The URL can be used to link to this page

08AugustPBhttp://www.randolphcountync.gov RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA August 2, 2022 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. 2. Roll call of the Board members: • Reid Pell, Chair; • Wayne Joyce, Vice-Chair; • John Cable; • Kemp Davis; • Melinda Vaughan; • Reggie Beeson; • Ken Austin; • Barry Bunting, Alternate; and • Brandon Hedrick, Alternate. 3. Consent Agenda: • Approval of agenda for August 2, 2022, Planning Board meeting. • Approval of the minutes from the July 12, 2022, Planning Board meeting. 4. Conflict of Interest • Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be disclosed? • If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified. 5. Old Business. REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001368 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by EMMANUEL CRUZ GARCIA, Siler City, NC, and his request to rezone 14.05 acres at 7845 US Hwy 64 E, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8712473956, Municipal Growth Area, from RA – Residential Agricultural District to CVOM-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed – Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a four lot subdivision for Class B mobile homes and better as per the site plan. 6. New Business. REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001825 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by HAROLD KOGER, McLeansville, NC, and their request to rezone 3.10 acres along US Hwy 64 W, Tabernacle Township, Lake Reese Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7712437632, Step Three, Inc, Subdivision, lot 2, Secondary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a proposed 70 ft. by 125 ft. retail building with a 50 ft. vegetative buffer as per the site plan. REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001902 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by FRANKLIN REYNOSO, Asheboro, NC, and his request to amend the Conditional District Permit on 1.40 acres at 7905 US Hwy 220 S, Richland Township, Tax ID #7665773033, Carl King Subdivision Map 1, lots 34-42, 49-52 + TR, Primary Growth Area, HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District amendment would specifically allow a barber shop. 7. Adjournment. Attachments Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 1 of 19 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES July 12, 2022 There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, July 12, 2022, at 6:30 p.m. in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance. Next, Pell called for a roll call of the members. Jay Dale, Randolph County Planning and Zoning Director, called the roll of the members. • Reid Pell, Chairman, present; • Wayne Joyce, Vice Chairman, present; • John Cable, present; • Kemp Davis, present; • Melinda Vaughan, present; • Reggie Beeson, present; • Ken Austin, present; • Barry Bunting, Alternate, absent; and • Brandon Hedrick, Alternate, present. County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was present for the meeting. Dale informed the Chairman there was a quorum of the members present for the meeting. Pell introduced the newest member of the Randolph County Planning Board, Ken Austin, Jr., and Austin shared his background and stated that he looked forward to being a member of the Planning Board. Pell called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Cable made the motion to approve the consent agenda as presented, with Davis making the second to the motion. Pell called the question on the motion to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion was adopted unanimously. Pell asked the Board members if there are any conflicts in the following cases. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 2 of 19 Dale stated that Austin has family that lives next to a case on the agenda tonight and asked Morgan if it was okay for Austin to participate in the case and Morgan replied that it would be fine if it did not violate the conflict-of-interest standards in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Hearing no conflicts of interest, Dale presented the first case of the night, which was tabled from the June 14, 2022, Planning Board meeting, along with the site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001383 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by ERIC L SMITH, Sophia, NC, to rezone 4.58 acres at 3321 Jess Smith Rd, Tabernacle Township, Tax ID #7724295330, Secondary Growth Area, from and RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOM-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow the creation of a new lot as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and asked for anyone in favor of the request to come and address the Planning Board. Eric Smith, 3321 Jess Smith Rd, rose to address the Planning Board. Smith started his comments by apologizing for missing the June 14, 2022, meeting and thanked the Planning Board for tabling the request as he was at the hospital with a family member. Smith stated that he wanted to split his existing parcel into two lots—one for his home and a lot for another home. Pell asked if there were any questions from the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the rezoning request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the rezoning request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion and a decision by the Planning Board. Cable asked if the meeting was published, and if property owners were notified as required by the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and Dale responded that all notifications were done according to the Ordinance. Cable said that, since he made the motion to table the request in June, he thanked the Planning Board for tabling the request until the applicant could attend the meeting. Davis said that he was not present for the June 14, 2022, meeting but that he saw nothing wrong with the request. Hedrick stated that he had visited the area and talked with the neighbors, and they seem Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 3 of 19 to be fine with the request. Cable made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. Joyce made a second to the motion to approve the rezoning request described with conditions. Pell called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request and the motion was adopted unanimously. Dale presented the next case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2022-00001656 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by UWHARRIE GREEN SCHOOL, INC, Asheboro, NC, to amend an existing Special Use Permit at 5154 US Hwy 220 Bus S, Cedar Grove Township, Tax ID #7658355370, 40.01 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an Administration building to be located next to the existing middle school as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and stated that anyone wanting to give testimony on this Special Use Permit request would need to come and take the following oath. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God.” Four people took the oath. Pell opened the public hearing and asked for anyone in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board. Sharon Castelli, Superintendent for Uwharrie Charter Academy, 220 Ridgeway Rd, Southern Pines, addressed the Planning Board and said that the proposed administration building is for school offices and will be located near the middle school on the existing campus. Davis asked if the proposed building would change the flow of traffic around the campus Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 4 of 19 and Castelli responded that the traffic flow would not be changed. Davis also asked if the building was needed at the campus to which Castelli responded that the building is needed on the campus. Cable asked that based upon the submitted plans that the building would be one story, have nine offices, and one board room. Castelli stated that the building will have nine offices and a large meeting space that can be used for a work area or Board meetings for the school. Keith Downing, 400 Regency Forest Dr, Cary, stated that his firm has done the landscape design for the campus and has contacted the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) regarding the traffic analysis that was done earlier this year for the new high school at this location and the NCDOT had issued a new letter stating that the proposed administration building would not cause any new traffic issues. Cable asked about the time frame for the completion of the new high and the administration building. Castelli responded that they are on track to have all the buildings ready by August 23, 2022. Austin asked if there would be additional parking required for the new building and Castelli responded that there would be no additional parking required. Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the Special Use Permit request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the Special Use Permit request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Laura Arborgast, 5107 US Hwy 220 Bus S, rose to address the Planning Board and stated that her main concern is traffic as it can take her as much as 30 minutes to get home due to school traffic. Arborgast said that she is constantly hearing people “burn out” at all times of the day and night and that she “hates to see the land go to waste.” Arborgast relayed to the Planning Board the times she could not get out of the church parking lot due to school traffic and asked how is this fair to taxpayers. Arborgast asked that the school be required to put in a turn lane and since the property is near Interstate 73/74 what would be the possibility of a ramp on and off Pisgah Covered Bridge Rd to provide access to the school but that she did not want to see more people lose their land for a turn lane as the school has enough property and should give part of their property for the safety of the school and the surrounding community. Cable asked Arborgast about the time of day when the traffic is so bad and how long it is backed up and Arborgast responded between 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. or during special events or parents were picking up their children from school. Cable asked about the accidents that Arborgast mentioned and asked if the accidents are caused by people trying to get around school traffic that has stopped to turn into the school off US Hwy 220 Bus S. Arborgast said that was her opinion. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 5 of 19 Pell asked if there were any more questions from the Planning Board. Pell asked if there was anyone else in opposition that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing no one, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion and a decision by the Planning Board. Kemp stated that he wanted to clarify the issue which is to amend the existing Special Use Permit to allow the administration building. Davis stated that the traffic issue was reviewed at the previous public hearing on the high school and that the understands Arborgast’s concerns. Dale stated that at the previous public hearing for the high school, NCDOT said the roads were okay and no further traffic study was needed and the Special Use Permit for the high school was issued based on the information from NCDOT and the findings of fact required to approve and issue a Special Use Permit. Beeson stated that the Planning Board sees these issues at every school until people understand the established traffic patterns, but the issues do get better with time. Cable said that is why he asked the question earlier about the accidents and reminded the Planning Board that traffic is an NCDOT District Engineer issue and outside of the scope of the Planning Board review and approval process. Cable went on to say that the proposed building is a one-story building for administration purposes and Uwharrie Charter Academy is not putting another school or daycare on site. Pell stated that at the previous public hearing for the Special Use Permit for the high school that the NCDOT District Engineer was at the public hearing and voiced no concerns regarding traffic. Kemp made the motion to APPROVE the Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Beeson made the second to the motion. Pell called the question on the motion to approve the Special Use Permit request and the motion was adopted unanimously. Dale presented the next case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 6 of 19 SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2020-00001657 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by DAVID OWENS, Asheboro, NC, to allow a Special Use Permit at 1853 NC HWY 42 S, Grant Township, Tax ID #7770427220, 2.0 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a Federal Firearms License to hydro dip weapon parts in twenty-four feet by twenty-four feet existing building as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and stated that anyone wanting to give testimony on this Special Use Permit request would need to come and take the following oath. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God.” One person took the oath. Pell opened the public hearing and asked for anyone in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board. David Owens, 1853 NC Hwy 42 S, says that he needs a Federal Firearms License to be able to do his proposed business of hydro-dipping. Owens said that everything would be dropped off at the shop so he could do the hydro-plating. Owens told the Planning Board that he would be retiring from the State on February 1, 2023. Davis asked what the hydro-drip process is, and Owens pointed to the information that he distributed to the Planning Board and that basically, it is a large tub filled with water and that he lays a special film on top and then dips the gun parts into the water and the ink from the film stays on the gun. (See exhibit number one.) Owens stated that this is a new process that is becoming very popular as it can be applied to guns, deer skulls, cups, etc. Austin asked if the guns brought to Owens were non-working guns and Owens said that customers bring him the gun and he must take it apart for the hydro-dip process and, since he must take the gun apart, the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (USATF) requires him to have a Federal Firearms License and that requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning Board. Davis asked Owens if he was going to test fire the guns and Owens said, “No.” Cable asked about chemicals on the site and Owens responded that there will be nothing on the property other than the activator that is required for the process. Austin asked if anyone else in the County was doing this business and Owens stated Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 7 of 19 that he is not aware of anyone else doing this, but the big gun dealers are starting to do this process more and more. Beeson asked Owens if the water he drained from the tank is safe and Owens stated that the water is a non-pollutant based on his information. Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the Special Use Permit request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the Special Use Permit request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing no one, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion and a decision by the Planning Board. Cable said this is another story of a person completing a career and wanting to do something close to home and this business could be a huge advantage to the County. Cable stated that he thought it is a neat process and that Owens has a great idea by starting small and he was very hopeful that Owens can expand his business in the future. Cable said he thought this was a good business in Randolph County and it would not disturb anyone and that there was no opposition at the public hearing. Cable made the motion to APPROVE the Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Vaughan made the second to the motion. Pell called the question on the motion to approve the Special Use Permit request and the motion was adopted unanimously. Dale presented the next case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. REZONING REQUEST 2022-00001368 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by EMMANUEL CRUZ GARCIA, Siler City, NC, and his request to rezone 14.05 acres at 7845 US Hwy 64 E, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8712473956, Municipal Growth Area, from RA – Residential Agricultural District to CVOM-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed – Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a four-lot subdivision for Class B mobile homes and better as per the site plan. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 8 of 19 Pell opened the public hearing and asked for anyone in favor of the request to come and address the Planning Board. Jim Raines, 7929 US Hwy 64 E, Ramseur said that he was a former Randolph County Planning Board member and had a couple of questions. Raines stated that was Garcia’s neighbor and in favor of his request. Raines said that the property he and his family live on is a farm and it is listed as a Century Farm, a farm that has been in operation for over one hundred years. Raines stated that the property is not listed on the Development Impact Analysis as tax-deferred so would the wells be required to meet the 100 ft. well setback? Raines related to the Planning Board how Kent Atkinson, another farmer in the area, uses the nearby property to cut hay and spread chicken litter and wanted any potential buyers to be aware of the existing farming activities. Raines further stated that the homes to be placed on the proposed lots will be new homes and he is excited about that along with the setbacks proposed. Raines stated that it appeared that NCDOT had questions on how traffic will get in and out of the lots and that the septic system and well location will be determined by Randolph County Public Health. Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the rezoning request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Janet Adams, 7791 US Hwy 64 E, Ramseur, rose to address the Planning Board with questions about mobile homes and how they would impact her property values. Adams related how she bought her house in 2018 and spent over $75,000 to rehabilitate the old farmhouse and what would the mobile homes do to her investment? Davis asked Adams to identify her property on the map and she said it was on the left side of US Hwy 64 E before getting to the request location. Adams stated that they do farming and other hobby activities on a 27-acre parcel with the back of the parcel being a forest. Adams said that the access shown on the property is the access for her neighbors. Davis asked about the drive showing on the site plan and Adams said that the drive goes on back behind her property and it is the access for the other property owners. Adams said that she was not opposed to dividing the 14.50 acres but was concerned about how the development would look compared to the existing housing patterns. Brynne Diaz, 7791 US Hwy 64 E, Ramseur, rose to speak to the Planning Board and told how they had put $75,000 put into rehabbing the home and they were also concerned about property value. Diaz stated their property is on the other side of the property and they are not opposed to the request but concerned due to the size of the acreage. Davis asked Diaz if their property abuts the request location and Diaz responded that the property does not abut but shares a driveway. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 9 of 19 Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the rezoning request. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the rezoning request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing no one, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion and a decision by the Planning Board. Beeson asked how the lots are accessing US Hwy 64 E. Beeson referenced the letters from NCDOT in the agenda pack and asked about the access for lots two, three, and four. Joyce said that the email from NCDOT said lot number three would have to go through the NCDOT driveway permitting process and Beeson said he did not have high hopes for either of the lots to get the necessary driveway permits. Emmanuel Cruz, 7845 US Hwy 64 E, Ramseur, the applicant, requested to be heard by the Planning Board. Pell reopened the public hearing so Cruz could address the questions from the Planning Board. Beeson asked again about the access to lots two, three, and four, and Cruz said that a thirty feet easement had already been agreed upon to allow access for lots two, three, and four. Morgan asked if there is one easement for lot number one and then the easement goes on to lots two and four. Cruz responded that he is going to try and access lot number three from US Hwy 64 E. Austin stated that this information should be on the site plan and Dale said that the site plan is often updated after the public hearing due to concerns raised during the public hearing process. Morgan stated that the applicant is “not married to site plan” so it can be modified during the public hearing process and if the lot sizes comply with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the number of lots does not increase after the public hearing, it is still acceptable. Austin asked about the wet area down the right-hand side of the plat and if there were any offsets for this area? Dale stated that development could not take place in those areas. Davis asked if lot sizes changed if the request must come back to the Planning Board? Morgan said that if approved, the number of lots cannot go beyond the four lots as shown on the plat and that the lot acreages would probably not change in the future. Beeson asked about placing a condition on the subdivision that no lot could be smaller than the proposed lot sizes as indicated on the preliminary plat. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 10 of 19 Cruz said that he bought the property to sell, and he is acting as the broker on the property. Pell again closed the Planning Board public hearing. Hedrick asked if the parcel were to be divided into two five acres parcels if it would still have to come to the Planning Board and Dale answered no as it would be a minor subdivision as defined by the Ordinance. Dale stated that the plat does show a fifty feet stream buffer that would not be allowed to be disturbed. Hedrick asked a question about minimum lot sizes and how the new homes would meet the required setbacks. Hedrick stated that the included deed restrictions said that the property must follow “County guidelines” and Dale said the developer can divide a lot, but it does not have to be a “buildable lot” and that each home would have to meet the standard setback requirements. Austin asked if someone could describe the entrance as it appears the access is off US Hwy 64 E and goes through lot number one. Pell asked Raines the size of the easement between lot one and lot two and Raines said it was approximately thirty-five feet and it goes to the property corner and turns west. Cable said that based on the plat it appears to be 35.6 feet from one corner to another corner and 35.7 feet at the back of the property. Davis stated that he appreciated Raines’ expertise, but he did not feel that he could accept the plat as currently shown with the access questions and he would suggest the Planning Board either table the request or deny the request. Morgan said the Planning Board would need to make the decision to either table or deny the request. Davis said he would like for the applicant to come back to the Planning Board with more information and Cable said there were too many variables to make him comfortable deciding on the request. Austin said that everything with the request is confusing. Pell asked Cruz if he understood the concerns of the Planning Board. Cruz stated that he would prefer for the Planning Board to table the request and allow him to bring back more information for the Planning Board. Davis made the motion to table the request and Cable seconded the request if the applicant knew the information to bring back to the Planning Board such as detailed Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 11 of 19 wetland information and clear answers regarding the access to the proposed lots. Pell called the question on the motion to table the rezoning request and the motion was adopted unanimously. Pell told Cruz to call the Planning Department to get more information on what the Planning Board is requesting. Dale presented the last rezoning case of the night along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. REZONING REQUEST 2022-00001661 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by NEW HORIZON BUILDING AND CONCRETE. LLC, Franklinville, NC, to rezone 2.45 acres at 2299 Whites Memorial Rd,, Franklinville Township, Tax ID #7784402024, Secondary Growth Area, from LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District and RA - Residential Agricultural District to LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would amend the existing Conditional Zoning District permit and the site plan to specifically allow for a proposed 60 ft. x 200 ft. building as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and asked for anyone in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board. Rafael Vega, 3281 Skyhaven Rd, Randleman, the applicant and owner of New Horizon Building and Concrete, LLC, addressed the Planning Board and stated that he purchased the building for his business and the business has grown and he now needs to expand to bring more jobs to the County. Vega presented the Planning Board with signatures from the closest neighbors, and they signed saying that they have no concerns with the proposed expansion. (See exhibit number two.) Davis asked for an explanation of the business that is conducted on the property. Vega said that the business produced kits for various types of metal buildings and the kits are sent over North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Davis asked if the proposed building would be for storage and Vega responded that the new building would be used for manufacturing the kits. Vega said that welding and manufacturing of trusses would be completed in the building. Vega stated that installers come to his business, pick up the kits and then go to the sites where the buildings are put together on the site. Vega said the existing building will be used to make doors that are included in the kits. Austin said that is familiar with this site and there is a lot of material that is laying in the open and asked if Vega was going to move the material in the open area into the existing building and Vega said that was his plan. Austin talked about the large building on the top of the hill at the site and Vega stated that he asked NCDOT to help with traffic and safety concerns and all that NCDOT would Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 12 of 19 do was put up a sign warning of trucks pulling into the road and that he had put up the mirror to help see over the hill. Austin asked if they do have large trucks coming onto the site and Vega said that large trucks come to the site around two times a week. Austin asked if the new building would create more traffic and Vega said that the new building should not increase traffic but that it will allow him to better organize the supplies on the property. Pell asked about the number of employees for the business and Vega said he has about twenty-five employees and when adding in the subcontractors that work for other companies, the numbers would be close to seventy to eighty. Pell stated that he would think that most of the activity is the contractors coming to the site to pick up the kits and then leaving to go to the site for assembly and Vega responded that this is what happens on the site. Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the Rezoning Request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the Rezoning Request that wanted to address the Planning Board. Kara Curl, 2259 Whites Memorial Rd, Franklinville rose to address the Planning Board and that she had not seen the list that Vega had presented to the Planning Board. Curl said her concern is that it is loud at the site from before sunup to sundown and often as late as midnight and that the music is so loud that it sometimes will shake her house. Curl told the Planning Board that she will be having her first baby in October and the existing building will be right next to the nursery and it would be exposed to all the noise from the business. Curl said that other neighbors in the area could not be at the public hearing, and they are not in support of the business due to the noise and traffic issues along Whites Memorial Rd. Hazel Elliott, 3122 Whites Memorial Rd, Franklinville, told the Planning Board that she grew up in this area and that she knows all the neighbors and they are opposed to the rezoning request due to the amount of traffic that has been produced by the business. Elliott said that everyone picks up speed at bottom of the hill and to get over the hill most vehicles are going at a “good amount of speed.” Elliott also relayed about the trucks backing into the site or stopping at the top of the hill. Elliott said that more trucks will be coming to the site if the request is approved, and those trucks will be carrying materials and that Whites Memorial Rd is such a busy road that they are afraid for their safety. Elliott said she has a neighbor that could not be at the public hearing due to being in the hospital and the signatures that Vega gave to the Planning Board must be from the people that sold the land to Vega. Elliott said that this was supposed to be a small business and it has gotten out of hand and is not in a good location at the top of the hill along Whites Memorial Rd. Elliott said that sometimes owners must move businesses if it outgrows their location and that this location is not designed for large trucks, and it is no longer safe for anyone to ride bicycles in the area. Elliott stated that the posted speed limit is fifty-five miles per hour, but trucks are going as fast as possible to get uphill. Elliott told the Planning Board that many neighbors were going to be at the public hearing but could not Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 13 of 19 come and that they are glad that the business is growing but it needs to move to another location. Alex Williamson, 2259 Whites Memorial Rd, Franklinville, told the Planning Board that he talked to all neighbors and said that drivers cannot see the driveway to the business until the trucks are at his driveway. Williamson further stated that people do not drive the speed limit and there are tire marks on the road in front of the house from where vehicles have had to stop quickly. Williamson informed the Planning Board that Vega was already working and grading in this area for the proposed building and that material is already leaving from the proposed site anywhere from 6:00 A.M. until midnight. Williamson said that Vega had not asked him about signing anything from the adjoining property owners before the public hearing. Williamson stated that this community is where he wants to raise his family and this proposed building will be in his back yard and that he wished it could be stopped and it might be time for Vega to move the business to another location. Williamson further told the Planning Board that Vega’s statement regarding two trailers at the site a week was not correct and that it was eighteen-wheelers at the site at least twice a week but other trucks and trailers in and out of the site every day. Williamson told the Board about seeing employees riding on the front of forklifts and not following any safety policies and that he wished the business the best, but it should not be on Whites Memorial Rd. Curl returned to tell the Planning Board about big sheets of metal in the field and that she is concerned about her safety during storms and wonders what is there to keep the material on the site from flying around during bad weather. Vega returned to address the concerns raised by the neighbors and told the Planning Board that he has never known of any issues and to check the records at the Sheriff’s department. Vega stated that Curl is deaf and there is no way she could hear “Mexican” music from the site. Vega stated that he does not pay attention to what the words say, and they just have the music on. Vega related how a Sheriff’s Deputy has come to the site several times after receiving complaints about the loud music coming from the site and the Deputies checked the site and found there was nothing to report but to keep the music turned down to not bother the neighbors. Vega stated that his office is behind the shop and if the music was as loud as the neighbor’s claimed, he would not be able to work. Vega said that he wants more customers and if the music is so loud, he would not be getting more customers and that it was true that Whites Memorial Rd has changed over the years, but it is not because of his business, and he has no control over how fast people are driving. Vega said that he was not lying about trucks coming in and out and that he can prove his statement based on his invoices and that there is no problem seeing the driveway to the business. Vega said that he cannot do anything because the neighbors came after his business was there and that he does not have the money to move the business and he needs the extra space for the business. Cable asked about the hours of operation and Vega said that when he first purchased the property and opened the business, the hours were 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and those are the same hours right now and that this year his business Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 14 of 19 has been slow. Cable asked that if the new building was approved and with the raw materials coming into the site, would there be a way to design everything so that trucks could pull into the property and then turn around instead of backing in from Whites Memorial Rd. Vega responded by saying that trucks do not back into the site unless they are a new driver coming to the site for the first time. Cable asked if the fifty-three feet trucks could pull into the site and turn around on the site and Vega responded that most trucks pull in and then turn around. Cable restated the hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and asked if there were any buffers to help quieten the sound or noise. Vega again stated there was no noise coming from the business but that employees do a lot of welding, and someone may drop a piece of tubing, etc., and that could cause some noise. Cable asked for clarification of the number of employees at the site and Vega said there were eight employees—three in the office and five in the shop and the office is only open from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and the shop is open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Austin asked how many of the fifty-three feet trucks and trailers enter the property and Vega said usually it is three a day maximum per day. Austin asked the length of the other trailers that come to the site and Vega answered that they are thirty feet. Austin said that with the length of the trailers and the posted speed limit of fifty-five miles per hour and turning into a blind entrance that could be a dangerous situation. Vega said the area is safe for people that live there all the time and that he sees the same cars come by the site every day. Austin asked Vega if he installed the mirror at this location. Vega responded that he had to put up the mirror since NCDOT said they could only put-up signs and that the property owner would have to install a mirror and that he purchased this property and building with the intent of working there into the future. Davis asked about the possibility of making the entrance safer and Vega said that he was going to do a loop drive around the site but has not moved forward with a new drive due to complaints from the adjoining property owners. Davis asked how wide the existing drive is and Vega said it is forty feet wide and that he lets a neighbor use the drive to access their property. Vaughan said that she can empathize with both the property owners and Vega. Vaughan stated it is a beautiful area but it’s in the County and she also owns a business and trailers pulling into her business. Vaughan petitioned NCDOT to reduce speed along the road to her business due to logging trucks traveling the road doing almost seventy-five to eighty miles per hour with residential traffic. Vaughan stated that this is the nature of having a business, but you must make it work for everyone and that the County wants commercial Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 15 of 19 growth to expand. Vaughan said that the Planning Board wants to do everything it can so that Vega could give the property owners a nice buffer to help cut the noise and Vaughan said that she was not suggesting a buffer because she owns a nursery but because it could help make the situation better for everyone involved. Vega said that it takes longer for certain trees to grow and if he must put in a buffer, the access to the property will be cut down since the drive is on the property line and he does not use the other drive on the site to avoid bothering neighbors. Vega stated that he would consider putting trees in along the property line. Williamson returned to ask asked how far the new building is from his house and Vega responded that the new building is approximately 150 feet from the property line and Williamson and Planning Board members pointed out that this is not what the site plan shows. Austin asked if the property is currently covered with metal and can that metal be moved into the building. Vega responded yes. Austin asked how tractor-trailers get into the site and turn around to which Vega replied that the trucks turn around in the existing parking area. Beeson asked if the new building would have dock doors. Vega responded that there will a dock door on the right side of the building and no dock doors facing the adjoining residences. Williamson stood to readdress the Planning Board and said that the business is open and operating seven days a week and it is not only the construction noise but also the loud music. Williamson said that the Sheriff’s Deputies have shown up at the site due to noise complaints and the business will turn the music down for about thirty minutes after law enforcement is gone. Pell closed the public hearing for discussion and a decision by the Planning Board. Beeson asked if the Planning Board could put conditions on the property and Morgan replied that the Board could put conditions on the property but that the owner would have to agree to those conditions. Hedrick stated that it looks like this business is an evolution from a Special Use Permit and then a Conditional District Permit. Hedrick asked if the hours of operation were part of the rezoning and where did 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. hours come from? After reviewing the previous Special Use Permit and Conditional District Permit there was nothing on either permit regarding the hours of operation. Dale stated that per the Ordinance if noise is an issue, the Planning Board could require HI – Heavy Industrial zoning. Cable stated that he felt that this operation is more of a light industrial business. Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 16 of 19 Hedrick asked if there were any other similar operations or businesses in this area to which Austin replied that there is nothing else like this on Whites Memorial Rd. Davis said that it seemed to him like the business has changed from the original intent, but it has grown and wants to expand, and he would suggest that the Planning Board should be trying to help the community from expanding by requiring a buffer and asked the Planning Board members if the buffer seems to be appropriate for this request. Austin said that he would suggest that the entrance be expanded to make it safer due to the dangerous location on Whites Memorial Rd. Beeson said he would like to clarify the hours of operation to exclude Sunday operations. Pell asked Vega if he heard what the Planning Board is suggesting which is to (1) add a buffer and (2) make the driveway wider. Vega said that he could not make the drive any wider. Pell stated that the property, according to the site plan is 245 feet wide and the Planning Board was asking for a driveway no wider than seventy feet. Beeson said he thought a driveway of forty to fifty feet wide would be sufficient to address the concerns raised during the public hearing. Cable asked Vega if he was going to be grading the proposed gravel drive to go around the building and take the drive to the back property line. Vega responded that he would not be grading for a new driveway and that the driveway at the front is existing and there is no room to make it larger. Pell asked Vega why he could not widen the drive and Vega answered that the drive is already as wide as it could be based on the site. Pell said that this is not what the submitted site plan shows. Morgan advised the Planning Board to provide Vega with a list of conditions for the property and if Vega does not agree to the conditions, the Planning Board could deny the request. Vega said it is still the same thing. Austin asked if the proposed building will be enclosed, and Vega stated that the proposed building will be closed on the sides but open on both ends. Pell asked Vega again about the conditions mentioned earlier. Morgan stated that all the conditions must be listed in the application and agreed to by the applicant. Cable asked Vega if he could stop operations at 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays to which Vega answered yes if he was still able to access his office as needed. Pell asked about the specific hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 17 of 19 Friday, and 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. Vega stated that those hours will work but he still wants to be able to go to the office after hours as needed. Davis asked Vega if he would put in a sixty feet drive and Vega said he would have to measure the property to be sure. Joyce asked Vega if the business is using the entire side property line for the drive and Vega stated that he is using that property line as the drive. Davis asked about the type of buffers that should be required. Joyce said that if the Planning Board requires a larger driveway and buffers, then it could result in a smaller buffer area. Cable suggested a buffer along the south property line close to the neighbor that lives in the mobile home. Vaughan stated that most municipalities and counties require something planting to be the size of a four-feet-tall at the time of planting in a single row and that would probably be sufficient. Hedrick said that Google shows the existing building as being set back sixty feet from Whites Memorial Rd. Morgan reminded the Planning Board that they needed to be very specific on the conditions that they were requesting. Beeson stated that the Planning Board was discussing a buffer and the Board needs to decide the area for the buffer whether it be from the proposed building corner to halfway to the existing building so it could be seen or another option for buffering. Pell mentioned the existing trees showing on the south line and Vega stated that those trees have been removed. Vega suggested a buffer from the back corner of the existing building all the way along the property line, but the neighbors need to know the buffer will be close to their home. Cable said that he would suggest buffers based on the photo with the red line in the agenda to go from the top property corner along Whites Memorial Rd to the other property line with a Level II buffer starting at the drive and then going north then west to sixty feet from the road on the south property line and then from the rear corner of the proposed building up to the corner at White Memorial Rd and that would put all the buildings inside of a buffer. Vega said that on the northeast side of the property there is a slope, and that side of the property faces a farm, and the building would still be seen by the adjoining property Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 18 of 19 owners. Pell asked about putting a buffer on just the south side of the building to help the adjoining property owners. The Planning Board then requested a Level II buffer be installed from the rear of the existing building to the corner along the south property line. The rezoning application was updated to reflect the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. 2. Level II buffers are to be installed from the rear of the existing building along the southern property line to the rear corner. 3. The existing driveway must be expanded to fifty to sixty feet in width. Vega signed the updated rezoning application with the revised conditions. Davis made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. Cable made a second to the motion to approve the rezoning request described with conditions. Pell called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously. Having no further business, Pell called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Beeson made the motion to adjourn, with Joyce making the second to the motion and the motion was adopted unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m., with 21 citizens present. RANDOLPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ________________________ Planning Director Planning Board Minutes July 12, 2022 Page 19 of 19 _________________________ _______________________________ Deputy Clerk to the Board Date Frankie David Owens Big O's Hydro Dipping, LLC Request for Special Use Permit By Randolph County Planning Board July 12,2022 Exhibit One Exhibit Two Planning Board Request Location Map 0 2 4 6 81 Miles Archdale Trinity Randleman Asheboro Seagrove Liberty Staley Ramseur Franklinville /0j2 ?v!"c$ KÃ !"`$ I¤I¤!"`$ KÈ ?k ?ø ?ø ?k ?i ?Å ?Ú ?Ä ?ç ?d ?ø ?ø?d !"a$ !"a$ !"`$ !"a$ Legend Roads Reservoirs County line Municipal Zoning Garcia Reynoso Koger TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001368 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by EMMANUEL CRUZ GARCIA, Siler City, NC, and his request to rezone 14.05 acres at 7845 US Hwy 64 E, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8712473956, Municipal Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOM-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a four lot subdivision for Class B mobile homes and better as per the site plan. The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case, and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the Technical Review Committee finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion. Policy 6.5 The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major housing source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph County. Policy 6.13 Conventional residential subdivision are anticipated of similar housing characteristics to the community. PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710871200J Growth Management Areas:MUNICIPAL GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 14.0500 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: CVOM-CD-CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY MIXED CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A 4 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CLASS B MOBILE HOMES AND ABOVE AS PER THE SITE PLAN Condition(S): Applicant: GARCIA, EMMANUEL CRUZ City, St. Zip: SILER CITY, NC 27344 Address: 1282 ALSTON BRIDGE RD Owner: GARCIA, EMMANUEL CRUZ Address: 1282 ALSTON BRIDGE RD City, St. Zip: SILER CITY, NC 27346 Permit #: 2022-00001368 Parcel #: 8712473956 Date: 05/05/2022 Location Address: 7845 US HWY 64 E RAMSEUR, NC 27316 Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:GARCIA, EMMANUEL CRUZ Contact Phone:919 820-1333 Acreage: Township:13.9200 06 - COLUMBIA Subdivsion: Lot number: Timothy Mangum Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Garcia Request Location Map NCHW Y49NARDEN CT N OAH R DFOX GROVE RD CRESTWICKRDGRAVES THOMASRD US HWY 6 4 E LEELAYNERDEASTERN RANDOLPH RD1 inch equals 750 feet I¤ I¤Ramseur Directions to site: US Hwy 64 E - Site on (L) approx 4/10 mile past Crestwick Rd at 7845 US Hwy 64 E. Garcia Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ReedCree k Reed CreekNOAHRD FOX GROVE RD LEELAYNERDEASTERN RANDOLPH RDUS HWY 6 4 E 1 inch equals 600 feet Baldwin Trucking (Rezoned in 2018) Request location SUP for beauty shop (1995) Convenience store (Rezoned in 1999) I¤ I¤ RR RM RA LI HI HC Districts County zoning Town of Ramseur Flood plains 50 ft. Stream buffer Streams Roads Temporary Structure!( Permanent Structure!( Multi-address!( Type Structures Parcels Legend 5/8" EIR Flush W/Cap 5/8" EIR Down 2"Capped 5/8" EIR Up 2" 3/4" EIP Up 2" Capped Ex. Nail Flush 5/8" EIR Up 4" W/Cap 3/4" EIP Up 5"5/8" NIR Up 4"3/4" EIP Down 4" Capped 3/8" EIR Up 6" 3/8" EIR Up 4" 3/8" EIR Up 2" Ex. Nail Up 4" Ex. Nail Flush 1/2" EIR Down 2" Ex. Nail Flush 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 150.76 69.38 122.6 0226.45130.5 4 118 .86 2 30 .27 Total Di st 173.481 27 .00838.83LINE BEARING DISTANCEL120.08L210.26L344.91L458.96L558.65 L1 L 3 L 4 L5 Tract 2 5.738 Acres Tract 3 5.030 Acres Tract 4 1.022 Acres Tract 1 2.100 Acres Paved Dri veShed Shed 1 S tory Framed Dwelling 7845 US H wy 64 E Ramseur, NC 8.9'4 0.0' 84.2'84.2' 148.03 Tie Line L2N: 727,482.48 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,814,649.79 Ground US Survey Feet N: 728,473.38 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,814,050.26 Ground US Survey Feet 365.22122.96629.26Total Dist: 273.68 263.04 10.64 Wh at w ill h app en?I D on't Kno w U S H i g h w a y 6 4 E a s t R/W VariesTommy E. GasterFaye J. GasterDB 1563 Pg. 773PB 54 Pg. 6Mari a Guadalupe Vi l l eda Sal asDB 2231 Pg. 421Rami ro M. Vi l l edaOral i a Sanchez Marti nezDB 2202 Pg. 750James Easton Rai ns, Jr.Mel anie Landrum Rai nsDB 2204 Pg. 36Doreen Marie Huntington Keith Jeffery HuntingtonDB 1560 Pg. 1681 PB 53 Pg. 99 Doreen Marie HuntingtonKeith Jeffery HuntingtonDB 1560 Pg. 1681PB 53 Pg. 99Grid NorthNAD 83 (2011)359.813.20Ti e Li nePNS on R/W 225.81T ota l D ist 23 0.1 3133.02Total Dist: 413.27408.674.60620.00C/L of CreekC/L of Creek138.1435.179 3 .9 5 258.20Proposed 35' Access and UtilityNon-Perpetual Easement11,141 Sq Ft1 95.07 35.0 6 PNS on R/W PNS PNS in Creek 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback10' Side Setback10' Si de Set back10' Si de Setback10' Si de Setback10' Si de Set back10' Si de Set back10' Si de Setback10' Si de Set back10' Si de Setback10' Si de Setback10' Side Setback35' Front Setb ack 35' Front Setback 35' Front Se tback 35' Front Setback 50.0' 50.0'50' No-Cut Buff erSite US Hwy 64 E Eastern Randolph Rd.Bent Oak Ave.Crestwick Rd.NC Hwy 49 NGraves Thomas Rd. Fox Grove Rd. Location Map (Not to Scale) Job #: 13713 Preliminary Survey For:Emmanuel Cruz Garcia Columbia Township Randolph County North Carolina March 4, 2022 Deed Book:2735 Pg:1700 Plat Book:146 Pg:58 Scale: 1" = 80 US Survey Feet Bar Scale: , Firm #: P-1110 Dan W Tanner II L-4787 154 S. Fayetteville St, Suite B, Asheboro, NC 27203 Phone Number: 336 625-8000 Email:mail@surveycarolina.com Owners: Emmanuel Cruz Garcia 1282 Alston Bridge Rd. Siler City, NC 27344 SEAL L-4787 IIRENNATWNA D ROYEVRUSD NALPROF E SSION A LNO R T H CAROLIN A I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from anactual survey made under my supervision (deed description recorded in: Book 2735 , page 1700 ; that the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as drawn from information found in Book See , page Notes ; that the ratio of precision or positional accuracy as calculated is 1:10000+, that this plat was prepared in accordance withG.S. 47-30 as amended. Witness my original signature, license number and seal this the 4th day of March, A.D., 2022. __________ _______________________________________________Professional Land Surveyor L-4787 PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES I, Dan W Tanner II, Professional Land Surveyor, certify: In accordance with NC General Statute 47-30(f)11a That the survey creates a subdivision of land within the area of a county or municipality that has an ordinance that regulates parcels of land. I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this map was drawn under my supervision from an actual GPS/ GNSS survey made under my supervision and the following information was used to perform the survey:(1) Class of survey: Class A(2) Positional accuracy: <0.10' (3) Type of GNSS field procedure: Real-Time Kinematic Networks(4) Dates of survey: February 22, 2022(5) Datum/Epoch: NAD83(2011) / 2010.00 (6) Published/Fixed-control use: North Carolina Real Time Network(7) Geoid model: Geoid 12A(8) Combined grid factor(s): 0.99989253 (9) GPS/GNSS Scale Point: N:727,755.51 E:1,814,256.13 Z:557.82(10) Units: US Survey Feet Notes:1. This project is not located within a special flood hazard area per NCFRIS. Map #: 3710871200J Effective Date: 1/2/2008 2. Area calculated by coordinate geometry.3. All lines surveyed by Survey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by bold lines. All lines notsurveyed by Survey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by dashed lines. 4. No attempt was made by this survey to locate all underground utilities nor any othereasements that would be revealed by a title search.5. Proposed Use: Residential 6. Tax PIN: 8712473956 7. No Wells Visible At Time of Survey OHU OHU Drop Inlet Junction Box Storm Sewer Manhole Yard Inlet Catch Basin Computed Point / Point Not Set Bench Mark Existing Concrete Monument EIP - Existing Iron Pipe EIR - Existing Iron Rod EN - Existing Nail NCGS Monument NIP - New Iron Pipe NIR - New Iron Rod RRS - Railroad Spike R/W - Right of Way Monument Stone Evergreen Tree Hardwood Tree Electric Manhole Electric Meter Fire Hydrant Gas Meter Gas Manhole Guy Wire Gas Valve Guy Pole Light Pole Power Pole U/G Power Box SS Cleanout SS - Sanitary Sewer SS Manhole Communications Manhole Transformer Telephone Pole Telephone Pedestal Utility Pole Water Meter Water Manhole Water Valve Back Flow Preventer Irrigation Control Valve Overhead Utility Line Sanitary Sewer Line Storm Sewer LineWater Line Fence Property Line Computed Property Line Right of Way Line Easement Line Setback Lines Tie Lines G G Gas Line Well Overhead Power Line E E E Underground Electric Line T T T 100 100 FW FW Underground Comm. Line 100-Year Flood Hazard Line Floodway Fire Dept. Connection C/L Railroad Z:0.00 Spot Elevation W W U T E C MH CO PP LP W U G G E E DI W 0 80 160 240 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA I, Jay Dale Review Officer of Randolph County, certify that the map or plat to which this certification is affixed meets all statutory requirements for recording. __________ ________________________________________ Review Officer Date I hereby certify that the subdivision plat shown hereon has been found to comply with the Subdivision Regulations for RandolphCounty, North Carolina, and that such plat has been approved according to the procedures for approval of minor subdivisions __________________________________________________________ Date Randolph County Planning Director ORIGINAL PLAT REVISED PLAT Garcia Rezoning Request R e ed Creek ReedCreek US HWY 6 4 E 1 inch equals 400 feet I¤ I¤ Legend Parcels Roads Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Flood plains Garcia Rezoning Request Picture 1: Existing residence in front of request location. Picture 2: Existing residence in front of request location. Picture 3: Existing residence in front of request location. Picture 4: Property across road from request location. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Crestwick Rd. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Eastern Randolph Rd. Page 1 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS County of Randolph, North Carolina Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro, NC 27203 (336) 318-6555  planning@randolphcountync.gov Development policies outlined in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan are specifically designed to encourage long-term planning among property owners, developers, and the County. The Development Impact Analysis is a key component of this Plan and its use will increase public awareness of the relationship of growth, rural environmental impacts, and the capacity of local government to provide adequate public facilities based on future land use demands. The information contained in the Development Impact Analysis comes from the best available public data sources. Preliminary Plat Name Plat name and section: Emmanuel Cruz Garcia Applicant Information Owner of Record: Developer: Name: Emmanuel Cruz Garcia Name: Emmanuel Cruz Garcia Address: 1282 Alston Bridge Rd Address: 1282 Alston Bridge Rd City, ST ZIP: Siler City, NC 27344 City, ST ZIP: Siler City, NC 27344 E-mail: E-mail: Phone: 919 820-1333 Phone: 919 820-1333 Representative: Engineer/Surveyor: Name: Name: Survey Carolina, PLLC Address: Address: 154 S Fayetteville St City, ST ZIP: City, ST ZIP: Asheboro, NC 27203 E-mail: E-mail: mail@surveycarolina.com Phone: Phone: 336 625-8000 Property Description Parcel: 8712473956 Acreage: 14.05 acres Growth Management Area: Municipal Growth Area Township: Columbia Fire District: Franklinville Existing Zoning: RA Existing conditions: Waterway Description Does the site contain any streams or rivers? Yes Stream name: Unnamed tributary Does the site contain any flood zone area? No Approximate acreage: 0.00 acres Does the site lie within a watershed? No Watershed: N/A Does the site contain wetlands? No Type: N/A Other comments: Page 2 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 Project Description (If appropriate, attach a letter outlining in detail, the scope of the request.) Subdivision type: ...................................................................... Class B Manufactured home and above Total acreage of development: ............................................................................................. 14.05 acres Total number of building lots: ................................................................................................................ 4 Minimum housing size: ....................................................................................................... sq. ft. Total acreage of proposed open space (if applicable): .......................................................... 0.00 acres Total road frontage of proposed development: ........................................................................ 393.38 ft. Average frontage of lots: .......................................................................................................... 132.55 ft. Width of the lot with smallest amount of road frontage: ............................................................. 44.94 ft. Width of the lot with greatest amount of road frontage: ............................................................ 230.13 ft. Is the 1:4 ratio maintained for Rural Growth Areas? ......................................................................... N/A Property is currently being used as: Residential Commercial Industrial Farming Leased hunting Vacant Other Features unique to this property: Ravines Hills Mountains Rights-of-way Easements Cemeteries Other Utilities Impact Water source: Individual well Sewer source: Septic system The distance, location, and provider of the nearest public water and sewer source. Service type Distance Location Provider Public water 0.00 ft US Hwy 64 E Town of Ramseur Public sewer 0.00 ft US Hwy 64 E Town of Ramseur Page 3 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 Public Education Impact (Provided by the Boards of Education) School system: Randolph County Schools School impacted Grade level DPI Capacity Current membership Impact Ramseur Elementary K-5 561 383 1 Southeastern Randolph Middle 6-8 583 529 1 Eastern Randolph High 9-12 1018 665 0 Current mobile classrooms present: School Number of mobile classrooms Ramseur Elementary Southeastern Randolph Middle Eastern Randolph High Current traffic assessment: School Traffic assessment Ramseur Elementary Congested Southeastern Randolph Middle Congested Eastern Randolph High Congested School construction plans: School Construction plans Ramseur Elementary N/A Southeastern Randolph Middle N/A Eastern Randolph High N/A Traffic Analysis Impact (Provided by NCDOT GIS data services) Road(s) directly accessed by development: Road name Speed limit Average daily traffic count US Hwy 64 E 55 mph 9,200 Condition of the road accessed by the development: Poor Characteristics of the road(s) directly accessed by development: Paved Curves Graveled Blindspot(s) Single lane Intersection(s) Bridge(s) Hill(s) The proposed development with 4 lots will generate an additional 24 total vehicle trips per day. Does the ADT count greater than 4,000 which would require a turning lane? Yes Page 4 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 Housing and Community Impacts (Within one mile of the proposal) Housing patterns in subdivisions: Subdivision Type Number of lots Average acreage Ashely Goldston Site built 1 3.68 Brown-Myers-Hammer Mobile home 3 1.30 Cheek Estate N/A 2 1.47 Columbia Heights Site built 26 0.42 Dixon-Tilley Site built 32 1.14 E H Bray Site built 4 0.65 Fletcher Pugh Site built 1 5.40 Hazel Goldston Mobile home 2 1.14 Holly Hills Site built 22 0.78 James Carmac Estate Site built 2 2.65 Keith J Farlow Site built 7 8.21 Oak Hollow Site built 23 0.63 Pinnix Property Site built 4 23.82 Ramseur Building Supply Site built 9 1.07 Robert & Alma McRae Site built 13 0.83 Sunshine Heights Site built 8 1.33 V E Curtis N/A 1 0.52 Total number of site-built homes ...................................................................................................... 197 Average square footage of site-built homes ................................................................... 1,664.25 sq. ft. Largest site-built home by square footage ..................................................................... 5,911.00 sq. ft. Smallest site-built home by square footage ...................................................................... 480.00 sq. ft. Total number of mobile homes ........................................................................................................... 35 Percentage of site-built homes .................................................................................................. 82.30 % Percentage of mobile homes .................................................................................................... 17.70 % Total number of acres .................................................................................................... 2,318.45 acres Average acreage ................................................................................................................... 4.42 acres Total acreage in tax-deferred farms .................................................................................. 745.72 acres Community Land Uses Commercial Farming Forestry Industrial Residential Church facilities Other: Special Community Districts Page 5 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 Airport Overlay District Cluster Subdivision Overlay District E-1 Districts Rural Lot Subdivision Overlay District Rural Business Overlay District Industrial Overlay District Scenic Corridor Overlay District Commercial Environmental Overlay District Voluntary Agricultural District Conventional Subdivision Overlay District Unique Rural Land Uses in the Community HLPC Landmark/Cultural Heritage Site National Historic Landmark National Forest Natural Heritage Designated Sites Trailway as part of the County Greenway Plan Youth Camp(s) Agricultural Impact (Within One mile of the proposal) Adjoining farm properties:  N/A Are all well minimum setback lines noted on plat? N/A Tax-deferred farm properties: Property owner Parcel ID Location Johnny Edward and Linda Pugh Hicks Life Estate 8702880658 R2442; W Johnny Edward and Linda Pugh Hicks Life Estate 8702886931 R2442; W Johnny Edward and Linda Pugh Hicks Life Estate 8702887242 Sunshine Hgts; L1-6 Johnny Edward and Linda Pugh Hicks Life Estate 8702980673 Sunshine Hgts; L11-48 Phillip Chad and Melany W Carmac 8712331475 Chad Carmac & James S Conway Tr 2 Mark T and Jan R Braswell 8712355036 Callie Ln; Tr 1-3 Deeded Access Phillip Chad Carmac and Others 8712428348 R2621; N Phillip Chad and Melany W Carmac 8712465578 R64; S No Rd Frtg Phillip and Karen Carmac 8712537163 R2626; W Phillip Chad and Melany W Carmac 8712542636 R2626; W Phillip B and Karen B Carmac 8712636116 R2626; W Gregory Brittenahm 8712669895 R2626; E Phillip Chad Carmac and Others 8712723506 James Carmac Est; Tr 2 Richard E Jr and Jacqueline M Canoy 8712751160 R2626; Both Carley M and Kathy Anne Tatum 8712772648 R64; S Richard E Jr and Jacqueline M Canoy 8712855042 R2627; N Homer F Leonard Trustee 8712877387 R64; S Bobby W and Kathryn P Coe 8712965879 R64; S Common Access McDowell Family Limited Partnership 8712997626 R64; N R2477; E Davis F and Laurie D Scotton 8713622778 R2481; E Page 6 of 6 Development Impact Analysis May 3, 2022 Property owner Parcel ID Location Phillip Ray Ward 8713644437 R2481; E David F and Laurie D Scotton 8713821795 R2481; E Bobby Wray and Kathryn P Coe 8722040490 R2627; Both Sally Spencer Breedlove 8722083118 Arlie F Culp Jr Lo Pt New B Farm operations that begin after the development of a major residential subdivision must abide by the 100 ft. waste setback rule on the farm property. Other Materials Submitted Preliminary approval from NCDOT District Engineer’s Office Buffer site plan Land Clearing Debris Plan Open Space Uses and maintenance agreements, if applicable Proposed deed restrictions Soil analysis Soil erosion plan, stormwater management plan, etc. Other: Land Clearing Debris Plan Subdivision: Emmanuel Cruz Garcia 4/26/2022 Debris will be mulched on site, piled in windrows, or hauled to approved LCID facility. Debris will not be burned or buried. Emmanuel Cruz Garcia 05/02/2022 SignNowe-signatureID:a35a2a228d... 05/03/202202:59:57UTC EMMANUELGARCIA(Signer) Deed Restrictions: This Development will use Randolph County restrictions and setbacks. 1 Mangum, Timothy V. From:Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Sent:Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:36 PM To:Survey Carolina Cc:Britt, Jennifer L; Mangum, Timothy V.; Monroe, Roosevelt J Subject:RE: [External] PIN 8712473956 Attachments:13713Garcia-Map.pdf Daniel, The following comments assumes this for single family residential tracts.  Turning lane would not be required for the number of proposed single-family residential tracts utilizing accesses  Tract 4 would not be able to have direct access to US 64.  We have concerns with tract 3 access due to adjacent guard rail and drainage structures. This access would need to go through the driveway permitting process, in which we would need plans showing existing structures (guardrail, drainage, etc.) and proposed driveway grading and drainage. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or this office. Thanks, Mickey Pate, PE Assistant District Supervisor Division 8 - District 1 (336)-318-4005 Direct (336)-318-4000 Main Office mpate1@ncdot.gov 300 DOT Drive Asheboro, NC 27205 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Survey Carolina <mail@surveycarolina.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:25 PM To: Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Mangum, Tim V <tim.mangum@randolphcountync.gov> Subject: [External] PIN 8712473956 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Good afternoon Mickey, I have this project going before the planning board and a requirement is comments from NCDOT. Thanks Daniel -- 2 (Daniel) Dan W Tanner II, PLS L-4787 Survey Carolina PLLC 154 S Fayetteville St Suite B Asheboro, NC 27203 336 625-8000 office mail@surveycarolina.com www.surveycarolina.com Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 Mangum, Timothy V. From:Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Sent:Thursday, May 5, 2022 10:36 AM To:Survey Carolina Cc:Britt, Jennifer L; Mangum, Timothy V.; Monroe, Roosevelt J Subject:RE: [External] PIN 8712473956 Yes, I don’t see any feasible way for tract 4 to access directly. Looking at the Topo, it appears to be in the natural channel or wetlands for a large drainage area and an access would likely be in conflict with our drainage structures and maintenance not to mention possible environmental impacts. Tract 3 may be able to access but it is questionable with concerns of Its proximity to the guardrail and drainage structures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or this office. Thanks, Mickey Pate, PE Assistant District Supervisor Division 8 - District 1 (336)-318-4005 Direct (336)-318-4000 Main Office mpate1@ncdot.gov 300 DOT Drive Asheboro, NC 27205 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Survey Carolina <mail@surveycarolina.com> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 9:05 AM To: Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Mangum, Tim V <tim.mangum@randolphcountync.gov>; Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: [External] PIN 8712473956 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Should Tract 4 and Tract 3 share a driveway? Thanks Daniel -- (Daniel) Dan W Tanner II, PLS L-4787 Survey Carolina PLLC 154 S Fayetteville St Suite B Asheboro, NC 27203 336 625-8000 office mail@surveycarolina.com 2 www.surveycarolina.com From: Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:36 PM To: Survey Carolina <mail@surveycarolina.com> Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Mangum, Tim V <tim.mangum@randolphcountync.gov>; Monroe, Roosevelt J <rjmonroe@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: [External] PIN 8712473956 Daniel, The following comments assumes this for single family residential tracts.  Turning lane would not be required for the number of proposed single-family residential tracts utilizing accesses  Tract 4 would not be able to have direct access to US 64.  We have concerns with tract 3 access due to adjacent guard rail and drainage structures. This access would need to go through the driveway permitting process, in which we would need plans showing existing structures (guardrail, drainage, etc.) and proposed driveway grading and drainage. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or this office. Thanks, Mickey Pate, PE Assistant District Supervisor Division 8 - District 1 (336)-318-4005 Direct (336)-318-4000 Main Office mpate1@ncdot.gov 300 DOT Drive Asheboro, NC 27205 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Survey Carolina <mail@surveycarolina.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:25 PM To: Pate, Mickey <mpate1@ncdot.gov> Cc: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>; Mangum, Tim V <tim.mangum@randolphcountync.gov> Subject: [External] PIN 8712473956 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Good afternoon Mickey, I have this project going before the planning board and a requirement is comments from NCDOT. Thanks Daniel 3 -- (Daniel) Dan W Tanner II, PLS L-4787 Survey Carolina PLLC 154 S Fayetteville St Suite B Asheboro, NC 27203 336 625-8000 office mail@surveycarolina.com www.surveycarolina.com Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS, a 13.92 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 8712473958 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on July 12, 2022 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2022- 00001368, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to CVOM-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on July 12, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Timothy V. Mangum, Deputy Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY EMMANUEL CRUZ GARCIA REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001368 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOM-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Mixed - Conditional District as described in the application of Emmanuel Cruz Garcia are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Municipal Growth Area which are areas that are could be located in the zoning jurisdiction of a municipality, expects urban density and use has mixed land uses. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 6.5 The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major housing source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph County. Consistency Analysis: The area is mostly residential and by approving this request, the Planning Board would ensure that the residential development can continue to expand in an orderly fashion and protect the quality of life for the area residents. Policy 6.13 Conventional residential subdivision are anticipated of similar housing characteristics to the community. Consistency Analysis: The proposed subdivision, if approved by the Planning Board, would reflect the type of housing characteristics in the surrounding community. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. Adopted on July 12, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Timothy V. Mangum, Deputy Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001825 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by HAROLD KOGER, McLeansville, NC, and his request to rezone 3.10 acres along US Hwy 64 W, Tabernacle Township, Lake Reese Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7712437632, Step Three, Inc, Subdivision, lot 2, Secondary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a proposed 70 ft. by 125 ft. retail building with a 50 ft. vegetative buffer as per the site plan. The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case, and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the Technical Review Committee finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion. Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation and the provision of services to the rural community. Policy 4.6 Compatible land used such as rural neighborhood retail and service establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered during the rezoning process with the goal of reducing automobile travel distances and promoting better livability in the community. PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: LAKE REESE WATERSHED Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710770200J Growth Management Areas:SECONDARY GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 3.1000 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A PROPOSED 70 FT X 125 FT RETAIL BUILDING WITH 50 FT VEGETATIVE BUFFERS AS PER THE SITE PLAN Condition(S): Applicant: KOGER, HAROLD City, St. Zip: MC LEANSVILLE, NC 27301 Address: 5318 MILLSTREAM RD Owner: KOGER, HAROLD Address: 5318 MILLSTREAM RD City, St. Zip: MCLEANSVILLE, NC 27301 Permit #: 2022-00001825 Parcel #: 7712437632 Date: 06/22/2022 Location Address: Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:KOGER, HAROLD Contact Phone:336 312-1776 STEP THREE INC2 Acreage: Township:3.1000 18 - TABERNACLE Subdivsion: Lot number: Eric Martin Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Koger Request Location Map US HWY 64 WHOOVERHILLRDROBBINSCIR CAMERON DR GARREN TOWN RDMT SHEPHERD RD 1 inch equals 400 feet I¤ I¤ Directions to site: US Hwy 64 W - Site on (R) approx 1/4 mile past Robbins Cir. Koger Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( CAMERON DR HOOVER H ILL RDGARREN TOWN RDROBBINS CIR MT SHEPHERD RD US HWY 64 W The request is located in Lake Reese Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 400 feet Barry Mullins S/D Sheppard Heights S/D Request location I¤ I¤ Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads WaterBodies Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts HC RA RR Koger Rezoning Request CAMERON DRROBBINS CIR US HWY 64 W The request is located in Lake Reese Watershed Area. 1 inch equals 125 feet I¤ I¤ Legend Parcels Roads WaterBodies Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Koger Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request location as seen from Robbins Cir. Picture 2: Bethel Baptist Church across road from request location. Picture 3: Bethel Baptist Church across road from request location. Picture 4: Bethel Baptist Church across road from request location. Picture 5: Adjacent residence. Picture 6: Adjacent residence. COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY HAROLD KOGER REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001825 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District as described in the application of Harold Koger are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Secondary Growth Area which are usually transitional in nature and provides for residential and commercial services. This parcel is along US Hwy 64 W which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation and the provision of services to the rural community. Consistency Analysis: Based upon the submitted site plan and the proposed use of the property, this request would increase economic activity, create jobs and provide needed services to this community. Policy 4.6 Compatible land used such as rural neighborhood retail and service establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered during the rezoning process with the goal of reducing automobile travel distances and promoting better livability in the community. Consistency Analysis: This request as presented in the site plan and the submitted application shows that the retail business, if approved, could provide needed services to this area, reduce travel distances for needed services and improve the livability of the community. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. Adopted on August 2, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS, a 3.10 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7712437632 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 2, 2022 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2022-00001825, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on August 2, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001902 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by FRANKLIN REYNOSO, Asheboro, NC, and his request to amend the Conditional District Permit on 1.40 acres at 7905 US Hwy 220 S, Richland Township, Tax ID #7665773033, Carl King Subdivision Map 1, lots 34-42, 49-52 + TR, Primary Growth Area, HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District amendment would specifically allow a barber shop. The Randolph County Technical Review Committee has met on the above-listed case, and after review of all applicable standards contained in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan, the Technical Review Committee finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting this conclusion. Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation and the provision of services to the rural community. Policy 4.6 Compatible land used such as rural neighborhood retail and service establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered during the rezoning process with the goal of reducing automobile travel distances and promoting better livability in the community. PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710766400J Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 1.4000 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): TO AMEND THE CONDITIONAL DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR A BARBER SHOP Condition(S): Applicant: REYNOSO, FRANKLIN City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Address: 7905 US HWY 220 S Owner: REYNOSO, FRANKLIN Address: 7905 US HWY 220 S City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit #: 2022-00001902 Parcel #: 7665773033 Date: 06/29/2022 Location Address: 7905 US HWY 220 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:REYNOSO, FRANKLIN Contact Phone:718 813-0016 CARL KING MP134-42, 49-52 + TR Acreage: Township:1.4000 17 - RICHLAND Subdivsion: Lot number: Eric Martin Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Reynoso Request Location Map US HWY 220 SBURN E Y R D SEAGROVEPLANKRDEXT 1 inch equals 100 feet Directions to site: US Hwy 220 S - Site on (L) across from Burney Rd at 7905 US Hwy 220 S. Reynoso Rezoning Request !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( BURN E Y R D US HWY 220 SSEAGROVEPLANKRDEXT SEAGROVE PLANK RD1 inch equals 200 feet Rezoned for pottery shop (2001) Rezoned for pottery shop (2001) Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads WaterBodies Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts HC RA RR Reynoso Rezoning Request !( !( BUR N E Y R D US HWY 220 SSEAGROVEPLANKRDEXT 1 inch equals 100 feet Legend Parcels Roads Reynoso Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request Location. Picture 2: Other side of request location. Picture 3: Commercial pottery shop near request location. Picture 4: Old commercial property near request location. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward Burney Rd. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Seagrove. Existing Conditional District PermitCOUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER Asheboro (336) 318-6555 ● Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3555 http://www.randolphcountync.gov CONDITIONAL DISTRICT PERMIT Page 1 of 1 CONDITIONAL DISTRICT PERMIT Applicant: PARKS,DARRELL Date: 1/6/2014 Address: 570 STEELE ST Parcel #: 7665773033 City, St Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 Permit #: 2013-00002160 Permit Type Code: PZ 2 Owner: LINDA O PARKS Address: 570 STEELE ST City, ST ZIP: ASHEBORO, NC 27205 CONTACT INFORMATION: Contact Name: PARKS,DARRELL Contact Phone Number: 336 629-7410 LOCATION INFORMATION: Township: (17) RICHLAND Subdivision name: CARL KING MP1 Subdivision lot #: 34-42, 49-52 + TR Address: 7905 US HWY 220 S ASHEBORO, NC 27205 ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District: HIGHWAY COMMECIAL – CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Growth Management Area: PRIMARY GROWTH AREA Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: N/A Class A Flood Plain On Prop? N/A Area rezoned: 1.40 A USE/CONDITIONS:TO ALLOW RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING POTTERY SHOP AND A RETAIL CAR DEALERSHIP, NO MORE THAN 4 CARS ON DISPLAY - AS PER SITE PLAN PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APPROVAL DATE: 12/03/2013 This CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT as described in the public hearing and reflected in the official minutes of the proceedings and subject to all applicable provisions agreed upon by the applicant and the Randolph County Planning Board is hereby approved.The applicant shall complete the development in accordance with the plans and conditions approved by this Board, a copy of which is filed in the County Planning Department. ________________________________________________________________________________________ RANDOLPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Planning & Development Director Date COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY FRANKLIN REYNOSO REZONING REQUEST #2022-00001902 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District as described in the application of Franklin Reynoso are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 220 S which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation and the provision of services to the rural community. Consistency Analysis: The request location is currently zoned HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District and it currently allows retail sales and an automotive dealership. The proposed use as a barber shop could be a less intense use but still increase economic activity in the area and provide services to the rural community. Policy 4.6 Compatible land used such as rural neighborhood retail and service establishments located close to general residential areas should be considered during the rezoning process with the goal of reducing automobile travel distances and promoting better livability in the community. Consistency Analysis: The proposed use of a barber shop at this location would be close to existing residential development and would reduce travel distances for the citizens in the area to received needed services and promote the livability of the community. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. Adopted on August 2, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS, a 1.40 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7665773033 is currently zoned HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 2, 2022 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2022-00001902, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on August 2, 2022. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion.