03MarchPBPlanning Board Agenda March 7, 2023 Page 1 of 2
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA March 7, 2023 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. 2. Roll call of the Board members:
• Reid Pell, Chair;
• Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair
• John Cable;
• Melinda Vaughan;
• Reggie Beeson;
• Ken Austin;
• Barry Bunting; and
• Brandon Hedrick, Alternate.
3. Consent Agenda:
• Approval of agenda for the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of the minutes from the February 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
4. Conflict of Interest
• Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be
disclosed?
• If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.
5. Old Business.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000015
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd,
Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential
Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use
Planning Board Agenda March 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan.
ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BY CHAIR OR CLERK TO THE BOARD BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY.
6. New Business.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000043
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 10.01 acres on Weeden St, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8734196253, Primary
Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOR-CD -
Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a six lot subdivision for Class A mobile homes as per the site plan.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000337
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by STRONACH PROPERTIES, INC, Raleigh, NC, and their request to rezone 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres at 9060 Hillsville Rd, Trinity Township, Tax ID #7726128995, Primary Growth
Area, from HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA –
Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial -
Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a retail store as per the site plan.
7. Adjournment. Attachments
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 1 of 11
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES February 7, 2023
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, February 7, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance and asked for a roll call of the members. Hal Johnson, County Manager, announced that the Crumley case, postponed until
tonight’s meeting has been postponed again and will probably be heard in March. Johnson also stated that the County has not received a request for a rock quarry in the Staley area and no public hearing will be held on this request until an application has been submitted. Johnson also discussed the review process before the request will be heard in a public hearing. Johnson also stated that Gordon's request will not be heard
at the meeting tonight due to his wife being in labor and no one being present to give testimony on the case. The Gordon case will be heard at the March Planning Board meeting. Johnson called the roll of the Board members.
• Reid Pell, Chair, present;
• Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair, present;
• John Cable, present;
• Melinda Vaughan, present;
• Reggie Beeson, present;
• Ken Austin, present;
• Barry Bunting, present; and
• Brandon Hedrick, Alternate, present. County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was also present. Johnson informed the Chairman there was a quorum of the members present for the meeting. Pell called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Consent Agenda:
• Approval of agenda for the February 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 11
• Approval of the minutes from the January 10, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
Cable made the motion to table Gordon’s request until the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting if he was not present and to approve the remainder of the consent agenda as presented, with Austin making the second to the motion. The motion was adopted unanimously.
Pell asked the Board members if there were any conflicts in the following cases. Hearing none, Johnson presented the first case along with site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000010
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by MICHAEL THOMAS
HEIL, Randleman, NC, and his request to obtain a Special Use Permit at
1449 Planning Board Agenda February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2 New Salem Rd, Providence Township, Polecat Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7776334652, 6.27 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District and RR – Residential Restricted District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain
a Special Use Permit to specifically allow obtaining a Federal Firearms
License to sell firearms and accessories and to allow on-site manufacturing (assembly of firearms) in the existing residence as per the site plan.
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the
request to come forward and take the oath before giving testimony on the request. Morgan administered the oath to Michael Thomas Heil, the applicant for the Special Use Permit.
Michael Heil, 1449 New Salem Rd, Randleman, told the Planning Board that he is
wanting to start this proposed business as a side business and hopefully turn it into a full-time business at which time he would then move the business into a properly zoned storefront. Heil stated that he will be taking more training for sales of firearms and that the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives, hereinafter ATF,
required him to obtain the federal firearms license, hereinafter FFL, to manufacture firearms. Heil stated that he was not planning to build any additional structures to manufacture and sell his products. Heil said that he is planning to have an online store and go to gun shows and that he would have no employees. Heil said that if family or
friends come over to his residence, he would be willing to help them and that there would
be no test firing of any firearms that he sells. Heil said that he does have a range in his backyard for his personal use as allowed by State and County laws. Cable asked Heil how he could tell the difference between the use of his personal firing
range and test firing what he is planning on selling. Heil said that he does not shoot very
often as his wife is very sensitive to loud noises and he wants to keep the disturbances
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 3 of 11
to a minimum and that he does not want to have firearms on site. Heil stated that he would rather have and sell just firearm accessories (ex., ammunition, etc.) but it all
depends on what ATF requires him to do moving forward.
Austin asked if Heil had any plans to secure firearms that he may be working on, such as cameras or alarm systems. Heil responded that he has a Ring doorbell and there is only one entry to his property so he does not have security cameras.
Davis asked Heil about possibly test firing of weapons that he would have on his property since there was nothing on the Special Use Permit application about the test firing of weapons.
Morgan stated that property owner can fire their own weapons on their property but that
the test firing of other weapons would require rezoning and that under State and County law property owners can only fire their personal firearms. Heil stated that he is okay with complying with this restriction. Heil asked for clarification on the test fire if he did the firing or if someone else did the firing and Morgan said that Heil could fire his personal firearms
for his personal use and Heil said that is what he is going to do at the site.
Bunting asked Heil if he would be doing repairs to firearms and Heil responded that he would probably not be doing repair work as it is not worth his time.
Morgan stated that Heil would be basically getting parts from various locations and then
putting them together and Heil responded that Morgan was correct in his statement. Pell asked if there were any other questions from Planning Board members for Heil. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the
request.
Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request. Denise Saunders, 4546 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, rose to address the Planning Board
and Morgan swore in Saunders before she spoke. Saunders stated that the property is
a pie-shaped piece of property and that she has lived at the site since 2007 and that she is concerned about the possible Special Use Permit and had several questions. Saunders listed all her questions so either Board or Morgan could answer at one time.
(The questions follow below with the answer after the question.)
1. Would the zoning approval move forward with the property if the property was sold to someone else? Morgan stated that the Special Use Permit would not transfer to a different property owner. (Article 100, Section 106
of the Randolph County Unified Ordinance states, “Unless provided
otherwise by law, all rights, privileges, benefits, burdens, and obligations
created by development approvals (e.g., Rezonings, Special Use Permits,
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 4 of 11
Variances) made according to this Ordinance shall attach to and run with the land for perpetuity.”)
2. The property is in the Polecat Creek Balance Watershed, and would the proposed operation have any impacts on the watershed? Morgan stated that he does not know of any impacts on the watershed due to the proposed operation.
3. What measures would Heil be taking to secure the firearms on the site? Saunders stated that she would assume that every firearm would be test fired at least once. Morgan said that Heil could address this question.
4. Would there be tracking of shell casings as required by federal law to
determine if a firearm was used in committing a crime? Morgan said that he was not aware of any law, Federal or State, that requires tracking of shell casings.
5. If the Special Use Permit was approved, what would prevent Heil from
turning the operation into a public firing range? Morgan said that a gun range would be prohibited as it is not part of the application for the Special Use Permit and the County Code Enforcement Officers cannot stop Heil from shooting on his own property.
6. What are the findings of fact that are required to show that the proposal will not harm property values? Morgan said that the Planning Board is not involved in property values or access and that anyone wanting to provide evidence regarding property values but be credible and certified to give
evidence of any impacts on property values.
7. Saunders asked the Planning Board to table the request until all the questions have been answered.
Morgan then administered the oath to Deborah Barkle, 4618 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman,
and she asked if the Special Use Permit application specifies a difference between assembly and manufacturing and Morgan said that the application says assembly of
firearms.
Barkle spoke about the number of children in the area around the request location.
Sherri Fonner, 4626 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, rose to address the Planning Board after Morgan administered the oath. Fonner stated that she used to be an appraiser but no longer has a license and she thinks this request will be “very bad” for property values.
Fonner said that she was opposed to Heil having retail sales at the site and Morgan said
that the application does not allow retail sales. Fonner closed her comments by asking who would purchase a firearm without test firing a firearm.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 5 of 11
Tommy Kirkman, 4713 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, addressed the Board after being sworn in by Morgan and stated that he has lived in the area for his entire life and at his
current location for 13 years and this is not a good location for the type of operation being
proposed. Kirkman asked how it would be possible to ensure that Heil was only firing his personal firearm and that there would be a fine line between personal weapon firing when doing
the assembly. Kirkman stated that Heil could test fire any firearm until the gun is sold
and claim that it is his personal firearm, but the neighbors would be the ones hearing the noise and no one wants the entire subdivision rezoned to allow this request. Morgan stated that the application is limited to what Heil has requested and only on his property and if Heil wants to change any conditions, he will have to come back to the Planning
Board for the conditions to be amended.
Clancy Barkle, 4618 Riveroaks Dr, Randleman, was sworn in by Morgan to testify before the Planning Board. Barkle stated that he had a question about the RA and RR zoning as they both allow gunsmithing but requires a Special Use Permit. Barkle said this
request is concerning because the application is too open and the community would like
more details about the proposed operation. Tom Murray, 4591 Riveroaks Dr., Randleman, addressed the Planning Board after being sworn in by Morgan and asked about traffic coming to the site and said there is nothing
stating that the operation cannot extend beyond internet sales. Morgan said that retail
sales are prohibited as it is not listed on the application. Murray said that he was still concerned about site security. Pell asked if anyone else in opposition to the request wanted to speak. Hearing none,
Pell asked Heil if he wanted to address the comments and questions presented by the
opposition. Heil said that he would address the concerns the best he can. As for the Polecat Creek Balance Watershed area, Heil said that he would not be using any chemicals other than
regular household cleaners. Heil said that he keeps his house locked and that any
ammunition or firearms will be stored in a locked safe in the basement of his home. Heil then addressed the questions regarding not being able to test-fire a gun and he stated that if someone purchases a gun in a retail store, they are not allowed to test-fire
the firearm before the purchase.
Heil stated that he did not know anything about the tracking of discharged shells but he guessed that for forensic purposes, he would assume that the test fire would have to be done in a clean area and would probably have to be done at a shooting range. Heil further
stated that he has not heard of this requirement, but if it was necessary, he would go to
a commercial shooting range to meet this requirement.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 6 of 11
Cable asked Heil if he had talked to anyone else doing what he is proposing, and Heil said that he moved to this area and has only taken training at this time. Cable asked
approximately how many parts Heil would have on hand at one time. Heil said that he
would start with ammunition and accessories as he is not comfortable selling firearms at his residence. Heil stated that the ATF requires him to have an FFL to sell ammunition and that after additional training he would like to buy and sell firearms at gun shows and via the internet.
Cable asked Heil how many parts it takes to make a firearm and how he plans to secure the items. Heil said that does not know the number of parts but if he did have firearms at his residence, he would prefer it to be only one firearm at a time and it will be locked up.
Cable asked Heil if the firearm or parts would be locked in a safe or closet and Heil stated
that the supplies would be behind lock and key. Davis asked Heil to describe his typical business transaction. Heil said that he typically received a customer’s order, which he orders from his supplier and after receiving the
supplies in the mail, he will then send them to the customer because he does not want
people at his house due to his family being there. Heil said that he mostly uses UPS for shipping as FedEx will not ship firearms. Morgan asked Heil how he receives his orders and Heil said it was either via his website
or at gun shows. He said he plans to have shirts printed with the web address on them.
Austin asked Heil if customers are buying guns without ever seeing what they are purchasing. Heil stated that he does not want people coming to his house to see the firearms but they look at his website to see what he has and when the order is placed and
paid, he will ship the order.
Pell asked Heil how he advertised his gun or accessories for sale and Heil responded either through his website or at gun shows and that this would be a part-time business and does not want people at his residence where his family lives.
Beeson asked if the Planning Board could amend the application to remove manufacturing and Morgan said the Board could amend the application only if the applicant agrees.
Austin asked Heil if he is going to sell ammunition at this time and Heil said that he would
be selling ammunition. Austin asked how much ammunition would be stored at Heil’s house and Heil responded that he would keep the ammunition to a minimum. Austin asked about security and Heil said the ammunition would be in his fireproof safe in the basement of his house.
Cable asked Heil if he has a business plan that outlines where he wants the business to go and to try and see all the details. Heil stated that he did not have a business plan at this time since he did not need a loan to start the business.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 7 of 11
Pell asked if there were any other questions from the Planning Board for the applicant. Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members
and a motion.
Cable said that the neighbors have asked good questions that could have been answered by the applicant before the meeting. Cable further stated that the Planning Board has seen several similar applications in the past several years, and most people do not want
signs bringing attention to their FFL activities due to safety issues. Cable said there are
strict restrictions on gun ranges. He also said he had been in law enforcement for 40 years at which time he purchased firearms without shooting them until later. Cable further stated that this request is for a start-up and if the business grows, he will have to go to another location. Cable said that he appreciates everyone’s concern and they all had
good questions about safety and security and these are all the questions the Planning
Board wants to know. Cable said that the thinks all of the items have been addressed by Heil. Austin asked what would happen if Heil deviated from the application or the Special Use
Permit if it was approved. Johnson said that Heil would have to come back to the
Planning Board to get the permits updated and that the surrounding property owners can file complaints with the County Planning Department if Heil does not follow the conditions of the Special Use Permit.
Johnson reminded Heil that if approved, the Special Use Permit allows the County to
intervene if he goes beyond his stated and sworn statements. Pell said that everything stated in the meeting will be in the minutes.
Hedrick mentioned the four findings of fact that the Board must find to approve the
Special Use Permit application. Pell called for a motion to either approve or deny the Special Use Permit application.
Bunting made the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit request on the specified
parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, the use meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the
value of adjoining property, that the use is a public necessity and the location and
character of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance. Cable seconded the motion to APPROVE the Special Use Permit.
Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 8 of 11
Johnson presented the second case, site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties. Gordon was not present as his wife was in labor at a local hospital, so the
Planning Board tabled this request until March 7, 2023, as indicated in the Consent
Agenda section of these minutes. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000015
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential
Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan. Johnson presented the last case of the night along with site plans, and pictures of the
site and surrounding properties. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000051
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by CAROL E WILSON, Randleman, NC, and her request to rezone 40,942 sq. ft. out of 19.41 acres at 6590 US Hwy
311, New Market Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed, Tax ID #7746118749, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential
Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a U-Haul business as per the site plan.
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board. Carol E Wilson, 720 S. Main St., Randleman, the applicant, rose to address the Planning
Board and said that she wants to rezone the property for a U-Haul business that is
currently located at another location. Johnson asked Wilson what she plans to do with the rest of the property and Wilson stated that she was not planning to do anything with the remainder of the property, and
she was just looking to rezone the property along US Hwy 311. Wilson was asked if the
existing trees would remain in the rear of the property and Wilson replied that the tree would remain on the property. Wilson stated that she only wanted the property along US Hwy 311 rezoned and that Planning Staff advised her to request a Conditional Zoning
District that would hold her to the specified use of the property.
Pell asked if there were any questions from the Planning Board. Davis asked Wilson if there were any buildings on the property and Wilson replied, “No.”
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 9 of 11
Davis then asked Wilson how long she had owned the property and Wilson stated that she had owned the property since November 2022. Davis then asked Wilson if the
access to the rear of the property was via Nelson Park Rd and Wilson replied, “Yes.” Beeson asked Wilson about the site plan and if she was keeping a right-of-way to access the back of the property and Wilson replied that she is leaving an access on both sides of the property to be rezoned. Wilson discussed the site plan as showing the buildings,
parking area, and the forty-foot drive to get to the rear of the property.
Morgan asked how Wilson accessed the back of the property and Wilson said that the access is via Nelson Park Rd.
Beeson stated that by looking at the site plan, it shows a forty-foot marking between the
area to be rezoned and the adjoining property line. Davis asked Wilson about the area between the property line and the proposed building and Wilson said this area is being retained as a buffer area and that they are trying to
protect the adjoining residence.
Davis asked Wilson for more specifics as to the operation on the site. Wilson stated that the units will go out and come back in after they are rented. Wilson further stated that they will not be repairing the units and will also be selling accessories like moving boxes
and wiring harnesses.
Bunting asked Wilson if there would be any signage and she stated that there will be a U-Haul sign at the site.
Wilson was asked about hours of operation, and she said that the business would be
closed on Sunday. Austin asked Wilson if they planned to fence the area and how many vehicles they would usually have on the site. Wilson replied that at most they have had six trailers and eight
U-Haul vehicles. Wilson also stated that there would not be enough vehicles on the site
to warrant a fence being installed and that they also have a camera system that they will install on the site. Cable asked Wilson if she is moving the business from Randleman to this location and
if it is a retail establishment to which Wilson responded yes to both questions.
Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request. Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request.
Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 10 of 11
With no opposition to the request, Cable asked if the request was advertised and properly posted, and the Planning Staff confirmed that all legal procedures were completed as
required by the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Beeson raised concern about the forty-foot easement to the rear of the property as it could cause some congestion.
Cable said he thought this was a good location for this type of business and it would fit in with the area and the Growth Management Plan. Cable made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the
Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Vaughan made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning
request. Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously.
Johnson explained the 15-day waiting period for a possible appeal and a permit will follow that waiting period. Having no further business, Pell called for a motion to ADJOURN the meeting. Davis
made the motion to adjourn, with Austin making the second to the motion.
Pell, having a proper motion, and second, called the question on the motion to ADJOURN. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m., with twenty citizens present.
RANDOLPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ________________________ Chairman
Planning Board Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 11 of 11
_________________________ _______________________________ Clerk to the Board Date
March Request Location Map
0 2 4 6 81
Miles
Archdale
Trinity
Randleman
Asheboro
Seagrove
Liberty
Staley
Ramseur
Franklinville
/0j2
?v!"c$
KÃ !"`$
I¤I¤!"`$
KÈ
?k
?ø
?ø
?k
?i
?Å
?Ú
?Ä
?ç ?d
?ø
?ø?d
!"a$
!"a$
!"`$
!"a$
Legend
Roads
Reservoirs
County line
Municipal Zoning
Davis
Stronach
Properties
Gordon
CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2023-00000015
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Quasi-
judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC, and their request to
obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID
#7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the
applicant to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for
automobiles, excluding junk vehicles, as per the site plan.
ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY.
OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS
(Special Use Permit Request,
Variances or Appeals)
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
Before opening the public hearing on a case, the
Chair must administer an oath or affimation to those
wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is
specified in NCGS 11-11.)
The Chair should say,
“The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and
against this request. Anyone wishing to offer
testimony on this request must come forward and
take the oath. Only those taking the oath may give
testimony for this request.
“Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall
give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you
God.”
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
3710773400JFlood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the
Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work
may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all
conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed
shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest.
SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: TO ALLOW AN OUTSIDE STORAGE LOT FOR AUTOMOBILES, (EXCLUDING
JUNK VEHICLES), AS PER THE SITE PLAN
Signature of Applicant:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official
Applicant: GORDON, ANTOINE BROOKS &
GORDON, CYNTHIA
City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350
Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD
Owner: GORDON, ANTOINE
Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD
City, St. Zip: SOPHIA, NC 27350
Permit #: 2023-00000015
Parcel #: 7734655151
Date: 01/03/2023
Location Address: 3457 BECKERDITE RD
SOPHIA, NC 27350
Permit Type Code: PZ 3
CONTACT
NAME:GORDON, ANTOINE Contact Phone:336 430-2259
SAWYER ESTTR1A
Acreage: Township:5.0400 02 - BACK CREEK
Subdivsion: Lot number:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Development
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Gordon Request Location Map
BECKERDITE RD
IVO
R
Y
L
N
SA
W
Y
E
R
R
D
P L O T T H O U N D T R L
1 inch equals 400 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 311 N -
(L) Beckerdite Rd - Site on (L) at
intersection of Beckerdite Rd and
Plott Hound Trl at 3457
Beckerdite Rd.
Gordon Special Use Permit Request
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
IVO
R
Y
L
N
BECKERDITE RD
S
A
W
YER
R
D
P L O T T H O U N D T R L
1 inch equals 400 feet
SUP for auto
repair (1998)
Request
location
Sawyer
Estate S/D
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
Roads
WaterBodies
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
County zoning
Districts
RA
Gordon Special Use Permit Request
SAW
Y
E
R
R
D
P L O T T H O U N D T R L
BECKERDITE RD
1 inch equals 250 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
WaterBodies
50 ft. Stream buffer
Gordon Special Use Permit Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Request location on
right as seen looking
along Plott Hound
Tr.
Picture 5:
Request location on
left as seen looking
along Beckerdite Rd.
Picture 6:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward Sawyer Rd.
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY ANTOINE GORDON SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2023-00000015
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on March 7, 2023, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that the
application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County
Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the application to make use of the property located at 3457 Beckerdite Rd for the purpose indicated is hereby Choose the decision., subject to all applicable provisions of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.
HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Choose the decision. THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR Antoine Gordon BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING:
1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact.
2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property,
or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact. 4. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: Click here to enter findings of fact.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this Special
Use Permit to be issued in its name and the property owners do hereby accept this
Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions as binding on them and their successors in interest.
Adopted on March 7, 2023.
_____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit
request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use will not
materially endanger the public health or safety, the use
meets all required conditions and specifications, the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property, that
the use is a public necessity and the location and character
of the use if developed according to the plan(s) as
submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area
and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request
on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit
application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is
included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any
and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may
materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use
does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or
the use may substantially injure the value of adjoining
property, that the use is not a public necessity and the
location and character of use if developed according to the
plan(s) as submitted and approved, or will not be in
harmony with the area and in general conformity with the
Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000043
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Davis Investment Properties, LLC
Property Owner: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To allow a six lot subdivision for Class A mobile homes as per
the site plan.
Current Zoning: RA – Residential Agricultural District Requested Zoning: CVOR-CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted –
Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Primary Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: None
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Location: Weeden St
Parcel Number: 8734196253 Parcel Size: 10.01 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
South RA - Residential Agricultural District Vacant
East RA - Residential
Agricultural District
Single-family
residential
West RA - Residential
Agricultural District
Single-family
residential
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
“A driveway permit is needed for each access point. The permit(s) will need to be completed and signed before submitting to our office. We require a plan or plat that shows exact driveway locations, a turnaround area off the right of way so that vehicles are not
forced to back out, and a min. 15” NCDOT approved driveway pipe per access point.
There is a $50 inspection fee (make check payable to NCDOT) per approved access which will need to be received by this office at 300 DOT Dr, Asheboro, NC 27204. Driveway permits can be submitted through the online portal via https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/Encroachment-
Agreements.aspx.
“The driveways need to be a min. 200 ft. apart, and have a safe sight distance in both directions (typically 10ft per mph road design). If spacing requirements cannot be met, joint driveways would be required. Please stake the driveway locations and reach out to
us when ready so that we can field inspect. Sight distance requirements must be met
before a driveway permit approval can be issued.”
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: There is no history of a rezoning, Variance or Special Use
Permit at the request location.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 614 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
A. CVO: CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District has been established to
accommodate single-family residential subdivisions with four or more owner-
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4
occupied lots created for sale or building development. This district is predominantly residential and suburban where current water and sewer needs are
met primarily by individual wells and septic systems. Some public infrastructure may be available in the future. Housing characteristics with the CVO district will be designated Exclusive (CVOE), Restricted (CVOR), or Mixed (CVOM), in conformance with other major subdivision zoning districts.
The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District is designed for those areas of
Randolph County where the requirement of such an Overlay District can help achieve the policies and objectives of the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan. This district is specifically designed for Primary Growth Areas and Secondary Growth Areas as reflected in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.
(1) PURPOSE AND USES PERMITTED The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District shall be considered as an overlay district to the existing zoning districts. Uses permitted within the underlying district shall be permitted provided they meet
the requirements within the overlay zone subject to the restrictions
provided by this section. (2) CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS (a) All standards as required by the land development
regulations contained within this Ordinance.
(b) Minimum lot sizes as specified by this Ordinance. Lot sizes may be increased as required by soils and other factors particular to the location.
(c) Designed under the policies and guidelines outlined in the comprehensive land-use plan. (d) Subdivision layout and use of land will assure safe and
convenient circulation patterns while minimizing the
impacts on the established residential areas. (e) Site plans shall be submitted to reduce stormwater impact by designing new development in a manner that
minimizes concentrated stormwater flows using as a
minimum vegetated buffer area. (3) SITING ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS
Conventional subdivisions shall be designed to minimize the number
of private driveway connections to existing public roads.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 6.5: The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by
compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major housing
source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph County. Consistency Analysis: As reflected on the Development Impact Analysis, the proposal,
if developed according to the site plan and the Randolph County Unified Development
Ordinance, would protect the existing rural neighborhoods while also providing housing that is a reflection of the quality of life in Randolph County. Policy 6.12: Factors to be considered major subdivision approval in Primary and
Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major
thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and community
compatibility.
Consistency Analysis: This proposed subdivision has close access to major
thoroughfares such as NC Hwy 49 N and US Hwy 421. Furthermore, the proposal is also
compatible with the existing housing in the surrounding community.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the
property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type
of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed
use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710872400K
Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 10.0100
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: CVOR-CD-CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY
RESTRICTED CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW 6 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CLASS A MOBILE HOMES
AS PER THE SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: DAVIS, ERIC
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Address: P O BOX 452
Owner: DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC
Address: 9755 US HWY 220 BUS N
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit #: 2023-00000043
Parcel #: 8734196253
Date: 01/05/2023
Location Address:
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:DAVIS, ERIC Contact Phone:336 587-5622
Acreage: Township:10.0100 06 - COLUMBIA
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Timothy Mangum
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Request Location Map
MARGARETCHAPEL RD
OLIVERS
CHAPEL
RD
MARLEY CIR
BROOKSDALE RD
WEED
E
N
S
T
1 inch equals 400 feet
Directions to site: NC Hwy 49 N -
(R) Weeden St - Site on (L) just
before Olivers Chapel Rd.
Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
MARGARET CHAPEL RD
OL
I
V
E
R
S
C
H
A
P
E
L
R
D
MARLEY CIR
BROOKSDALE RD
WEED
E
N
S
T
1 inch equals 400 feet
Rezoned in 2021 for
10 lot subdivision
Request
location
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
County zoning
Districts
CVOR
LI
RA
Travis Earl Pugh2011-767PB 105 Pg 66 James Worth Brooks
Harriet Karen Brooks
1124-502
Oliver's Chapel African Methodist
Episcopal Zion Church
208
0
-
7
1
Oliver Chapel African Methodist
Episcopal Zion Church
19
7
2
-
3
7
4
Helen P. Headen
1864-1188
Bruce Bailey Graham
Mary Lou Robertson1567-677
Barbara Garner
Estate File: 21E - 748
Jacqueline B. Brooks
DB: 2754 Pg: 1313
Michael A. Early
Mary Copeland Early
1910-1395
Michael A. Early
Mary Copeland Early
1246-1150
85.23'
LINE BEARING DISTANCEL159.71'L2 46.79'L3 57.66'L4 13.22'L5 23.56'L1
L2
L3
73.58'
62.45'
140.59'
71.19'
70.79'
115.01'
117.98'
362.87'
275.85'
71.90'
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLEC11500.46'49.87'49.87'C2 1500.46'105.02'105.00'C3 1500.46'105.02'105.00'C4 1500.46'91.80'91.79'
C1
C2
C3
C4
L4
105.00'
105.00'
527.46'
525.29'
510.42'
505.61'
510.45'
New Tract 1
1.488 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642
New Tract 2
1.239 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642
New Tract 3
1.403 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642 New Tract 4
1.429 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642
New Tract 51.461 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642
New Tract 6
2.989 Acres
A Portion of DB 2524 Pg. 642
1/2" EIR Up 4"
5/8" NIR Up 4"
5/8" NIR Up 4"
3/4" EIP Up 4"
1" EIP Up 2"
1" EIP Up 2"
1" EIP Down 4"
60d Set @ Base1" EIP Flush
5/8" EIR Up 2"
5/8" EIR Up 10"
1/2" EIP Up 2"
Weeden Street
SR 2469 60' Public R/W
L5
144.30'
N: 749,652.12 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,831,326.62 Ground US Survey Feet
N: 748,703.91 Ground US Survey FeetE: 1,832,058.30 Ground US Survey Feet
5/8" EIR Flush
Gr
i
d
N
o
r
t
h
NA
D
8
3
(
2
0
1
1
)
Keith Allen Burgio
Korrina Lynn Burgio
DB 2775 Pg. 1689
T2 of PB 168 Pg. 89
5/8" NIR Flush5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
5/8" NIR Flush
517.05
30' Rear Setback
30' Rear Setback
30' Rear Setback
30' Rear Setback
30' Rear Setback
30' Rear Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
10' Side Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
100' Farm Well Setback
Brooksdale Rd
NC HWY 49 N
US HWY 421Willard Rd
Sandy Creek
Church Rd
Shady Grove Church Rd
Weeden St
N Main St
Olivers Chapel Rd
Old 421 Rd
Site
Pike Farm Rd
Location Map
(Not to Scale)
Job #: 14662
Survey For:Davis Investment Properties, LLC
Columbia Township Randolph County
North Carolina November 16, 2022
Deed Book:2524 Pg:642
Scale: 1" = 60 US Survey Feet
Bar Scale:
,
Firm #: P-1110Dan W Tanner II L-4787
154 S. Fayetteville St, Suite B, Asheboro, NC 27203Phone Number: 336 625-8000Email: mail@surveycarolina.com
Owners:
Davis Investment Properties, LLC
9755 US Hwy 220 Business N.
Randleman, NC 27317
0 60 120 180
I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from anactual survey made under my supervision (deed description recorded in:
Book 2524 , page 642 ;
that the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as drawn from information
found in Book See , page Notes ; that the ratio of precision or positionalaccuracy as calculated is 1:10000+, that this plat was prepared in accordance withG.S. 47-30 as amended. Witness my original signature, license number and seal thisthe 16th day of November, A.D., 2022.
__________ _______________________________________________Professional Land Surveyor L-4787
PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES
Notes:1. This project is not located within a special flood hazard area per NCFRIS.Map #: 3710872400K Effective Date: 1/2/20082. Area calculated by coordinate geometry.
3. All lines surveyed by Survey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by bold lines. All lines not surveyed bySurvey Carolina, PLLC are indicated by dashed lines.
4. No attempt was made by this survey to locate all underground utilities nor any other easements thatwould be revealed by a title search.5. Tax PIN: 87341962536. Proposed Use: Residential
OHU OHU OHU
Drop Inlet
Junction Box
Storm Sewer ManholeYard InletCatch Basin
Computed Point / Point Not Set
Bench MarkExisting Concrete Monument
EIP - Existing Iron Pipe
EIR - Existing Iron Rod
EN - Existing Nail
NCGS Monument
NIP - New Iron Pipe
NIR - New Iron Rod
RRS - Railroad Spike
R/W - Right of Way Monument
Stone
Evergreen Tree
Hardwood Tree
Electric ManholeElectric Meter
Fire Hydrant
Gas Meter
Gas Manhole
Guy Wire
Gas Valve
Guy PoleLight Pole
Power Pole
U/G Power Box
SS Cleanout
SS - Sanitary SewerSS Manhole
Communications Manhole
Transformer
Telephone Pole
Telephone Pedestal
Utility Pole
Water Meter
Water Manhole
Water Valve
Back Flow Preventer
Irrigation Control Valve
Overhead Utility Line
Sanitary Sewer LineStorm Sewer LineWater Line
Fence
Property Line
Computed Property Line
Right of Way Line
Easement Line
Setback Lines
Tie Lines
G G G Gas Line
Well
Overhead Power Line
E E E E Underground Electric Line
T T T T
100 100 100
FW FW FW
Underground Comm. Line
100-Year Flood Hazard LineFloodway
Fire Dept. Connection
C/L Railroad Z:0.00 Spot Elevation
W
W
U
T
E
C
MHCO
PP
LP
W
U
G
G
E
E
DI
W
I, Dan W Tanner II, Professional Land Surveyor, certify:
In accordance with NC General Statute 47-30(f)11d
That the survey is of another category, such as the recombination of existingparcels, a court-ordered survey, or other exemption or exception to the definitionof subdivision.
I, Dan W Tanner II, certify that this map was drawn under my supervision froman actual GPS/ GNSS survey made under my supervision and the followinginformation was used to perform the survey:(1) Class of survey: Class A(2) Positional accuracy: <0.10'(3) Type of GNSS field procedure: Real-Time Kinematic Networks(4) Dates of survey: March 03, 2021(5) Datum/Epoch: NAD83(2011) / 2010.00(6) Published/Fixed-control use: North Carolina Real Time Network(7) Geoid model: Geoid 12A(8) Combined grid factor(s): 0.99988881(9) GPS/GNSS Scale Point:N:749,249.44 E:1,831,041.91 Z:738.33(10) Units: US Survey Feet
SEALL-4787
IIRENNATWNA
D
ROYEVRUSDN
A
L
PR O F ESSION
A
L
N O R T H CAROLIN
A
Site Data
Proposed Use:
Proposed Lots: 6
Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
MARGARET CHAPEL RD
OL
I
V
E
R
S
C
H
A
P
E
L
R
D
MARLEY CIR
BROOKSDALE RD
WEED
E
N
S
T
1 inch equals 400 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
50 ft. Stream buffer
Davis Investment Properties, LLC, Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Nearby commercial
operation.
Picture 4:
Property across
road from request
location.
Picture 5:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward NC Hwy 49
N.
Picture 6:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Olivers
Chapel Rd.
Page 1 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS
County of Randolph, North Carolina
Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro, NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 planning@randolphcountync.gov
Development policies outlined in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan are specifically designed to encourage
long-term planning among property owners, developers, and the County. The Development Impact Analysis is a key
component of this Plan and its use will increase public awareness of the relationship of growth, rural environmental impacts, and the capacity of local government to provide adequate public facilities based on future land use demands. The
information contained in the Development Impact Analysis comes from the best available public data sources.
Preliminary Plat Name
Plat name and section: Davis Investment Properties, LLC
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Developer:
Name: Davis Investment Properties, LLC Name: Eric Davis Address: 9755 US Hwy 220 Bus N Address: P O Box 452 City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 E-mail: E-mail: ericdavisrealestate@yahoo.com
Phone: Phone: 336 587-5622
Representative: Engineer/Surveyor: Name: Name: Survey Carolina Address: Address: 154-B S Fayetteville St
City, ST ZIP: City, ST ZIP: Asheboro, NC 27203
E-mail: E-mail: mail@surveycarolina.com Phone: Phone: 336 625-8000
Property Description
Parcel: 8734196253 Acreage: 10.01 acres
Growth Management Area: Primary Growth Area Township: Columbia
Fire District: Staley Existing Zoning: RA Existing conditions:
Waterway Description
Does the site contain any streams or rivers? No Stream name:
Does the site contain any flood zone area? No Approximate acreage: acres
Does the site lie within a watershed? No Watershed: N/A Does the site contain wetlands? No Type: N/A Other comments:
Page 2 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
Project Description
(If appropriate, attach a letter outlining in detail, the scope of the request.)
Subdivision type: ........................................................................................ Class A Manufactured home Total acreage of development: ............................................................................................. 10.01 acres
Total number of building lots: ................................................................................................................ 6
Minimum housing size: ....................................................................................................... sq. ft. Total acreage of proposed open space (if applicable): .......................................................... 0.00 acres
Total road frontage of proposed development: ........................................................................ 646.80 ft. Average frontage of lots: .......................................................................................................... 107.08 ft.
Width of the lot with smallest amount of road frontage: ........................................................... 105.00 ft.
Width of the lot with greatest amount of road frontage: ............................................................ 121.74 ft. Is the 1:4 ratio maintained for Rural Growth Areas? ......................................................................... N/A
Property is currently being used as: Residential Commercial Industrial Farming Leased hunting Vacant
Other
Features unique to this property:
Ravines Hills
Mountains Rights-of-way
Easements Cemeteries
Other
Utilities Impact
Water source: Individual well
Sewer source: Septic system
The distance, location, and provider of the nearest public water and sewer source. Service type Distance Location Provider
Public water 3.00 miles Old 421 Rd Town of Liberty
Public sewer 3.00 miles Old 421 Rd Town of Liberty
Page 3 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
Public Education Impact (Provided by the Boards of Education)
School system: Randolph County Schools
School impacted Grade level DPI Capacity Current membership Impact
Liberty Elementary K-5 606 403 1
Southeast Randolph Middle 6-8 583 529 1
Eastern Randolph High 9-12 1015 665 0
Current mobile classrooms present: School Number of mobile classrooms
Liberty Elementary
Southeast Randolph Middle
Eastern Randolph High
Current traffic assessment:
School Traffic assessment
Liberty Elementary Good
Southeast Randolph Middle Congested
Eastern Randolph High Congested
School construction plans:
School Construction plans
Liberty Elementary N/A
Southeast Randolph Middle N/A
Eastern Randolph High N/A
Traffic Analysis Impact (Provided by NCDOT GIS data services)
Road(s) directly accessed by development:
Road name Speed limit Average daily traffic count Weeden St 55 mph 900
Condition of the road accessed by the development: Poor Characteristics of the road(s) directly accessed by development: Paved Curves
Graveled Blindspot(s) Single lane Intersection(s) Bridge(s) Hill(s)
The proposed development with 6 lots will generate an additional 36 total vehicle trips per day.
Does the ADT count greater than 4,000 which would require a turning lane? No
Page 4 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
Housing and Community Impacts (Within one mile of the proposal)
Housing patterns in subdivisions:
Subdivision Type Number of lots Average acreage
Hunter's Cove Site built 11 3.80
J Hampton Pike N/A 4 12.80
Liberty Business Park N/A 1 3.09 Mary Siler Site built 5 2.95
Naomi Brown Site built 4 1.90
Prudy L Kivett Heirs Site built 6 8.70 Ronnie & Judith Hill Mobile home 5 0.82
Smokey Hollow Mobile home 3 0.75
Staley Cove Mobile home 28 1.50
Tammy McKinney Mobile home 2 4.96
Vickrey Farm Mobile home 10 1.56
Warren Acres Site built 5 1.70
Total number of site-built homes ...................................................................................................... 136
Average square footage of site-built homes ................................................................... 1,508.70 sq. ft. Largest site-built home by square footage ..................................................................... 4,619.00 sq. ft.
Smallest site-built home by square footage ...................................................................... 528.00 sq. ft.
Total number of mobile homes ........................................................................................................... 67 Percentage of site-built homes .................................................................................................. 66.99 %
Percentage of mobile homes .................................................................................................... 33.01 % Total number of acres .................................................................................................... 2,177.80 acres
Average acreage ................................................................................................................... 5.90 acres
Total acreage in tax-deferred farms .................................................................................. 856.50 acres Community Land Uses
Commercial Farming
Forestry Industrial Residential Church facilities Other:
Special Community Districts
Airport Overlay District Cluster Subdivision Overlay District E-1 Districts Rural Lot Subdivision Overlay District Rural Business Overlay District Industrial Overlay District Scenic Corridor Overlay District Commercial Environmental Overlay District
Voluntary Agricultural District Conventional Subdivision Overlay District
Page 5 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
Unique Rural Land Uses in the Community
HLPC Landmark/Cultural Heritage Site National Historic Landmark
National Forest Natural Heritage Designated Sites Trailway as part of the County Greenway Plan Youth Camp(s)
Agricultural Impact (Within One mile of the proposal)
Adjoining farm properties:
• 8734182135 (Travis Earl Pugh)
Are all well minimum setback lines noted on plat? Yes
Tax-deferred farm properties: Property owner Parcel ID Location
John Mitchell and Michelle Kristen Cain 8724976904 R2472; E
Harriette E Cox Trustee 8724948044 R2473; Both Margaret L Dunn 8734459747 R2469; S
Margaret Leary Dunn 8734460690 R2469; S
Clyde Oliver Fulk, Jr 8735154919 R421; E
Janet Pike Hill 8735448669 R421; E
Janet Pike Hill 8735527550 R1006; E
Janet Pike Hill 8735629439 R421; N
Koopman Dairies, Inc 8735224254 R2461; Both
Koopman Dairies, Inc 8735319605 J Hampton Pike, L3 Deeded Access
Betty Joe Lackey 8724846636 R2474; E Side
Betty Joe Lackey 8724847059 R2473; N Side
John D and Elnora Langley 8734439904 R2470; N
Kevin D and Jenna Linn Harris Lineberry 8725716752 Larry M Kennedy & Kevin & Jenna Lineberry Lo 2
Betty Jo Owen 8725741123 R2459; N
Joe R & Virginia Petree 8734139805 R2470; N Common Access
J Hampton Pike Trustee 8735631659 R2463; Both Travis Earl Pugh 8734182135 R2469; Both
Travis Earl Pugh 8734261835 R2469; S
David and James Lewis Scotton 8724993885 R2469; Both David and James Lewis Scotton 8724996562 R2469; Both
Jeffrey Lee Scotton 8734048862 R2470; N Common Access
Jeffrey Lee Scotton 8734064246 Jeffrey & Malinda Scotton; Tr1-
2 Deed Acc
Barbara K Wall 8724692306 W L Kivett Estate Lo 2
Barbara K Wall 8725720332 R2459; R2458
Barbara Kivett Wall 8725725576 R2459; N
Page 6 of 6 Development Impact Analysis January 12, 2023
Property owner Parcel ID Location
Kenneth A Welker and Margaret L Dunn 8734248363 W Franklinville St, W No Rd
Frtg
Kenneth A Welker and Margaret L Dunn 8734454426 W Franklinville St; End of Rd
Kenneth A Welker and Margaret Leary Dunn 8734350207 W Franklinville St; W No Rd Frtg Nancy Fox White 8724987623 R2472; E
Ronald Wayne Williams 8724795125 R49; W
Farm operations that begin after the development of a major residential subdivision must
abide by the 100 ft. waste setback rule on the farm property.
Other Materials Submitted
Preliminary approval from NCDOT District Engineer’s Office Buffer site plan
Land Clearing Debris Plan Open Space Uses and maintenance agreements, if applicable Proposed deed restrictions Soil analysis Soil erosion plan, stormwater management plan, etc.
Other:
Deed Restrictions:
This Development will use Randolph County restrictions and setbacks.
Signature Date
12/15/2022
SignNow e-signature ID: 081a4f39cf...
12/15/2022 20:35:12 UTC
Eric Davis Eric Davis (Signer)
Land Clearing Debris Plan
Subdivision: Eric Davis
Date: 12/15/22
Debris will be mulched on site, piled in windrows, or hauled to approved LCID facility.
Debris will not be burned or buried.
Signature Date
12/15/2022
SignNow e-signature ID: 70b75e7838...
12/15/2022 20:34:42 UTC
Eric Davis Eric Davis (Signer)
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000043
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOR-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay
Restricted - Conditional District as described in the application of David Investment Properties, LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development
Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable
and in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is just off of NC Hwy 49 N which is a major transportation corridor.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 6.5: The protection of viable rural neighborhoods should be encouraged by compatible residential development to ensure the continued existence as a major
housing source and as a reflection of the long-term quality of life in Randolph
County. Consistency Analysis: As reflected on the Development Impact Analysis, the proposal, if developed according to the site plan and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, would protect the existing rural neighborhoods while also
providing housing that is a reflection of the quality of life in Randolph County. Policy 6.12: Factors to be considered major subdivision approval in Primary and Secondary Growth Areas should include suitability of soils, access to major
thoroughfares, the potential availability of public services and facilities and community compatibility.
Consistency Analysis: This proposed subdivision has close access to major thoroughfares such as NC Hwy 49 N and US Hwy 421. Furthermore, the proposal is also compatible with the existing housing in the surrounding community.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
Adopted on March 7, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 10.01 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 8734196253 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on March 7, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000043, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to CVOR-CD - Conventional Subdivision
Overlay Restricted - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on March 7, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000337
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Stronach Properties, LLC
Property Owner: June M. Fulton Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To rezone 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres to allow a retail store
as per the site plan.
Current Zoning: HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District
Requested Zoning: HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District Small Area Plan: NC Hwy 705 Scenic Business Overlay Growth Management: Primary Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: None
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Location: 9060 Hillsville Rd
Parcel Number: 7726128995 Parcel Size: 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres
Existing Use: Auto dealership in existing building as per the site plan.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
South RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential
East RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
West RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
“We are fine with the location. We don’t anticipate required roadway improvements based
on the plans and location. We would want to know exactly what is being proposed to
further assess traffic generation. We are currently assuming a dollar store (sic) in our
assessment.”
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: The last rezoning on this property was on August 2, 2010,
when the existing conditions were amended to allow an auto
dealership office in the existing building with no more than six
autos being displayed. The previous rezoning was from July
7, 2003, when 1.00 acre was rezoned to allow an accounting
office use in the existing residence.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
HC: HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Highway Commercial (HC) District is to provide a place in which
the principal use of land is for the retailing of durable goods, the provision of
commercial services to industrial areas, and the provision of services to tourists.
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE
Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4
Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres
Lot width 100 ft. at building line
Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line
Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way
Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watershed and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations.
3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. Minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon signed petition of all owners of the land to be included
in the Conditional District.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion.
Policy 1.7 Planning and development decisions should be based on the principal of
promoting investment in Randolph County to expand employment opportunities while preserving and improving the quality of life for all County residents.
Consistency Analysis: This request location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. The proposed change to a retail store could expand employment opportunities for the area citizens and improve their quality of life.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4
Policy 4.4 Commercial land uses should be encouraged to develop by consolidation and
deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when such consolidation and
deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the effect of incompatibility with
adjoining residential land uses.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, this location has been rezoned several
times as mentioned earlier. This rezoning request would extend the Highway Commercial
zoning district into more of the property while still maintaining a large portion of the parcel
in its current Residential Agricultural zoning that could act as a buffer for existing
residential land uses.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the
property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type
of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed
use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710772600J
Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 1.8100
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW FOR RETAIL STORE AS THE PER SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: STRONACH PROPERTIES INC.
City, St. Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27609
Address: 4004 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 106
Owner: FULTON, JUNE M
Address: 10003 ARCHDALE RD
City, St. Zip: TRINITY, NC 27370
Permit #: 2023-00000337
Parcel #: 7726128995
Date: 02/02/2023
Location Address: 9060 HILLSVILLE RD
TRINITY, NC 27370
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:STRONACH, WILL Contact Phone:919 270-1750
Acreage: Township:5.0400 19 - TRINITY
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Stronach Properties, Inc., Request Location Map
VALLEY RIDGE DR
HILLSVILLERD
R
O
L
L
I
N
G
W
O
O
D
D
R
VALLEYRIDGEDR
EXTMILLERS MIL
L
R
D
1 inch equals 250 feet
Directions to site: 1004N - Site on
(R) just past Millers Mill Rd at
9060 Hillsville Rd.
Stronach Properties, Inc., Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
HIL
L
S
V
I
L
L
E
R
D
VALLEYRIDGE
DR
EXT
R
O
L
L
I
N
G
W
O
O
D
D
R
VALLEYRIDGE DR
MILLERS MI
L
L
R
D
1 inch equals 300 feet
Rezoned to RA
in 2022
Rezoned in 2012
for retail store
SUP for auto
dealer in 1995
Request
location
White
Estate S/D
Legend
Parcels
Type
!(Multi-address Structure
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Duplex/Complex
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Districts
HC
RA
RR
Stronach Properties, Inc., Rezoning Request
HIL
L
S
V
I
L
L
E
R
D
VALLEYRIDGE
DR
EXT
R
O
L
L
I
N
G
W
O
O
D
D
R
VALLEYRIDGE DR
MILLERS MI
L
L
R
D
1 inch equals 300 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
50 ft. Stream buffer
Stronach Properties, Inc, Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Nearby Hillsville
Community Center.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Roy Farlow
Rd.
Picture 6:
Site on right as seen
looking toward
Valley Ridge Dr
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY STRONACH PROPERTIES, INC REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000337
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District as described in the application of Stronach Properties, Inc., are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County
Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following
reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along Hillsville Rd which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 1.7 Planning and development decisions should be based on the principal
of promoting investment in Randolph County to expand employment opportunities while preserving and improving the quality of life for all County residents.
Consistency Analysis: This request location has been rezoned several times as
mentioned earlier. The proposed change to a retail store could expand employment opportunities for the area citizens and improve their quality of life. Policy 4.4 Commercial land uses should be encouraged to develop by
consolidation and deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when
such consolidation and deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the
effect of incompatibility with adjoining residential land uses.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, this location has been rezoned several times as mentioned earlier. This rezoning request would extend the
Highway Commercial zoning district into more of the property while still maintaining a large portion of the parcel in its current Residential Agricultural zoning that could act as a buffer for existing residential land uses. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The
proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
Adopted on March 7, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 1.81 acre parcel out of 5.04 acres, having the Randolph County Parcel
Identification Number of 7726128995 is currently zoned HC-CD - Highway Commercial -
Conditional District and RA – Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on March 7, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000337, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC-CD - Highway Commercial -
Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on March 7, 2023. _____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.