Loading...
03MarchPBPlanning Board Agenda March 7, 2023 Page 1 of 2 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA March 7, 2023 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. 2. Roll call of the Board members: • Reid Pell, Chair; • Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair • John Cable; • Melinda Vaughan; • Reggie Beeson; • Ken Austin; • Barry Bunting; and • Brandon Hedrick, Alternate. 3. Consent Agenda: • Approval of agenda for the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting. • Approval of the minutes from the February 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting. 4. Conflict of Interest • Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be disclosed? • If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified. 5. Old Business. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000015 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Planning Board Agenda March 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BY CHAIR OR CLERK TO THE BOARD BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. 6. New Business. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000043 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 10.01 acres on Weeden St, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8734196253, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOR-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a six lot subdivision for Class A mobile homes as per the site plan. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000337 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by STRONACH PROPERTIES, INC, Raleigh, NC, and their request to rezone 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres at 9060 Hillsville Rd, Trinity Township, Tax ID #7726128995, Primary Growth Area, from HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a retail store as per the site plan. 7. Adjournment. Attachments Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 1 of 11 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES February 7, 2023 There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, February 7, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance and asked for a roll call of the members. Hal Johnson, County Manager, announced that the Crumley case, postponed until tonight’s meeting has been postponed again and will probably be heard in March. Johnson also stated that the County has not received a request for a rock quarry in the Staley area and no public hearing will be held on this request until an application has been submitted. Johnson also discussed the review process before the request will be heard in a public hearing. Johnson also stated that Gordon's request will not be heard at the meeting tonight due to his wife being in labor and no one being present to give testimony on the case. The Gordon case will be heard at the March Planning Board meeting. Johnson called the roll of the Board members. • Reid Pell, Chair, present; • Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair, present; • John Cable, present; • Melinda Vaughan, present; • Reggie Beeson, present; • Ken Austin, present; • Barry Bunting, present; and • Brandon Hedrick, Alternate, present. County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was also present. Johnson informed the Chairman there was a quorum of the members present for the meeting. Pell called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Consent Agenda: • Approval of agenda for the February 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 11 • Approval of the minutes from the January 10, 2023, Planning Board meeting. Cable made the motion to table Gordon’s request until the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting if he was not present and to approve the remainder of the consent agenda as presented, with Austin making the second to the motion. The motion was adopted unanimously. Pell asked the Board members if there were any conflicts in the following cases. Hearing none, Johnson presented the first case along with site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000010 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by MICHAEL THOMAS HEIL, Randleman, NC, and his request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 1449 Planning Board Agenda February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2 New Salem Rd, Providence Township, Polecat Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7776334652, 6.27 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District and RR – Residential Restricted District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow obtaining a Federal Firearms License to sell firearms and accessories and to allow on-site manufacturing (assembly of firearms) in the existing residence as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to come forward and take the oath before giving testimony on the request. Morgan administered the oath to Michael Thomas Heil, the applicant for the Special Use Permit. Michael Heil, 1449 New Salem Rd, Randleman, told the Planning Board that he is wanting to start this proposed business as a side business and hopefully turn it into a full-time business at which time he would then move the business into a properly zoned storefront. Heil stated that he will be taking more training for sales of firearms and that the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives, hereinafter ATF, required him to obtain the federal firearms license, hereinafter FFL, to manufacture firearms. Heil stated that he was not planning to build any additional structures to manufacture and sell his products. Heil said that he is planning to have an online store and go to gun shows and that he would have no employees. Heil said that if family or friends come over to his residence, he would be willing to help them and that there would be no test firing of any firearms that he sells. Heil said that he does have a range in his backyard for his personal use as allowed by State and County laws. Cable asked Heil how he could tell the difference between the use of his personal firing range and test firing what he is planning on selling. Heil said that he does not shoot very often as his wife is very sensitive to loud noises and he wants to keep the disturbances Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 3 of 11 to a minimum and that he does not want to have firearms on site. Heil stated that he would rather have and sell just firearm accessories (ex., ammunition, etc.) but it all depends on what ATF requires him to do moving forward. Austin asked if Heil had any plans to secure firearms that he may be working on, such as cameras or alarm systems. Heil responded that he has a Ring doorbell and there is only one entry to his property so he does not have security cameras. Davis asked Heil about possibly test firing of weapons that he would have on his property since there was nothing on the Special Use Permit application about the test firing of weapons. Morgan stated that property owner can fire their own weapons on their property but that the test firing of other weapons would require rezoning and that under State and County law property owners can only fire their personal firearms. Heil stated that he is okay with complying with this restriction. Heil asked for clarification on the test fire if he did the firing or if someone else did the firing and Morgan said that Heil could fire his personal firearms for his personal use and Heil said that is what he is going to do at the site. Bunting asked Heil if he would be doing repairs to firearms and Heil responded that he would probably not be doing repair work as it is not worth his time. Morgan stated that Heil would be basically getting parts from various locations and then putting them together and Heil responded that Morgan was correct in his statement. Pell asked if there were any other questions from Planning Board members for Heil. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request. Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request. Denise Saunders, 4546 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, rose to address the Planning Board and Morgan swore in Saunders before she spoke. Saunders stated that the property is a pie-shaped piece of property and that she has lived at the site since 2007 and that she is concerned about the possible Special Use Permit and had several questions. Saunders listed all her questions so either Board or Morgan could answer at one time. (The questions follow below with the answer after the question.) 1. Would the zoning approval move forward with the property if the property was sold to someone else? Morgan stated that the Special Use Permit would not transfer to a different property owner. (Article 100, Section 106 of the Randolph County Unified Ordinance states, “Unless provided otherwise by law, all rights, privileges, benefits, burdens, and obligations created by development approvals (e.g., Rezonings, Special Use Permits, Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 4 of 11 Variances) made according to this Ordinance shall attach to and run with the land for perpetuity.”) 2. The property is in the Polecat Creek Balance Watershed, and would the proposed operation have any impacts on the watershed? Morgan stated that he does not know of any impacts on the watershed due to the proposed operation. 3. What measures would Heil be taking to secure the firearms on the site? Saunders stated that she would assume that every firearm would be test fired at least once. Morgan said that Heil could address this question. 4. Would there be tracking of shell casings as required by federal law to determine if a firearm was used in committing a crime? Morgan said that he was not aware of any law, Federal or State, that requires tracking of shell casings. 5. If the Special Use Permit was approved, what would prevent Heil from turning the operation into a public firing range? Morgan said that a gun range would be prohibited as it is not part of the application for the Special Use Permit and the County Code Enforcement Officers cannot stop Heil from shooting on his own property. 6. What are the findings of fact that are required to show that the proposal will not harm property values? Morgan said that the Planning Board is not involved in property values or access and that anyone wanting to provide evidence regarding property values but be credible and certified to give evidence of any impacts on property values. 7. Saunders asked the Planning Board to table the request until all the questions have been answered. Morgan then administered the oath to Deborah Barkle, 4618 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, and she asked if the Special Use Permit application specifies a difference between assembly and manufacturing and Morgan said that the application says assembly of firearms. Barkle spoke about the number of children in the area around the request location. Sherri Fonner, 4626 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, rose to address the Planning Board after Morgan administered the oath. Fonner stated that she used to be an appraiser but no longer has a license and she thinks this request will be “very bad” for property values. Fonner said that she was opposed to Heil having retail sales at the site and Morgan said that the application does not allow retail sales. Fonner closed her comments by asking who would purchase a firearm without test firing a firearm. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 5 of 11 Tommy Kirkman, 4713 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, addressed the Board after being sworn in by Morgan and stated that he has lived in the area for his entire life and at his current location for 13 years and this is not a good location for the type of operation being proposed. Kirkman asked how it would be possible to ensure that Heil was only firing his personal firearm and that there would be a fine line between personal weapon firing when doing the assembly. Kirkman stated that Heil could test fire any firearm until the gun is sold and claim that it is his personal firearm, but the neighbors would be the ones hearing the noise and no one wants the entire subdivision rezoned to allow this request. Morgan stated that the application is limited to what Heil has requested and only on his property and if Heil wants to change any conditions, he will have to come back to the Planning Board for the conditions to be amended. Clancy Barkle, 4618 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, was sworn in by Morgan to testify before the Planning Board. Barkle stated that he had a question about the RA and RR zoning as they both allow gunsmithing but requires a Special Use Permit. Barkle said this request is concerning because the application is too open and the community would like more details about the proposed operation. Tom Murray, 4591 Riveroaks Dr., Randleman, addressed the Planning Board after being sworn in by Morgan and asked about traffic coming to the site and said there is nothing stating that the operation cannot extend beyond internet sales. Morgan said that retail sales are prohibited as it is not listed on the application. Murray said that he was still concerned about site security. Pell asked if anyone else in opposition to the request wanted to speak. Hearing none, Pell asked Heil if he wanted to address the comments and questions presented by the opposition. Heil said that he would address the concerns the best he can. As for the Polecat Creek Balance Watershed area, Heil said that he would not be using any chemicals other than regular household cleaners. Heil said that he keeps his house locked and that any ammunition or firearms will be stored in a locked safe in the basement of his home. Heil then addressed the questions regarding not being able to test-fire a gun and he stated that if someone purchases a gun in a retail store, they are not allowed to test-fire the firearm before the purchase. Heil stated that he did not know anything about the tracking of discharged shells but he guessed that for forensic purposes, he would assume that the test fire would have to be done in a clean area and would probably have to be done at a shooting range. Heil further stated that he has not heard of this requirement, but if it was necessary, he would go to a commercial shooting range to meet this requirement. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 6 of 11 Cable asked Heil if he had talked to anyone else doing what he is proposing, and Heil said that he moved to this area and has only taken training at this time. Cable asked approximately how many parts Heil would have on hand at one time. Heil said that he would start with ammunition and accessories as he is not comfortable selling firearms at his residence. Heil stated that the ATF requires him to have an FFL to sell ammunition and that after additional training he would like to buy and sell firearms at gun shows and via the internet. Cable asked Heil how many parts it takes to make a firearm and how he plans to secure the items. Heil said that does not know the number of parts but if he did have firearms at his residence, he would prefer it to be only one firearm at a time and it will be locked up. Cable asked Heil if the firearm or parts would be locked in a safe or closet and Heil stated that the supplies would be behind lock and key. Davis asked Heil to describe his typical business transaction. Heil said that he typically received a customer’s order, which he orders from his supplier and after receiving the supplies in the mail, he will then send them to the customer because he does not want people at his house due to his family being there. Heil said that he mostly uses UPS for shipping as FedEx will not ship firearms. Morgan asked Heil how he receives his orders and Heil said it was either via his website or at gun shows. He said he plans to have shirts printed with the web address on them. Austin asked Heil if customers are buying guns without ever seeing what they are purchasing. Heil stated that he does not want people coming to his house to see the firearms but they look at his website to see what he has and when the order is placed and paid, he will ship the order. Pell asked Heil how he advertised his gun or accessories for sale and Heil responded either through his website or at gun shows and that this would be a part-time business and does not want people at his residence where his family lives. Beeson asked if the Planning Board could amend the application to remove manufacturing and Morgan said the Board could amend the application only if the applicant agrees. Austin asked Heil if he is going to sell ammunition at this time and Heil said that he would be selling ammunition. Austin asked how much ammunition would be stored at Heil’s house and Heil responded that he would keep the ammunition to a minimum. Austin asked about security and Heil said the ammunition would be in his fireproof safe in the basement of his house. Cable asked Heil if he has a business plan that outlines where he wants the business to go and to try and see all the details. Heil stated that he did not have a business plan at this time since he did not need a loan to start the business. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 7 of 11 Pell asked if there were any other questions from the Planning Board for the applicant. Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion. Cable said that the neighbors have asked good questions that could have been answered by the applicant before the meeting. Cable further stated that the Planning Board has seen several similar applications in the past several years, and most people do not want signs bringing attention to their FFL activities due to safety issues. Cable said there are strict restrictions on gun ranges. He also said he had been in law enforcement for 40 years at which time he purchased firearms without shooting them until later. Cable further stated that this request is for a start-up and if the business grows, he will have to go to another location. Cable said that he appreciates everyone’s concern and they all had good questions about safety and security and these are all the questions the Planning Board wants to know. Cable said that the thinks all of the items have been addressed by Heil. Austin asked what would happen if Heil deviated from the application or the Special Use Permit if it was approved. Johnson said that Heil would have to come back to the Planning Board to get the permits updated and that the surrounding property owners can file complaints with the County Planning Department if Heil does not follow the conditions of the Special Use Permit. Johnson reminded Heil that if approved, the Special Use Permit allows the County to intervene if he goes beyond his stated and sworn statements. Pell said that everything stated in the meeting will be in the minutes. Hedrick mentioned the four findings of fact that the Board must find to approve the Special Use Permit application. Pell called for a motion to either approve or deny the Special Use Permit application. Bunting made the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Cable seconded the motion to APPROVE the Special Use Permit. Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 8 of 11 Johnson presented the second case, site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. Gordon was not present as his wife was in labor at a local hospital, so the Planning Board tabled this request until March 7, 2023, as indicated in the Consent Agenda section of these minutes. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000015 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan. Johnson presented the last case of the night along with site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000051 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by CAROL E WILSON, Randleman, NC, and her request to rezone 40,942 sq. ft. out of 19.41 acres at 6590 US Hwy 311, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed, Tax ID #7746118749, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a U-Haul business as per the site plan. Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board. Carol E Wilson, 720 S. Main St., Randleman, the applicant, rose to address the Planning Board and said that she wants to rezone the property for a U-Haul business that is currently located at another location. Johnson asked Wilson what she plans to do with the rest of the property and Wilson stated that she was not planning to do anything with the remainder of the property, and she was just looking to rezone the property along US Hwy 311. Wilson was asked if the existing trees would remain in the rear of the property and Wilson replied that the tree would remain on the property. Wilson stated that she only wanted the property along US Hwy 311 rezoned and that Planning Staff advised her to request a Conditional Zoning District that would hold her to the specified use of the property. Pell asked if there were any questions from the Planning Board. Davis asked Wilson if there were any buildings on the property and Wilson replied, “No.” Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 9 of 11 Davis then asked Wilson how long she had owned the property and Wilson stated that she had owned the property since November 2022. Davis then asked Wilson if the access to the rear of the property was via Nelson Park Rd and Wilson replied, “Yes.” Beeson asked Wilson about the site plan and if she was keeping a right-of-way to access the back of the property and Wilson replied that she is leaving an access on both sides of the property to be rezoned. Wilson discussed the site plan as showing the buildings, parking area, and the forty-foot drive to get to the rear of the property. Morgan asked how Wilson accessed the back of the property and Wilson said that the access is via Nelson Park Rd. Beeson stated that by looking at the site plan, it shows a forty-foot marking between the area to be rezoned and the adjoining property line. Davis asked Wilson about the area between the property line and the proposed building and Wilson said this area is being retained as a buffer area and that they are trying to protect the adjoining residence. Davis asked Wilson for more specifics as to the operation on the site. Wilson stated that the units will go out and come back in after they are rented. Wilson further stated that they will not be repairing the units and will also be selling accessories like moving boxes and wiring harnesses. Bunting asked Wilson if there would be any signage and she stated that there will be a U-Haul sign at the site. Wilson was asked about hours of operation, and she said that the business would be closed on Sunday. Austin asked Wilson if they planned to fence the area and how many vehicles they would usually have on the site. Wilson replied that at most they have had six trailers and eight U-Haul vehicles. Wilson also stated that there would not be enough vehicles on the site to warrant a fence being installed and that they also have a camera system that they will install on the site. Cable asked Wilson if she is moving the business from Randleman to this location and if it is a retail establishment to which Wilson responded yes to both questions. Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request. Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request. Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion. Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 10 of 11 With no opposition to the request, Cable asked if the request was advertised and properly posted, and the Planning Staff confirmed that all legal procedures were completed as required by the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Beeson raised concern about the forty-foot easement to the rear of the property as it could cause some congestion. Cable said he thought this was a good location for this type of business and it would fit in with the area and the Growth Management Plan. Cable made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. Vaughan made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request. Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously. Johnson explained the 15-day waiting period for a possible appeal and a permit will follow that waiting period. Having no further business, Pell called for a motion to ADJOURN the meeting. Davis made the motion to adjourn, with Austin making the second to the motion. Pell, having a proper motion, and second, called the question on the motion to ADJOURN. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m., with twenty citizens present. RANDOLPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ________________________ Chairman Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 11 of 11 _________________________ _______________________________ Clerk to the Board Date March Request Location Map 0 2 4 6 81 Miles Archdale Trinity Randleman Asheboro Seagrove Liberty Staley Ramseur Franklinville /0j2 ?v!"c$ KÃ !"`$ I¤I¤!"`$ KÈ ?k ?ø ?ø ?k ?i ?Å ?Ú ?Ä ?ç ?d ?ø ?ø?d !"a$ !"a$ !"`$ !"a$ Legend Roads Reservoirs County line Municipal Zoning Davis Stronach Properties Gordon CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2023-00000015 The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi- judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan. ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY. OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS (Special Use Permit Request, Variances or Appeals) NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY Before opening the public hearing on a case, the Chair must administer an oath or affimation to those wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is specified in NCGS 11-11.) The Chair should say, “The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and against this request. Anyone wishing to offer testimony on this request must come forward and take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give testimony for this request. “Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God.” PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO 3710773400JFlood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest. SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW AN OUTSIDE STORAGE LOT FOR AUTOMOBILES, (EXCLUDING JUNK VEHICLES), AS PER THE SITE PLAN Signature of Applicant: Eric Martin Authorized County Official Applicant: GORDON, ANTOINE BROOKS & GORDON, CYNTHIA City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350 Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD Owner: GORDON, ANTOINE Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350 Permit #: 2023-00000015 Parcel #: 7734655151 Date: 01/03/2023 Location Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD SOPHIA, NC 27350 Permit Type Code: PZ 3 CONTACT NAME:GORDON, ANTOINE Contact Phone:336 430-2259 SAWYER ESTTR1A Acreage: Township:5.0400 02 - BACK CREEK Subdivsion: Lot number: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Gordon Request Location Map BECKERDITE RD IVO R Y L N SA W Y E R R D P L O T T H O U N D T R L 1 inch equals 400 feet Directions to site: US Hwy 311 N - (L) Beckerdite Rd - Site on (L) at intersection of Beckerdite Rd and Plott Hound Trl at 3457 Beckerdite Rd. Gordon Special Use Permit Request !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( IVO R Y L N BECKERDITE RD S A W YER R D P L O T T H O U N D T R L 1 inch equals 400 feet SUP for auto repair (1998) Request location Sawyer Estate S/D Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads WaterBodies Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts RA Gordon Special Use Permit Request SAW Y E R R D P L O T T H O U N D T R L BECKERDITE RD 1 inch equals 250 feet Legend Parcels Roads WaterBodies 50 ft. Stream buffer Gordon Special Use Permit Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Request location on right as seen looking along Plott Hound Tr. Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking along Beckerdite Rd. Picture 6: Request location on right as seen looking toward Sawyer Rd. COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY ANTOINE GORDON SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2023-00000015 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on March 7, 2023, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 3457 Beckerdite Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby Choose the decision., subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Choose the decision. THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR Antoine Gordon BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest. Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000043 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Property Owner: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To allow a six lot subdivision for Class A mobile homes as per the site plan. Current Zoning: RA – Residential Agricultural District Requested Zoning: CVOR-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted – Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Primary Growth Area Watershed Overlay: None Flood Plain Overlay: None Airport Overlay: None Location: Weeden St Parcel Number: 8734196253 Parcel Size: 10.01 acres Existing Use: Vacant Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4 SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use North RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential South RA - Residential Agricultural District Vacant East RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential West RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation: “A driveway permit is needed for each access point. The permit(s) will need to be completed and signed before submitting to our office. We require a plan or plat that shows exact driveway locations, a turnaround area off the right of way so that vehicles are not forced to back out, and a min. 15” NCDOT approved driveway pipe per access point. There is a $50 inspection fee (make check payable to NCDOT) per approved access which will need to be received by this office at 300 DOT Dr, Asheboro, NC 27204. Driveway permits can be submitted through the online portal via https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/Encroachment- Agreements.aspx. “The driveways need to be a min. 200 ft. apart, and have a safe sight distance in both directions (typically 10ft per mph road design). If spacing requirements cannot be met, joint driveways would be required. Please stake the driveway locations and reach out to us when ready so that we can field inspect. Sight distance requirements must be met before a driveway permit approval can be issued.” ZONING INFORMATION Zoning History: There is no history of a rezoning, Variance or Special Use Permit at the request location. Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 614 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.): A. CVO: CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District has been established to accommodate single-family residential subdivisions with four or more owner- Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4 occupied lots created for sale or building development. This district is predominantly residential and suburban where current water and sewer needs are met primarily by individual wells and septic systems. Some public infrastructure may be available in the future. Housing characteristics with the CVO district will be designated Exclusive (CVOE), Restricted (CVOR), or Mixed (CVOM), in conformance with other major subdivision zoning districts. The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District is designed for those areas of Randolph County where the requirement of such an Overlay District can help achieve the policies and objectives of the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. This district is specifically designed for Primary Growth Areas and Secondary Growth Areas as reflected in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. (1) PURPOSE AND USES PERMITTED The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District shall be considered as an overlay district to the existing zoning districts. Uses permitted within the underlying district shall be permitted provided they meet the requirements within the overlay zone subject to the restrictions provided by this section. (2) CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS (a) All standards as required by the land development regulations contained within this Ordinance. (b) Minimum lot sizes as specified by this Ordinance. Lot sizes may be increased as required by soils and other factors particular to the location. (c) Designed under the policies and guidelines outlined in the comprehensive land-use plan. (d) Subdivision layout and use of land will assure safe and convenient circulation patterns while minimizing the impacts on the established residential areas. (e) Site plans shall be submitted to reduce stormwater impact by designing new development in a manner that minimizes concentrated stormwater flows using as a minimum vegetated buffer area. (3) SITING ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS Conventional subdivisions shall be designed to minimize the number of private driveway connections to existing public roads. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4 STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 6.5: The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major housing source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph County. Consistency Analysis: As reflected on the Development Impact Analysis, the proposal, if developed according to the site plan and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, would protect the existing rural neighborhoods while also providing housing that is a reflection of the quality of life in Randolph County. Policy 6.12: Factors to be considered major subdivision approval in Primary and Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and community compatibility. Consistency Analysis: This proposed subdivision has close access to major thoroughfares such as NC Hwy 49 N and US Hwy 421. Furthermore, the proposal is also compatible with the existing housing in the surrounding community. Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710872400K Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 10.0100 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: CVOR-CD-CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY RESTRICTED CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW 6 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CLASS A MOBILE HOMES AS PER THE SITE PLAN Condition(S): Applicant: DAVIS, ERIC City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Address: P O BOX 452 Owner: DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC Address: 9755 US HWY 220 BUS N City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Permit #: 2023-00000043 Parcel #: 8734196253 Date: 01/05/2023 Location Address: Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:DAVIS, ERIC Contact Phone:336 587-5622 Acreage: Township:10.0100 06 - COLUMBIA Subdivsion: Lot number: Timothy Mangum Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Request Location Map MARGARETCHAPEL RD OLIVERS CHAPEL RD MARLEY CIR BROOKSDALE RD WEED E N S T 1 inch equals 400 feet Directions to site: NC Hwy 49 N - (R) Weeden St - Site on (L) just before Olivers Chapel Rd. Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( MARGARET CHAPEL RD OL I V E R S C H A P E L R D MARLEY CIR BROOKSDALE RD WEED E N S T 1 inch equals 400 feet Rezoned in 2021 for 10 lot subdivision Request location Legend Parcels Structures Type !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure Roads Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer County zoning Districts CVOR LI RA Travis Earl Pugh2011-767PB 105 Pg 66 James Worth Brooks Harriet Karen Brooks 1124-502 Oliver's Chapel African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church 208 0 - 7 1 Oliver Chapel African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church 19 7 2 - 3 7 4 Helen P. Headen 1864-1188 Bruce Bailey Graham Mary Lou Robertson1567-677 Barbara Garner Estate File: 21E - 748 Jacqueline B. Brooks DB: 2754 Pg: 1313 Michael A. Early Mary Copeland Early 1910-1395 Michael A. Early Mary Copeland Early 1246-1150 85.23' LINE BEARING DISTANCEL159.71'L2 46.79'L3 57.66'L4 13.22'L5 23.56'L1 L2 L3 73.58' 62.45' 140.59' 71.19' 70.79' 115.01' 117.98' 362.87' 275.85' 71.90' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLEC11500.46'49.87'49.87'C2 1500.46'105.02'105.00'C3 1500.46'105.02'105.00'C4 1500.46'91.80'91.79' C1 C2 C3 C4 L4 105.00' 105.00' 527.46' 525.29' 510.42' 505.61' 510.45' New Tract 1 1.488 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 2 1.239 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 3 1.403 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 4 1.429 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 51.461 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 6 2.989 Acres A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 1/2" EIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 5/8" NIR Up 4" 3/4" EIP Up 4" 1" EIP Up 2" 1" EIP Up 2" 1" EIP Down 4" 60d Set @ Base1" EIP Flush 5/8" EIR Up 2" 5/8" EIR Up 10" 1/2" EIP Up 2" Weeden Street SR 2469 60' Public R/W L5 144.30' N: 749,652.12 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,831,326.62 Ground US Survey Feet N: 748,703.91 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,832,058.30 Ground US Survey Feet 5/8" EIR Flush Gr i d N o r t h NA D 8 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) Keith Allen Burgio Korrina Lynn Burgio DB 2775 Pg. 1689 T2 of PB 168 Pg. 89 5/8" NIR Flush5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 5/8" NIR Flush 517.05 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 30' Rear Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 10' Side Setback 100' Farm Well Setback 100' Farm Well Setback 100' Farm Well Setback 100' Farm Well Setback 100' Farm Well Setback 100' Farm Well Setback Brooksdale Rd NC HWY 49 N US HWY 421Willard Rd Sandy Creek Church Rd Shady Grove Church Rd Weeden St N Main St Olivers Chapel Rd Old 421 Rd Site Pike Farm Rd Location Map (Not to Scale) Job #: 14662 Survey For:Davis Investment Properties, LLC Columbia Township Randolph County North Carolina November 16, 2022 Deed Book:2524 Pg:642 Scale: 1" = 60 US Survey Feet Bar Scale: , Firm #: P-1110Dan W Tanner II L-4787 154 S. Fayetteville St, Suite B, Asheboro, NC 27203Phone Number: 336 625-8000Email: mail@surveycarolina.com Owners: Davis Investment Properties, LLC 9755 US Hwy 220 Business N. Randleman, NC 27317 0 60 120 180 I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from anactual survey made under my supervision (deed description recorded in: Book 2524 , page 642 ; that the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as drawn from information found in Book See , page Notes ; that the ratio of precision or positionalaccuracy as calculated is 1:10000+, that this plat was prepared in accordance withG.S. 47-30 as amended. Witness my original signature, license number and seal thisthe 16th day of November, A.D., 2022. __________ _______________________________________________Professional Land Surveyor L-4787 PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES Notes:1. This project is not located within a special flood hazard area per NCFRIS.Map #: 3710872400K Effective Date: 1/2/20082. Area calculated by coordinate geometry. 3. All lines surveyed by Survey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by bold lines. All lines not surveyed bySurvey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by dashed lines. 4. No attempt was made by this survey to locate all underground utilities nor any other easements thatwould be revealed by a title search.5. Tax PIN: 87341962536. Proposed Use: Residential OHU OHU OHU Drop Inlet Junction Box Storm Sewer ManholeYard InletCatch Basin Computed Point / Point Not Set Bench MarkExisting Concrete Monument EIP - Existing Iron Pipe EIR - Existing Iron Rod EN - Existing Nail NCGS Monument NIP - New Iron Pipe NIR - New Iron Rod RRS - Railroad Spike R/W - Right of Way Monument Stone Evergreen Tree Hardwood Tree Electric ManholeElectric Meter Fire Hydrant Gas Meter Gas Manhole Guy Wire Gas Valve Guy PoleLight Pole Power Pole U/G Power Box SS Cleanout SS - Sanitary SewerSS Manhole Communications Manhole Transformer Telephone Pole Telephone Pedestal Utility Pole Water Meter Water Manhole Water Valve Back Flow Preventer Irrigation Control Valve Overhead Utility Line Sanitary Sewer LineStorm Sewer LineWater Line Fence Property Line Computed Property Line Right of Way Line Easement Line Setback Lines Tie Lines G G G Gas Line Well Overhead Power Line E E E E Underground Electric Line T T T T 100 100 100 FW FW FW Underground Comm. Line 100-Year Flood Hazard LineFloodway Fire Dept. Connection C/L Railroad Z:0.00 Spot Elevation W W U T E C MHCO PP LP W U G G E E DI W I, Dan W Tanner II, Professional Land Surveyor, certify: In accordance with NC General Statute 47-30(f)11d That the survey is of another category, such as the recombination of existingparcels, a court-ordered survey, or other exemption or exception to the definitionof subdivision. I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this map was drawn under my supervision froman actual GPS/ GNSS survey made under my supervision and the followinginformation was used to perform the survey:(1) Class of survey: Class A(2) Positional accuracy: <0.10'(3) Type of GNSS field procedure: Real-Time Kinematic Networks(4) Dates of survey: March 03, 2021(5) Datum/Epoch: NAD83(2011) / 2010.00(6) Published/Fixed-control use: North Carolina Real Time Network(7) Geoid model: Geoid 12A(8) Combined grid factor(s): 0.99988881(9) GPS/GNSS Scale Point:N:749,249.44 E:1,831,041.91 Z:738.33(10) Units: US Survey Feet SEALL-4787 IIRENNATWNA D ROYEVRUSDN A L PR O F ESSION A L N O R T H CAROLIN A Site Data Proposed Use: Proposed Lots: 6 Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request MARGARET CHAPEL RD OL I V E R S C H A P E L R D MARLEY CIR BROOKSDALE RD WEED E N S T 1 inch equals 400 feet Legend Parcels Roads 50 ft. Stream buffer Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Adjacent residence. Picture 3: Nearby commercial operation. Picture 4: Property across road from request location. Picture 5: Request location on right as seen looking toward NC Hwy 49 N. Picture 6: Request location on left as seen looking toward Olivers Chapel Rd. Page 1 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS County of Randolph, North Carolina Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro, NC 27203 (336) 318-6555  planning@randolphcountync.gov Development policies outlined in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan are specifically designed to encourage long-term planning among property owners, developers, and the County. The Development Impact Analysis is a key component of this Plan and its use will increase public awareness of the relationship of growth, rural environmental impacts, and the capacity of local government to provide adequate public facilities based on future land use demands. The information contained in the Development Impact Analysis comes from the best available public data sources. Preliminary Plat Name Plat name and section: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Applicant Information Owner of Record: Developer: Name: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Name: Eric Davis Address: 9755 US Hwy 220 Bus N Address: P O Box 452 City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 E-mail: E-mail: ericdavisrealestate@yahoo.com Phone: Phone: 336 587-5622 Representative: Engineer/Surveyor: Name: Name: Survey Carolina Address: Address: 154-B S Fayetteville St City, ST ZIP: City, ST ZIP: Asheboro, NC 27203 E-mail: E-mail: mail@surveycarolina.com Phone: Phone: 336 625-8000 Property Description Parcel: 8734196253 Acreage: 10.01 acres Growth Management Area: Primary Growth Area Township: Columbia Fire District: Staley Existing Zoning: RA Existing conditions: Waterway Description Does the site contain any streams or rivers? No Stream name: Does the site contain any flood zone area? No Approximate acreage: acres Does the site lie within a watershed? No Watershed: N/A Does the site contain wetlands? No Type: N/A Other comments: Page 2 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 Project Description (If appropriate, attach a letter outlining in detail, the scope of the request.) Subdivision type: ........................................................................................ Class A Manufactured home Total acreage of development: ............................................................................................. 10.01 acres Total number of building lots: ................................................................................................................ 6 Minimum housing size: ....................................................................................................... sq. ft. Total acreage of proposed open space (if applicable): .......................................................... 0.00 acres Total road frontage of proposed development: ........................................................................ 646.80 ft. Average frontage of lots: .......................................................................................................... 107.08 ft. Width of the lot with smallest amount of road frontage: ........................................................... 105.00 ft. Width of the lot with greatest amount of road frontage: ............................................................ 121.74 ft. Is the 1:4 ratio maintained for Rural Growth Areas? ......................................................................... N/A Property is currently being used as: Residential Commercial Industrial Farming Leased hunting Vacant Other Features unique to this property: Ravines Hills Mountains Rights-of-way Easements Cemeteries Other Utilities Impact Water source: Individual well Sewer source: Septic system The distance, location, and provider of the nearest public water and sewer source. Service type Distance Location Provider Public water 3.00 miles Old 421 Rd Town of Liberty Public sewer 3.00 miles Old 421 Rd Town of Liberty Page 3 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 Public Education Impact (Provided by the Boards of Education) School system: Randolph County Schools School impacted Grade level DPI Capacity Current membership Impact Liberty Elementary K-5 606 403 1 Southeast Randolph Middle 6-8 583 529 1 Eastern Randolph High 9-12 1015 665 0 Current mobile classrooms present: School Number of mobile classrooms Liberty Elementary Southeast Randolph Middle Eastern Randolph High Current traffic assessment: School Traffic assessment Liberty Elementary Good Southeast Randolph Middle Congested Eastern Randolph High Congested School construction plans: School Construction plans Liberty Elementary N/A Southeast Randolph Middle N/A Eastern Randolph High N/A Traffic Analysis Impact (Provided by NCDOT GIS data services) Road(s) directly accessed by development: Road name Speed limit Average daily traffic count Weeden St 55 mph 900 Condition of the road accessed by the development: Poor Characteristics of the road(s) directly accessed by development: Paved Curves Graveled Blindspot(s) Single lane Intersection(s) Bridge(s) Hill(s) The proposed development with 6 lots will generate an additional 36 total vehicle trips per day. Does the ADT count greater than 4,000 which would require a turning lane? No Page 4 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 Housing and Community Impacts (Within one mile of the proposal) Housing patterns in subdivisions: Subdivision Type Number of lots Average acreage Hunter's Cove Site built 11 3.80 J Hampton Pike N/A 4 12.80 Liberty Business Park N/A 1 3.09 Mary Siler Site built 5 2.95 Naomi Brown Site built 4 1.90 Prudy L Kivett Heirs Site built 6 8.70 Ronnie & Judith Hill Mobile home 5 0.82 Smokey Hollow Mobile home 3 0.75 Staley Cove Mobile home 28 1.50 Tammy McKinney Mobile home 2 4.96 Vickrey Farm Mobile home 10 1.56 Warren Acres Site built 5 1.70 Total number of site-built homes ...................................................................................................... 136 Average square footage of site-built homes ................................................................... 1,508.70 sq. ft. Largest site-built home by square footage ..................................................................... 4,619.00 sq. ft. Smallest site-built home by square footage ...................................................................... 528.00 sq. ft. Total number of mobile homes ........................................................................................................... 67 Percentage of site-built homes .................................................................................................. 66.99 % Percentage of mobile homes .................................................................................................... 33.01 % Total number of acres .................................................................................................... 2,177.80 acres Average acreage ................................................................................................................... 5.90 acres Total acreage in tax-deferred farms .................................................................................. 856.50 acres Community Land Uses Commercial Farming Forestry Industrial Residential Church facilities Other: Special Community Districts Airport Overlay District Cluster Subdivision Overlay District E-1 Districts Rural Lot Subdivision Overlay District Rural Business Overlay District Industrial Overlay District Scenic Corridor Overlay District Commercial Environmental Overlay District Voluntary Agricultural District Conventional Subdivision Overlay District Page 5 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 Unique Rural Land Uses in the Community HLPC Landmark/Cultural Heritage Site National Historic Landmark National Forest Natural Heritage Designated Sites Trailway as part of the County Greenway Plan Youth Camp(s) Agricultural Impact (Within One mile of the proposal) Adjoining farm properties: • 8734182135 (Travis Earl Pugh) Are all well minimum setback lines noted on plat? Yes Tax-deferred farm properties: Property owner Parcel ID Location John Mitchell and Michelle Kristen Cain 8724976904 R2472; E Harriette E Cox Trustee 8724948044 R2473; Both Margaret L Dunn 8734459747 R2469; S Margaret Leary Dunn 8734460690 R2469; S Clyde Oliver Fulk, Jr 8735154919 R421; E Janet Pike Hill 8735448669 R421; E Janet Pike Hill 8735527550 R1006; E Janet Pike Hill 8735629439 R421; N Koopman Dairies, Inc 8735224254 R2461; Both Koopman Dairies, Inc 8735319605 J Hampton Pike, L3 Deeded Access Betty Joe Lackey 8724846636 R2474; E Side Betty Joe Lackey 8724847059 R2473; N Side John D and Elnora Langley 8734439904 R2470; N Kevin D and Jenna Linn Harris Lineberry 8725716752 Larry M Kennedy & Kevin & Jenna Lineberry Lo 2 Betty Jo Owen 8725741123 R2459; N Joe R & Virginia Petree 8734139805 R2470; N Common Access J Hampton Pike Trustee 8735631659 R2463; Both Travis Earl Pugh 8734182135 R2469; Both Travis Earl Pugh 8734261835 R2469; S David and James Lewis Scotton 8724993885 R2469; Both David and James Lewis Scotton 8724996562 R2469; Both Jeffrey Lee Scotton 8734048862 R2470; N Common Access Jeffrey Lee Scotton 8734064246 Jeffrey & Malinda Scotton; Tr1- 2 Deed Acc Barbara K Wall 8724692306 W L Kivett Estate Lo 2 Barbara K Wall 8725720332 R2459; R2458 Barbara Kivett Wall 8725725576 R2459; N Page 6 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023 Property owner Parcel ID Location Kenneth A Welker and Margaret L Dunn 8734248363 W Franklinville St, W No Rd Frtg Kenneth A Welker and Margaret L Dunn 8734454426 W Franklinville St; End of Rd Kenneth A Welker and Margaret Leary Dunn 8734350207 W Franklinville St; W No Rd Frtg Nancy Fox White 8724987623 R2472; E Ronald Wayne Williams 8724795125 R49; W Farm operations that begin after the development of a major residential subdivision must abide by the 100 ft. waste setback rule on the farm property. Other Materials Submitted Preliminary approval from NCDOT District Engineer’s Office Buffer site plan Land Clearing Debris Plan Open Space Uses and maintenance agreements, if applicable Proposed deed restrictions Soil analysis Soil erosion plan, stormwater management plan, etc. Other: Deed Restrictions: This Development will use Randolph County restrictions and setbacks. Signature Date 12/15/2022 SignNow e-signature ID: 081a4f39cf... 12/15/2022 20:35:12 UTC Eric Davis Eric Davis (Signer) Land Clearing Debris Plan Subdivision: Eric Davis Date: 12/15/22 Debris will be mulched on site, piled in windrows, or hauled to approved LCID facility. Debris will not be burned or buried. Signature Date 12/15/2022 SignNow e-signature ID: 70b75e7838... 12/15/2022 20:34:42 UTC Eric Davis Eric Davis (Signer) COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000043 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOR-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted - Conditional District as described in the application of David Investment Properties, LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is just off of NC Hwy 49 N which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 6.5: The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major housing source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph County. Consistency Analysis: As reflected on the Development Impact Analysis, the proposal, if developed according to the site plan and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, would protect the existing rural neighborhoods while also providing housing that is a reflection of the quality of life in Randolph County. Policy 6.12: Factors to be considered major subdivision approval in Primary and Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and community compatibility. Consistency Analysis: This proposed subdivision has close access to major thoroughfares such as NC Hwy 49 N and US Hwy 421. Furthermore, the proposal is also compatible with the existing housing in the surrounding community. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS, a 10.01 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 8734196253 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 7, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023- 00000043, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to CVOR-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000337 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Stronach Properties, LLC Property Owner: June M. Fulton Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To rezone 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres to allow a retail store as per the site plan. Current Zoning: HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District Requested Zoning: HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District Small Area Plan: NC Hwy 705 Scenic Business Overlay Growth Management: Primary Growth Area Watershed Overlay: None Flood Plain Overlay: None Airport Overlay: None Location: 9060 Hillsville Rd Parcel Number: 7726128995 Parcel Size: 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres Existing Use: Auto dealership in existing building as per the site plan. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4 SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use North RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential South RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential East RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential West RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation: “We are fine with the location. We don’t anticipate required roadway improvements based on the plans and location. We would want to know exactly what is being proposed to further assess traffic generation. We are currently assuming a dollar store (sic) in our assessment.” ZONING INFORMATION Zoning History: The last rezoning on this property was on August 2, 2010, when the existing conditions were amended to allow an auto dealership office in the existing building with no more than six autos being displayed. The previous rezoning was from July 7, 2003, when 1.00 acre was rezoned to allow an accounting office use in the existing residence. Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.): HC: HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Highway Commercial (HC) District is to provide a place in which the principal use of land is for the retailing of durable goods, the provision of commercial services to industrial areas, and the provision of services to tourists. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4 Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres Lot width 100 ft. at building line Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watershed and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. Minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request: • Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan; • Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and • Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 1.7 Planning and development decisions should be based on the principal of promoting investment in Randolph County to expand employment opportunities while preserving and improving the quality of life for all County residents. Consistency Analysis: This request location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. The proposed change to a retail store could expand employment opportunities for the area citizens and improve their quality of life. Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4 Policy 4.4 Commercial land uses should be encouraged to develop by consolidation and deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when such consolidation and deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the effect of incompatibility with adjoining residential land uses. Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, this location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. This rezoning request would extend the Highway Commercial zoning district into more of the property while still maintaining a large portion of the parcel in its current Residential Agricultural zoning that could act as a buffer for existing residential land uses. Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. PARCEL INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: Zoning District 1: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT Zoning District 3: Specialty District: N/A Watershed Name: NONE Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO Flood Plain Map #: 3710772600J Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA Flood Plane Map #: Total Permit Fee: $100.00 COMMENTS: REQUESTED CHANGE: The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. Area To Be Rezoned: 1.8100 Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S) Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW FOR RETAIL STORE AS THE PER SITE PLAN Condition(S): Applicant: STRONACH PROPERTIES INC. City, St. Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27609 Address: 4004 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 106 Owner: FULTON, JUNE M Address: 10003 ARCHDALE RD City, St. Zip: TRINITY, NC 27370 Permit #: 2023-00000337 Parcel #: 7726128995 Date: 02/02/2023 Location Address: 9060 HILLSVILLE RD TRINITY, NC 27370 Permit Type Code: PZ 2 CONTACT NAME:STRONACH, WILL Contact Phone:919 270-1750 Acreage: Township:5.0400 19 - TRINITY Subdivsion: Lot number: Eric Martin Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1 - LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER - Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov COUNTY OF RANDOLPH Department of Planning & Zoning 204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Stronach Properties, Inc., Request Location Map VALLEY RIDGE DR HILLSVILLERD R O L L I N G W O O D D R VALLEYRIDGEDR EXTMILLERS MIL L R D 1 inch equals 250 feet Directions to site: 1004N - Site on (R) just past Millers Mill Rd at 9060 Hillsville Rd. Stronach Properties, Inc., Rezoning Request !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( HIL L S V I L L E R D VALLEYRIDGE DR EXT R O L L I N G W O O D D R VALLEYRIDGE DR MILLERS MI L L R D 1 inch equals 300 feet Rezoned to RA in 2022 Rezoned in 2012 for retail store SUP for auto dealer in 1995 Request location White Estate S/D Legend Parcels Type !(Multi-address Structure !(Permanent Structure !(Temporary Structure !(Duplex/Complex !(Miscellaneous Structures Roads Streams 50 ft. Stream buffer Districts HC RA RR Stronach Properties, Inc., Rezoning Request HIL L S V I L L E R D VALLEYRIDGE DR EXT R O L L I N G W O O D D R VALLEYRIDGE DR MILLERS MI L L R D 1 inch equals 300 feet Legend Parcels Roads 50 ft. Stream buffer Stronach Properties, Inc, Rezoning Request Picture 1: Request location. Picture 2: Nearby Hillsville Community Center. Picture 3: Adjacent residence. Picture 4: Adjacent residence. Picture 5: Request location on left as seen looking toward Roy Farlow Rd. Picture 6: Site on right as seen looking toward Valley Ridge Dr COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY STRONACH PROPERTIES, INC REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000337 NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District as described in the application of Stronach Properties, Inc., are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along Hillsville Rd which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 1.7 Planning and development decisions should be based on the principal of promoting investment in Randolph County to expand employment opportunities while preserving and improving the quality of life for all County residents. Consistency Analysis: This request location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. The proposed change to a retail store could expand employment opportunities for the area citizens and improve their quality of life. Policy 4.4 Commercial land uses should be encouraged to develop by consolidation and deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when such consolidation and deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the effect of incompatibility with adjoining residential land uses. Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, this location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. This rezoning request would extend the Highway Commercial zoning district into more of the property while still maintaining a large portion of the parcel in its current Residential Agricultural zoning that could act as a buffer for existing residential land uses. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County. Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS, a 1.81 acre parcel out of 5.04 acres, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7726128995 is currently zoned HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 7, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023- 00000337, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST _______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board MOTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is also consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion. MOTION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD “I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is not consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.” If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the motion.