04AprilPBPlanning Board Agenda April 4, 2023 Page 1 of 2
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA April 4, 2023 1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board. 2. Roll call of the Board members:
• Reid Pell, Chair;
• Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair
• John Cable;
• Melinda Vaughan;
• Reggie Beeson;
• Ken Austin;
• Barry Bunting; and
• Brandon Hedrick, Alternate.
3. Consent Agenda:
• Approval of agenda for the April 4, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of the minutes from the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
4. Conflict of Interest
• Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be disclosed?
• If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member
with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified. 5. Old Business.
6. New Business. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000382
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by JOE MILLIKAN, Randleman, NC,
and his request to rezone 15.88 acres at 1801 Naomi Rd, Providence
Township, Polecat Creek Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #7775062096,
Planning Board Agenda April 4, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Rural Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOE-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive - Conditional District. The
proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a six lot site-
built subdivision as per the site plan. Property Owner: Nicholas Jason Millikan REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000567
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by CAROLINA TRAVEL
MANAGEMENT, INC, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 5.09
acres out of 29.56 acres at 10367 Randleman Rd, Level Cross Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed, Tax ID #7758809298, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway
Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District
would specifically allow an overflow parking lot as per the site plan.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000595
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by JOSE FLORES, Asheboro, NC, and his request to amend the existing Conditional District Permit on 2.39 acres
at 7606 US Hwy 220 S, Richland Township, Tax ID #7665688138, Primary Growth Area, from LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District to LI-CD -
Light Industrial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District Amendment would specifically amend the existing Conditional District permit to allow an 80 ft. by 60 ft. addition to the existing building as
per the site plan. REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000599
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by ZACHARY DANIEL DAVIDSON, Denton, NC, and his request to rezone 2.29 acres on Brantley Gordon Rd, Concord Township, Tax ID #6698784149, Rural Growth Area, from RA -
Residential Agricultural District to RBO-CD - Rural Business Overlay -
Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a farm equipment repair and service business as per the site plan.
7. Adjournment. Attachments
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 1 of 14
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES March 7, 2023
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, March 7, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance and asked for a roll call of the members. Johnson called the roll of the Board members.
• Reid Pell, Chair, present;
• Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair, present;
• John Cable, present;
• Melinda Vaughan, present;
• Reggie Beeson, present;
• Ken Austin, absent;
• Barry Bunting, present; and
• Brandon Hedrick, Alternate, present. (Substituting for Austin) County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was also present. Johnson informed the Chairman there was a quorum of the members present for the meeting. Pell called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Consent Agenda:
• Approval of agenda for the March 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of the minutes from the February 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting. Cable made the motion to approve the consent agenda as presented, with Bunting
making the second to the motion. The motion was adopted unanimously.
Pell asked the Board members if there were any conflicts in the following cases. Brandon
Hedrick stated that he lives close to the Gordon request and it directly affects some of
his family members, so he asked to recuse himself. Davis made the motion to recuse Hedrick from the Gordon case, with Cable making the second to the motion. The motion was unanimous.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 2 of 14
Hal Johnson, County Manager, said there may be some citizens present to speak to the Board regarding a rock quarry in the Staley area. He explained that there have been no
applications made for such a request and it is not part of the current agenda. He explained
that there would be no public hearing on the request until such applications have been made, and notification requirements are taken care of. Johnson also announced that the Crumley case for a meat processing facility, previously
postponed until tonight’s meeting, has officially been withdrawn.
Johnson presented the first case along with site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2023-00000015
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
Quasi-judicial Hearing on the request by ANTOINE GORDON, Sophia, NC,
and their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734655151, 5.04 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain a Special Use
Permit to specifically allow an outside storage lot for automobiles, excluding
junk vehicles, as per the site plan.
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to come forward and take the oath before giving testimony on the request. Morgan administered the oath to Gordon.
Antoine Gordon, 3457 Beckerdite Rd, Sophia, NC, said he is trying to obtain the approvals needed to expand his existing towing business by starting rotation with the Highway Patrol for storage of vehicles from wrecks and such.
Johnson asked Gordon if he lives on the property and for how long. Gordon said he
does live on the property and has been there since May 2022. Johnson asked how many vehicles he planned to have on the property. Gordon said he would guess five to ten but there was no way of knowing. He said the insurance companies move quickly for processing and he would normally not have a vehicle stored for more than a couple of
weeks. Johnson asked where the vehicles are taken when they leave storage. Gordon said some are taken to a junkyard, some are taken to insurance auctions, and depending on
the damage to the vehicles, owners will sometimes pay the storage fees and reclaim the
vehicle. Johnson asked Gordon to describe the fencing that is required by the highway patrol. Gordon said an eight-foot fence without visibility is required because of the security and
privacy needed for these vehicles.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 3 of 14
Johnson asked how many employees he would have. Gordon said it is currently a one-man operation but he would like to expand his towing business with the hauls from the
highway patrol.
Davis asked about the hours of operation. Gordon said it would require 24-hour towing service.
Cable asked Gordon if he has stored vehicles on his property in the past, how many
vehicles he is storing, and if he has talked to any of his neighbors about his plans. Gordon told Cable he transfers vehicles so if he picks up a vehicle after hours, he has held on to it until the facility opens the following morning but he is currently not storing vehicles. He said the neighbors are pretty spread out so he has only talked to Mr. Beasley, which lives
across the street, and he did not have a problem with his request. He also said none of
the other neighbors have reached out to him with any issues after receiving notices and seeing signs posted. Johnson asked if the highway patrol contacts him to pick up vehicles on a rotation
schedule. Gordon said he would be contacted for assistance with vehicle recovery and
cleanup from accidents on a rotation schedule with other approved companies and if he is unavailable, the call is forwarded to the company listed next on the rotation. Johnson asked if he would be storing vehicles other than those hauled for the Highway
Patrol. Gordon said he does not carry the type of insurance needed for the storage of
vehicles and the permit request is specifically for the Highway patrol. Johnson asked how large of an area will his services reach. Gordon said it would include all of Randolph County.
Beeson said Gordon mentioned that he has been in business for three years and asked if he hauled vehicles to other locations in the past. Gordon said he assists with roadside assistance, gas delivery, towing, and winching services, and has not dealt with storing vehicles in the past.
Davis asked Gordon if he knew how long it would take to outgrow the proposed storage area if he is successful and expands his business. Gordon said he would love to expand the business and need a larger location to house his business but this is just a starting point for him. He purchased this property intending to start the business until a larger
location is required.
Davis asked about his plans for fencing to prevent unsightly views for the neighbors. Gordon explained the fencing proposal as shown on the site plan. Davis asked if the entrance would come off his existing drive located on Beckerdite Rd Gordon answered
yes. He said the entrance would be better located off Plott Hound Trl. but he is unsure if
that is possible.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 4 of 14
Cable asked Gordon if he holds certifications for hazardous materials or Class B certifications. Gordon asked if he is referring to his license. He said he holds a standard
driver’s license because the vehicle he drives does not require other endorsements. Cable asked if he had been to hazardous material cleanup school. Gordon said he previously held a CDL license and is very familiar with hazardous materials. He said his license expired when he went into the Military and he just never renewed them
Bunting said the Highway Patrol is very stringent on who they allow to tow and store
vehicles for them. He said the property has to pass inspections, the individual has to be bonded, and they have to be insured for approval. Gordon said he holds a hefty insurance policy.
Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request.
Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request.
Susan Richards, 201 Andrew Hunter Rd, Asheboro, rose to address the Planning Board
and Morgan administered the oath before she spoke. Richards said she is not against
the request but would like to know the process when an owner does not pick up their
vehicle, what type of lighting is required, and how will it affect the surrounding neighbors.
Gordon said he plans to start with minimum solar-powered lighting, and after sixty days,
if a vehicle is not claimed, he is allowed to send off for the title or take it to a junkyard but
from his experience, insurance claims usually only take six to ten days.
Having no one else in opposition, Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the
Board members and a motion.
Cable said he would like to commend Gordon for wanting a business, he said he is pro-growth, and pro-business. He told the Board that he and Bunting together have eighty-
five to ninety years of law enforcement experience and knows that the inspections are
extreme for having a holding lot for the Highway Patrol. He said he has concerns with the water run-off from leaking batteries, hazardous waste on the property, and the possibility of vehicles stacking up without any fault of his own due to the demands of the business.
Beeson said he agrees that there should be a limitation on the number of vehicles allowed
on site, he appreciates Bunting sharing the fact that the inspections are made for the property. He also said the road is extremely busy and he should have a rollback instead of a tow truck.
Cable said his major concern is the leakage and the fluids that are going to be in the
ground at this location because it is in a residential area and there is no plan for run-off or possible damage to the neighbors and the value of their homes. He also said to be approved for the highway rotation, you cannot limit yourself to the number of vehicles because they will remove you from the rotation schedule.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 5 of 14
Vaughan asked if there is some type of EPA approval required for this type of facility. Cable said he was unsure. He said there is a long list of requirements including proper
lighting, privacy fencing, and a big insurance bond and the inspections are standard
across the State. Cable said he would love to see Gordon expand his business and haul for the Highway Patrol but he does not feel this residential area is the best location.
Davis asked Cable if he would like to make a motion based on his previous statements and asked to check the Special Use reminders for denying or approving the request. Beeson said he has an issue with a commercial operation in a residential area causing
possible environmental issues.
Cable said he also has concerns that the request is not compatible with the area, that it could endanger the public health or safety of residents, and it could have an adverse effect on the value of adjoining property.
Cable made the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use Permit application, based upon the sworn witness testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and that the use may materially endanger the public health or safety, or the use
does not meet all required conditions and specifications, or the use may substantially
injure the value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public necessity and the location and character of use if developed according to the plan(s) as submitted, or will not be in harmony with the area and in general conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance. Beeson seconded the motion to DENY the Special Use Permit.
Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to deny the Special Use request. By a show of hands, the motion was adopted unanimously. Johnson presented the second case along with site plans, and pictures of the site and
surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000043
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by DAVIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 10.01
acres on Weeden St, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8734196253, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to CVOR-CD -
Conventional Subdivision Overlay Restricted - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a six-lot subdivision for Class A mobile homes as per the site plan.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 6 of 14
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the
request to come forward.
Eric Davis, Randleman, NC, explained to the Board his plan to have six new home sites,
allowing double-wide homes with brick skirting which will be valued from two hundred to
two hundred, twenty thousand dollars. He said the property is located near the new
megasite where homes are needed. He also said the sites would be fully cleared and
each lot will have a conventional septic system and wells installed.
Bunting asked if he understood correctly that each individual lot would have a septic and
well. Davis answered yes. He said he has already had the soil evaluated and each lot
should have a gravity-fed septic system.
Johnson asked where the driveways would be located. Davis said he spoke with Jennifer
Britt from NCDOT earlier in the afternoon and she approved the revised map, with shared
driveway locations as provided on a map given to the Board members before the meeting.
(Exhibits 1A & 1B).
Kemp Davis said with the new map proposal, it limits the number of driveway access to
the road and asked if there would be a turn-around area for each lot. Davis answered
yes.
Cable asked if there would be six-lots with three driveways. Davis answered yes.
Beeson said he saw in the original information, that NCDOT recommended there be two
hundred feet between each drive. Davis said NCDOT did recommend the two hundred
feet between the driveway accesses but his surveyor, Daniel Tanner, has been trying to
obtain the actual rules that require that recommendation since December with no result.
He said he drove to NCDOT earlier in the afternoon and asked Ms. Britt for an explanation
and she said “that’s the way they want it”, so they had the survey redrawn to comply. He
said he developed another subdivision up the street and they are all one-hundred-foot
lots with individual driveways.
Johnson asked if the homes are new, the approximate size, and the cost of the homes.
Davis said they would average fourteen to fifteen hundred square feet, which creates
affordable housing, with an average cost of two hundred thousand dollars.
Pell asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of the request. Hearing none, Pell asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the request.
Doug Nixon, Staley, NC, came forward to address the Board. He asked if the lots would be similar to a mobile home park situation or if they would be owned individually. He said he has concerns for safety because of the volume and speed of traffic nearby.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 7 of 14
Pell said he will have Mr. Davis address all of the concerns after everyone has spoken.
Maggie Dunn, Staley, NC said she has lived in Staley since 1989 and has a vested
interest in the development of Staley. She said she has only recently gotten involved with the development that is taking place in Staley. She said she knows that Mr. Davis went unattested with the development which took place nearby located just off of Weeden St. She said many of the landowners in Staley were unaware of how the property was being
developed so they are present to make a voice regarding this request.
Dunn said she has several questions regarding the development. She said she would like to know if Mr. Davis is planning to clear all of the trees on the property or leave a buffer for the surrounding residents, how this development is going to affect property
values, and how it will affect the Rocky River watershed. She said the 200 ft. minimum
requirement between driveways will be impossible with six proposed lots. Dunn said the analysis information presented by the Planning Department is very dated and does not represent what the community wants in Staley. She said she called the
Randolph County sheriff’s department and asked for the number of calls relating to
several of the mobile home developments and there have been forty-three calls in the last twelve months for drug overdoses, domestic violence, as well as shootings and this is not what the Staley community wants and it is not a good development.
Pell said Dunn mentioned that the property is located in the Rocky River watershed and
the information given to the Board says the property does not contain any streams, that the property is not located within a flood zone, and the site does not lie within any watershed. Dunn said the information is wrong.
Hedrick told Ms. Dunn if she has evidence to present, she is more than welcome to do
so. Johnson said the watershed requirements for residential development are that each lot has a minimum of 40,000 square feet per residence. He said that if the entire property
was located within a watershed, it meets the requirements for development.
Dunn asked Johnson if he was stating that the watershed did not matter. Johnson said he did not say that. He said it meets all the requirements even if it were located in a watershed.
Travis Pugh, Liberty, NC, said he is a fourth-generation farmer of a 165-acre farm just south of this property. He said he is not against development but is for maintaining the integrity of the neighborhood. He said he is concerned with traffic and safety. He said he is also concerned about the effects development will have on him because he applies a
lot of animal waste which is permitted and regularly inspected. He said he realizes that
Randolph County is beginning to transition but he feels there is a need for maintaining “a little countryside” for agriculture.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 8 of 14
Paul A. (unable to determine last name from sign-in sheet or recording of the meeting), Staley, NC, said he is a realtor and would like everyone to know that the manufactured
homes are built to the Department of Transportation specifications and not to the US
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). He said the last thing we need is something that will degrade our County and there have been people here that have spoken about where they stand on this matter.
Elizabeth Pate, 382 Browns Crossroad Rd, Staley, NC asked about whether or not there
would be individual well and septics allowed for the development because she owns 5 acres and was only allowed one septic on her property. Morgan said a lot of the times, developers will hire soil scientists to evaluate the soil
before a request to find out the potential for development, and if approved, the developer
will then have to have the County approve the sites for individual systems for permitting a home. Hedrick said the applicant did provide a soil map showing potential approvals for
individual septic locations.
Carol Lobisser, 1395 Langley Rd, Staley, NC, said although this request is for ten acres, there is a power line easement that does not allow ten usable acres which seems to make the houses more condensed. She said she understands there will be a need for housing
due to Toyota and valuable housing for young families but feels this may not be the best
use for this piece of property. She said Toyota is advertising the investment of billions of dollars and asked if they really want this type of development. Pell asked Davis if he would like to address some of the concerns and answer questions.
Eric Davis said he understands the concerns. He said he has hired a soil scientist and the property has good soil, allowing each lot to have its own septic system. He said Toyota hires blue-collar workers and this type of housing fits the budget of those workers. He said these are not people that are participating in illegal activities, they are people that
need affordable housing for which they can obtain a loan. He said he is a farmer as well
and has a love for land but also has a love for people and people need homes. Eric Davis said these are nice, affordable homes with brick foundations, and not everyone can afford half-million-dollar homes.
Kemp Davis asked what the average costs of the homes he has provided in the area. Eric Davis said the last home he closed on cost $199,500.00. Kemp Davis asked what the market is supporting for blue-collar families. Eric Davis said most of the pre-qualification letters he has received are for approximately $225,000.00. He said maybe
one day they will afford a 2,000 sq. ft. home on 20 acres that cost $400,000.00 but they
have to start somewhere. Cable asked about the power line on the property mentioned earlier. Eric Davis said
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 9 of 14
there is a power line easement between lots five and six and lot six is wider to accommodate for the easement.
Johnson asked if these lots are potential rentals. Eric Davis said they will be individually owned, not rentals. Cable asked if there would be a buffer maintained for the adjoining properties. Eric Davis
said he originally planned to clear-cut the property but after hearing the concerns, he will
only cut the trees needed for the placement of the homes, septic system, and well which will probably leave trees on the back. Hedrick asked Eric Davis if he is aware that he has to leave a thirty-five no-cut buffer
along the state-maintained roads if he plans to clear-cut property. He also asked Davis if
he has had any conversations with the adjoining church property. Eric Davis said he had a community meeting for the development and no one showed up except him. Hedrick asked if the chassis would be removed from the homes. Eric Davis answered
yes.
Vaughan said she understands how disturbing it is to see change because she is seeing a change in the Farmer area and unfortunately if you do not want to see a property change, you must buy it. She also said she is happy to see the number of driveways
reduced with the 200 ft. requirement from NCDOT. She appreciates the concerns of the
citizens and also feels their pain. Cable said he knows everyone is passionate and the Board is passionate as well. He said there is a large crowd tonight and it does not mean you’re right or wrong, it just means
you have a large crowd. He said the Board has listened to each of you and your concerns
and he knows that change is not easy. He thanked the citizens for coming and sharing their concerns because this process is what makes our County great. Hedrick said the County is aware of the need for the Growth Management Plan to be
updated in this area of the County and a group is currently working on those changes. He
said there will be a public meeting regarding those changes which should be announced soon. Hedrick said the applicant has based his proposal on the current requirements of the
Unified Development Ordinance and it is the Board’s job to decide on meeting the
requirements as it is currently written and it is his understanding that the same property would allow a three-lot division without coming before the Board for approval. Johnson said three lots would be considered a minor subdivision allowing single-wide, double-wide, or modular homes, and would not require approval from the Board. Hedrick said
this request holds the housing type to a little higher standard.
Beeson said he understands the concerns, he grew up on a farm and still lives on a farm, but things are changing with new developments. He said no one wants to hear the term
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 10 of 14
“trailer park” and this is a far cry from that and the homes will not be rentals, they will be individually owned.
Johnson said there was a time when single-wide homes and mobile home parks were being developed all over the County and because of the Growth Management Plan and zoning there have been no new mobile home parks in a long time. He said this request is for owner-occupied, double-wide homes with brick foundations for $200,000.00. He
commended the citizens for being involved and expressing their opinions.
Hedrick said the property is located in a primary growth area. He said he commends Davis for obtaining preliminary soil evaluations and recommendations from NCDOT for consideration by the Board although they are not required for the Board to make a
decision. He said one thing that gives him pause is that there is no buffer consideration
for the church property located to the East of the request. Cable said he believes the request falls within the requirements laid out in the Unified Development Ordinance, and the current Growth Management Plan.
Kemp Davis said he understands wanting to maintain the character of the area but if the Board goes by the regulations set forth by the Unified Development Ordinance and the
Growth Management Plan, it is hard to deny something that meets the criteria. Cable agreed.
Cable said he would make a motion, including the revised map and letter from NCDOT (referring to Exhibits 1A & 1B), as provided to the Board. Cable made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified
parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the
Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the
minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into
the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Beeson made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning
request. Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to
approve the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously.
Johnson explained the 15-day waiting period for a possible appeal and a permit will
follow that waiting period.
Johnson presented the last case along with site plans, and pictures of the site and surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000337
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 11 of 14
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by STRONACH PROPERTIES, INC,
Raleigh, NC, and their request to rezone 1.81 acres out of 5.04 acres at
9060 Hillsville Rd, Trinity Township, Tax ID #7726128995, Primary Growth Area, from HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District and RA –
Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would
specifically allow a retail store as per the site plan.
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward.
Will Stronach, 1912 Victoria Rd, Raleigh, NC, stated he is requesting a rezoning to allow
a Family Dollar and Dollar Tree retail store. Johnson asked if there are any studies done on the area for a potential activity for these types of stores. Stronach answered yes. He said he owns the property, they run the
business and there are in-depth studies done before they commit to an investment.
Cable asked Stronach if he will own and operate the business. Stronach said he will own the buildings and lease them to Family Dollar/Dollar Tree.
Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the request. Hearing none, Pell asked if
there was anyone to speak in opposition to the request. Kim Lee, 4474 Old Park Rd, Trinity, NC, said her husband’s family has owned the property across the street since Family Dollar has been in existence. She said they have
seen a lot of growth and know growth is inevitable but they need to preserve the
community as much as possible. She said she and her husband visited one of the closest Family Dollars before the meeting located at 110 Lexington Ave, Thomasville, and passed out the photos (Exhibit 2A thru 2E – 13 photos), demonstrating trash around the entire building, trash in the parking lot, and fallen fencing surrounding the building. She asked
what will be done to protect the adjoining property owners if the property becomes
unsightly to neighbors as mentioned by one of the Board members previously with the Special Use Request. Lee asked what Family Dollar will do to ensure the community and adjoining property
owners that they will keep the aesthetics and outside of the property will be well
maintained and what recourse the adjoining property owners and community members have when it is not maintained. She also asked if the proposed building going to be a metal building or can a brick building be requested to improve the community.
Cable asked if she has filed a complaint to the Planning department. Lee said she has
talked with NCDOT and they are on a three-month rotation for cleanup and didn’t realize Planning was a place to file the complaint. She said she would make a call tomorrow.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 12 of 14
Pell asked Stronach if he would like to address some of the concerns and answer questions.
Stronach said the standard for their building is a complete trash enclosure and the maintenance for the building is very important. He said he would want to know of any repeat problems but Family Dollar would want to know as well. He said these stores are continually improving their retail assortment and the goal is to have a well-organized,
clean store.
Morgan asked Stronach to describe the structure. Stronach said the building is pre-engineered metal building with articulation on the front and looks nice and attractive building.
Cable asked if it is similar to the building as Ms. Lee provided photos. Stronach said that the proto-type building was discontinued approximately twelve years ago. Davis asked who bears the responsibility of maintaining these structures. Stronach said
the general manager has the responsibility for day-to-day maintenance. Davis asked who
should be contacted if there are complaints. Stronach said hopefully they would walk right into the store and speak with a manager regarding the issues. He said everyone has problem stores and areas but from a corporate standpoint, the only way to grow is to get better.
Morgan told Mr. Stronach if a citizen files a complaint with Planning, ultimately he would be responsible because he is the actual property owner. Stronach said he is aware that he will bear responsibility as well.
Pell asked if there are inspections done periodically. Stronach answered yes.
Hedrick said he has seen on the information provided, that there is a traffic count and asked if he has spoken to the traffic engineer and if septic has been considered for the project.
Stronach said plans were sent to the NCDOT district engineer for approval and he has a soil consultant that has looked at the soil maps. Hedrick said the stormwater management is indicated on the south side of the site plan
and asked if it has been addressed. Stronach said it has not been designed yet but his
civil engineer is aware of the requirements. Hedrick asked about his plans for buffers. Stronach said they have not designed the landscaping at this time beyond what is required. Hedrick asked what is planned for the
south side of the building. Stronach said he was unsure because he is purchasing only
the northern portion of the property. Pell closed the public hearing for discussion among the Board members and a motion.
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 13 of 14
Hedrick asked about the current Conditional District zoning on the property. Johnson said if approved, this rezoning will override the current zoning.
Cable said he has traveled that road a million times, it has grown quite a bit and provided a lot of service to the area. He mentioned several businesses that have been a part of the area and thinks this proposal falls within the trend of where the area is headed.
Hedrick said he has concerns that there are no vegetative buffers shown on the site plan
for incompatible adjoining properties. There was additional discussion among the Board members regarding buffers needed that were not shown on the site plan.
Cable made a motion to re-open the public hearing to discuss those buffer requirements with the applicant. Hedrick seconded the motion. The motion was unanimous. After a discussion with the Board regarding buffers for the incompatible uses adjoining
the property. Stronach agreed to install a six-foot privacy fence as well as a 5-gallon
evergreen buffer to be made part of his application. Pell closed the public hearing again for the Board members to make a motion.
Davis made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified
parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the
Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the
minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into
the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Bunting made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning
request.
Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to approve
the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously.
Having no further business, Pell called for a motion to ADJOURN the meeting. Beeson
made the motion to adjourn, with Bunting making the second to the motion.
Pell, having a proper motion, and second, called the question on the motion to ADJOURN. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 8:39 p.m., with thirty-two citizens present.
RANDOLPH COUNTY
Planning Board Minutes March 7, 2023 Page 14 of 14
NORTH CAROLINA
________________________ Chairman
_________________________ _______________________________ Clerk to the Board Date
April Request Location Map
0 2 4 6 81
Miles
Archdale
Trinity
Randleman
Asheboro
Seagrove
Liberty
Staley
Ramseur
Franklinville
/0j2
?v!"c$
KÃ !"`$
I¤I¤!"`$
KÈ
?k
?ø
?ø
?k
?i
?Å
?Ú
?Ä
?ç ?d
?ø
?ø?d
!"a$
!"a$
!"`$
!"a$
Legend
Roads
Reservoirs
County line
Municipal Zoning
Carolina Travel
Management, Inc
Millikan
Flores
Davidson
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 5
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000382
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Joe Millikan
Property Owner: Nicholas Jason Millikan Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To rezone 15.88 acres to allow a six lot site-built subdivision
as per the site plan.
Current Zoning: RA – Residential Agricultural District Requested Zoning: CVOE – CD – Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive –
Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Rural Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: Polecat Creek Critical Area
Flood Plain Overlay: Yes
Airport Overlay: None
Location: 1801 Naomi Rd
Parcel Number: 7775062096 Parcel Size: 15.88 acres
Existing Use: Single-family residential
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 5
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
South RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential
East RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
West City of Randleman Class A Flood Plain
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
“Per our conversation, the proposed single family residential lots will not require a driveway permit. The driveways shall have a minimum 100 ft. separation and a turnaround area off the right-of-way so that vehicles are not forced to back into the highway. Each driveway shall have a NCDOT approved drainage pipe installed in the ditch line that
sufficiently accepts stormwater runoff. The minimum drainage pipe is 15 inches diameter
and 20 ft. in length. Driveways shall be graded and or crowned so that runoff does not flow into the highway. Locate driveways in a safe location with sufficient sight distance in both directions along the highway.” E-mail from Mickey Pate, PE, Division 8, District 1
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: There was a request received in 2018 to rezone this property
similar to the request that is being considered now. As the property is in a Rural Growth Area that requires 3.00 acres per residence, the Planning Board was asked in 2018 to amend the Randolph County Growth Management Plan
before considering the subdivision rezoning. The Planning
Board did not take any action after the applicant requested consideration of small area plan for this location. No action was taken and the request was withdrawn.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 614 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
CVO: CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT
The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District has been established to accommodate single-family residential subdivisions with four or more owner-occupied lots created for sale or building
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 5
development. This district is predominantly residential and suburban where current water and sewer needs are met primarily by individual wells and septic systems. Some public infrastructure
may be available in the future. Housing characteristics with the CVO district will be designated
Exclusive (CVOE), Restricted (CVOR), or Mixed (CVOM), in conformance with other major subdivision zoning districts. The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District is designed for those areas of Randolph County where the requirement of such an Overlay District can help achieve the policies and objectives of the Randolph County Growth Management Plan. This district is specifically designed for Primary
Growth Areas and Secondary Growth Areas as reflected in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.
(1) PURPOSE AND USES PERMITTED
The Conventional Subdivision Overlay District shall be considered as an overlay district to the existing zoning districts. Uses permitted within the underlying district shall be permitted provided they meet the requirements within the overlay zone subject to the restrictions provided by this section. (2) CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS
(a) All standards as required by the land development regulations
contained within this Ordinance. (b) Minimum lot sizes as specified by this Ordinance. Lot sizes may be increased as required by soils and other factors
particular to the location.
(c) Designed under the policies and guidelines outlined in the comprehensive land-use plan.
(d) Subdivision layout and use of land will assure safe and
convenient circulation patterns while minimizing the impacts on the established residential areas. (e) Site plans shall be submitted to reduce stormwater impact by
designing new development in a manner that minimizes
concentrated stormwater flows using as a minimum vegetated buffer area. (3) SITING ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS
Conventional subdivisions shall be designed to minimize the number of private driveway connections to existing public roads.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 5
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Does not meet all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is not consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be DENIED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion.
Policy 6.23 The County should encourage the use of rural lot subdivisions where the size
of the lot allows for open space and groundwater recharge areas preserved by careful
siting of the principal residence and accessory uses as noted through subdivision plat notifications and related deed restrictions.
Consistency Analysis: The Randolph County Growth Management Plan identifies this area for this proposed development as a Rural Growth Area due to its proximity to Polecat Creek which was the water supply reservoir for the City of Randleman. The reservoir is still recognized by the State as a reservoir and as a Watershed Critical Area and requires
a minimum of 80,000 sq. ft. per residence. The Growth Management Plan requires development in the Rural Growth Area to be a minimum of three acres in size and maintain a 1:4 lot width to depth ratio (the lots cannot be over four times deep than the lot is wide, ex. 100 feet lot width with lots not deeper than 400 feet.) The preliminary plat as presented does not meet the requirements of the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance nor the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.
Policy 7.4 Protection of public water supply watershed and the water quality critical areas
shall be considered in rezoning and development proposals.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the proposed subdivision in in the Polecat Creek Critical Watershed Area and must meet minimum State requirements of 80,000 sq. ft. per residence. Also the Randolph County Growth Management Plan requires a
minimum of three acres per residence for newly created lots in Rural Growth Areas. The proposed preliminary plat does not meet the requirements of the Randolph County
Unified Development Ordinance nor the Randolph County Growth Management Plan.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is not consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General
Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request would be subject to any Conditions agreed upon
between the property owner and the Planning Board. The Randolph County Growth
Management Plan gives development guidelines for the Rural Growth Area and this request does
not meet those development guidelines.
The Planning Board should be aware that due to provisions contained in North Carolina General Statute 160D, if the Board decided to approve this rezoning
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 5 of 5
request, the Randolph County Growth Management Plan will be automatically amended to make this request consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District:
Watershed Name: POLECAT CREEK WATER QUALITY CRITICAL AREA
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: YES
Flood Plain Map #: 3710776400J
Growth Management Areas:RURAL GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 14.4700
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: CVOE-CD-CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OVERLAY EXCLUSIVE
CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A SIX LOT SITE-BUILT SUDVISION AS PER THE SITE
PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: MILLIKAN, JOE
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Address: 1788 NAOMI RD
Owner: MILLIKAN, NICHOLAS JASON
Address: 105 WEAVER ST
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit #: 2023-00000382
Parcel #: 7775062096
Date: 02/07/2023
Location Address: 1801 NAOMI RD
RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:MILLIKAN, JOE Contact Phone:336 498-3270
Acreage: Township:15.8800 15 - PROVIDENCE
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Timothy Mangum
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Millikan Request Location Map
NAOMI RD
LA
U
R
E
L
L
N
CA M PFIRERD
CE
D
A
R
SPRIN
G
S
R
D
AVONLEA LN
C AMPNAW A K A R D E XT
C
A
M
P
NA
W
AK
A
R
D
1 inch equals 400 feet
City of
Randleman
Directions to site: US Hwy 220 Bus N -
(R) Naomi St - Continue (R) on Naomi
St - Site on (L) approx 600 ft past Cedar
Springs Rd at 1801 Naomi Rd.
Millikan Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
P
o
l
e
c
a
t
C
r
e
e
k
P
o
l
e
c
a
t
C
re
e
k
Polecat C r e e k
B u ll R un
Bul l R u nCAMPFIRERD
AVONLEA LN
C AMP NA W A K A R D E X T
CE
D
A
R
S
PRIN
G
S
R
D
C
A
M
P
N
A
W
A
K
A
R
D
NAOMI RD
The request is located in Polecat Creek Critical Watershed Area.
1 inch equals 400 feet
SUP for auto dealers
license (1999)
Request
location
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Multi-address Structure
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
Flood plains
City of Randleman Zoning
County zoning
Districts
RA
Millikan Rezoning Request
P
o
l
e
c
a
t
C
r
e
e
k
P
o
l
e
c
a
t
C
re
e
k
Polecat C r e e k
B u ll R un
Bul l R u nCAMPFIRERD
AVONLEA LN
C AMP NA W A K A R D E X T
CE
D
A
R
S
PRIN
G
S
R
D
C
A
M
P
N
A
W
A
K
A
R
D
NAOMI RD
The request is located in Polecat Creek Critical Watershed Area.
1 inch equals 400 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
50 ft. Stream buffer
Flood plains
Millikan Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Property across
road from request
location.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward Cedar
Springs Rd.
Picture 6:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Camp
Nawaka Rd.
Page 1 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS
County of Randolph, North Carolina
Department of Planning & Development 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro, NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 planning@randolphcountync.gov
Development policies outlined in the Randolph County Growth Management Plan are specifically designed to encourage
long-term planning among property owners, developers, and the County. The Development Impact Analysis is a key
component of this Plan and its use will increase public awareness of the relationship of growth, rural environmental impacts, and the capacity of local government to provide adequate public facilities based on future land use demands. The
information contained in the Development Impact Analysis comes from the best available public data sources.
Preliminary Plat Name
Plat name and section: Naomi Northwest
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Developer:
Name: Nicholas Jason Millikan Name: Joe Millikan Address: 105 Weaver St Address: 1788 Naomi Rd City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 City, ST ZIP: Randleman, NC 27317 E-mail: billsmith_jm@yahoo.com E-mail: billsm_jm@yahoo.com
Phone: 336 498-3270 Phone: 336 498-3270
Representative: Engineer/Surveyor: Name: Name: Summey Engineering Associates, PLLC Address: Address: 1342 E Salisbury St
City, ST ZIP: City, ST ZIP: Asheboro, NC 27203
E-mail: E-mail: mack@summeryengineering.com Phone: Phone: 336 328-0902
Property Description
Parcel: 7775062096 Acreage: 14.47 acres
Growth Management Area: Rural Growth Area Township: Providence
Fire District: Randleman - Sophia Existing Zoning: RA Existing conditions:
Waterway Description
Does the site contain any streams or rivers? Yes Stream name: Polecat Creek
Does the site contain any flood zone area? Yes Approximate acreage: 1.80 acres
Does the site lie within a watershed? Yes Watershed: Polecat Creek Critical Does the site contain wetlands? Yes Type: Lake Other comments:
Page 2 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Project Description
(If appropriate, attach a letter outlining in detail, the scope of the request.)
Subdivision type: ....................................................................................................................... Site built Total acreage of development: ............................................................................................. 14.47 acres
Total number of building lots: ................................................................................................................ 6
Minimum housing size: ....................................................................................................... sq. ft. Total acreage of proposed open space (if applicable): ....................................................... acres
Total road frontage of proposed development: ........................................................................ 732.00 ft. Average frontage of lots: .......................................................................................................... 122.00 ft.
Width of the lot with smallest amount of road frontage: ........................................................... 122.00 ft.
Width of the lot with greatest amount of road frontage: ................................................................. 122 ft. Is the 1:4 ratio maintained for Rural Growth Areas? .......................................................................... No
Property is currently being used as: Residential Commercial Industrial Farming Leased hunting Vacant
Other
Features unique to this property:
Ravines Hills
Mountains Rights-of-way
Easements Cemeteries
Other
Utilities Impact
Water source: Individual well
Sewer source: Septic system
The distance, location, and provider of the nearest public water and sewer source. Service type Distance Location Provider
Public water 0.30 mile Naomi Rd/Lou Myers Ln City of Randleman
Public sewer 0.60 mile Naomi Rd/Lacy Dr City of Randleman
Page 3 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Public Education Impact (Provided by the Boards of Education)
School system: Randolph County Schools
School impacted Grade level DPI Capacity Current membership Impact
Randleman Elementary K-4 619 557 1 Randleman Middle 5-8 969 851 1
Randleman High 9-12 705 878 1
Current mobile classrooms present: School Number of mobile classrooms Randleman Elementary
Randleman Middle
Randleman High
Current traffic assessment:
School Traffic assessment
Randleman Elementary Congested
Randleman Middle Congested Randleman High Congested
School construction plans:
School Construction plans
Randleman Elementary N/A Randleman Middle N/A
Randleman High N/A
Traffic Analysis Impact (Provided by NCDOT GIS data services)
Road(s) directly accessed by development:
Road name Speed limit Average daily traffic count Naomi Rd 55 mph 1,300
Condition of the road accessed by the development: Good Characteristics of the road(s) directly accessed by development: Paved Curves
Graveled Blindspot(s) Single lane Intersection(s) Bridge(s) Hill(s)
The proposed development with 6 lots will generate an additional 36 total vehicle trips per day.
Does the ADT count greater than 4,000 which would require a turning lane? No
Page 4 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Housing and Community Impacts (Within one mile of the proposal)
Housing patterns in subdivisions:
Subdivision Type Number of lots Average acreage
Arnold & Mary Trodgon Site built 3 1.67
Bobby & Betty Short Mobile home 3 0.73
Brown Oaks Site built 147 0.67 Bullins & McLaughlin Site built 2 2.20
Camp Nawaka Site built 43 1.27
Capps Farm Mobile home 6 7.90 Cates Property Site built 5 14.30
David & Tina Ivey Site built 8 11.60
Dayspring Site built 30 0.32
Fogleman Lake Mobile home 6 0.54
Fox Creek Site built 8 1.20
Fox Landing Site built 15 0.46
Fox Run Site built 10 1.09 Foxwood Site built 24 0.44
George & Sherill Shaw Site built 9 0.52
Gray & Millikan Site built 3 2.90 Greenwood Site built 28 0.43
Hammond Place Site built 6 0.45
Hudson Heights N/A 1 0.29
Imogene Holt Site built 5 7.80
Lou Myers Lane Development Site built 8 1.30
Melba Jobe Site built 5 0.94
Naomi Mill Village Site built 9 2.53 North Fork Site built 9 0.59
Northwoods Site built 1 0.05
Pinecrest Site built 10 0.49
River's Bend Site built 8 0.98
Rivers Edge Site built 8 5.10
The Millikan N/A 1 0.18
Tony & Cheryl Ryals Both 3 2.10
Winfred & Winnie McAden N/A 4 3.20
Total number of site-built homes ...................................................................................................... 494 Average square footage of site-built homes ................................................................... 1,482.00 sq. ft. Largest site-built home by square footage ..................................................................... 5,269.00 sq. ft.
Smallest site-built home by square footage ...................................................................... 560.00 sq. ft. Total number of mobile homes ........................................................................................................... 24
Percentage of site-built homes .................................................................................................. 95.40 %
Page 5 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Percentage of mobile homes ...................................................................................................... 4.60 %
Total number of acres .................................................................................................... 2,350.20 acres
Average acreage ................................................................................................................... 3.26 acres Total acreage in tax-deferred farms .................................................................................. 747.50 acres
Community Land Uses Commercial Farming Forestry Industrial Residential Church facilities
Other:
Special Community Districts Airport Overlay District Cluster Subdivision Overlay District E-1 Districts Rural Lot Subdivision Overlay District
Rural Business Overlay District Industrial Overlay District
Scenic Corridor Overlay District Commercial Environmental Overlay District Voluntary Agricultural District Conventional Subdivision Overlay District Unique Rural Land Uses in the Community
HLPC Landmark/Cultural Heritage Site National Historic Landmark
National Forest Natural Heritage Designated Sites Trailway as part of the County Greenway Plan Youth Camp(s)
Agricultural Impact (Within One mile of the proposal)-
Adjoining farm properties:
• Randy Garland Millikan (7775053360)
• Patrick Chad Millikan (7775150292)
• Nicholas Jason Millikan (7775062096 - request location)
Are all well minimum setback lines noted on plat? No
Tax-deferred farm properties: Property owner Parcel ID Location
Ash Leigh Woods, LLCS 7765353677 River Dr; Both Sides
Michael & Lucy J Kirkman 7765555583 Naomi St; N Edwards Timber Company 7765827192 R2133; Both
Brian Keith and Sondra F Sharpe 7766716086 R2116; S
Patrick Chad Millikan 7775048176 R2119; S Deeded Access Randy Garland Millikan 7775053360 R2119; S
Nicholas Jason Millikan 7775162096 R2119; N
Patrick Chad Millikan 7775150292 R2119; S
Bernard C Richardson III 7775182806 R2328; End of rd
Page 6 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Property owner Parcel ID Location
Rachel H Caudle Life Estate 7775211860 R2132; W Deeded Access
Cody D Holder 7775230768 Joseph F & Jean P Millikan Tr 2
Joseph F & Jean P Millikan 7775238102 Joseph F & Jean P Millikan Tr 5
Joseph F & Jean P Millikan 7775238569 Joseph F & Jean P Millikan Tr 4
Cody Holder 7775238930 Joseph F & Jean P Millikan Tr 3
Cody Holder 7775245251 Joseph F & Jean P Millikan
Tina Renee Pugh Matthews 7775267973 R2119; Both
Charles Wayne & Deborah K Caudle 7775317115 Caudle Dairy Est; Tr 1
Rebecca Ann & Kenneth John Dornhecker 7775323187 Caudle Dairy Est; Tr 2 Deeded Access
Tammy Jo Capps 777537245 R2132; W Tr 3 Deeded Access
Colon G & Linda S Pugh 7775383795 Ruth J Pugh; Tr 1
Edward Michael & Brandy C Moran 7775421139 Caudle Dairy Est; Tr 3 Deeded Access Edward Michael & Brandy C Moran 7775429098 R2132; W
Tammy Jo Capps 7775442266 R2132; W Tr 4
Tommy E Pugh 7775488025 Imogene Holt; Tr 2, 4
Patrick Chad Millikan 7775493567 R2111; E
Joseph Farrell & Nancy Capps 7775530193 Capps Farm; Parcel 3
Joseph Farrell Jr & Misty C Capps 7775531883 Capps Farm; Parcel 4
Joseph Farrell & Nancy Capps 7775543009 Capps Farm; Parcel 5 Joseph Farrell Jr & Misty C Capps 7775543952 Capps Farm; Parcel 7
Joseph Farrell Jr & Misty C Capps 7775549210 Capps Farm; Parcel 2
Sharon Lamb Cannon 7775579028 R2111; Both Richard J Nixon 7775695478 R2136; W
Karole W Wette 7776024950 R2116; Both Sides
Bernard C Richardon III 7776105123 R2116; S Deeded Access
Nicholas Jason Millikan 7776403378 James Clarence Pugh
Randy Garland Millikan 7776412035 Joseph F Millikan Tr 2A + Tr
Farm operations that begin after the development of a major residential subdivision must
abide by the 100 ft. waste setback rule on the farm property.
Other Materials Submitted
Preliminary approval from NCDOT District Engineer’s Office
Buffer site plan Land Clearing Debris Plan Open Space Uses and maintenance agreements, if applicable Proposed deed restrictions
Soil analysis
Soil erosion plan, stormwater management plan, etc.
Page 7 of 7 Development Impact Analysis January 24, 2023
Other:
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY JOE MILLIKAN REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000382
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to CVOE-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay
Exclusive - Conditional District as described in the application of Joe Millikan are not consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest
for the following reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Rural Growth Area which has rural density, large residential lots and is designed to protect watersheds or other environmentally sensitive areas. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 6.23 The County should encourage the use of rural lot subdivisions where
the size of the lot allows for open space and groundwater recharge areas preserved by careful siting of the principal residence and accessory uses as noted
through subdivision plat notifications and related deed restrictions.
Consistency Analysis: The Randolph County Growth Management Plan identifies this area for this proposed development as a Rural Growth Area due to its proximity to Polecat Creek which was the water supply reservoir for the City of Randleman. The reservoir is still recognized by the State as a reservoir and as a
Watershed Critical Area and requires a minimum of 80,000 sq. ft. per residence. The Growth Management Plan requires development in the Rural Growth Area to be a minimum of three acres in size and maintain a 1:4 lot width to depth ratio (the lots cannot be over four times deep than the lot is wide, ex. 100 feet lot width with
lots not deeper than 400 feet.) The preliminary plat as presented does not meet the requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance nor the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan.
Policy 7.4 Protection of public water supply watershed and the water quality critical
areas shall be considered in rezoning and development proposals.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the proposed subdivision in in the
Polecat Creek Critical Watershed Area and must meet minimum State requirements of 80,000 sq. ft. per residence. Also the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan requires a minimum of three acres per residence for newly created lots in Rural Growth Areas. The proposed preliminary plat does not meet
the requirements of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance nor the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan. 2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is not consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request would be subject to any Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. The Randolph County Growth Management Plan gives development guidelines for the Rural Growth Area and this request does not
meet those development guidelines.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 15.88 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7775062096 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on April 4, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000382, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to CVOE-CD - Conventional Subdivision
Overlay Exclusive - Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000567
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Carolina Travel Management, Inc
Property Owner: Carolina Travel Management, Inc Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To rezone 5.09 acres to allow overflow parking as per the site
plan.
Current Zoning: RA – Residential Agricultural District Requested Zoning: HC-CD – Highway Commercial – Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Primary Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: Randleman Lake Protected Area
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Location: 10367 Randleman Rd
Parcel Number: 7758809298 Parcel Size: 5.09 acres out of 29.56 acres
Existing Use: The portion to be rezoned is vacant. The front portion of the property current zoned HC-CD, Highway Commercial –
Conditional District, is used for a travel company.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential
South RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
East RA - Residential
Agricultural District Vacant
West RA - Residential
Agricultural District Farming
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
No comments have been received from NC Department of Transportation.
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: In February, 2024, 8.50 acres was rezoned to including the
existing travel operations and parking area expansion for
future parking. In January, 2006, the previous Conditional
District Permit was amended to include a 65 ft. by 82 ft.
garage addition and a 10 ft. by 30 ft. water recycling plant. In
July, 2021, the Conditional District Permit was again amended
to allow an automobile and recreational vehicle sales lot.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
HC: HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Highway Commercial (HC) District is to provide a place in which the principal use of land is for the retailing of durable goods, the provision of
commercial services to industrial areas, and the provision of services to tourists.
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4
Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres
Lot width 100 ft. at building line
Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line
Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way
Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watershed and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations.
3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. Minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized development conditions are imposed only upon signed petition of all owners of the land to be included
in the Conditional District.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board. The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion.
Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions will
depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it related to the specific site and location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis: The applicant is requesting to rezone 5.09 acres to add to the existing 8.50 acres that was previously zoned for the travel company and associated structures which would mean a total of 13.59 acres out of 29.56 acres, or approximately
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4
forty-six percent of the parcel. The area would be used for overflow parking and would have minimum impacts to surrounding uses.
Policy 4.4 Commercial uses should be encouraged to develop by consolidation and
deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when such consolidation and
deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the effect of incompatibility with
adjoining residential land uses.
Consistency Analysis: By deepening the area to be rezoned, the proposed
development would lessen the impacts on adjoining land uses and it would only be used
for overflow parking.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the
property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type
of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed
use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710775800K
Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 5.0900
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: HC-CD-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO REZONE 5.09 ACRES TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERFLOW
PARKING LOT AS PER THE SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT INC.
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Address: 10367 RANDLEMAN RD.
Owner: CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT INC
Address: 10367 RANDLEMAN RD
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit #: 2023-00000567
Parcel #: 7758809298
Date: 02/28/2023
Location Address: 10367 RANDLEMAN RD
RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:MOODY, JONATHAN Contact Phone:336 823-3924
Acreage: Township:29.5600 10 - LEVEL CROSS
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Carolina Travel Management, Inc Request Location Map
R
A
N
D
L
E
MAN
RD
US HWY 220 BUS N
1 inch equals 400 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 220
Bus N - Site on (L) approx 700
ft past Branson Mill Rd at
10367 Randleman Rd.
Carolina Travel Management, Inc., Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
R
A
ND
L
E
M
A
N
R
D
US HWY 220 BUS N
The request is located in Randleman Lake Protected Watershed Area.
1 inch equals 500 feet
Rezoned for industrial
park (1987)
Huff's
Texaco
Hidden Forest
Estates MHP
Request
location
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Multi-address Structure
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
County zoning
Districts
HC
LI
RA
RM
Carolina Travel Management, Inc., Rezoning Request
R
A
NDL
EMA
N
RD
US HWY 220 BUS N
The request is located in Randleman Lake Protected Watershed Area.
1 inch equals 400 feet
Huff's
Texaco
Legend
Parcels
Roads
50 ft. Stream buffer
Carolina Travel Management, Inc., Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Property across the
road from the
request location.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 5:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Clodfelter
Trl.
Picture 6:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward Branson Mill
Rd.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT, INC REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000567
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to HC-CD - Highway Commercial - Conditional District as described in the application of Carolina Travel Management, Inc, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County
Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following
reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along Randleman Rd which is a major transportation corridor and has fast access to Interstate 73.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions will depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it related to the specific
site and location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis: The applicant is requesting to rezone 5.09 acres to add to the existing 8.50 acres that was previously zoned for the travel company and associated structures which would mean a total of 13.59 acres out of 29.56 acres, or approximately forty-six percent of the parcel. The area would be used for
overflow parking and would have minimum impacts to surrounding uses. Policy 4.4 Commercial uses should be encouraged to develop by consolidation and deepening of existing commercially zoned property, only when such
consolidation and deepening can be developed in a way that lessens the effect of incompatibility with adjoining residential land uses.
Consistency Analysis: By deepening the area to be rezoned, the proposed development would lessen the impacts on adjoining land uses and it would only be used for overflow parking.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of
development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 5.09 acre parcel out of 29.56 acres, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7758809298 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural
District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on April 4, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000567, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC-CD - Highway Commercial -
Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000595
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Jose Flores
Property Owner: Jose Flores Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To amend the existing Conditional District Permit to allow an
80 ft. by 60 ft. addition to the existing building as per the site
plan.
Current Zoning: LI-CD – Light Industrial – Conditional District Requested Zoning: LI-CD – Light Industrial – Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Primary Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: None
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Location: 7606 US Hwy 220 S
Parcel Number: 7665688138 Parcel Size: 2.39 acres Existing Use: Warehouse storage facility
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
South LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District Hosiery manufacturing facility
East RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
West RM-CD - Residential
Mixed - Conditional District Mobile home park
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
No comments have been received from NC Department of Transportation.
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: This property was rezoned on January 3, 2017, to allow a
warehouse storage facility in a proposed 80 ft. by 125 ft.
building as per the site plan.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
LI: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) District is to provide a place for light industrial, warehousing and distribution, and sales of large-item products.
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE
Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of State road frontage 40,000 sq. ft. Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft.
Lot size with less than 100 ft. of State road frontage 5 acres
Lot width 100 ft. at building line Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way
Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES 1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health. 2. Lot areas in designated Watershed and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County Watershed Protection Regulations. 3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way. 4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities. 5. Minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres. 6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio. 7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres. 8. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized
development conditions are imposed only upon signed petition of all owners of the land to be included in the Conditional District.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion. Policy 3.1 Industrial development should be on land that is physically suitable and has
unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the identification of such
land should be encouraged. Consistency Analysis: When originally constructed, this warehouse was built to support the adjacent hosiery business. The hosiery business has grown over the years, as
evidenced by amendments to the Conditional District Permit at the production facility. By having the warehouse in close proximity to the manufacturing facility, it provide locational advantages for the hosiery business. Policy 3.4 Warehousing, storage and distribution facilities should have direct access to
appropriate thoroughfares and should be visually buffered according to their location.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the existing warehouse is adjacent to the
hosiery manufacturing facility. The warehouse has direct access to US Hwy 220 S and
can be at the interstates and highways in just a few minutes.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the
property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type
of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed
use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: LI-CD-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710766400J
Growth Management Areas:PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 2.3900
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: LI-CD-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO AMEND THE EXISTING CONDITIONAL DISTRICT PERMIT TO
ALLOW AN 80' X 60' ADDITION TO EXISITING COMMERCIAL
BUILDING AS PER THE SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: FLORES, JOSE
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Address: 2302 WHITE PINE LN
Owner: FLORES, JOSE
Address: 2302 WHITE PINES LN
City, St. Zip: ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Permit #: 2023-00000595
Parcel #: 7665688138
Date: 03/02/2023
Location Address: 7606 US HWY 220 S
ASHEBORO, NC 27205
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:FLORES, JOSE Contact Phone:336 953-7253
Acreage: Township:2.3900 17 - RICHLAND
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Flores Request Location Map
U
S
H
W
Y
2
2
0
S
EDGEWOOD VIEW DR
BENNETT FARM RD
WEST EDGEWOOD CIR
1 inch equals 200 feet
Directions to site: US Hwy 220 S -
Site on (R) across from Bennett Farm
Rd at 7606 US Hwy 220 S.
Flores Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
EDGEWOOD VIEW DR
BUR
N
E
Y
R
D
BENNETT FARM RD
WEST EDGEWOOD CIR
U
S
H
W
Y
2
2
0
S
1 inch equals 300 feet
Rezoned to allow 3
new lots in MHP (1998)
Request
location
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Multi-address Structure
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Duplex/Complex
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
County zoning
Districts
HC
LI
RA
RM
RR
Flores Rezoning Request
EDGEWOOD VIEW DR
BENNETT FARM RD
U
S
H
W
Y
2
2
0
S
WEST EDGEWOOD CIR
1 inch equals 200 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
Flores Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Property across
road from request
location.
Picture 3:
Adjacent
residences.
Picture 4:
Adjacent
Commercial
structure.
Picture 5:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward Richland
Park Dr.
Picture 6:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward West
Edgewood Cir.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Pe
r
m
i
t
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY JOSE FLOREZ REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000595
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District as described in the application of Jose Flores are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management
Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area
which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban services. This parcel is along US Hwy 220 S which is a major transportation corridor. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 3.1 Industrial development should be on land that is physically suitable and
has unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the identification of such land should be encouraged.
Consistency Analysis: When originally constructed, this warehouse was built to support the adjacent hosiery business. The hosiery business has grown over the years, as evidenced by amendments to the Conditional District Permit at the production facility. By having the warehouse in close proximity to the manufacturing facility, it provide locational advantages for the hosiery business.
Policy 3.4 Warehousing, storage and distribution facilities should have direct
access to appropriate thoroughfares and should be visually buffered according to their location.
Consistency Analysis: As previously stated, the existing warehouse is adjacent to the hosiery manufacturing facility. The warehouse has direct access to US Hwy
220 S and can be at the interstates and highways in just a few minutes.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within
the County.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 2.39 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 7665688138 is currently zoned LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on April 4, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000595, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to LI-CD - Light Industrial - Conditional
District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 4
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
STAFF REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION APPLICATION #2023-00000599
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Zachary Daniel Davidson
Property Owner: Zachary Daniel Davidson Hearing Type: Legislative Request: To allow a farm equipment repair and service business as per
the site plan.
Current Zoning: RA – Residential Agricultural Requested Zoning: RBO-CD – Rural Business Overlay – Conditional District Small Area Plan: None Growth Management: Rural Growth Area
Watershed Overlay: None
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Location: Brantley Gordon Rd
Parcel Number: 66987894149 Parcel Size: 2.29 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 4
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
South RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
East RA - Residential Agricultural District Single-family residential
West RA - Residential
Agricultural District Single-family residential
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation:
No comments have been received from NC Department of Transportation.
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: There is no history of a rezoning, Variance or Special Use
Permit at the request location.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 614 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
RBO: RURAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DISTRICT
(1) PURPOSE AND USES PERMITTED The Rural Business Overlay District is established to provide locations where compatible rural land uses such as neighborhood retail and service establishments can be in general proximity to established rural residential areas to reduce automobile travel distances and promote better livability in
the rural community. The Rural Business Overlay District shall be considered as an overlay district to the Residential Agricultural District. Uses permitted within the
underlying district shall be permitted provided they meet the requirements
within the overlay zone subject to the restrictions provided by this section. (2) BUFFER REQUIREMENTS Where the property adjoins a residential use, a Level III buffer shall be installed.
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 4
(3) SITE CONSIDERATIONS
Yards may be used only for driveways, landscaping, and screening. The
minimum lot size is three acres. Site plans shall be submitted to reduce stormwater impact by designing new
development in a manner that minimizes concentrated stormwater flows using as
a minimum vegetated buffer area.
(4) SIGNAGE
Signage shall be permitted as allowed by Article 600, Section 634.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Staff has reviewed this request finds that this request:
• Meet all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were identified by the Technical Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Staff as supporting the above conclusion.
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural commercial
activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation, and the
provision of services to the rural community. Consistency Analysis: By approving this request, the Planning Board would recognize
the need for this type of rural activity and the need for this type of activity, job creation
and provision of this service to this rural community. Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions will
depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it relates to the specific site and
location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis: This proposal, if developed as proposed, would balance the use
of the property and provide buffering to adjoining rural land uses.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
The parcel in this rezoning request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the
Staff Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 4
property owner and the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type
of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed
use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plain Map #: 3710668800J
Growth Management Areas:RURAL GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 2.2600
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: RBO-CD-RURAL BUSINESS OVERLAY CONDITIONAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW A FARM EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND SERVICE
BUSINESS AS PER THE SITE PLAN
Condition(S):
Applicant: DAVIDSON, ZACHARY DANIEL AND
DAVIDSON HANNAH
City, St. Zip: DENTON, NC 27239
Address: 5898 BRANTLEY GORDON RD
Owner: DAVIDSON, ZACHARY DANIEL
Address: 5898 BRANTLEY GORDON RD
City, St. Zip: DENTON, NC 27239
Permit #: 2023-00000599
Parcel #: 6698784149
Date: 03/02/2023
Location Address:
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:DAVIDSON, ZACHARY Contact Phone:336 460-4153
ZACH DAVIDSON1 - 2
Acreage: Township:2.2600 07 - CONCORD
Subdivsion: Lot number:
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Davidson Request Location Map
SANDSTONE
T
RL
BRANTLEY GORDON RD
1 inch equals 400 feet
Directions to site: NC Hwy 49 S -
(R) Brantley Gordon Rd - Site on
(R) just before Sandstone Trl.
Davidson Rezoning Request
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
SANDSTONE
T
RL
BRANTLEY GORDON RD
1 inch equals 400 feet
SUP for ceramic
shop (1995)
SUP for auto repair
shop (2022)
Request
location
Legend
Parcels
Structures
Type
!(Permanent Structure
!(Temporary Structure
!(Miscellaneous Structures
Roads
Streams
50 ft. Stream buffer
County zoning
Districts
RA
Davidson Rezoning Request
SANDSTONE
TRL
BRANTLEY GORDON RD
1 inch equals 200 feet
Legend
Parcels
Roads
50 ft. Stream buffer
Davidson Rezoning Request
Picture 1:
Request
location.
Picture 2:
Adjacent
residence.
Picture 3:
Property across
road from request
location.
Picture 4:
Property across
road from request
location.
Picture 5:
Request location on
right as seen looking
toward Sandstone
Trl.
Picture 6:
Request location on
left as seen looking
toward NC Hwy 49
S.
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING BY ZACHARY DANIEL DAVIDSON REZONING REQUEST #2023-00000599
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed zoning district map amendments to RBO-CD - Rural Business Overlay - Conditional
District as described in the application of Zachary Daniel Davidson are consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County
Growth Management Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following
reasons: 1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan. A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Rural Growth Area which has rural density, large residential lots and is designed to protect watersheds or other environmentally sensitive areas. B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.1 Provide for sites in Randolph County jurisdiction where rural
commercial activity can locate with the goal of increasing economic activity, job creation, and the provision of services to the rural community.
Consistency Analysis: By approving this request, the Planning Board would recognize the need for this type of rural activity and the need for this type of activity, job creation and provision of this service to this rural community. Policy 4.3 Individual Rural Business or Highway Commercial rezoning decisions
will depend upon the scale of the proposed development as it relates to the specific
site and location weighed against impacts to adjoining rural land uses.
Consistency Analysis: This proposal, if developed as proposed, would balance the use of the property and provide buffering to adjoining rural land uses.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes. The parcel in this rezoning
request is subject to the Conditions agreed upon between the property owner and
the Planning Board. These Conditions will limit the amount and type of development on the property reducing the impact on adjoining parcels. The proposed use will also increase the tax base and increase economic activity within the County.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________ Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, a 2.29 acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification Number of 6698784149 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on April 4, 2023 to consider the proposed rezoning on application number 2023-
00000599, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied; WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to RBO-CD - Rural Business Overlay -
Conditional District. The official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan Map is hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on April 4, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________ Kimberly J. Heinzer, Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
MOTION TO APPROVE
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application
and the Map Amendment Ordinance, to the requested
zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is also
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.
MOTION TO DENY
A CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to rezone
the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the
requested zoning district based upon the Determination of
Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and
Public Interest statements that are included in the
Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning
presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site
plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, also
incorporated into the motion and that the request is not
consistent with the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of the
motion.