Analysis February 24, 2021
Other Materials Submitted
Preliminary approval from NCDOT District Engineer’s Office
Buffer site plan
Land Clearing Debris Plan
Open Space Uses and maintenance agreements, if applicable
Proposed deed restrictions
Soil analysis
Soil erosion plan, stormwater management plan, etc.
Other:
PROPOSED RESTRICTIONS FOR PIERCE ESTATES
1.All lots in said subdivision shall be known, described and used as
residential lots only. No structure shall be erected, altered, placed,
or permitted to remain on any of said lots, other than one
detached single family dwelling, not to exceed two and one half
stories in height, and a private garage and other outbuildings
incidental to the residential use of said lots; said garage and other
outbuildings to be architecturally harmonious with the dwelling
upon such lots.
2.No residence shall be built upon less than a minimum of one (1)
lot as set out on said plat. No resident shall be built with no less
than thirteen hundred (1,300) square feet of floor space exclusive
of carports, porches, or garages.
3.There shall be no junk automobiles or debris remaining on the
property at any time.
4.No imitation or asbestos sighting may be used and no cement
blocks shall be left showing from the outside appearance. For the
purpose of this covenant aluminum siding and vinyl siding are not
considered imitation siding.
5.The minimum building line and sideline restrictions should be as
set out on the recorded plat.
6.No animals or livestock shall be kept on any lot except that
domestic or household pets may be kept provided they are not
raised or kept for commercial use.
7.No obnoxious or offensive affairs or activities that should become
an annoyance to the neighborhood shall be permitted.
8.No billboards or signs shall be erected or allowed to remain on
said property except “For Sale” signs or “For Rent” signs, and
these shall not exceed 3 feet in length and 2 feet in width.
9.These covenants shall run with the land and shall be binding by all
parties and all persons claiming the for a period of twenty-five (25)
years from the date these covenants are recorded after which
time said covenants shall be automatically extended for
successive period of ten (10) years unless an instrument signed
by majority of then owners of the lots have been recorded,
agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part.
10.The developer, together with the owners of the adjacent lots on
each side may waive any minor violations of these covenants.
What is a minor violation is in the sole discretion of the developer.
In the event the adjacent land owner and the developer are not
able to agree, then the decision should be made solely by the
developer. Such waivers shall be in writing suitable for recording
in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Randolph County; by
such waiver, developers should incur no liability.
11.Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against
any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any
covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damages.
12.Invalidation of anyone of these covenants by judgement or court
order shall in no way effect any of the other provisions which shall
remain in full force and effect.
13.All fences installed on these lots shall be approved in writing by
an instrument qualified to be recorded in the Office of Register
Deeds of Randolph County, and signed by the developer for a
period of five (5) years for a period of this agreement. After said
date no approval shall be necessary.
14.For a period of five (5) years from the recording date of this
agreement, any outbuildings must be approved by writing by the
developer. After said date such approval must be signed by at
least one property owner.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Martin, Eric J.
Sent:Wednesday, February 3, 2021 10:36 AM
To:Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:46 AM
To: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>; Martin, Eric J. <Eric.Martin@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
Jay and Eric, I’m reaching out in regards to the planned development at the intersection of Flint Hill Road, Beckerdite
Road, and Beeson Farm Road in Sophia. I have some concerns over the traffic impact of the planned development. It
seems like the road infrastructure is already not suitable for the amount of traffic received. My fear is adding increased
housing density will further this issue. My wife and I built our current residence at 2829 Sawyer Rd a year ago. Prior to
that, we owned a home at 3006 Wesley Farm Ln for 10 years, which is even closer to the proposed development. Our
prior house was also in the Hearthwood neighborhood, which has future planned access to Beckerdite Rd in the vicinity
of the proposed development as well.
Since moving to our new residence, my wife and I are incredibly nervous when traveling down Beckerdite Road. We
experience oncoming vehicles in our lane almost daily. We both use the road to access Highway 74, as both of our jobs
lead us to High Point, Greensboro, and at times, Asheboro. I presume this will be the case for many future homeowners
in the proposed development as well. Before finding out about the proposed development, we were already worried
about what Beckerdite road will look like in 5 years when our daughter will be a teenage driver. We are already nervous
about her driving with the ever presence of mobile devices, along with other drivers having increased opioid usage.
However, the situation on Beckerdite seems to be beyond this. Many of the drivers that find themselves in the lane of
oncoming traffic is the result of a curvy road and an almost nonexistent shoulder. If anyone is towing a trailer (many
construction guys around here), or worse, if a large tractor or combine is oncoming, it’s impossible to avoid them
without swerving into oncoming traffic. Additionally, there’s no where to pull off on the side. Speed doesn’t seem to be
as much a factor as the lack of space.
The trend for increased traffic in this area isn’t just residential. There are several businesses along Beckerdite Road as
well. There as some long-term businesses such as Snyder Farms restaurant, Farlow Oil, and Sophia Barbershop, and
more-recently, the County issued a zoning variance to Triple Target Gun Range. These businesses account for traffic
along Beckerdite Rd as well.
The only other concerns we have are environmental impacts. We hope that no variances or waivers are provided in
achieving the requested development density, as it relates to waste water (primary fields and repair areas), erosion
control/water runoff, and other considerations. Although, having gone through that process myself, I’m aware you guys
have that under control and do a great job. I assume on the water supply, the neighborhood would likely use Davidson
Water, since their supply line runs nearby?
While I am involved in the business community of the triad, with most of my clients in the surrounding region, I don’t
endorse endless growth. I feel growth should be strategic and well thought-out. For that reason, I don’t envy you
guys having to account for all of the variables involved with zoning and planning. I appreciate the work you do. Your
consideration in the traffic pattern for the planned development is greatly appreciated as well. If I need to reach out to
another agency, like the NCDOT, please let me know. I’ll be happy to contact them separately if that’s best.
2
Best Regards,
Brandon Hedrick
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential
intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of
any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the person transmitting the information immediately.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Janna Allen <janna.m.allen@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:58 PM
To:Planning DL
Subject:Neighborhood Information Meeting: Citizen Concern Form
Name: Cameron and Janna Allen
Address: 6448 Flint Hill Rd, Sophia, NC 27350
Phone: 336-337-2861 & 336-944-4934
Email: callen3615@gmail.com, janna.m.allen@gmail.com
Rezoning request applicant name: Pierce Estates, #2021-00000075
Rezoning request location: Parcel # 7724675402
Concerns/Comments:
First of all, thank you for the time and effort that has been taken to research the impact this
development will have on our community of Flint Hill. Our community is made up of several families
that have lived here for many generations and I believe we all feel the same about preserving that
history, heritage, and beauty as best we can.
We live at 6448 Flint Hill Rd, which directly adjoins the property to be developed. We have
thought through the different scenarios of what might happen to the land and hoped for the least
invasive outcome, but never envisioned it being this large of a development.
We are concerned with the level of flooding that would occur on our property, increasing in
both intensity and frequency, if this development is allowed to proceed as presented. The density of
the proposed development will drastically increase impervious areas including the proposed roofs,
driveways, and roads, that will directly impact the runoff downstream creating flashy flows and
subsequent stream bank erosion leading to a loss of property, as well as increased pollution
downstream and increased flooding. We request that the density be reduced to 1 home per 3 to 4
acres to mitigate this issue. In addition, according to the proposed development, it appears that piping
the stream will be necessary for lots 20, 21, 22, and 23 to develop and make the lots usable. By
piping the stream we will see increased velocity of water running off the subject property onto our
property creating increased erosion and scouring of the stream channel which will increase the depth
and width of the creek creating a hazardous situation. We are concerned with having 4/5 properties
bordering the back of our land and the liabilities that will come along with that. The topography of our
land makes it hard to see the eastside of our property increasing our concern that if anyone were to
come across it, specifically during a rain event, it would be dangerous for the individual and put us as
property owners at risk. The proposed development has direct and long lasting negative impacts to
our property, changing the entire use, safety, and value of our land.
2
Another concern of ours is the significant increase in traffic to the intersection and three
separate roads that border the P.E. property. Flint Hill Rd may be a ‘back’ road, but it is a major
transit route for many people traveling from Asheboro to Archdale/High Point. We were very
surprised with how busy this road has been since we moved here. It is also an area that many
people enjoy riding over Caraway mountain by bike, motorcycle and sportscars. All throughout the
day and week it stays steady with traffic. There have been multiple occasions when deer, cats, or the
neighbor’s dog were hit by cars traveling at relatively high speed along Flint Hill Road. If you allow
the addition of 27 homes, 7 of those being accessed in the blind curve on Flint Hill Rd, then we fear
for the safety of any children, pets and people, in general, that will be living along the street. We are
also concerned with increased congestion for both intersections. There will be 16 more driveways
and cars that will be coming directly onto each of those 3 roads, with an estimated increase in 162
total vehicle trips a day from the development, according to the development impact analysis that was
provided; an analysis that we are concerned is not entirely accurate. I am curious how Beckerdite Rd
was found to have the highest traffic count over Flint Hill and Beeson Farm, when the latter two roads
are main transits to cities and highways. It begs to question the validity of the overall report.
There are more concerns that we have and that many of our neighbors in the community have
brought to light. We strongly believe there must be a better scenario than the one that has been
presented. Although, we would love to see the property stay as is, we are not against the property
being developed. We are concerned that the proposal for 27 homes will adversely affect this
community in safety, value, and environmental ways. The few developments that have been added
to this area have been off of main roads, on larger lots and of improved value. These proposed
homes will be limited in size and quality based on the size of the lots proposed, which will have an
adverse effect on the rest of the community’s property values. It would be more beneficial for our
community if the P.E. property was developed to have less lots to accommodate for larger
homes. Therefore, we respectfully request the density be reduced to 1 home per 3 to 4 acres. Fewer
homes on that property would lessen the road congestion, result in less water runoff issues and retain
the general rural atmosphere the residents in the neighborhood enjoy.
There are no economic changes coming to this area to justify the need for more homes and
there is not a housing shortage in Flint Hill or the surrounding communities. The housing market is
doing extremely well and construction costs are currently high, but that is not a reason to damage and
take advantage of small county communities.
As public officials and servants to your county and local communities, we hope that it would be
the highest priority to make a decision that would be most beneficial to the community you serve and
not for what will financially benefit a small number of people that do not live in our community.
Thank you,
Cameron and Janna Allen
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Lori Weatherman <loryweatherman@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, February 19, 2021 11:16 PM
To:Planning DL
Subject:Norma pierce estate
I wrote this original copy two weeks ago It was not listed in your
randolph. County , about the meeting .... why is that ?
Concerned Citizen of Flint Hill Community :
My name is Lori Canoy Weatherman. I am a concerned citizen of what is
happening in my neighborhood .The county had a meeting which I was unable
to attend due to work .
My concerns are as to what is happening with the rural countryside of
Flint Hill community
Our community has 3-4 developments in it within a mile from where this
one will go , which most are full and the other people are still building
in one . I know that my aunt held on to this property for years . The
Forestry has their beautiful trees planted on it .
What will people do for sewage ? Will they have their own ? I was told
they would need their own septic tanks , or will they slide the sewage
system into our community which tax payers will have pay for? How do you
get 27 homes in a 29 acre without it going onto land of other homes ?
Why is it that when an individual wants to sell their home or build onto
their land they need 5 acres ? Why is that ? but yet a builder can build
27 homes on top of each other ?
My question is this , why can’t they be bigger homes , more property
acreage ?
How is there one entrance from Flint Hill with a cul de sac that all the
homes around the cul de sac have access to
Flint Hill rd ? Is that the correct way for having that passed ?
Why do you say that there are 1400.00 vehicles on this road per day,
knowing there are more than that .
Does the land perk?
Why not put a school there? Help the community
The schools are not at full capacity because of COVID . Some have più led
their children out to go to private schools because they are open . When
this pandemic has became a memory , the schools will be over crowed again
, and with homes at 1300sq ft , there will be that situation again
So why not raise the acreage per lot
Why overcrowd a rural area with 27 homes?
Why?
Is it for the property tax?
Is it because they are “looking after human nature? “
Is it because it is a win win for everyone involved in the selling buying
and building ?
Who is protecting our wildlife when they cut all these trees?
2
Hawks, deer, all types of birds, all kinds of wildlife .
So for me this can still happen but I feel that less than an acre per lot
to an acre is too small . People might as well move into an apartment
complex if all they want is that amount of room in a home and land .
It to me is a money maker for the buyer and seller other than what is
best for the people that are settled here for years .
Thank you ,
Lori Canoy Weatherman
Tommy Weatherman
Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Marie Hollingsworth <bmhollingsworth@yahoo.com>
Sent:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:53 PM
To:Planning DL
Subject:Rezoning for Norma Pierce Estate
My name is Marie Hollingsworth and I have lived on Beckerdite Rd for 46 years.
Many families along with myself have many concerns with this rezoning for this development. If this development is approved safety
concerns are so visible with 16 driveway entering onto Beckerdite Rd, Beeson Farm Rd and Flint Hill Rd in Sophia. As you know
Beckerdite Rd. is a well traveled road with 1600 cars passing on it daily. All three roads have a limited sight issue when pulling out
onto them with many hills and curves. If this developer is approved they are proposing 16 driveways to enter/exit around the perimeter
of 29 acres. Most all subdivisions have one entrance into them which is much safer for everyone in the community. Our roads will be
much safer with less congestion and with less driveways surrounding these three well traveled roads. SAFETY is our main concern to
stop so many entrances to these roads.
We would like to see the covenants be more in line with the surrounding of the subdivisions in this community. Less homes with
larger sq. ft., Homes be a minimum of 1600-1700 sg ft., closed in carports, paved driveways, no aggressive breed of dogs and dogs
contained, NO unsightly junk in yard. These homes need to be more in line with the surroundings area. Most people have worked
hard to have these nice homes and this standard type of development will decrease their property value. We also need to keep our
schools in our thought for our children with more overcrowding being an issue already. Neighbor's close to the development area to
the are concerned with the water coming from Archdale as of now. Water being shut off for different reasons and water pressure being
so minimal. With 27 more home what will it be for the other neighbors water issues.
Thank you for your time and taking all these into consideration for a safer and happier community for everyone involved.
Thank You
Marie Hollingsworth
2092 Beckerdite Rd.
Sophia, NC 27350
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Permits DL
Sent:Monday, February 22, 2021 4:10 PM
To:Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
Attachments:Hearthwood Sylvan Grove.pdf
Tim,
Jay just forwarded this comment sheet and asked if we should just print for the Board members for the meeting. I was
wondering if we should just go ahead and add to Agenda since we have enough time??? Just let me know.
Thanks.
Kim
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 12:59 PM
To: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
Jay, I saw where the agenda for the March 2nd meeting is already in place. I’m not sure anything can be done at this time
to add comments to the agenda. I would like to bring to the board’s attention, that Hearthwood Development, which is
already in place, has over 40 vacant buildings sites, and is less than 7/10 of a mile from the proposed Pierce Estates. The
argument for needing more homesites in the area, isn’t a great argument with these sitting vacant. I know the developer
of Hearthwood continues to build, and I’m sure he’ll do so as quickly as he gets contracts for new construction.
I think even more important, is that the development model and plan for Hearthwood was much better, as none of the
homesites had direct driveway access to main roads. Hearthwood also provided open areas, allowing the development
to be more aesthetically pleasing. I suspect if the developers of Pierce Estates would propose something similar, there
would be much less pushback from the surrounding community in terms of property values, quality of life, aesthetics,
and traffic concerns.
I know you have access, but for easy reference, attached is a plat of Hearthwood.
Best Regards,
Brandon
From: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Subject: RE: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
2
Thank you for taking the time to contact us with your concerns. We will forward them to the members of the Planning
Board. In light of what I have read it might be worth your time to contact the NCDOT as well and bring their attention to
the road conditions.
Have a great afternoon and thank you again.
Jay Dale
Planning Director
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:46 AM
To: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>; Martin, Eric J. <Eric.Martin@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: Concerns over proposed development in Sophia
Jay and Eric, I’m reaching out in regards to the planned development at the intersection of Flint Hill Road, Beckerdite
Road, and Beeson Farm Road in Sophia. I have some concerns over the traffic impact of the planned development. It
seems like the road infrastructure is already not suitable for the amount of traffic received. My fear is adding increased
housing density will further this issue. My wife and I built our current residence at 2829 Sawyer Rd a year ago. Prior to
that, we owned a home at 3006 Wesley Farm Ln for 10 years, which is even closer to the proposed development. Our
prior house was also in the Hearthwood neighborhood, which has future planned access to Beckerdite Rd in the vicinity
of the proposed development as well.
Since moving to our new residence, my wife and I are incredibly nervous when traveling down Beckerdite Road. We
experience oncoming vehicles in our lane almost daily. We both use the road to access Highway 74, as both of our jobs
lead us to High Point, Greensboro, and at times, Asheboro. I presume this will be the case for many future homeowners
in the proposed development as well. Before finding out about the proposed development, we were already worried
about what Beckerdite road will look like in 5 years when our daughter will be a teenage driver. We are already nervous
about her driving with the ever presence of mobile devices, along with other drivers having increased opioid usage.
However, the situation on Beckerdite seems to be beyond this. Many of the drivers that find themselves in the lane of
oncoming traffic is the result of a curvy road and an almost nonexistent shoulder. If anyone is towing a trailer (many
construction guys around here), or worse, if a large tractor or combine is oncoming, it’s impossible to avoid them
without swerving into oncoming traffic. Additionally, there’s no where to pull off on the side. Speed doesn’t seem to be
as much a factor as the lack of space.
The trend for increased traffic in this area isn’t just residential. There are several businesses along Beckerdite Road as
well. There as some long-term businesses such as Snyder Farms restaurant, Farlow Oil, and Sophia Barbershop, and
more-recently, the County issued a zoning variance to Triple Target Gun Range. These businesses account for traffic
along Beckerdite Rd as well.
The only other concerns we have are environmental impacts. We hope that no variances or waivers are provided in
achieving the requested development density, as it relates to waste water (primary fields and repair areas), erosion
control/water runoff, and other considerations. Although, having gone through that process myself, I’m aware you guys
have that under control and do a great job. I assume on the water supply, the neighborhood would likely use Davidson
Water, since their supply line runs nearby?
While I am involved in the business community of the triad, with most of my clients in the surrounding region, I don’t
endorse endless growth. I feel growth should be strategic and well thought-out. For that reason, I don’t envy you
guys having to account for all of the variables involved with zoning and planning. I appreciate the work you do. Your
consideration in the traffic pattern for the planned development is greatly appreciated as well. If I need to reach out to
another agency, like the NCDOT, please let me know. I’ll be happy to contact them separately if that’s best.
Best Regards,
3
Brandon Hedrick
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential
intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of
any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the person transmitting the information immediately.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for use only by the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying of this
communication, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately by reply email and then delete
this message from your system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Randolph County Government. This email and any file attachments
have been scanned for potential viruses; however, the recipient should check this email for the presence of viruses
and/or malicious code. Randolph County accepts no liability for any damage transmitted via this email.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential
intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of
any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the person transmitting the information immediately.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:paige linthicum <phlinthicum@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:19 PM
To:Planning DL
Subject:Concerns for rezoning
Paige Linthicum
6232 Flint Hill Rd
Sophia, NC 27350
336-848-3074
Rezoning request applicant name: Norma Pierce Rezoning request location:
Intersections of Flint Hill Rd., Beeson Farm Rd., and Beckerdite Rd.
Concerns/Comments: I am writing concerning the proposal to make a
subdivision at the intersection of the these roads. I feel it would cause
problems with traffic due to having 16 driveways coming onto the main
roads that are already heavily traveled. There are two intersections and
another development within 100 ft. of this area. There are curves, blind
spots, and hills that cause trouble when traveling these roads already,
and I feel that adding this many driveways would only create a more
hazardous situation. Bringing in this many houses would not only create
traffic issues, it would also mean more population for our schools.
Randleman is already overcrowded and doesn't need anymore students. We
can't reduce class size if we keep adding students and have no room to put
them. Therefore, I feel education would suffer due to overcrowding of the
schools. I also feel this would decrease the property value of the houses
that already exist in this area. The average size house is 1700 sq. feet
and the proposal is for speck houses of 1300 sq ft., therefore, property
value in this area would decrease. Davidson Water ends at my driveway,
and I am currently connected to their water supply. I feel with this many
houses on the water system it would create more problems than we already
have. I hate waking up to no water due to water line problems. We
already have issues with this and I feel more houses would just increase
the problem. We are a country/farming community with wooded areas all
around, and I think it would be a shame to have this much construction in
this area. This land had a contract and was planted with pines and has
wildlife throughout the area. If they were to clear all the trees, it
would take away many homes for the wildlife that is living there now.
These are a few of the concerns I have about this proposal, with the main
one being the traffic issues. Thank you for considering blocking this
rezoning request.
Paige Linthicum
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:09 PM
To:Pate, Mickey; Britt, Jennifer L; Dale, Jay L.; Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Objections to proposed development: Pierce Estates
FYI.
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paula Storm <pstorm@northstate.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:01 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Objections to proposed development: Pierce Estates
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report
Spam.<mailto:report.spam@nc.gov>
Dear Mr. Monroe,
As a concerned citizen who resides off Beckerdite Rd. (Hollow Ridge
subdivision) in Sophia, I would like to voice my concerns. The proposed
subdivision at the intersections of Flint Hill Rd., Beeson Farm Rd., and
Beckerdite Rd. is a very dangerous design. 16 individual driveways
accessing 2 busy intersection areas is a definite hazard. People already
don't stop at the intersection on Beckerdite and Beeson Farm Rd., and to
make matters worse, its an angled intersection. After this intersection-
adjoining onto Beeson Farm the proposed plan is to create 5 lots with 5
driveways accessing this already short area - around 500' before you turn
onto Flint Hill Rd. The entire plan consists of creating 5 driveways off
Beckerdite close to the intersection, another 5 off Beeson Farm, again,
close to both intersections, and another 7 off Flint Hill Rd., also close
to the intersections! This subdivision plan is very hazardous especially
to us that travel back and forth through there frequently. Not to mention
2
Beckerdite is a narrow road as it is. The inside lane width is only 8'9".
Also I want to mention the traffic is moving at 55 mph plus on Flint Hill
Rd. This plan has too many driveways too close to intersections on 3 busy
roads. If this plan is to move forward I would suggest increasing lot
size, house size (to recoup costs) and allow only interior roads with
maybe only 2 access points off of Beckerdite and Flint Hill Road. The
area off Beeson Farm is only around 500' and is not long enough to gauge
traffic safely from all directions. Thanks in advance for allowing me to
voice my concerns. I would also like to suggest an in person site visit
with the proposed plat in hand so you can see what I am voicing concerns
about.
Regards,
Paula
Storm (336) 495-3200
________________________________
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Pat Hollingsworth <path@northstate.net>
Sent:Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:58 PM
To:Planning DL
Subject:Beckerdite Road Concerns
To whom it may concern;
Name: Patricia Hollingsworth and H. Curt Hollingsworth
Address: 2078 Beckerdite Road
City, State, Zip: Sophia, NC 27350
Phone # -336-498-2018
E-mail: path@northstate.net
Rezoning request applicant name: Norma C Pierce
Rezoning request location: Back Creek Township (Parcel: 7724675402)
Concerns/comments:
I have lived on Beckerdite Rd for almost 60 years and have witnessed many changes. Some
were good and some were not. This proposal will not be a good one. The traffic on this road
is 24/7 and the speed limit is 45 not 55. No one seems to know the difference and there have
been numerous wrecks on our property. This road is too narrow and curvy to handle any
more traffic. This housing development would not be an asset but a liability to all of the
residents of Beckerdite Road.
I ask that this permit be denied for the health and safety of all residents living in this area.
Best Regards,
Pat Hollingsworth
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:11 PM
To:Pate, Mickey; Britt, Jennifer L; Dale, Jay L.; Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Pierce Estates Development
FYI.
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Jodi Smith <jhsmith1126@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:48 AM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Pierce Estates Development
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hi Jeron,
My name is Jodi Hollingsworth Smith. I wanted to touch base with you regarding the Pierce Estates development in
Sophia located at the corner of Flint Hill Rd, Beeson Farm Rd., and Beckerdite Rd.
My family, along with many others in the community, have major safety concerns with these three roads and
intersections if this development is approved. They are proposing 16 driveways to enter/exit homes around the
perimeter of the 29 acres. There is 1 proposed street to be added off Flint Hill Rd. to access the internal 11 lots. Including
the new street, there will be 17 entrance and exit points on these three roads. Honestly, most housing developments I
see, whether they’re on a corner of multiple roads or not, have one, maybe two entrances. There are ZERO driveways
exiting onto these surrounding roads in these developments. The driveways enter/exit onto a street built within the
development. This keeps the traffic flow entering and exiting at one, maybe two designated areas.
Our community is asking you and your office to please help us keep the high safety standards by not allowing this
development to be built. If any portion of the development is approved, please keep our roads and intersections
2
surrounding this area safe by not allowing driveways to enter/exit onto the perimeter roads. Also, by increasing the
acreage per house sold, which in turn will decrease the number of homes built, will help with road safety as well. Our
roads will be safer and less congested with less homes and less driveways exiting the perimeter.
Thank you for your time regarding Pierce Estates development! My family and community members really appreciate it!
Thank you,
Jodi Hollingsworth Smith
540-589-2639
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:13 PM
To:Pate, Mickey; Britt, Jennifer L; Dale, Jay L.; Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Pierce Estates Proposed Development Traffic Concerns 2021-00000075
FYI.
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Kim Therrien <Kim.Therrien@altiumpkg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:48 AM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Pierce Estates Proposed Development Traffic Concerns 2021-00000075
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Good morning. I am a resident of Beckerdite Road. I am writing this email to express my concerns for the
proposed Pierce Estates development at corners of Flint Hill Road, Beeson Farm Road, and Beckerdite Road. I
am concerned that this development will increase traffic on these narrow and curvy roads from residents
trying to get to the bypass. I think this safety concern should be looked at further before the development is
approved. The roads are dangerous enough without increased traffic from an unneeded subdivision.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Kim Therrien | Office Manager
Altium Packaging
1408 Unity Street | Thomasville, NC 27360
T: 336-472-1500 | T: 336-481-0035 Direct | F: 336-472-5531 | Kim.therrien@altiumpkg.com
2
Consolidated Container Company is now Altium Packaging! Please update my new email address accordingly.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:01 PM
To:Pate, Mickey; Britt, Jennifer L; Dale, Jay L.; Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Norma C Pierce Estste
FYI.
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marie <bmhollingsworth@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:54 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Norma C Pierce Estste
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report
Spam.<mailto:report.spam@nc.gov>
My name is Marie Hollingsworth, I live on Beckerdite Rd and have land that
joins Pierce Estate.
Many families of this community have a safety concern with the three
intersections on the end of Beckerdite Rd, Beeson Farm Rd and Flint Hill
Rd If this development goes forward and approved as is. This would be way
to many driveways entering into these roads. It is already a bad area to
pull out of these roads with limited visual sight with the amount of
traffic daily on these roads. Most all sub-divisions around this area
have one entrance/exit drive for the entire sub-division. We feel this
would be the safest benefit if the is approved.
We are truly hoping for less houses or no houses built to keep our area
safe by not allowing so many houses in such a tight setting with less
congestion all around. Speed is a another factor for these roads not
giving you time to even pull out of your driveway with out a car flying
2
over the hill or coming around a curve before they are right on you in a
split second. If this development is approved in any size we hope you
will see that the safest measures are taken by not allowing driveways to
enter/exit onto the perimeter roads.
Thank you for your time regarding our concerns for the Pierce Estate
Development.
Thank you
Marie Hollingsworth
336-870-6591
Sent from my iPhone
________________________________
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:00 PM
To:Dale, Jay L.
Cc:Mangum, Timothy V.; Jones, Brandon H; Pate, Mickey; Britt, Jennifer L
Subject:Proposed Pierce Estates Subdivision
Attachments:Pierce Estates Proposed Subdivision.pdf
Jay,
Good afternoon. This e-mail is in reference to the attached proposed Pierce Estates subdivision, which is
located along Beckerdite Rd. (SR 1524), Beeson Farm Rd. (SR 1525), and Flint Hill Rd. (SR 1004). Based on safety
and mobility concerns for the existing roadways in this area, NCDOT recommends that only one main access point
be allowed to serve this development and all proposed lots should be accessed by an internal roadway
network. Safety is a top priority for the Department and we feel this recommendation will best serve the traveling
public and those who will eventually utilize this site.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, just let us know. Thanks!
Jeron
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Dale, Jay L.
Sent:Friday, February 26, 2021 4:57 PM
To:Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Thank You
Attachments:Proposed Pierce Estates Subdivision
From: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
Yes, see the attached e-mail. When you get a chance, can you please give me a call. Thanks!
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:22 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Have you sent your recommendations yet?
From: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:01 PM
To: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>;
2
Dale, Jay L. <Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
Mr. Hedrick,
Yes, that’s correct. The roads will need to be designed to meet the minimum NCDOT construction
standards and the plat should match the approved plans. If you have any additional questions, just let us
know. Thanks!
Jeron
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:20 AM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Jeron, So in talking with the county planning director, Jay, it sounds like the road on the plat for Pierce Estates will be a
public road, not private. As such, it seems like the plat will require a stamp from NCDOT to be recorded. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Brandon
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
From: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:33 AM
To: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
3
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Mr. Hedrick,
Good morning and no problem. As a Department, we value the public’s input as it relates to the safety of
our roadways. Thanks and I hope you enjoy your weekend!
Jeron
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:07 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>;
Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Thank You
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Jeron, Brandon Jones called me this morning to let me know you met with the planning/zoning department regarding
Pierce Estates. I greatly appreciate your efforts in doing so. Other neighbors and myself are hopeful that the
planning/zoning board will force the developers to revise the plat to at least meet NCDOT access recommendations,
prior to county approval.
Again, we sincerely appreciate the efforts of you and your staff.
Best Regards,
Brandon
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
4
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for use only by the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying of this
communication, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately by reply email and then delete
this message from your system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Randolph County Government. This email and any file attachments
have been scanned for potential viruses; however, the recipient should check this email for the presence of viruses
and/or malicious code. Randolph County accepts no liability for any damage transmitted via this email.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1
Mangum, Timothy V.
From:Dale, Jay L.
Sent:Friday, February 26, 2021 4:58 PM
To:Mangum, Timothy V.
Subject:FW: [External] Thank You
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:51 PM
To: 'Jones, Brandon H' <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>; Dale, Jay L.
<Jay.Dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
Thanks for that clarification Brandon.
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
From: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:20 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>; Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>; Jay Dale
<jay.dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
I will add that there are additional requests and reviews that NCDOT has to approve. The developer has to apply for
access to our roads. We must grant access to properties but we have to approve the accesses in safe locations. Example
if their proposed roadway was accessing our road in an unsafe location due to sight distance, proximity to an
intersection, etc, then we could deny their request as submitted if they have other options.
Also, the proposed rezoning plan shows an internal roadway based on some type of design. NCDOT must review and
approve the roadway design if it is going to be a future NCDOT road. If their submitted design does not meet our
requirements then we would deny their submittal and they would have to redesign.
The redesigns mentioned above may require a change in the plat. The developer would then have to go back to the
county and their process for such a change.
Brandon Jones, PE
Division Engineer
Division Eight
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2
910 773-8003 office
bhjones@ncdot.gov
121 DOT Drive
Carthage, NC 28327
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:01 PM
To: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>;
Jay Dale <jay.dale@randolphcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
Mr. Hedrick,
Yes, that’s correct. The roads will need to be designed to meet the minimum NCDOT construction
standards and the plat should match the approved plans. If you have any additional questions, just let us
know. Thanks!
Jeron
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:20 AM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
3
Jeron, So in talking with the county planning director, Jay, it sounds like the road on the plat for Pierce Estates will be a
public road, not private. As such, it seems like the plat will require a stamp from NCDOT to be recorded. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Brandon
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
From: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:33 AM
To: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Thank You
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Mr. Hedrick,
Good morning and no problem. As a Department, we value the public’s input as it relates to the safety of
our roadways. Thanks and I hope you enjoy your weekend!
Jeron
R. J. Monroe
District Supervisor
Division 8 - District 1
336-318-4000
rjmonroe@ncdot.gov
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Brandon Hedrick <bhedrick@smith-leonard.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:07 PM
To: Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>; Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov>;
Jones, Brandon H <bhjones@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Thank You
4
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Jeron, Brandon Jones called me this morning to let me know you met with the planning/zoning department regarding
Pierce Estates. I greatly appreciate your efforts in doing so. Other neighbors and myself are hopeful that the
planning/zoning board will force the developers to revise the plat to at least meet NCDOT access recommendations,
prior to county approval.
Again, we sincerely appreciate the efforts of you and your staff.
Best Regards,
Brandon
Brandon Hedrick, CPA | Tax Director
Smith Leonard PLLC
D (336) 821-1358 M (336) 870-4704
HIGH POINT | LEXINGTON | WINSTON-SALEM
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for
the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-
mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the
information immediately.
5
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential
intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of
any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the person transmitting the information immediately.
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY NORMA C PIERCE HEIRS
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000075
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOE-CD –
Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive – Conditional District as described in the
application of Norma C Pierce Heirs are consistent with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and
are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area. Primary Growth Areas generally lie along major transportation corridors and have
access to urban services.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 6.13 Conventional Residential subdivisions are anticipated of similar
housing characteristics to the community.
Consistency Analysis: As indicated in the Development Impact Analysis, there
are sixteen subdivisions within one mile of the request location. Of those sixteen,
thirteen are site built subdivisions with an average lot size of 2.50 acres. Based
upon this calculation, the proposed subdivision would be similar to the existing
subdivisions in the community.
Policy 6.14 Residential subdivisions should, in order to promote efficiencies in the delivery of urban services, be encouraged to develop in a fashion which minimizes
“leap frog” development (i.e. leaving large vacant areas between developments).
Consistency Analysis: This request location for a proposed subdivision, if
approved, would encourage more “in-fill” of the vacant property in the community
by allowing the development of a subdivision that is similar to the existing land use
conditions while also encouraging more efficient delivery of services to this area.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY NORMA C PIERCE HEIRS
REZONING REQUEST #2021-00000075
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 153A-341 and 342, the Randolph County
Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOE-CD –
Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive – Conditional District as described in the
application of Norma C Pierce Heirs are not consistent with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and
are not reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area. Primary Growth Areas generally lie along major transportation corridors and have
access to urban services.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 6.12 Factors to be considered in major subdivision approval in Primary and
Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major
thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and
community compatibility.
Consistency Analysis: As indicated in the Development Impact Analysis, there
are sixteen subdivisions within one mile of the request location. The traffic counts
for the area roads show the average daily traffic counts, based upon information
from NCDOT, as being 1,600 for Beckerdite Rd, 390 for Beeson Farm Rd and
1,400 for Flint Hill Rd. NCDOT also classified Beckerdite Rd as being in poor
condition, with Beeson Farm Rd being in good condition and Flint Hill Rd being in
fair condition. NCDOT has expressed concerns about the number of proposed
drive-way connections on each road and they feel that the proposed number of
connections would be unsafe.
Policy 6.22 New driveway connections should be designed in a way to minimize
new locations on existing public roads.
Consistency Analysis: Based upon the current design of the proposed
subdivision, there are sixteen proposed driveway connections onto existing State
maintained roads. The driveway connections have not been designed to minimize
the number of connections on the existing State road system.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is not consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. This request is not in the
public interest due to the number of driveway connections on the existing State
maintained road system since it does not consider public safety in its design.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Randolph County Planning Director Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
_______________________________ _______________________________
Clerk to Planning Board Date
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning
request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the
rezoning application to the requested zoning district
based upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning
application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions,
also incorporated into the motion and that the request
is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.