11NovemberPB
Planning Board November 7, 2023 Page 1 of 2
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING 204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 7, 2023
1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board.
2. Roll call of the Board members.
3. Consent Agenda:
● Approval of agenda for the November 7, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
● Approval of the minutes from the October 3, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
● Approval of the Randolph County Planning Board Meeting Schedule for
2024.
4. Conflict of Interest
● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be
disclosed?
● If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the member
with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the specific
case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.
5. Old Business.
6. New Business.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00002454
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
Legislative Hearing on the request by TARNIK FUNDS, LLC, Spring, TX,
and their request to rezone 3.66 acres on the intersection of US Hwy 64 E
and Lee Layne Rd, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8712578454, Municipal
Growth Area, from RA – Residential Agricultural District and RR -
Residential Restricted District to HC - Highway Commercial District. It is the
desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by
Page 1 of 29
Planning Board November 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2
right in the HC - Highway Commercial District.
7. Adjournment.
Page 2 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 1 of 7
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 3, 2023
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in Meeting Room A, Randolph County Office Building, 725 McDowell Rd, Asheboro, NC, 27205, due to renovations at the 1909 Historic Courthouse.
Chairman Pell called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance and called the roll of the Board members.
• Reid Pell, Chair, present;
• Kemp Davis, Vice-Chair, absent;
• John Cable, present;
• Melinda Vaughan, absent;
• Reggie Beeson, present.
• Ken Austin, present;
• Barry Bunting, absent; and
• Brandon Hedrick, Alternate, substituting for Davis, present.
County Attorney, Ben Morgan, was also present. Randolph County Planning staff members Tonya Caddle, Kim Heinzer, Eric Martin, David Harris, Cory Hartsoe, and Tim Mangum were also present for the meeting.
Pell called for a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented.
• Approval of agenda for the October 3, 2023, Planning Board meeting.
• Approval of the minutes from the September 12, 2023, Planning Board
meeting.
Cable made the motion to APPROVE the consent agenda as presented, with Austin making the second to the motion. The motion was adopted unanimously.
Pell asked the Board members if there were any conflicts in the cases before the Planning
Board tonight. Hearing none, Pell turned to Caddle to present the first case of the night. Caddle presented the first case along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00002421
Page 3 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 2 of 7
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative Hearing on the request by RICHARD KIPKE, JR., Ramseur, NC, and their request to rezone 1.00-acre out of 8.92 acres at 561 Wright
Ctry Rd, Columbia Township, Tax ID #8723023723, Secondary Growth
Area, from RE-CD - Residential Exclusive - Conditional District to CVOE-
CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District would specifically allow a 1.00-acre lot to be cut from 8.92-acres in the existing Reed Creek Subdivision, Map 4, as
per the site plan.
Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward and address the Planning Board.
Richard Kipke, Jr., 561 Wright Ctry Rd, rose to address the Planning Board and said that
he wanted to divide a one-acre lot from his property on Wright Ctry Rd. Kipke related how this proposed lot would be in front of his existing home and that the one-acre size is the minimum required by the restrictive covenants and it is consistent with other lots in the subdivision.
Pell asked if there were any questions from the Planning Board members. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the request who would like to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in
opposition to the request who would like to address the Planning Board.
Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing. Hedrick asked why the request was to rezone the lot from RE-CD - Residential Exclusive
- Conditional District to CVOE-CD - Conventional Subdivision Overlay Exclusive -
Conditional District and Caddle said that the requested district is to comply with the districts listed in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and currently in use throughout the County.
Morgan asked about any restrictive covenants for the existing subdivision and Martin
stated that the existing covenants require a minimum one-acre lot size for any newly created, single-family residential lots. Caddle reminded the Planning Board that the County cannot enforce restrictive covenants but does try to make sure that citizens follow any restrictive covenants that may be recorded.
Cable stated that he thought the proposed one-acre lot would be consistent with the surrounding area and that the new lot would look like the neighboring lots. Beeson stated that he liked the fact that the existing lot is wider along the road frontage.
It was noted that the larger road frontage was due to the stream that is on the corner of
the property.
Page 4 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 3 of 7
Pell called for a motion on the rezoning request. Beeson made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified
parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into
the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Austin made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request. Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to APPROVE
the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously.
Caddle presented the last case along with site plans and pictures of the site and surrounding properties.
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00002422
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
Legislative Hearing on the request by FILIBERTO CALDERON, Asheboro, NC, and their request to rezone 3.00-acres out of 4.30-acres at 3342 US Hwy 64 E, Franklinville Township, Tax ID #7771991174, Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to HC-CD - Highway
Commercial - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning District
would specifically allow two 60 ft. by 100 ft. warehouse buildings for storage of tools and equipment as per the site plan. Property Owner: Jo Anne Ganey Pell opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the
request to come forward and address the Planning Board.
Filiberto Calderon, 3342 US Hwy 64 E, rose to address the Planning Board and explained that he wanted to rezone the property to allow two 60 ft. by 100 ft. warehouse buildings for storage of material and equipment for his business. Calderon stated that the first
building to be constructed will have an office area so customers can come to the area to order their buildings and pay the deposits. Calderon passed out a proposed flood plan for the proposed building. (See Exhibit #1.) Calderon concluded that he would start with one building at this time and the second building will be added later.
Pell asked if there were any questions from the Planning Board members. Cable asked Calderon about his business and Calderon stated that he builds carports and metal buildings and that he is currently renting an existing building for storage and wants to own the buildings where he will be storing his materials and equipment. Calderon
Page 5 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 4 of 7
stated that he is going to keep the existing house on the property, and he wants to improve the property but also maintain the existing buffers on the property.
Cable asked Calderon if the front building as shown on the site plan would be the first
building to be constructed and Calderon said that this would be the first building and the one in the rear on the site plan would be built later. Beeson asked Calderon if he owned the house shown on the site plan and Calderon
responded that he did own the house along with the adjoining 6.80 acres behind this site
and that he just wanted the buildings out front along US Hwy 64 E. Cable asked about the parking area and Calderon stated that the parking would be at the rear of the proposed buildings.
Austin asked if the property would be connecting to public water and sewer and Calderon said that the house has a current well and septic system and there is an existing septic system on the property that he can use for the proposed buildings.
Pell stated that he thought the City of Asheboro had water lines that go by this property
and Beeson agreed that the thought water lines were at the site. Austin asked about signage and hours and Calderon said that he wants to put a sign on the site and there would be one employee in the office to meet customers and collect
deposits. Austin asked if there would be any outside storage and Calderon stated that he
wants everything inside of the proposed buildings except for large equipment if necessary. Cable asked again about hours of operation and Calderon stated the hours of operation
would be either 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. or 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday
and maybe half a day on Saturday. Calderon did tell the Planning Board that sometimes he has to come in on Sunday mornings to load a truck so it can leave early Monday mornings.
Hedrick told Calderon that the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance has
different requirements in case he wanted to do outside storage, and he wanted Calderon to be aware of the requirements. Calderon said that he would not be storing construction material outside but might store large equipment outside if necessary.
Hedrick also asked about the 35 ft. buffer as shown on the site plan and he asked
Calderon if the buffers were going to be no-cut buffers. Calderon stated that the buffers shown on the site plan exist and does not want to cut or change the buffers. Cable stated that based on the site plan and the orthophotography in the agenda packets,
the proposed buildings will be going in an area that has already been cleared and
Calderon stated that Cable was correct.
Page 6 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 5 of 7
Caddle stated that the buffer shown on the site plan is what is currently on the site and that they must remain and Calderon said that the goal was to retain the existing buffers.
Cable asked if there was adequate site distance to be able to see from the exits and
Calderon responded that there are adequate site distances. Hedrick stated that the site plan shows two hundred thirty-eight feet of road frontage, and he asked Calderon if the trucks coming to the site to deliver or pick up materials would
have enough room to navigate the site. Calderon said that the proposed buildings would
have roll-up doors on each end so trucks could drive in the building, drop off or pick up their loads, exit the other end of the building, and drive around the back of the proposed buildings to leave the site.
Pell reminded Calderon that if he changed anything on the site plan such as cutting a
buffer, he would be required to replant the buffer and could be forced to come back to the Planning Board to change the site plan and Calderon stated that the site plan shows his current plans for the property and how he is going to develop the property.
Hedrick stated that based upon the provided site plan, the trucks would only have around
twenty to twenty-five feet at the end of the buildings for them to be able to navigate the site. Pell asked if there were any other questions or comments from the Planning Board
members.
Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone else in favor of the request who would like to address the Planning Board. Hearing none, Pell asked if there was anyone in opposition to the request who would like to address the Planning Board.
Pell asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak in opposition to the rezoning request. Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing. Cable said that he thought that Calderon had presented a good site plan for the proposed
business, and it was very specific, and Calderon was aware that he would be required to
come back if anything changed. Cable said that he did not see problems based on the information supplied. Hedrick stated that the property is in a Primary Growth Area and there are other
commercial uses in the area and his only concern is regarding the buffers being
maintained. Beeson said that the proposed development is what the proposed Growth Management Plan wants for this area.
Hedrick said that he felt that water and sewer would eventually get to this property.
Page 7 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 6 of 7
Cable said he thought this is a great location and he hopes that Calderon outgrows the location.
Cable made the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request to rezone the specified
parcel(s) on the rezoning application to the requested zoning district based upon the Determination of Consistency and Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest statements that are included in the Planning Board agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation and as may be amended, incorporated into the motion, to be included in the
minutes, as well as the site plan(s) with all agreed-upon revisions, also incorporated into
the motion and that the request is consistent with the Randolph County Growth
Management Plan. Austin made a second to the motion to APPROVE the rezoning request.
Pell, having a proper motion and second, called the question on the motion to APPROVE
the rezoning request, and the motion was adopted unanimously. Caddle reminded the Planning Board of the Board of Commissioners meeting on October 16, 2023, rezoning appeal meeting for the TJTR Properties rezoning request that the
Planning Board denied in September 2023. Caddle also reminded the Planning Board
about their Joint Public Hearing on October 26, 2023, with the Board of Commissioners on the Northeast Randolph County Growth Management Plan. Caddle said that both of these meetings will be held in the Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro, NC 27203.
Caddle also told the Planning Board that the Planning Department and the State would be holding a Public Open House on the Preliminary Flood Maps on October 17, 2023, from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. in Meeting Room A, Randolph County Office Building, 725 McDowell Rd, Asheboro, NC 27205. Caddle concluded her remarks by stating that the
Planning Board will be back in the Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St,
Asheboro, NC 27203, for the November and December meetings. Having no further business, Pell called for a motion to ADJOURN the meeting. Austin made the motion to adjourn, with Beeson making the second to the motion.
Pell, having a proper motion, and second, called the question on the motion to ADJOURN. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m., with six citizens present.
RANDOLPH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
________________________
Page 8 of 29
Planning Board Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 7 of 7
Chairman
_________________________ _______________________________ Clerk to the Board Date
Page 9 of 29
http://www.randolphcountync.gov
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555 RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
RANDOLPH COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2024 January 9, 2024
February 6, 2024 March 5, 2024
April 2, 2024
May 7, 2024 June 4, 2024
July 9, 2024 August 6, 2024
September 10, 2024
October 8, 2024 November 12, 2024
December 3, 2024 The above-listed meetings may be canceled if there are no cases for the agenda.
Additional Randolph County Planning Board or Randolph County Zoning Board of
Adjustment meetings may be scheduled as needed and the public will be notified as required by the North Carolina General Statutes. Adopted by the Randolph County Planning Board on ________________.
Page 10 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 6
RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION
APPLICATION #2023-00002454
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified Legislative
Hearing on the request by TARNIK FUNDS, LLC,Spring, TX, and their request to rezone
3.66-acres at the intersection of US Hwy 64 E and Lee Layne Rd,Columbia Township,
Tax ID #8712578454, Municipal Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District
and RR – Residential Restricted District to HC - Highway Commercial District.It is the
desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed by right in the HC
- Highway Commercial District.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Property Owner:Tarnik Funds, LLC
Hearing Type:Legislative
Small Area Plan:None
Flood Plain Overlay:Yes
Airport Overlay:None
Existing Use:Vacant
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
North HC - Highway Commercial
District
Office space and single-
family residential
South RR - Residential Restricted
District Vacant
East
HC-CD - Highway
Commercial - Conditional
District
Convenience store and
mobile home park
West HC-CD - Highway
Commercial - Conditional
Church
Page 11 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 6
District
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT):
NCDOT recommends that the drive into the parcel be from Lee Layne Rd.e par
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History:There is no history of a rezoning, Variance or Special Use
Permit at the request location.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance,Article 600, Section 613 (ex. Fencing, buffers, etc.):
HC: HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Highway Commercial (HC) District is to provide a place in which
the principal use of land is for the retailing of durable goods, the provision of
commercial services to industrial areas, and the provision of services to tourists.
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE
Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of
State road frontage
40,000 sq. ft.
Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft.
Lot size with less than 100 ft. of
State road frontage 5 acres
Lot width 100 ft. at building line
Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line
Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way
Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES
1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health.
2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County
Watershed Protection Regulations.
3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way.
4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000
sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities.
5. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres.
Page 12 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 6
6. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio.
7. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres.
8.Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans and individualized
development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be
included in the Conditional District.
Possible allowed uses in the HC - Highway Commercial District include the following from
the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance:
x Accessory uses;
x Agricultural uses;
x Amusements, indoor commercial (e.g., bowling alleys, skating rinks);
x Amusements, out-of-doors commercial (e.g., roller coasters, fairgrounds);
x Apparel and accessory sales;
x Auction sales, yards, permanent;
x Auction sales, temporary, one-time use;
x Automobile and truck rental;
x Automobile body shops (excluding open storage of wrecked vehicles);
x Automobile carwash, drive-through, requiring vehicle stacking;
x Automobile parts sales;
x Automobile sales;
x Automobile service stations;
x Automobile storage (excluding wrecked and junked vehicles);
x Bakery;
x Banks, savings and loans, credit unions;
x Barber and beauty service;
x Boats, recreational vehicles sales, and service;
x Bottling plants;
x Builders supply sales;
x Bus station;
x Cabinet making;
x Churches and their customary uses including childcare on-premises;
x Clinics, medical, dental;
x Clubs and lodges, private, non-profit;
x Clubs and places of entertainment (commercial);
x Community centers, public or private non-profit, for assembly and
recreation;
x Compartmentalized storage for individual storage of residential and
commercial goods;
x Contractor’s yard and outdoor storage area;
x Convenience store;
x Daycare facility (freestanding);
x Drive-in window services (banks, laundries, fast food) if permitted in the
district;
Page 13 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 6
x Drugstores;
x Dry cleaning and laundry;
x Exterminating services;
x Farm machinery sales,
x Farm supplies sales (feed, seed, fertilizer);
x Fire, sheriff, and emergency services;
x Fitness and recreational sports center;
x Flea markets (indoors);
x Flea markets (out-of-doors);
x Florist;
x Funeral homes;
x Gift shops;
x Glass Manufacturing;
x Governmental offices;
x Grocery stores;
x Gun sales,
x Gunsmith;
x Hardware, paint, and garden supplies;
x Home occupations;
x Hotels and motels;
x Home furnishings and appliance sales;
x Health and social services centers;
x Industrial equipment sales and service;
x Laboratory, medical, and dental;
x Laundry or dry cleaning, self-service;
x Library, public;
x Locksmith;
x Machine shop, welding shop;
x Medical/Dental clinics or laboratories;
x Mini warehouse;
x Mixed commercial and residential use where commercial use is primary and
both occupy the same structure or lot;
x Mobile home, travel trailer, camper, marine, recreational vehicle sales;
x Monument and cut stone manufacture and sales;
x Nursery and plant cultivation and sales;
x Office supplies sales;
x Outdoor storage yard;
x Pharmacy and drugstore;
x Post Office;
x Pottery manufacturing and sales;
x Printing and reproduction shop;
x Radio or television studio;
x Retail sales, not listed elsewhere;
x Repair, rental, and service of products sold at retail in the same district;
Page 14 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 5 of 6
x Restaurant;
x Retail stores and shops (excluding vehicle sales) not otherwise listed
herein;
x Schools, business/trade;
x Service stations;
x Services establishments include but are not limited to barber and beauty
shops, small-item repair, and rental;
x Sign, directional gateway;
x Sign, on-premise;
x Tailor shop;
x Taxi stand;
x Temporary buildings, incidental to the development;
x Temporary carnivals, rides, Ferris wheels;
x Theater, Drive-in;
x Trailer rentals;
x Upholstering and furniture refinishing;
x Veterinary clinics;
x Warehouses, sales or service; and
x Wholesale sales, not otherwise listed.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee has reviewed this request finds that this request:
x Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
x Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
x Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting the above conclusion.
Policy 4.2:Highway-oriented commercial uses should be clustered along segments of
arterial streets and contain land uses that are mutually compatible and reinforcing in use
and design. They should be designed in a way that minimizes signage, access points,
and excessive lengths of commercial strip development.
Consistency Analysis:In its analysis, the Technical Review Committee noted the
various commercial operations that have been approved over the years such as the
convenience store and Baldwin Trucking. Approving this request clusters the commercial
development in one area instead of spreading it along the US Hwy 64 E corridor and it
will help to limit commercial strip development in the corridor.
Page 15 of 29
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 6 of 6
Policy 8.4:The County should approach land use and economic development decisions,
not as isolated individual issues, but as part of a larger interconnecting framework of
building sustainable growth within Randolph County.
Consistency Analysis:As previously noted, this parcel is along the US Hwy 64 Corridor
which is an area that is infused with residential and commercial uses. Approving this
request would further infuse the corridor with commercial uses and make it part of the
framework of sustainable growth in the County.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:The policies listed above illustrate how
this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
It should be noted that this recommendation is only the opinion of the
Technical Review Committee based on information supplied by the applicant
before the public hearing. Additional information provided at the public
hearing could cause the Planning Board to either accept or reject these
recommendations.
Page 16 of 29
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RR-RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: NONE
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: YES
Flood Plain Map #: 3710871200J
Growth Management Areas:MUNICIPAL GROWTH AREA
Flood Plane Map #:
Total Permit Fee: $100.00
COMMENTS:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance.
Area To Be Rezoned: 3.6600
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: HC-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW ANY USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THE HC -
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Condition(S):
Applicant:TARNIK FUNDS LLC
City, St. Zip: SPRING, TX 77386
Address:28634 CLEAR WOODS DR.
Owner:TARNIK FUNDS LLC
Address:28634 CLEAR WOODS DR
City, St. Zip: SPRING, TX 77386
Permit #: 2023-00002454
Parcel #: 8712578454
Date:09/07/2023
Location Address:
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
CONTACT NAME:GALLIMORE, H R Contact Phone:336 626-5560
Acreage:Township:3.6400 06 - COLUMBIA
Subdivsion:Lot number:
(5,&0$57,1
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - PO Box 771 - Asheboro NC 27204-0771
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Page 17 of 29
Tarnik Funds LLC Request LocaƟon Map
EA
S
T
E
R
N
R
A
N
D
O
L
P
H
R
D
US HWY 6
4
E
LE
E
L
A
Y
N
E
R
D
1 inch equals 250 feet
DirecƟons to site: US Hwy 64 E ‐
Site on (R) Just before Lee Layne Rd.
X
X
Page 18 of 29
Ta
r
n
i
k
F
u
n
d
s
L
L
C
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Re
e
d
Cre
e
k
Ree
d
Cre
ek
EASTERN RANDOLPH RD
LEE
L
A
YNE
R
D
U
S
H
W
Y
6
4
E
1
i
n
c
h
e
q
u
a
l
s
4
0
0
f
e
e
t
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
4
l
o
t
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
2
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
t
r
u
c
k
i
n
g
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
(
2
0
1
8
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
Ɵ
o
n
a
l
fu
e
l
p
u
m
p
s
(
1
9
9
9
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
H
C
(1
9
8
7
)
Re
q
u
e
s
t
lo
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
X
X
Le
g
e
n
d
Pa
r
c
e
l
s
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
Ty
p
e
!(
Mu
l
Ɵ
‐
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
!(
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
!(
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Ro
a
d
s
St
r
e
a
m
s
50
Ō
.
S
t
r
e
a
m
b
u
f
f
e
r
Fl
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
s
Co
u
n
t
y
z
o
n
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
CV
O
M
HC LI RA RM RR
Page 19 of 29
Ta
r
n
i
k
F
u
n
d
s
L
L
C
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Re
e
d
Cre
e
k
Ree
d
Cre
ek
EASTERN RANDOLPH RD
LEE
L
A
YNE
R
D
U
S
H
W
Y
6
4
E
1
i
n
c
h
e
q
u
a
l
s
4
0
0
f
e
e
t
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
4
l
o
t
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
2
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
t
r
u
c
k
i
n
g
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
(
2
0
1
8
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
Ɵ
o
n
a
l
fu
e
l
p
u
m
p
s
(
1
9
9
9
)
Re
z
o
n
e
d
H
C
(1
9
8
7
)
X
X
Le
g
e
n
d
Pa
r
c
e
l
s
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
Ty
p
e
!(
Mu
l
Ɵ
‐
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
!(
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
!(
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Ro
a
d
s
50
Ō
.
S
t
r
e
a
m
b
u
f
f
e
r
Fl
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
s
Co
u
n
t
y
z
o
n
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
CV
O
M
HC LI RA RM RR
Page 20 of 29
Ta
r
n
i
k
F
u
n
d
s
L
L
C
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
Ree
d
C
r
e
e
k
Ree
d
C
r
e
e
k
EASTERN RANDOLPH RD
U
S
H
W
Y
6
4
E
LEE LAYNE RD
1
i
n
c
h
e
q
u
a
l
s
2
0
0
f
e
e
t
X
X
Le
g
e
n
d
Pa
r
c
e
l
s
Ro
a
d
s
50
Ō
.
S
t
r
e
a
m
b
u
f
f
e
r
Fl
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
s
Page 21 of 29
Ta
r
n
i
k
F
u
n
d
s
L
L
C
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
EASTERN RANDOLPH RD
L EE
L
A
Y
N
E
R
D
U
S
H
W
Y
6
4
E
1
i
n
c
h
e
q
u
a
l
s
5
0
0
f
e
e
t
X
X
Le
g
e
n
d
Ro
a
d
s
Gr
o
w
t
h
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ar
e
a
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
r
e
a
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
r
e
a
Se
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
r
e
a
Page 22 of 29
Ta
r
n
i
k
F
u
n
d
s
,
L
L
C
,
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
1
:
Re
q
u
e
s
t
lo
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
.
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
2
:
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
c
r
o
s
s
ro
a
d
f
r
o
m
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
lo
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
.
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
3
:
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
c
r
o
s
s
ro
a
d
f
r
o
m
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
lo
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
.
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
4
:
Ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
c
h
u
r
c
h
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
5
:
Re
q
u
e
s
t
l
o
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
o
n
le
Ō
a
s
s
e
e
n
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
to
w
a
r
d
C
r
e
s
t
w
i
c
k
Rd
.
Pi
c
t
u
r
e
6
:
Re
q
u
e
s
t
l
o
c
a
Ɵ
o
n
o
n
ri
g
h
t
a
s
s
e
e
n
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
to
w
a
r
d
W
r
i
g
h
t
C
t
r
y
Rd
.
Page 23 of 29
Page 24 of 29
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY TARNIK FUNDS, LLC
REZONING REQUEST #2023-00002454
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed
zoning district map amendments to HC - Highway Commercial District as described in the
application of Tarnik Funds, LLC, are consistent with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance and the 2009 Randolph County Growth Management Plan and
are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Municipal Growth Area
which generally are areas of mixed land uses normally associated with urban
centers. This parcel is along US Hwy 64 E which is a major transportation corridor.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 4.2:Highway-oriented commercial uses should be clustered along
segments of arterial streets and contain land uses that are mutually compatible
and reinforcing in use and design. They should be designed in a way that
minimizes signage, access points, and excessive lengths of commercial strip
development.
Consistency Analysis:In its analysis, the Technical Review Committee noted the
various commercial operations that have been approved over the years such as
the convenience store and Baldwin Trucking. Approving this request clusters the
commercial development in one area instead of spreading it along the US Hwy 64
E corridor and it will help to limit commercial strip development in the corridor.
Page 25 of 29
Policy 8.4:The County should approach land use and economic development
decisions, not as isolated individual issues, but as part of a larger interconnecting
framework of building sustainable growth within Randolph County.
Consistency Analysis:As previously noted, this parcel is along the US Hwy 64
Corridor which is an area that is infused with residential and commercial uses.
Approving this request would further infuse the corridor with commercial uses and
make it part of the framework of sustainable growth in the County.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
Adopted on November 7, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
Page 26 of 29
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
UPON REQUEST BY TARNIK FUNDS, LLC.
WHEREAS, a 3.66-acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification
Number of 8712578454 is currently zoned RA – Residential Agricultural District and RR
- Residential Restricted District by Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS,the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on November 7, 2023, to consider the proposed rezoning on application number
2023-00002454, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina General Statute
160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have been satisfied;
WHEREAS,the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed rezoning
is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and the
Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest,
and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to this effect;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to HC - Highway Commercial District. The
official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan Map are hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same and this Ordinance shall
become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on November 7, 2023.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
Page 27 of 29
MOTION TO APPROVE
A REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning
request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the
rezoning application and the Map Amendment
Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes and that the
request is also consistent with the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
Page 28 of 29
MOTION TO DENY
A REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning
application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes and that the
request is not consistent with the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
Page 29 of 29